Print Page | Close Window

Something strange about Bollywood

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Regional History or Period History
Forum Name: History of the South Asian subcontinent
Forum Discription: The Indian sub-continent and South Central Asia
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9406
Printed Date: 28-Apr-2024 at 06:18
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Something strange about Bollywood
Posted By: Killabee
Subject: Something strange about Bollywood
Date Posted: 21-Feb-2006 at 14:37
I rarely saw any dravidian-looking actor/actress in the Bollywood industry.  Most of the actor/actress are olive to light skin and which makes them more resemble Persian or Arabs. I have a few time in my life run into any light-skin Indian. Most of them are very dark skin as far as I am concerned. I know Indian society  is still running in caste system. But is India holding prejudice against darker skin people?



Replies:
Posted By: Mira
Date Posted: 21-Feb-2006 at 15:04
South Indians generally have darker complexions.  The farther north you go, the lighter the skin color gets, especially in the Punjab region.  And as far as I know, the caste system still exists in some parts of India, and I think (but I may be wrong) most noticeably in the south.

According to one of my professors, who is an Indian, the caste system still exists, obscurely, to this day.  In her own words, "As harsh and shocking as this may sound; this system works, and works well.  The son of a soldier will always be a soldier, and the son of a servant will always be a servant.  We'll never run of the arms and legs."

By arms and legs, my professor was using the Purusha-sakta example from the Rigveda.  Purusha is a giant man, whose body was dismembered by the gods, so that "his mouth became the Brahmin; his arms were made into the Warrior, his thighs the People, and from his feet the servants were born.

The moon was born from his mind; from his eye the sun was born.  Indra and Agni came from his mouth, and from his vital breath the Wind was born."  (Ch. 10; v. 129)

-------------


Posted By: Killabee
Date Posted: 21-Feb-2006 at 15:25
Interesting. I have visited a great deal of Indian restaurants and most of the owners and servers were punjabi speakers. They too , have dark complexion.


Posted By: TeldeIndus
Date Posted: 21-Feb-2006 at 19:59

Are you Indian? How'd you know they speak Punjabi? A lot of Indian restaurants are Bangladeshi, Indian or Pakistani, and depending on where you live, will determine how much of each you'll get. Punjabi isnt far off Urdu, and most people will speak it to each other, even Bengalis since they can all understand it. 

Your observation is probably correct though, I think the majority of top stars there are lighter skinned, though Punjabis are not so dark generally. There's some dark ones and some light ones (when I say light I mean mediterranean lightness, and when I say dark, I mean south Indian). Perhaps there's an actor caste..



-------------
We are not without accomplishment. We have managed to distribute poverty - Nguyen Co Thatch, Vietnamese foreign minister


Posted By: Anujkhamar
Date Posted: 22-Feb-2006 at 05:39

They have their own film industry. Thats the main reason. East India has it's own and so does the south. Bollywood is generally focused around Mumbai (Bombay -----Hollywood-----B-ollywood=====> Bollywood)

Caste has got very little to do with this. It's more families.  For example, if you are a member of the Bachan family your in. Likewise with the Kapoors, and Shah Rukh Khan's children will be accepted as actors (even if they are crap).

Caste may be bigger in the countryside, but in cities people rarely care about it. It's more "is your family from banglapur? im from banglapur! hey baby, wanting you to go out and drink some lassi's?"

You do get actresses who are dark though. but these tend to be newer actresses who don't mind striping down in the film sense.

 

In general, lighter people are found more attractive, not becasue of caste, but for the same reason tanned people are found attractive in western cultures.

 

Actually it was until the last century that in England fairer people were found more attractive. It wasn't till the bikini came through that being tanned came in.



Posted By: Killabee
Date Posted: 22-Feb-2006 at 14:15
Originally posted by TeldeIndus

Are you Indian? How'd you know they speak Punjabi? A lot of Indian restaurants are Bangladeshi, Indian or Pakistani, and depending on where you live, will determine how much of each you'll get. Punjabi isnt far off Urdu, and most people will speak it to each other, even Bengalis since they can all understand it. 

Your observation is probably correct though, I think the majority of top stars there are lighter skinned, though Punjabis are not so dark generally. There's some dark ones and some light ones (when I say light I mean mediterranean lightness, and when I say dark, I mean south Indian). Perhaps there's an actor caste..

No, I am not Indian. But I just happen to like to chat with people.  They told me they are from the Punjab in Norhern India.



Posted By: Killabee
Date Posted: 22-Feb-2006 at 14:20
Originally posted by Anujkhamar

They have their own film industry. Thats the main reason. East India has it's own and so does the south. Bollywood is generally focused around Mumbai (Bombay -----Hollywood-----B-ollywood=====> Bollywood)

Caste has got very little to do with this. It's more families.  For example, if you are a member of the Bachan family your in. Likewise with the Kapoors, and Shah Rukh Khan's children will be accepted as actors (even if they are crap).

Caste may be bigger in the countryside, but in cities people rarely care about it. It's more "is your family from banglapur? im from banglapur! hey baby, wanting you to go out and drink some lassi's?"

You do get actresses who are dark though. but these tend to be newer actresses who don't mind striping down in the film sense.

 

In general, lighter people are found more attractive, not becasue of caste, but for the same reason tanned people are found attractive in western cultures.

 

Actually it was until the last century that in England fairer people were found more attractive. It wasn't till the bikini came through that being tanned came in.

Thanks for the answer.

It reminds me of the scene in the movie "Bent lt like Beckham" in which the mother does not want her daughter to play soccer due to sun exposure and  consequently it will darken her skin complexion and it is not considered beauty in the eye of Indian.



Posted By: flyingzone
Date Posted: 22-Feb-2006 at 14:29

This is an Indian version of what some sociologists call "colourism", something that is like an open secret in the Black community - the lighter your skin colour, the "better" you get treated even (or especially) by members of your own community.  

It's so pathetic.



-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 23-Feb-2006 at 14:17

I like Bollywood Movies.



-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 23-Feb-2006 at 20:59
Originally posted by ChawwaniKiChaa

I like Bollywood Movies.



They definitively don't look representative of Indian population but rather they seem a Mediterranean type selected sample. I doubt they even represent the skin tone or complexion of the majority of the people of Mumbay...


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: AlokaParyetra
Date Posted: 23-Feb-2006 at 21:07
Originally posted by Maju

Originally posted by ChawwaniKiChaa

I like Bollywood Movies.



They definitively don't look representative of Indian population but rather they seem a Mediterranean type selected sample. I doubt they even represent the skin tone or complexion of the majority of the people of Mumbay...

actually, u'd be surprised. i personally know several indians much lighter in complexion than those in the picture. and while the main actor and all actresses are probably very heavily make-uped (word?), the indian males to the left and right are very close.



Posted By: AthaNnikIcHaA
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 05:52

I also like Bollywood Movies.

Some of my favourite actors.

Johnny Lever

 

Shakti Kapoor

Ajay Devgan

Kashmira Shah

Ria Sen

Nasiruddin Shah



-------------

Baingan Khaa Lo Baingan


Posted By: AthaNnikIcHaA
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 06:26


-------------

Baingan Khaa Lo Baingan


Posted By: Cywr
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 10:02
Yeah, most Indian resturaunts are actualy run by Bangladeshis for some reason (even in the Netherlands, where most south-Asian types migrated there via Suriname, the resturants are overwelming run by recent Bangladeshi immigrants). Next most likely owner in my experience is Tamil.
Also n the UK alot of cornershops are run by Gujaratis for some reason. Intresting that patterns like that should emerge.

One of the whitest people i've ever met was Punjabi, and i'm taking real cream white here, not the pinkish to light-beige Euro variety.

Incidently, what exactly is 'Mollywood' and 'Lollywood'?


-------------
Arrrgh!!"


Posted By: AthaNnikIcHaA
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 10:20

Mollywood-S Indian Movie Industry {Madras-now Chennai}.

Lollywood-Pakistani film Industry {Lahore}.

http://www.world.of.lollywood.fws1.com/ - http://www.world.of.lollywood.fws1.com/

LITERAL MEANING OF PAKISTAN

According to the language of the people
of this region, the term "Pak" has a very
special meaning. It means something
very fair or something free from any
evil. The literal meaning of Pakistan
is " THE LAND OF FAIR PEOPLE ",
and the literal meaning of Pakis is
"FAIR PEOPLE". In the same way,
Paki means "FAIR PERSON".
http://www.world.of.lollywood.fws1.com/ - http://www.world.of.lollywood.fws1.com/



-------------

Baingan Khaa Lo Baingan


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 16:18
Originally posted by AlokaParyetra

Originally posted by Maju


They definitively don't look representative of Indian population but rather they seem a Mediterranean type selected sample. I doubt they even represent the skin tone or complexion of the majority of the people of Mumbay...

actually, u'd be surprised. i personally know several indians much lighter in complexion than those in the picture. and while the main actor and all actresses are probably very heavily make-uped (word?), the indian males to the left and right are very close.



I don't say that those types are not Indian, I say that they don't seem to represent the complexion and appearence of the majority of Indians, even of the majority of NW Indians.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Decebal
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 16:53
Originally posted by AthaNnikIcHaA

Mollywood-S Indian Movie Industry {Madras-now Chennai}.

Lollywood-Pakistani film Industry {Lahore}.

http://www.world.of.lollywood.fws1.com/ - http://www.world.of.lollywood.fws1.com/

LITERAL MEANING OF PAKISTAN

According to the language of the people
of this region, the term "Pak" has a very
special meaning. It means something
very fair or something free from any
evil. The literal meaning of Pakistan
is " THE LAND OF FAIR PEOPLE ",
and the literal meaning of Pakis is
"FAIR PEOPLE". In the same way,
Paki means "FAIR PERSON".
http://www.world.of.lollywood.fws1.com/ - http://www.world.of.lollywood.fws1.com/

From my understanding, Paki does not refer to "fair" but rather to pure. It is also an acronym for Punjab, Afghan, Kashmir, Indus; and the "stan" comes from Baluchistan, so the name indicates the major regions of Pakistan.



-------------
What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte

Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi



Posted By: Killabee
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 19:54
Originally posted by Maju

Originally posted by AlokaParyetra

Originally posted by Maju


They definitively don't look representative of Indian population but rather they seem a Mediterranean type selected sample. I doubt they even represent the skin tone or complexion of the majority of the people of Mumbay...

actually, u'd be surprised. i personally know several indians much lighter in complexion than those in the picture. and while the main actor and all actresses are probably very heavily make-uped (word?), the indian males to the left and right are very close.



I don't say that those types are not Indian, I say that they don't seem to represent the complexion and appearence of the majority of Indians, even of the majority of NW Indians.

That's right. I live in California, US where there is large population of Indian. There is a city name Artesia and it is also known as "Little India" because of half of the population are Indian or Indian-descent. I have been there many times.  Frankly speaking, so far I have never rubbed up against any Indian with the facial feature and skin complexion as it depicted in the poster. The characters in the poster do show more resemblance to Persian or Arab  or even Turk than the typical Indian.

 



Posted By: TeldeIndus
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 22:17

Punjabis I've known (and it's been quite a few) have had a skin complexion like those in the picture (some have been lighter, some darker), but to say their skin colour is not standard for Punjabis is ridiculous. They look very much Punjabi to me. Yes, they're more fitter, but hey, Brad Pitt doesnt resemble all Americans. 

One on the far left probably isnt standard Punjabi, but even that can be found in the Punjab.



-------------
We are not without accomplishment. We have managed to distribute poverty - Nguyen Co Thatch, Vietnamese foreign minister


Posted By: amir khan
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 22:38
Originally posted by Killabee

Originally posted by Maju

Originally posted by AlokaParyetra

Originally posted by Maju


They definitively don't look representative of Indian population but rather they seem a Mediterranean type selected sample. I doubt they even represent the skin tone or complexion of the majority of the people of Mumbay...

actually, u'd be surprised. i personally know several indians much lighter in complexion than those in the picture. and while the main actor and all actresses are probably very heavily make-uped (word?), the indian males to the left and right are very close.



I don't say that those types are not Indian, I say that they don't seem to represent the complexion and appearence of the majority of Indians, even of the majority of NW Indians.

That's right. I live in California, US where there is large population of Indian. There is a city name Artesia and it is also known as "Little India" because of half of the population are Indian or Indian-descent. I have been there many times.  Frankly speaking, so far I have never rubbed up against any Indian with the facial feature and skin complexion as it depicted in the poster. The characters in the poster do show more resemblance to Persian or Arab  or even Turk than the typical Indian.

 

 

The level of discussion is deteriorating all the time  on these boards.

Because you havent come across them doesnt mean they dont exist!!!

It just highlights your lack of insight on the topic.

Its like Michael jackson and family touring India, and Indians deducing that all Americans must be black!

Those Indians are one type of Indians, but not the only type.

There are many other types of Indians!

There are certainly HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS more light skined  people in India then Iran(i.e. ahmednejad or fairer), of this there is NO DOUBT AT ALL.(Iran popn. is only 70mil.---India 1.4billion). If we talk about percentages, then it is a different question, and maybe 50% is close to the mark?

the above actors do look north indian though.

South India has its own film Industry.

India has been considered amongst the most hetrogenous countries in the world. You should look up the meaning of this word.

 

ridiculously uninformed comments coming through recently!

everyone seems an expert on India, but only neighbours, Pakistan or ex-colonial British seem to know a thing about India.

People should remember it is much more than a country like Iran or spain etc. Its almost an entire world by itself(infact 1/5 of the world popn.)

I know the american president made the following comments

"Do you have black people in Brazil, too?"

Californians should aspire to being more informed then that, about the world.

 

This whole topic is just getting silly.

 

 



Posted By: ramin
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 23:09

Nasiruddin Shah

Isn't he the former king of Iran? same name... but different features lol




-------------
"I won't laugh if a philosophy halves the moon"


Posted By: amir khan
Date Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 23:15

 

Far left is the classic jatt punjabi look- as anyone who has seen sikh girls in u.k. or canada will have seen that look.

But conversation getting crazy now.



Posted By: azimuth
Date Posted: 25-Feb-2006 at 01:43

nothing strange really, indians are not black and not white in the majority they are in between with different level of skin colors.

the actors are not all light colored they are of different colors and the make up part makes them lighter.

also its the industry that looking for "cute" people to act, add to all that the darker indians are the ones in the south  and they usually have different industry due to the difference in the language. while the most famouse indian movies industry (bollywood) are the ones in the Hindi language which i think same as Urdu.

----

that movie poster called khamoosh lol that mean "shut up" or something?

 



-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 25-Feb-2006 at 06:31

Some of the Bollywood {female}stars whose movies I've enjoyed

Kajol

Shilpa Shetty

 

Rekha

Helen {she is Anglo-Burmese}

Waheeda Rahman

Madhubala

Lalita Pawar

Yana Gupta {like her item songs}...she is Polish or Czech not sure...

Divya Bharti {died too young ...}

Shabana Azmi {is she still a member of Parliament?}.....

 

Tun Tun

She did a song n a dance in a Bollywood Movie......

Nagma

Sangeeta Bijlani/Ayesha Azhar {she is a Sindhi}

 


-------------


Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 25-Feb-2006 at 22:28
It's just 'colourism' as somebody already mentioned.  Lighter skin is considered more attractive and so those kinds of people get more attention in superficial industries like bollywood.  There are notable exceptions of course, but it's no coincidence that skin bleaching treatments are as popular on the subcontinent as tanning is in say North America.  It's not supposed to be representative of the population...the whole point of bollywood is fantasy.  


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 26-Feb-2006 at 04:03



-------------


Posted By: Omar al Hashim
Date Posted: 26-Feb-2006 at 05:15
Agreed jayeshk.
Firstly it is fashionable to be light skinned.
Secondly Bollywood actors are rich by definition and probably from a higher social bracket. Meaning they aren't from the families who have to go out and tend the fields each day.

To people who have said punjabis tend to be light. It depends on which punjabi and who your comparing too. Some punjabis are as light as Arabs, and others are as dark as Nigerians. Ones ancestors probably watched the other's tend the fields each day. I personally would be more inclined to say punjabis are dark, because the chance of finding a blue eyed, white skinned punjabi are practically zero, but I've seen plenty of blue eyed, white skinned patans. That is only because I'm comparing with other pakis and not with bengalis or tamils.

To anyone who has said 'typical indian' your just being silly there is no such thing as a typical indian.


-------------


Posted By: Serge L
Date Posted: 26-Feb-2006 at 16:23
I wonder where this fix for light skins --which is relatively common in several cultures-- comes from


Posted By: Anujkhamar
Date Posted: 26-Feb-2006 at 18:17
I think it's been said above. It could be answered by power. If you are a farmer and stay out in the sun all day your dark. If your a king or merchant and stay inside or in the shade then your lighter. As the more powerful figures tended to be lighter lighter people became more attractive.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 27-Feb-2006 at 12:39

Bollywood... the actors an actresses are absolutely fabulous...

Shah Rukh Khan and Karan Johar

 

These are my fav two men in bollywood...

Shah Rukh Khan and Karan Johar



-------------


Posted By: Gyadu
Date Posted: 23-Mar-2006 at 10:32

Originally posted by Killabee

I rarely saw any dravidian-looking actor/actress in the Bollywood industry.  Most of the actor/actress are olive to light skin and which makes them more resemble Persian or Arabs. I have a few time in my life run into any light-skin Indian. Most of them are very dark skin as far as I am concerned. I know Indian society  is still running in caste system. But is India holding prejudice against darker skin people?

Please be clear in your approach Killabee.

Below are pics of two Arabs.

I won't post any pics of Persians as I'm not clear about the distinction between Aryan/Persian/Iranian.

So is it a disturbing trend if most Indian actors resemble Arabs?

 



-------------
Izan zirelako gara...... Izan garelako izango dira....


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 10:43

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

I personally would be more inclined to say punjabis are dark, because the chance of finding a blue eyed, white skinned punjabi are practically zero, but I've seen plenty of blue eyed, white skinned patans. That is only because I'm comparing with other pakis and not with bengalis or tamils.

If by Pathans you mean Eastern Afghans and NWFP(Pakistan), they're a mixture of races (mongloid, scythian, aryan etc.) and the blue eyes/white skin genes are probably given to them by the greeks who came along with alexander.  Pathans are a very diverse group of people.  The first four pathans resemble many punjabis for sure.  The punjabi in pakistan is majority muslim and they've mantained their genes because many tend to marry cousins and it is also common for pathans and punjabis to inter marry, something the Eastern punjabi does not do.

   

   

 

 

 

 



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 11:43
Originally posted by Rajput

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

I personally would be more inclined to say punjabis are dark, because the chance of finding a blue eyed, white skinned punjabi are practically zero, but I've seen plenty of blue eyed, white skinned patans. That is only because I'm comparing with other pakis and not with bengalis or tamils.

If by Pathans you mean Eastern Afghans and NWFP(Pakistan), they're a mixture of races (mongloid, scythian, aryan etc.) and the blue eyes/white skin genes are probably given to them by the greeks who came along with alexander.  Pathans are a very diverse group of people.  The first four pathans resemble many punjabis for sure.  The punjabi in pakistan is majority muslim and they've mantained their genes because many tend to marry cousins and it is also common for pathans and punjabis to inter marry, something the Eastern punjabi does not do.

   

   

Completely clueless. Since when did Punjabis have green and blue eyes? Look at the picture of the first Pathan.

 

Since when did Punjabis have green eyes?

The coloured eyes didnt come from the Greeks either. Greeks are predominantly brown eyed, and even though Pathans are also predominantly brown eyed (perhaps 30% are non brown eyed), the Greek contribution is minimal as genetics and anybody with any common sense would know. The pictures of the old pathans are naturally going to be darker skinned (happens with age, exposure to the sun), but even then they have non brown eyes from what I can see. Your suggestion that Pathans are mongoloid highlights your lacking - Pathans are not mongoloid in any way, Hazaras are Mongoloid, Pathans can be classed as Scythian and Aryan but definitely not Mongoloid. Best stick to your knowledge of India which also appears incorrect about your knowledge of marriages

In South India, in sharp contrast, marriages are preferred between cousins (especially cross-cousins, that is, the children of a brother and sister) and even between uncles and nieces (especially a man and his elder sister's daughter). The principle involved is that of return--the family that gives a daughter expects one in return, if not now, then in the next generation. The effect of such marriages is to bind people together in relatively small, tight-knit kin groups. A bride moves to her in-laws' home--the home of her grandmother or aunt--and is often comfortable among these familiar faces. Her husband may well be the cousin she has known all her life that she would marry.

http://countrystudies.us/india/86.htm - http://countrystudies.us/india/86.htm  

This one doesnt look Pathan, but if he is he would be the exception.

 

 



Posted By: Gyadu
Date Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 12:17

Hi guys.Lets stick to the topic.



-------------
Izan zirelako gara...... Izan garelako izango dira....


Posted By: Gyadu
Date Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 22:37



-------------
Izan zirelako gara...... Izan garelako izango dira....


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 06-Apr-2006 at 09:08

Some Punjabi actors in bollywood with hazel, blue and green eyes:

            Randhir Kapoor                                                    Raj Kapoor

  

              Kabir Bedi                                                   Aditya Pancholi

 

           Hritik Roshan                                                     Sanjay Dutt

      



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: mipsyfaris
Date Posted: 25-Apr-2006 at 13:04
My personal favorite actor is Raj Kapoor, or possibly Kishore Kumar. Both are very funny, especially in Kishore's move "Half-Ticket". Most Raj Kapoor movies were more serious, but also very good.


Posted By: malizai_
Date Posted: 25-Apr-2006 at 22:00

http://www.ibnlive.com/article.php?id=4932&section_id=8 - http://www.ibnlive.com/article.php?id=4932&section_id=8

""Peshawar: Peshawar the land of Pathans, known for its hospitality has been the home to many Bollywood stars.

From Pritviraj Kapoor to Raj Kapoor to Dilip Kumar, Amjad Khan and current heart throb Shah Rukh Khan, the ancient bazaar of Qissa Khawani has been home to many Bollywood legends.

Now a shop in the busy street this mansion is the birthplace of the first family in Bollywood, the Kapoor family. Raj Kapoor and his father were born here and though now it is hard to find the traces of the past there are those who remember the era gone by.

Another Indian superstar, Shah Rukh Khan, has his legion of fans and followers in Peshawar.

The love and adulation is something that the Khan family has got used to.

After partition Shahrukh's father migrated to India but the families have been in touch since then.""

fardeen khan, feroz khan and many others are not of punjabi ethnicity or origin. ++ Most of the male leading stars in Bollywood have names ending with khan.

Arbaz khan, salman khan, saifali khan, amir khan etc..



-------------


Posted By: Mila
Date Posted: 25-Apr-2006 at 22:06
I think this is a strange thing to be discussing? It's the same everywhere. Not all Americans are tall, thin, attractive, and have perfect teeth. Not all Bosnians are tall, slender, have huge breasts, and are Meditteranean-toned. Not all Croatians are tall, slender, and blonde. Not all Serbs are tall, slender, and pale. Not all French have psychotic eyes. Not all Italians have sex 10 times a day...

No film industry is an accurate reputation of the citizens of the country its hosted in. Like Brigit Bardot said, "For half a century and continueing today, Hollywoods "All American Girl" is Swedish."


-------------
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">


Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 15:45
Originally posted by Rajput

Some Punjabi actors in bollywood with hazel, blue and green eyes:

            Randhir Kapoor                                                    Raj Kapoor

  

              Kabir Bedi                                                   Aditya Pancholi

 

           Hritik Roshan                                                     Sanjay Dutt

      

Originally posted by Malizai_

http://www.ibnlive.com/article.php?id=4932&section_id=8 - http://www.ibnlive.com/article.php?id=4932&section_id=8

""Peshawar: Peshawar the land of Pathans, known for its hospitality has been the home to many Bollywood stars.

From Pritviraj Kapoor to Raj Kapoor to Dilip Kumar, Amjad Khan and current heart throb Shah Rukh Khan, the ancient bazaar of Qissa Khawani has been home to many Bollywood legends.

Now a shop in the busy street this mansion is the birthplace of the first family in Bollywood, the Kapoor family. Raj Kapoor and his father were born here and though now it is hard to find the traces of the past there are those who remember the era gone by.

Another Indian superstar, Shah Rukh Khan, has his legion of fans and followers in Peshawar.

The love and adulation is something that the Khan family has got used to.

After partition Shahrukh's father migrated to India but the families have been in touch since then.""

fardeen khan, feroz khan and many others are not of punjabi ethnicity or origin. ++ Most of the male leading stars in Bollywood have names ending with khan.

Arbaz khan, salman khan, saifali khan, amir khan etc..

Yep, Raj Kapoor was born in Peshawar, it's most likely he's a Pathan, not Punjabi as Rajput claims. Same with Randir Kapoor, they have their origins in Peshawar. I think they had only hints of green/blue though unlike those pictures, but as for the rest of them, Kabir Bedi and Sanjay Dutt have what looks like brown eyes, but the other two most likely are on fake lenses. I've not met a Punjabi with green or blue eyes or one with their style of eyes, I have come across many Pathans with blue or green eyes though.

Sanjay Dutt's "hazel eyes"

 



-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 17:57
Umm, I've met several Punjabis with light eyes.  That anecdotal evidence is about as meaningless as yours.  I'm confused about your point though.  How does being from Peshawar make it more likely that the Kapoors are Pathan and not Punjabi?

-------------
Once you relinquish your freedom for the sake of "understood necessity,"...you cede your claim to the truth. - Heda Margolius Kovaly


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 18:33

I didn't read all of the comments here, so forgive me for sounding redundant.

I hope everybody knows that the camera and lighting can make you appear lighter than you are.  People that look light on screen aren't necessarily light in real life.   I have tons of pictures that make me look "fair", when I'm as brown as your average Indian in reality.  

 

Here's a picture of Meghna Naidu looking light-skinned.

 

Here's another picture of her.  Look at how much tanner she looks.  I can safely say that she's brown-skinned in reality, as I have seen her on stage.

 

 

I don't know what everybody's definition of "dark" is, but there are plenty of colored women that dominate the fashion ramps in India.   For example, there's Sheetal Mallar, Diandre Soares, Reshmi Ghosh, Vidisha Pavate, Carol Gracias, and Nayonika Chatterjee. 

There's also a new beautiful dark-skinned actress in the soap opera "Saat Phere."    There are others that I can think of, but I will name them only if you want me to.   

 

 



Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 18:40

Originally posted by jayeshks

Umm, I've met several Punjabis with light eyes.  That anecdotal evidence is about as meaningless as yours.  I'm confused about your point though.  How does being from Peshawar make it more likely that the Kapoors are Pathan and not Punjabi?

I havent seen any Punjabis with non-brown eyes really (i've heard of some, and I've seen what looked to be hazel-ish perhaps). All the Punjabis I saw had brown eyes though basically. Pashtuns I've seen are about a quarter non brown eyed (10%-30%) and the rest brown eyed.

About the Kapoor thing.

"Yaqoob Khan, a milkman, studied with Raj Kapoor in a primary school and later Kapoor got admission to Khalsa Dharam School at Khyber Bazar in the higher grade.

Yaqoob said the Kapoor’s love for Peshawar and Hindko language could be seen from the fact that Shami Kapoor and Dilip Kumar, another Peshawar resident, co-starred in a film and spoke Hindko in a Hindi film."

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_29-12-2003_pg7_25 - http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_29-12-20 03_pg7_25  

Hindko is spoken by the Hindu Pathans. 50 years ago, the Yusufzai tribe of Mardan (next to Peshawar) spoke Hindko, so it's pretty likely that Raj Kapoor & his family were Pathans from this region originally. If they were Punjab I'd expect them to trace their origin to the Punjab, not to Peshawar.



-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 18:47

To the initial poster-

Punjab isn't the only region where light skin (or sharp/fine features) is evident.  I've also noticed that some ABI's (American-born Indians) fall prey to this stereotype.  And yes, it's not that hard to find a Punjabi that looks like your so-called "typical Indian."  Trust me, most of our family friends are Punjabi.   Just look at the PM Manmohan Singh, or actress Parminder Nagra. 

 The only reason why it may seem like Punjabis are the lightest is because they are one of the most populous groups in the South Asian diaspora.  Many Indian groups didn't migrate to the West, so the Indians that you see in America aren't necessarily an accurate reflection of all Indians. 

India is a very diverse country with all kinds of looks.  Why can't people accept that? 

In North India-Kashmiris, Sindhis, Uttaranchalis, Himachalis, some parts of Rajasthan,  and some parts of UP are reputed to have a substantial amount of light-skinned people.   I also heard the North-Eastern part of India has a lot of fair people, but I don't know too many people from there.   Udita Goswami and Shruti Agarwal are examples of North-Eastern Indian women. 

In South India/West/ Central India, the Tulus (Aishwarya's people), the Konkani Brahmins (Leena Chandrevekar's people), the Nairs, the Iyers, and the Chitpavan Brahmins are reputed to have light-skinned AND light-eyed people.  Of course, there are many dark-featured people in these groups too.  

 

 I don't believe that any Indian sect or Indian regional ethnicity will look homogenous.  You will even find diversity within one family.  Why is my mom light-skinned, but my brothers and I are "dark"?   Why is Aishwarya Rai light-eyed and light-skinned, but her dad is extremely dark?  

Skin color also doesn't always correlate with facial features or eye color.   I have extremely dark relatives with light eyes and narrow features, and have light-skinned friends with blunt features.    

 

 



Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 18:55
Originally posted by RajputGirl

Why is Aishwarya Rai light-eyed and light-skinned, but her dad is extremely dark?   .    

Creams and lenses?



-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 18:58

 

Because you havent come across them doesnt mean they dont exist!!!

 

 

Exactly!  I repeat again that South Asia is a land of tremendous diversity.    

The South Asians in the West are miniscule in comparison to the multitude of ethnic groups residing in South Asia.     There are so many different groups that don't live in the West, and probably don't want to.   

I have never met a Chitpavan Brahmin here in America, but I had the opportunity to meet them in Maharashtra (when I went to visit some relatives).   I also never met any Indian with blonde hair, until I went to my parents' hometown in Allahabad.   

When you go to every part of South Asia, it opens up your eyes.

And to the person that said that they've never seen a Punjabi with light eyes, it exists.  Light eyes can occur in any South Asian community for that matter.    It's just that some communities may have a higher proportion of it? 



Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 18:59
Originally posted by TeldeInduz

Originally posted by RajputGirl

Why is Aishwarya Rai light-eyed and light-skinned, but her dad is extremely dark?   .    

Creams and lenses?

Even if that is the case, it's quite common for one family member to be light and another family member to be brown/dark.   The same thing goes for one family member to be light-eyed, and another to have dark eyes. 

 

 

 



Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 19:09

 

That's right. I live in California, US where there is large population of Indian. There is a city name Artesia and it is also known as "Little India" because of half of the population are Indian or Indian-descent. I have been there many times.  Frankly speaking, so far I have never rubbed up against any Indian with the facial feature and skin complexion as it depicted in the poster. The characters in the poster do show more resemblance to Persian or Arab  or even Turk than the typical Indian. 

Um, what is your definition of "typical Indian features?"  If you read my previous post, there technically is no such thing as a "typical " Indian anyway. 

I'm sorry, but I don't perceive our celebrities as looking "Arab."  I can tell such Indians apart from Arabs, Turks and Persians. 

Aishwarya Rai's big eyes, pouty lips and nose is actually quite common among Indian women.   I thought Indian women were known for their big eyes and doll-like features?

 The only deceiving thing is that she has light hair and light eyes.    But if you examine the facial structure and hair texture of Indian celebrities, you will notice that such features aren't that hard to find among Indians. 



Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 19:50
Originally posted by Killabee

Originally posted by TeldeIndus

Are you Indian? How'd you know they speak Punjabi? A lot of Indian restaurants are Bangladeshi, Indian or Pakistani, and depending on where you live, will determine how much of each you'll get. Punjabi isnt far off Urdu, and most people will speak it to each other, even Bengalis since they can all understand it. Your observation is probably correct though, I think the majority of top stars there are lighter skinned, though Punjabis are not so dark generally. There's some dark ones and some light ones (when I say light I mean mediterranean lightness, and when I say dark, I mean south Indian). Perhaps there's an actor caste..

No, I am not Indian. But I just happen to like to chat with people.  They told me they are from the Punjab in Norhern India.

 

You also got to realize that what part of India you're from doesn't always have to do with your actual roots.  There are people that claim that they're Punjabi, Gujarati, whatever....when they aren't natives of that state in the first place. 

Indians migrate a lot.  There are Gujaratis from Punjab, Sindhis from Rajasthan, etc.  I'm from UP, but my roots go back to Rajasthan. 

I knew a Gujarati guy that thought he was "half-Punjabi" because his mom was born and raised in Punjab.  But she was just a Guju that migrated there.    The ethnic dynamics of South Asia is quite confusing. 

I also don't see why it matters whether Raj Kapoor is Pathan or not?   Certain looks aren't only restricted to certain South Asian groups. 

 

Again, some groups may have a HIGHER proportion of certain features, but that doesn't mean that those same features are  unheard of in other sects and regions. 



Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 20:11
Originally posted by TeldeInduz

I havent seen any Punjabis with non-brown eyes really (i've heard of some, and I've seen what looked to be hazel-ish perhaps). All the Punjabis I saw had brown eyes though basically. Pashtuns I've seen are about a quarter non brown eyed (10%-30%) and the rest brown eyed.


I admit I've seen a lot more Pathans with light eyes than Punjabis but there's even a Sikh girl in one of my classes right now with the last name Brar and very light eyes.  Still of course it could be that she is remotely Pashtun or something but you'll need to do more to prove that it's not possible to have light eyed Punjabis. 


About the Kapoor thing.

"Yaqoob Khan, a milkman, studied with Raj Kapoor in a primary school and later Kapoor got admission to Khalsa Dharam School at Khyber Bazar in the higher grade.

Yaqoob said the Kapoor’s love for Peshawar and Hindko language could be seen from the fact that Shami Kapoor and Dilip Kumar, another Peshawar resident, co-starred in a film and spoke Hindko in a Hindi film."

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_29-12-2003_pg7_25 - http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_29-12-20 03_pg7_25  

Hindko is spoken by the Hindu Pathans. 50 years ago, the Yusufzai tribe of Mardan (next to Peshawar) spoke Hindko, so it's pretty likely that Raj Kapoor & his family were Pathans from this region originally. If they were Punjab I'd expect them to trace their origin to the Punjab, not to Peshawar.



Doesn't Peshawar have a large Punjabi population? 

Apparently Peshawar still even has a sizeable Sikh population:

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030622/world.htm

The actual bases of Punjabi in Pakistan are Nankana Sahib and Peshawar. At Nankana Sahib, there are nearly 550 boys studying in Guru Nanak Devji Public High School. The councillor of Nanakana Sahib, Mr Mastan Singh, who is also managing director of the school, says that, out of the 550 students, 125 are Sikhs. However, all students are taught Punjabi. About the propagation of Punjabi, Mr Mastan Singh says the community should not look towards the government. Instead, it should itself endeavour with its own resources to teach Punjabi to the younger generation.

Punjabi also has a strong foothold at Peshawar because of the thick concentration of the Sikh families — which are more than 100. There are two schools — Bhai Joga Singh School and Guru Angad Devji School — where children of the Sikh families learn Punjabi. Though Sikh boys speak a fluent Pushto, Punjabi still thrives in these lands, thanks to the Sikhs’ love for their mother tongue.


And Prithviraj Kapoor was born in Punjab proper anyway:

http://www.upperstall.com/people/prithviraj.html

He was born in Prithvinath Kapoor in a middle-class landlord family in Samundri, a district of the industrial township of Lyallpur, Punjab, the son of a police officer.





-------------
Once you relinquish your freedom for the sake of "understood necessity,"...you cede your claim to the truth. - Heda Margolius Kovaly


Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 20:31



And Prithviraj Kapoor was born in Punjab proper anyway:

http://www.upperstall.com/people/prithviraj.html

He was born in Prithvinath Kapoor in a middle-class landlord family in Samundri, a district of the industrial township of Lyallpur, Punjab, the son of a police officer.


Your link is wrong. Prithviraj Kapoor (father of Raj Kapoor) was born in Peshawar and was a Pathan.

Baburao Patel, the editor and publisher of the top cinema magazine, Film India (the renowned magazine of 30s, 40s and 50s) made an observation about Prithviraj Kapoor saying, “ There is no place in the films for uncouth brawny Pathans who think they can make it as actors.” In his reply to Film India, Prithviraj said, “Baburao, do not provoke this Pathan. If there is no place for me in the Indian films I shall swim across the seven seas to Hollywood and make it there as an actor.” Prithviraj did not need to go to Hollywood. That is history.

http://www.deshvidesh.com/article%20HTML%20files/Four_Gen_Of_Kapoor.htm - http://www.deshvidesh.com/article%20HTML%20files/Four_Gen_Of _Kapoor.htm  

Prithviraj Kapoor's father worked in Peshawar also.

Dewan Basheswarnath Kapoor (Prithviraj Kapoor's father), a retired Sub Inspector of Police in Peshawar (now in Pakistan)  

http://www.deshvidesh.com/article%20HTML%20files/Four_Gen_Of_Kapoor.htm - http://www.deshvidesh.com/article%20HTML%20files/Four_Gen_Of _Kapoor.htm  

__________________________

Samandri in Lyallpur given in your link was where Prithviraj Kapoor's grandparent worked as a policeman.

Bashesharnath was in the police. Prithviraj's grandfather, the rather stately Dewan Keshavmal Kapoor, had been the tehsildar of Samundari in Lyallpur district (now in Pakistan).

http://specials.rediff.com/movies/2006/feb/02slide1.htm - http://specials.rediff.com/movies/2006/feb/02slide1.htm  



-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 23:11

Telde,

Just out of curiosity, are you Pakistani ? 



Posted By: malizai_
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2006 at 23:25

Originally posted by jayeshks

Umm, I've met several Punjabis with light eyes.  That anecdotal evidence is about as meaningless as yours.  I'm confused about your point though.  How does being from Peshawar make it more likely that the Kapoors are Pathan and not Punjabi?

U misunderstood me, the phenotype being presented of punjabis is not one that reflects reality.

Not all pathans are good looking some may even be ugly. punjabis in the north are fairer than punjabis in the south because of climate. But 90% of them would be described as various degrees of brown than fair. Pathans however are generally fairer and i think after watching enough news most people can accept that. lighter eye colour it is an oddity amongst the punjabis and not a norm. The opposite is true for pathans.

Kashmirs also fit this bill and it may be the case that the kapoors and others like them are Kashmirs from Peshawar. who knows and who cares!

Let me categorically state that having fairer skin and lighter eyes does not equate to beauty. Beauty is a an amalgamation of many features and proportionality. Personally i am tired of this resurfacing mental complex and the Dravidian bashing that i come across in all its subtlety.



-------------


Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 27-Apr-2006 at 01:24
Originally posted by TeldeInduz

Your link is wrong. Prithviraj Kapoor (father of Raj Kapoor) was born in Peshawar and was a Pathan.

Baburao Patel, the editor and publisher of the top cinema magazine, Film India (the renowned magazine of 30s, 40s and 50s) made an observation about Prithviraj Kapoor saying, “ There is no place in the films for uncouth brawny Pathans who think they can make it as actors.” In his reply to Film India, Prithviraj said, “Baburao, do not provoke this Pathan. If there is no place for me in the Indian films I shall swim across the seven seas to Hollywood and make it there as an actor.” Prithviraj did not need to go to Hollywood. That is history.

http://www.deshvidesh.com/article%20HTML%20files/Four_Gen_Of_Kapoor.htm - http://www.deshvidesh.com/article%20HTML%20files/Four_Gen_Of _Kapoor.htm  

Prithviraj Kapoor's father worked in Peshawar also.

Dewan Basheswarnath Kapoor (Prithviraj Kapoor's father), a retired Sub Inspector of Police in Peshawar (now in Pakistan)  

http://www.deshvidesh.com/article%20HTML%20files/Four_Gen_Of_Kapoor.htm - http://www.deshvidesh.com/article%20HTML%20files/Four_Gen_Of _Kapoor.htm  

__________________________

Samandri in Lyallpur given in your link was where Prithviraj Kapoor's grandparent worked as a policeman.

Bashesharnath was in the police. Prithviraj's grandfather, the rather stately Dewan Keshavmal Kapoor, had been the tehsildar of Samundari in Lyallpur district (now in Pakistan).

http://specials.rediff.com/movies/2006/feb/02slide1.htm - http://specials.rediff.com/movies/2006/feb/02slide1.htm  



You're right!
http://www.hindu.com/lr/2004/12/05/stories/2004120500020100.htm - http://www.hindu.com/lr/2004/12/05/stories/2004120500020100. htm
BOMBAY 1928. A strikingly handsome 21-year-old Pathan arrives by Frontier Mail, suitcase in one hand, his lucky hockey stick in the other. A fellow Pathan watchman lets him into the Imperial Studio. The leading star picks him out from a line of extras to partner her in the film. And Prithviraj Kapoor never looks back, he goes to play a crucial role in India's film and theatre history.


I had no idea there were Hindu Pathans too


-------------
Once you relinquish your freedom for the sake of "understood necessity,"...you cede your claim to the truth. - Heda Margolius Kovaly


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 27-Apr-2006 at 10:08

Originally posted by jayeshks

Umm, I've met several Punjabis with light eyes.  That anecdotal evidence is about as meaningless as yours.  I'm confused about your point though.  How does being from Peshawar make it more likely that the Kapoors are Pathan and not Punjabi?

Kapoors (Kapurs) are punjabi khatris not pathan, they were mainly businessmen in Peshawar and have fair features their dynasty was the Burdwan of Lahore.  Most of the hindus/sikhs in NWFP(Pakistan) and even Afghanistan are Khatris; fact is that they have assimilated into the culture of the pathans and speak the language and take up customs which are the lay of the land and the local population acknoledge them as so.  Some muslims I know from the hazara area and gilgit speak hindko and in no way is/was this language limited to hindus of the area.

The pure hindu pathans died out with the hindu shahi dynasty or converted to Islam.

 

 



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 01:26
Originally posted by malizai_

Originally posted by jayeshks

Umm, I've met several Punjabis with light eyes.  That anecdotal evidence is about as meaningless as yours.  I'm confused about your point though.  How does being from Peshawar make it more likely that the Kapoors are Pathan and not Punjabi?

 

Let me categorically state that having fairer skin and lighter eyes does not equate to beauty. Beauty is a an amalgamation of many features and proportionality.

 

 

Word.  Associating beauty with what region you are from or what ethnicity you are is just stupid.  If you go to RateDesi.com (a site filled with second-generation South-Asian Americans), you will see numerous threads dedicated to that.  It's sad how they didn't even grow up in South Asia, and that's all what they talk about.   When they try to prove that their group is better-looking than other Desi groups, they always use the "we're lighter than other Indians" claim.  

That's why I didn't understand why some of the posters were over-analyzing the Kapoor's whereabouts.  Why does it matter?  

My mom remarried a Punjabi man when I was little.  According to her wishes, I'm not allowed to acknowledge to anyone that he is my step-father.    I've had people tell me stupid stuff like, "No wonder your brothers are so tall because you're half-Punjabi," or "No wonder your cute because you got the Punjabi genes!"

Ummm...what the heck?  The joke is on them, because my Punjabi dad isn't even my biological father.   So,  I'm not really "half-Punjabi."        



Posted By: Omar al Hashim
Date Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 07:39
"No wonder your brothers are so tall because you're half-Punjabi," or "No wonder your cute because you got the Punjabi genes!"

One thing I find odd, is talking to Indians you get the idea that Punjabi's are the tough big people. But in Pakistan everyone picks on the Punjabis, they're the guys to push around.


-------------


Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 09:31
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim


One thing I find odd, is talking to Indians you get the idea that Punjabi's are the tough big people. But in Pakistan everyone picks on the Punjabis, they're the guys to push around.


Well you obviously haven't heard the 'Sardar' jokes then   They get stereotyped as being the not-so-clever tough-guy (no offence to any Sardars reading).  Then again my community gets stereotyped as being chatty, bad with money and lazy...we all get to share the love


-------------
Once you relinquish your freedom for the sake of "understood necessity,"...you cede your claim to the truth. - Heda Margolius Kovaly


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 10:38

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

One thing I find odd, is talking to Indians you get the idea that Punjabi's are the tough big people. But in Pakistan everyone picks on the Punjabis, they're the guys to push around.

Keeping in mind the topic on this thread, Bollywood is partially to be blamed for this, what type of Indians have you been talking to Omar, respect to background?  Punjabis (hindus and sardars) dont even run their own state on the Indian side, its their neighbors on the east (with rajput muscle) that run it along with a good part of north india.  

The pakistani punjab is far more diverse in its population than the indian, but I have personally noticed that punjabis on a whole (save some ligit tribes) are very conniving.  I've been involved in altercations with punjabis from both sides of the border and for some reason they don't fight unless they have atleast 5-6 other guys backing them up.  Also for some reason the punjabis of pakistan have this envy about pathans and sardars (sikhs).  But at the end of the day punjabis in pakistan run the country for sure, what do you mean when you say that they're easy to push around?  Arent they the ones pushing around the Sindhis and NWFP? (eg. Kalabagh Dam) 

PS. Whats funny is that Balochistan was initially in favor of the dam as it would actually benefit from it,  but they have now sided with the Sindhis and Pathans because of their animosity towards Punjabis and Punjabi politics..

Originally posted by Jayeshks

Then again my community gets stereotyped as being chatty, bad with money and lazy...we all get to share the love

What community do you belong to Jayeshks?  I doubt there are any sardars on this board, havent come across any so far.



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 19:39
Originally posted by RajputGirl

Telde,

Just out of curiosity, are you Pakistani ? 

 

Must be the name that gave it away.



-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 19:54

Originally posted by jayeshks



I had no idea there were Hindu Pathans too

Yes, there are/were Hindu Pathans, not many though. More common than them are the Hindu/Sikh Afghans (Khatris) who are Punjabis and Sindhis that migrated around the 19th century (but they're not Pathans). Kapoor though is a Hindu Pathan.



-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 20:50
Originally posted by Rajput

What community do you belong to Jayeshks?  I doubt there are any sardars on this board, havent come across any so far.


Northeast kayasths or 'Lala' in Bihari vernacular. 


-------------
Once you relinquish your freedom for the sake of "understood necessity,"...you cede your claim to the truth. - Heda Margolius Kovaly


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 00:15

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

"No wonder your brothers are so tall because you're half-Punjabi," or "No wonder your cute because you got the Punjabi genes!"

One thing I find odd, is talking to Indians you get the idea that Punjabi's are the tough big people. But in Pakistan everyone picks on the Punjabis, they're the guys to push around.

I have never heard any Indian auntie or uncle talk claim that Punjabis are "big/tough people."      My dad (step-father) has never perpetuated that Punjabis are the tallest or the "biggest."    If he did say that, he would look silly because he's only 5'7.  

BUT,  I know plenty of second-generation American-born/raised Desis (both Indian and Pakistani) that believe these things.  LOL, I just tell that the big build comes from the Rajput genes from my mom's side.  It's the truth, because my nana ji was 6'5 and most of my mama ji's are at least 6 ft and up.   Some ABD's (American-born Desis) find that hard to believe, because they don't know much about Rajputs or UPites.    As a matter of fact, most of my Hindu Punjabi ABD friends don't even know what a Rajput is. 

 Again, I just think these stereotypes arise from not being exposed to the variation in South Asia.   The American diaspora mostly consists of Indian Punjabis, Pakistanis, Gujaratis and certain South Indian groups (not including Punjabi or Gujarati Rajputs here).    The average ABD (American-Born Desi) can get a narrow and biased view of Desis by just looking at what's here in America.    You would be surprised at how many ABD's don't even know what's beyond Gujarat or Punjab.  

 

I'm not trying to put anyone down, as some of my Punjabi friends get offended if I point out that it's possible for Punjabis to be short or brown-skinned.    It's not a bad thing to be short or darker-complected.  



Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 00:31

On one of my trips to India I came across some rural people on the outskirts of Delhi with dirty blonde hair which was a first for me!

 

 



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 01:12
Originally posted by Rajput

On one of my trips to India I came across some rural people on the outskirts of Delhi with dirty blonde hair which was a first for me!

 

 

The first picture you posted of the young girl is a good picture, if you could have posted the link to her picture it would have been better. She has light brown to hazel eyes.

The other two pictures are of Bollywood people, which are of no use for showing green/blue eyes colours (assuming that's what you were trying to prove by this - for the last time, you cannot use rich people or Bollywood stars to prove a point like this. 

Some Delhites with fair skin for sure exist though.



-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: cattus
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 01:18


Wow, a little heavy on the make-up but there is no doubt that this is a natural beauty.


Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 01:54
Agree with you on this one thing Cattus.

-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: Omar al Hashim
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 03:26
Originally posted by Rajput

Keeping in mind the topic on this thread, Bollywood is partially to be blamed for this, what type of Indians have you been talking to Omar, respect to background?

1 Punjabi, 2 Delhites, 1 Gujarati

But at the end of the day punjabis in pakistan run the country for sure, what do you mean when you say that they're easy to push around?  Arent they the ones pushing around the Sindhis and NWFP? (eg. Kalabagh Dam)

Thats true, I mean they cop all the jokes, maybe its because they need 5-6 people to back them up while any Pathan, Baluchi or Sindhi would gladly take on the whole Indian army by themselves.

-------------


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 07:37

The rural people I spoke of were dark in skin color but had dirty blonde hair...they were not 'fair delhites'.

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

1 Punjabi, 2 Delhites, 1 Gujarati

Yea I figured this much, but even amongst the delhites you probably didnt speak to any gujjar or jat villagers of delhi, they hate sardars/punjabis to the same extent that the mirpuris in pakistan hate punjabis.  I think most punjabis, now financially secure, have lost that edge but there are exceptions to this rule.

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

Thats true, I mean they cop all the jokes, maybe its because they need 5-6 people to back them up while any Pathan, Baluchi or Sindhi would gladly take on the whole Indian army by themselves.

I dont know about your sindhis but the pathans and baloch probably would lol even the hindustani pathans (mostly Afreedi and Orakzai) for that matter carry a  "hum kisi se kum nahin" attitude, but one thing about the hindustani pathans, they get punked up REAL good by the jats, gujjars, rajputs and for some reason are always trying to show that they're authentic pathan from their mainland lol....like some gujjar or jat gives a flying f**k.  



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 09:31

There are around 50,000 Indians Pashtuns (lets keep the terms proper here), so how they ever get noticed, let alone pushed around is beyond me.

 As for light eyes/hair/skin, yes Pashtuns are usually very fair, the women especially. Hair is usually chestnut brown (like Shahid Afridi) but blonds are not uncommon. Most common eye color is brown, but its not in a majority, but a plurality. Next comes Green (hence the term Hare Ankaien Valee) and finally Blue.

Now TeleInduz, whats a Pakistani doing in Paraguay?



-------------


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 16:23

Originally posted by Sparten

There are around 50,000 Indians Pashtuns (lets keep the terms proper here), so how they ever get noticed, let alone pushed around is beyond me.

Sparten you're off on the # of Pashtuns by alot buddy, i'm curious as to the source you're using, I hope its not some shady website such as answers.com used by our beloved Gharanai baba

My friend in India alone there are over 10 million pashtuns!  Would you also like a breakdown per country that they inhabit?

Uttar Pradesh (4,670,000) Maharashtra (1,047,000)
West Bengal (988,000) Rajasthan (925,000)
Madhya Pradesh (816,000) Karnataka (599,000)
Tamil Nadu (467,000) Bihar (306,000)
Andhra Pradesh (261,000) Gujarat (231,000)



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: Anujkhamar
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 17:14
Oh my god! i just found out that Priety Zinta is going out with......Jinnah's great grandson!


Posted By: TeldeInduz
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 18:29
Originally posted by Sparten

There are around 50,000 Indians Pashtuns (lets keep the terms proper here), so how they ever get noticed, let alone pushed around is beyond me.

 As for light eyes/hair/skin, yes Pashtuns are usually very fair, the women especially. Hair is usually chestnut brown (like Shahid Afridi) but blonds are not uncommon. Most common eye color is brown, but its not in a majority, but a plurality. Next comes Green (hence the term Hare Ankaien Valee) and finally Blue.

Now TeleInduz, whats a Pakistani doing in Paraguay?

Your figure of 50,000 Pashtuns in India is about right, it's definitely not 10 million though . 10 million Pashtuns in India would be nearly equivalent to Afghanistan!

Breakdown of Pashtuns in various countries

Regions with significant populations Pakistan:
28,000,000
[2]

Afghanistan:
12,500,000
[3]
Iran:
   500,000
United Arab Emirates:
   126,000
United Kingdom:
   88,000
Turkey:
   54,000
United States:
   44,000
India:
   40,000
Germany:
   35,000
France:
   33,000
Austria:
   31,000
Tajikistan:
   26,000
Netherlands:
   26,000

I think the figures for the countries aside from Pakistan and Afghanistan are a bit higher, and not totally accurate, but 50,000 sounds about right. 

 



-------------
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................


Posted By: kingofmazanderan
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 19:04
Your guys are absolutly right most of the Actors in bolly wood are either almost all Aryan blood or mixed with Aryans.


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 19:55

Originally posted by Anujkhamar

Oh my god! i just found out that Priety Zinta is going out with......Jinnah's great grandson!

hey anuj who's the #1 Indian actress out there now days?

I'd go with Katrina Kaif hands down !  mama mia!



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 29-Apr-2006 at 23:43
Originally posted by kingofmazanderan

Your guys are absolutly right most of the Actors in bolly wood are either almost all Aryan blood or mixed with Aryans.


Oh dear god...like this thread didn't have enough issues already


-------------
Once you relinquish your freedom for the sake of "understood necessity,"...you cede your claim to the truth. - Heda Margolius Kovaly


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 00:00

Originally posted by Killabee

Most of the actor/actress are olive to light skin and which makes them more resemble Persian or Arabs. I have a few time in my life run into any light-skin Indian. Most of them are very dark skin as far as I am concerned. I know Indian society  is still running in caste system. But is India holding prejudice against darker skin people?

If your thread is about colourism in Bollywood.I would say colourism does exist in Bollywood.Herez how Kajol looked in Baazigar.Her first movie.

Herez another pic.

Now I have a few questions for you.

*Does Kajol look Dravidian/Non-Dravidian.

*Are Persians/Arabs olive to light skin?

This is a S Korean Actress.She has light skin which I'm sure has been lightened further  by paint and light.Does she look like Arab/Persian.

*Fair and lovely does good business in India.Assuming you are a Pakistani I'd like to know how big is the market for skin lighteners in your country.

 



-------------


Posted By: Maziar
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 00:44
Originally posted by ChawwaniKiChaa

I like Bollywood Movies.

does "khamosh" mean silent?



-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 00:51

Originally posted by Maziar

does "khamosh" mean silent?

 ﺵﻭﻤﺎﺨ = silent;extinct;off;hush!

http://www.farsidic.com/ - http://www.farsidic.com/

Hope that answers your question Maziar.



-------------


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 03:21
Originally posted by Rajput

Originally posted by Anujkhamar

Oh my god! i just found out that Priety Zinta is going out with......Jinnah's great grandson!

hey anuj who's the #1 Indian actress out there now days?

I'd go with Katrina Kaif hands down !  mama mia!

 

Katrina is half-white. 

 

She doesn't count as an Indian actress! 

 

Just kidding!       



Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 03:35

Originally posted by cattus



Wow, a little heavy on the make-up but there is no doubt that this is a natural beauty.

 

Her eye make-up looks fine to me. 

Here's another one of my favorite "dusky" girls. 

Sheetal Mallar

 

 

 

 

 



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 08:30

Originally posted by RajputGirl

Katrina is half-white.  She doesn't count as an Indian actress!

She is half-kashmiri too if I remember correctly.Perhaps she could count as a Pakistani actress.What's your view?



-------------


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 10:04

Originally posted by RajputGirl

Katrina is half-white.  She doesn't count as an Indian actress!

squash that then...what about Vidya Balan?  She's more charming anyways....

 



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: Maziar
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 16:13
Originally posted by 0000

Originally posted by Maziar

does "khamosh" mean silent?

 ﺵﻭﻤﺎﺨ = silent;extinct;off;hush!

http://www.farsidic.com/ - http://www.farsidic.com/

Hope that answers your question Maziar.

I am awar, yes. i wanted to be sure, i am iranian myself. Thanks anyway.

-------------


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 23:00
Originally posted by 0000

Originally posted by RajputGirl

Katrina is half-white.  She doesn't count as an Indian actress!

She is half-kashmiri too if I remember correctly.Perhaps she could count as a Pakistani actress.What's your view?

 

LOL! I was just joking! 

I don't mind considering Katrina Kaif as an Indian actress.  If she considers herself Indian, that's fine with me.  It's up to the person to call themselves whatever they want.  



Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 01-May-2006 at 17:20

There are only a handful of strong calibre male muslim actors who are quality artists and were able develop a legacy in the Indian film industry:

http://movies.indiainfo.com/tales/images/0611_dilipkumar01.gif - Dilip Kumar    http://im.rediff.com/movies/2003/sep/11leag4.jpg - Naseerudin Shah    http://www.dishant.com/albums/1637.jpg - Farooq Shaikh     http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20050717/spectrum/khan2.jpg - Amjad Khan    http://www.bbc.co.uk/shropshire/films/bollywood/2005/10/images/feroz_khan_150.jpg - Firoz Khan  

http://www.bbc.co.uk/shropshire/films/bollywood/2004/07/images/pop_up_indo_pak_project_05.jpg - Raza Murad     http://www.sfs.org.sg/2004/images/indigo/maqbool.jpg - Irfan Khan      http://www.10ka20.com/img/kamal-hasan-2.jpg - Kamal Hasan     http://www.shaadi.com/wedding/celebrities/celebtalk/images/amir-khan.jpg - Amir Khan



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: Anujkhamar
Date Posted: 01-May-2006 at 17:37
You don't consider Shah Rukh Khan to be quality?



and to the question that you asked, the leading ladies at the moment have to be Rani Mukherjee and Priety Zinta, the latter of which is going out with the great grandson of the father of Pakistan.

Films having been great the last few months, but i do hope the upcoming summer releases fix that.
Rani Mukherjee


Priety Zinta



Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 01-May-2006 at 18:17

Originally posted by Anujkhamar

You don't consider Shah Rukh Khan to be quality?

Not much of an actor, nor a good looker with that pakora nose of his and  he is what he is because of the support he got from the underworld, they caught that Abu Salem character and now he's about to spill the beans on all these faki lovers.  Even Salman Khan does decent comic roles compared to this guy, face it man the quality of bollywood has gone down tremendously.



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: Anujkhamar
Date Posted: 01-May-2006 at 18:32
I understand what you mean, i dislike the majority of these noobs.

But i have to disagree with you about Shah Rukh. He get's the job done. He's what people are looking for at the moment, some romantic guy. He's proven himself in the romance arena, but i have to admit, he needs to leave that genre and improve other areas.

I think we can both safely agree that Amir Khan is a legend. He's really inspirational.

Who is your favourite Bollywood comedian from the 90's and 2000's? Mine has to be Paresh Rawal, he has a nice sense of classical comedy that is in danger of fading away from our country.

and back to a serious topic (otherwise this may as well be moved into the tavern), i don't think that there is a faultless actor. They've all either had to sleep with the directors once (lucky buggers) or been involved in some dodgy dealings, that and the majority of the noobs are just there for sexual appeal.


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 01-May-2006 at 20:16

Originally posted by Anujkhamar

I think we can both safely agree that Amir Khan is a legend. He's really inspirational.

Sure, Amir Khan has this zeal for acting and he's a real perfectionist to the extent that his coworkers say hes gone insane, that is a strong committment to ones work.  Shah Rukh Khan became what he became because he 'shared' a good amount of profits of movies with the underworld guys for which he was rewarded by getting first priority in all the movies and gigs.  His 'best' work was probably in Devdas and Deewanapan where he played a villan.

Paresh Rawal hands down he's talented and that new guy Rajpal Yadav is funny too.

 They've all either had to sleep with the directors once (lucky buggers) or been involved in some dodgy dealings, that and the majority of the noobs are just there for sexual appeal.

You heard about Rakesh Roshan getting into a shoot out with some underworld guys? Hritik had just come into the business, word is that Shah Rukh Khan approached Dawood for that stunt cuz Hritik was killing the competition and Rakesh wouldnt pay up for 'protection'! 

PS. What about that Sanjay Dutt fellow, his mom (Nargis) was a muslim who married Sunil Dutt-- Pakistani Haleem meets Punjabi Kebabi and what do you get? ...lol 'Sanju baba'



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 02-May-2006 at 08:35

Originally posted by Maziar

I am awar, yes. i wanted to be sure, i am iranian myself. Thanks anyway.

You are welcome Maziar.I got the impression that you are a German and unfamiliar with Bollywood.

Herez a nice website incase you'd like to enjoy music and movies from Bollywood.

http://lucky88.eigenstart.nl/ - http://lucky88.eigenstart.nl/

 





-------------


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 03-May-2006 at 01:57
Originally posted by ramin

Nasiruddin Shah

Isn't he the former king of Iran? same name... but different features lol


 

Doesn't he look like the Indian father in Monsoon Wedding?  



Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 03-May-2006 at 10:47
He is the Indian father in Monsoon Wedding

-------------
Once you relinquish your freedom for the sake of "understood necessity,"...you cede your claim to the truth. - Heda Margolius Kovaly


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 03-May-2006 at 15:53

Originally posted by jayeshks

He is the Indian father in Monsoon Wedding

 

Why did that guy say he was the former King of Iran?  



Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 04-May-2006 at 09:08
  lol I guess you can argue that he looks like shah pahalvi from some angles....nasirudin shahs best work hands down 'jaaney bhi do yaaron',  movie is HILARIOUS comedy!

-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: jayeshks
Date Posted: 04-May-2006 at 09:34
Originally posted by RajputGirl

Why did that guy say he was the former King of Iran?  



'cause there was a Nasiruddin Shah in the 19th century who was the shah of Iran.  It was a joke


-------------
Once you relinquish your freedom for the sake of "understood necessity,"...you cede your claim to the truth. - Heda Margolius Kovaly


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 13-May-2006 at 14:43

Yana Gupta....sooo tempting...



-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”


Posted By: RajputGirl
Date Posted: 14-May-2006 at 22:49
Originally posted by Rajput

Yana Gupta....sooo tempting...

 

 

I hope you're aware that she's not Indian either. 



Posted By: DayI
Date Posted: 17-May-2006 at 13:34
More actors please!! :)

What does "Khan" means in (any) Indian languages? How it came that name whas so popular out there? Also are semitic origined names popular there? Like i saw in this thread: yaqoob, nasiruddin, etc


-------------
Bu mıntıka'nın Dayı'sı
http://imageshack.us - [IMG - http://www.allempires.com/forum/uploads/DayI/2006-03-17_164450_bscap021.jpg -


Posted By: Rajput
Date Posted: 17-May-2006 at 14:33
Originally posted by DayI

More actors please!! :)
 
Looks like my man is hooked on bollywood babes! 
Sahiban Kamaal, Bibi Beymisaal.... http://bollywood501.com/classic_f/parveen_babi/ - Parveen Babi ki Dhamaal!  Wink
 


-------------


“If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.”



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com