Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedKurdicization of Anatolia

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567
Author
baracuda View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 13-May-2005
Location: Russian Federation
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 722
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Kurdicization of Anatolia
    Posted: 08-Aug-2005 at 01:36
"Miller" dont try to distort what I said pls.. in that thread you were talking about I was talking about the 'kurds', and the possibity of them being the real deal what they claim to be, existed some thousand years ago, as like 'strategos' in all the ancient maps I've look at, they dont exist.

There are clear differences between who are freedom-fighters and who are terrorists by their definition and so to put them into a single category just shows the way some people are trying to cover up support for terrorism.

Palestinians? no we cant say the same thing, that land was in an essence theirs only 50 years ago (not 5000 years ago.. ), but various groups and sects within them we can call terrorists..


Back to Top
strategos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 09-Mar-2005
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1096
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 21:15

If we talk of the Kurdanization of Eastern Anatolia, we must talk of the Turkanization of the whole of Anatolia..

On many ancient maps of years ago, I really never do see Kurds anywhere, on either ancienct maps or maps 200-1000 years back.. and i have wondered my times why not, unless they migrated sometime sooner to now..



Edited by strategos
http://theforgotten.org/intro.html
Back to Top
Miller View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 487
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 20:14
In another thread here I read It said that Kurdish claim in Turkey is not valid because it is a 5000 year old claim unlike Palestinians which ir 50 years old. Now here you are saying the reverse. So which one is it
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 13:25

What I don't understand is how can a population without any legal representation that promotes repopulation of certain areas go unopposed in a country like Turkey.  Who organises it? Don't tell me PKK, becuase if it was, the Turkish authorities would not hesitate in stopping these "resettlements".

This sounds like the paranoid nonsense one can read here: www.stormfront.org/forum



Edited by Zagros
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 12:29

Of course you are, no one denies it.

Turks arent totally new in Anatolia. The descendents of the indegenious people consist an impotant part of Anatolian gene pool, so we partly, originally belong to Anatolia.

some Greek settlements in the region

That is funny. Greeks have never reached eastern Anatolia, by settlements. There were no Greeks living beyond Aegean region during the Byzanthine region, except a minor ethnic Greek settlement in Cappadocia and Greek colony of Trebizond. Southeastern Anatolia (Northern Mesopotamia was shared btw Assyrians and Kurds.

If you mean Zeugma, the Roman city, its inhabitants werent Greeks.

Eastern Anatolia was a region where Armenians, Kurds and Turks were living together before the Armenian exiles. Today, Kurds have policies of settling and expanding all over Eastern Anatolia, including once non-Kurdish regions of north of Lake Van so that they can consist the dominant population there.

Back to Top
Cent View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 20-Jun-2005
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 10:27

"So if these people they want to call themselves 'kurds', then let them"

You speak of us like we were made up... We are indo-europeans from Zagros mountains.

 

 

They don't speak enough about the Kurds, because we have never taken hostages, never hijacked a plane. But I am proud of this.
Abdul Rahman Qassemlou
Back to Top
baracuda View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 13-May-2005
Location: Russian Federation
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 722
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 10:21
"Tangriberdi" - Turks have been in anatolia for how long? 800-1000 years? maybe longer? what about Persians? Armenians? Arabs? Byzantines? Romans? Greeks? they've been here even longer... So the real question should be to ask 'who' are these people, that call themselves 'kurds'; Yes they were a small minority in the ottoman empire.. but you dont honestly think that these
can be the originals.. under dominant ruling countries of the area, those much harsher than the ottomans, and the seljuks, and so on..

   Somethings really depend on what you want to call yourself, if some idiot comes up and says Im begining my own race of 'Tangriberdi's' then let them.. I mean they will be only harmfull to themselves..

   So if these people they want to call themselves 'kurds', then let them. If their comfort in modern countries has gone to their brains and they want to farm some dust cloud in the middle-east let them.. When their only possible source of income runs out (petrol) then we shall see..

If they terrorize, civilians and think they can get away with it.. well; Turks are patient but patience does run out, and Turk is a bred warrior, we'll pick up our swords and enter the middle east. Like your nick translates "Tanri('god')gave - Tanri's gift" to us.
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 10:06
Originally posted by Tangriberdi

During the events between 1900-1940 Kurds captured the cities Diyarbakir, and Urfa completely and Van, Erzincan  and some other small towns partially.


With Ottoman/Turk support, I assume.

When the Turkish republic was declared, Turkey was a country which lost 25% of her proper territory  to a 5% population, Kurds.

How do you define that? Kurds have never had (at least in recent history) a state of their own... how could Turkey loss territory to Kurds if they didn't even have a state or an army to take them?

By time going process did not cease. Kurds were being spread towards cities like  Ardahan Kars Igdir South of Erzurum, Marash, Malatya , Adiyaman and towards some other small towns of the region by 1960 when Kurds stared to go further west. At the same time they produced dramatically.

So Kurds grow more quickly than Turks... and they don't let themselves Turkicize easily...

You have it easy: set a border near the Euphrates and keep the Kurds in Kurdistan by denying them Turk citizenship and the right to migrate to Turkey. Imperialism may backfire, you know.

Today 28% (estimates changing) of Turkish population of Turkey and 40%of its territory is belonging to Kurds and there is no Turkish city that has no Kurdish immigrants. Estimates shows that 48% of Turkish pop. will have consisted of Kurds by 2050 and ethnic Turks will be a minority in their own country.

Well, it seems that (according to your own reasoning) we should soon be calling Turkey Kurdistan... hummm...

Well it may be that we have to call Germany New Turkey too... times are changing, LOL!

SO THE BIG LIE THAT KURDS TELL ABOUT THAT ANATOLIA IS A 4000- YEAR KURDISH LAND APPEAR What do you think about that?

I think that Kurds are there since before Turks, as Indo-Iranian migrations are earlier than those of Turks, who just came to Anatolia since 1000 CE. Nothing against Turks but really I can't bear imperialist nations weeping that other nations they hold subjugated are growing or demanding their rights. It's like Serbians complaining of Albanians...


NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 09:44

Well whatever happened, it happened under Turkish Ottoman rule. It's funny how you are demonizing the existence of Kurds in Anatolia.

Even if true, do you know people use the same arguments against Turks in Anatolia and Iran? You say the real home of Kurds is in Iran, some people say the real home of Turks is in Mongolia.

It is a stupid argument.

Back to Top
Tangriberdi View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 03-Aug-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 267
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 09:09
Originally posted by Cent

What are you talking about? Kurds have been in that area much longer than Turks. Kurds are the ones who are getting assimiliated by Turks.

If Kurds have been in that area much longer than Turks please can you give me some examples of bridges, cisterns, baths and other buildings built in the region by Kurds. Are there any?. You tell a lie and then believe in that by yourselves too. The proper name of  Kurds appears in 900s.  The first Kurds in Eastern Anatolia are told to be nomads which migrating bewteen  winter lands and summer lands. And everyone interested in Iranology knows well that homeland of Kurds is Zagros mountains. They are in Iran not in Anatolia.



Edited by Tangriberdi
Back to Top
Cent View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 20-Jun-2005
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 08:58

"When the Turkish republic was declared, Turkey was a country which lost 25% of her proper territory  to a 5% population, Kurds."

What territories? They are still Turkish. After WW1 the french and brits, promised us a State in Eastern Anatolia, but that was later forgotten when Ataturk intervened.

They don't speak enough about the Kurds, because we have never taken hostages, never hijacked a plane. But I am proud of this.
Abdul Rahman Qassemlou
Back to Top
Cent View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 20-Jun-2005
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 08:55

What are you talking about? Kurds have been in that area much longer than Turks. Kurds are the ones who are getting assimiliated by Turks.

Turks are bringing Kurds to the major cities in Turkey, because they want to assimiliate them.

The Genocide against Armenians was commited by the Ottoman Empire, plus Kurdish bandits, not the Kurdish people.

And all those statistics are your own assumptions, give me real data.

 

They don't speak enough about the Kurds, because we have never taken hostages, never hijacked a plane. But I am proud of this.
Abdul Rahman Qassemlou
Back to Top
Tangriberdi View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 03-Aug-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 267
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 08:48

It can be easily detected in Ottoman, Iranian and Russian documents that Eastern Anatolia has begun to be Kurdicized in late 1650s. Before that there were only Assyrians Armenians  Arab Turkish and some Greek settlements in the region(only Kurds in the region was around Colemerg (now Hakkari). The ottoman policy was Sunnitizing the region against the Iranian Shia peril. In order to that Shia and Alawite Turkmen population of the region was exposed to serious pressures, massacres and exiles. So the region was evicted from Shia elements amd in place of Shia Turkmens Sunnite Kurds were invited to the region by the Ottomans. And then properties and territories of Turkmens were given to Kurds and especially to their feodal lords. These lords(aqas) tortured Turks in the region and led them to go out of the region and sparse towards south or  east and the rest to be assimilated by Kurds. Many of them sent to the Cyprus and the Balkans.  Until 1900s things went on. And that ever-mentioned Armenian holocaust( and according to some others it was just a replacement) broke out. And the villages, towns and cities where Armenians evacuated were captured by Kurds and so Kurdicization and Kurdification of the Eastern Anatolia was almost complete except some Turkish cities which still remained. Now it was out of contol of Ottomans too.

During the events between 1900-1940 Kurds captured the cities Diyarbakir, and Urfa completely and Van, Erzincan  and some other small towns partially.

When the Turkish republic was declared, Turkey was a country which lost 25% of her proper territory  to a 5% population, Kurds.

By time going process did not cease. Kurds were being spread towards cities like  Ardahan Kars Igdir South of Erzurum, Marash, Malatya , Adiyaman and towards some other small towns of the region by 1960 when Kurds stared to go further west. At the same time they produced dramatically.

Today 28% (estimates changing) of Turkish population of Turkey and 40%of its territory is belonging to Kurds and there is no Turkish city that has no Kurdish immigrants. Estimates shows that 48% of Turkish pop. will have consisted of Kurds by 2050 and ethnic Turks will be a minority in their own country. SO THE BIG LIE THAT KURDS TELL ABOUT THAT ANATOLIA IS A 4000- YEAR KURDISH LAND APPEAR What do you think about that?



Edited by Tangriberdi
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.074 seconds.