Difference between Indians and Pakistanis

Originally posted by balochii ^ it's south asian but its under pakistan's control that is what i am saying and indians cannot even touch it, its pakistan's people history more then anyone else.

Edited by Vajra - 23-Jul-2010 at 13:13

Originally posted by Vajra Originally posted by balochii ^ it's south asian but its under pakistan's control that is what i am saying and indians cannot even touch it, its pakistan's people history more then anyone else.    Pakistan's history has been tied to other South Asian countries from from Indus valley civilization to Hinduism, Buddhism, Mughals and all the way to British Raj.  That would same as Indians claiming Mughals as only Indias heritage just because famous mughal monuments are in India.  "Nationalist ideologies frequently employ results of archaeology and ancient history as propaganda, often significantly distorting them to fit their aims..." Originally posted by Cryptic   Maybe a test like this can settle the debate.  Evidently, it is very difficult for Chinese, Japanese and Koreans to tell themselves apart.   alllooksame.com   But...  There would probably be allegations that the sample Indians and Pakistanis were picked to rig the test towards a pre conceived out come.    There has already been studies done on this subject.

^ ok forget the video, what i have said is true and it stands, for example even if you go to karachi today. Today almost half the city is made of pashtuns and pashtuns you know are much fairskinned compared to most indic population

^ pashtuns are the second largest majority in pakistan, there are 30 million+ pashtuns in pakistan. There are more pashtuns in pakistan then in afghanistan. Most of you indian think pakistan is only made of indic population which is not true at all. Like i said come to Karachi and you will see Pashtun outnumber anyone. roughly 6 million pashtuns live in Karachi

Edited by balochii - 23-Jul-2010 at 19:09

Originally posted by balochii ^ pashtuns are the second largest majority in pakistan, there are 30 million+ pashtuns in pakistan. There are more pashtuns in pakistan then in afghanistan. Most of you indian think pakistan is only made of indic population which is not true at all. Like i said come to Karachi and you will see Pashtun outnumber anyone. roughly 6 million pashtuns live in Karachi   also i haven't seen the video and dont care for the video. i am speaking reality, doesn't matter if the video is fake or not

You have to understand Indo-Aryan peoples are a linguistic group, not a "race"

Infact Indo-Aryans of Pakistan seem to be closer to Iranic peoples than to Indians who are mostly of Australian aborigine stock.

And also I know most Baloch are brown, but not as dark as Indians as your wrote. I know Brahui people are similar to Indians in appearance as they indeed might be Indians.  But not the Baloch

Originally posted by PakistaniShield Originally posted by balochii ^ pashtuns are the second largest majority in pakistan, there are 30 million+ pashtuns in pakistan. There are more pashtuns in pakistan then in afghanistan. Most of you indian think pakistan is only made of indic population which is not true at all. Like i said come to Karachi and you will see Pashtun outnumber anyone. roughly 6 million pashtuns live in Karachi   also i haven't seen the video and dont care for the video. i am speaking reality, doesn't matter if the video is fake or not You have to understand Indo-Aryan peoples are a linguistic group, not a "race" Infact Indo-Aryans of Pakistan seem to be closer to Iranic peoples than to Indians who are mostly of Australian aborigine stock. And also I know most Baloch are brown, but not as dark as Indians as your wrote. I know Brahui people are similar to Indians in appearance as they indeed might be Indians.  But not the Baloch

The darkest of pakistanis are sindhis, yet look at their faces, clearly they look of the indo-aryan stock 

Edited by balochii - 24-Jul-2010 at 12:12

^ thats true that pure Australoids are small in number, however the guy i posted for example is definatly mixed with Australoids or has some trace of Australoids in him, you can find a lot of southern indians who look like him. Recent genetic testing has proven the eastern/central and southern India is mixed with the orginal population that moved there some 60000-80000 years ago, they most likely looked like Australoids of australia of today, even tribal south indians look like Australoids.

Edited by balochii - 24-Jul-2010 at 20:55

^ do you mean tamils or sinhalese in sri lanka? sinhalese claim to be recent migrants and if you look at them many of them indeed look different from other people there.

Originally posted by balochii The darkest of pakistanis are sindhis, yet look at their faces, clearly they look of the indo-aryan stock    no i am not denying there could some mohajirs who migrated from india who might look like that, but overall mohajirs only make 8-9% of the population and most of them migrated from north india

I think the darkest Pakistanis are Bravis, that is if you would count them as Pakistanis.