Pourpirar: "Slavic origin of Achaemenid Persians"

2. 1. His view on Iranian history

Pourpirar's revisionism begins with the event of Purim, recorded in the Biblical Book of Esther. He believes that that Purim was a genocide against indigenous civilised Iranians committed by the Achaemenid Shah Darius I and his Jewish allies. He claims that "after the great genocide committed by Jews in Purim, the land of Iran was completely wiped out of human beings until the beginning of Islam." [5]

He considers Behistun Inscription as a symbol of this genocide. [2]. He claims that construction of Persepolis was never finished [3] and the Achaemenid dynasty whom he considers as a group of ancient barbarian Slavic invaders ended with Darius the Great, after they returned to their homeland in Eurasian steppes. The rest of the Achaemenid, Parthian, Sassanid, Tahirid, Ghaznavid, Seljuqid, and Samanid dynasties according to Pourpirar were fabricated by historians of mostly Jewish background as part of a Jewish conspiracy. [6]

According to Pourpirar a few historic sites which are said to be Parthian, are indeed either clearly related to Greeks or are modern forgery. He claims all inscriptions which are said to be Sassanid are modern forgeries. He also believes that historical personalities such as Mazdak, Mani, Zoroaster, Babak, Abu Moslem, and Salman the Persian were also invented by modern Jewish historians. [7] [8]

Regarding reliability of Iranian dynasties he says: "So everyone should know that the builders of the false historical and social lies of the last two thousand years between Purim till the Safavids were the Jews. They wanted to hide their genocide and thus used lies by fabricating history." [9]

Why do you keep on creating these kind of topics? Are you trying to show us that Persians are white Europeans? If so, you are failing miserably.

I'm willing to overlook every document, proof, scientist, historian or source and just ask a simple question.

How does he define himself, an Arab invader?

http://www.azargoshnasp.net/recent_history/atoor/responseasgharzadeh/asghrazadehresponse.htm : Thus the passage:” Behold, a people comes from the north; and a great nation and many kings shall be stirred up from the uttermost parts of the earth.” (from the book Jeremiah written before Cyrus the Great) is taken by Pourpirar that Cyrus the Great will march from North (which he believes it is Khazaria and Slavia!).

As I said here: http://www.allempires.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=24888 I also believe that Cyrus the Great was from the north but the north of Iran, not Khazaria or Slavia!

In Persica, the 5th century BC Greek physician Greek physician and historian Ctesias, says Cyrus the Great was an Amardian, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amard The Amard people, or Amardis (also Amardians, Amui in Pahlavi) were a tribe living along the southern shore of the Caspian, including current day Amol, Iran.

I guess the guys saying that Aryans orginated in Iran and all over the worldare way much less than guys who openly speak, publish books and papersclaiming the Turkics were inhabitants not only Iranian plateau but a major part of Asia and Europe.

erasing the history of Iran before that? how could you assess this one?! your sources?  I see you have also new theories for the history of Iranian plateau during the Persian empire too.  But I can't wait to see your prooves for thisclaim this time.