Topic: Epirotans were Greeks or Illyrians ? Posted: 15-Apr-2006 at 19:52
Ancient writers make a very clear segeration between Illyrians and Epirotans.I begin with Strabo
The remainder of Europe consists of the country which is between the Ister and the encircling sea, beginning at the recess of the Adriatic and extending as far as the Sacred Mouth of the Ister. In this country are Greece and the tribes of the Macedonians and of the Epeirotes, and all those tribes above them whose countries reach to the Ister and to the seas on either side, both the Adriatic and the Pontic to the Adriatic, the Illyrian tribes, and to the other sea as far as the Propontis and the Hellespont, the Thracian tribes and whatever Scythian or Celtic tribes are intermingled with them. Strabo,Geography, 7,V
and
And even to the present day the Thracians, Illyrians, and Epeirotes live on the flanks of the Greeks (though this was still more the case formerly than now); indeed most of the country that at the present time is indisputably Greece is held by the barbarians Macedonia and certain parts of Thessaly by the Thracians, and the parts above Acarnania and Aetolia by the Thesproti, the Cassopaei, the Amphilochi, the Molossi, and the Athamanes Epeirotic tribes.
Strabo, Geography,7,VII
Strabo segerated the Illyrian tribes from the Epirotans Tribes.
Except Strabo that make a clearly segeration between Epirotans and Illyrians there some others proofs that show these axiomatic truths are truths recognized by the simplest order of reasoning
Pyrrhos of Epiros from an inscription of a dedication to the temple of Minerva Itonis:
"Pyrrhus, descendant of Molossian kings, These shields to thee, Itonian goddess, brings, Won from the valiant Gaul when in the fight Antigonus and all his host took flight' 'Tis not to-day or yesterday alone That for brave deeds the Aeacidae are known."
It is well known fact that the Molossians and Aecidae were descendants of Neoptolemus, Achilles son, and by relation the first and original 'Hellenes' of Homer.
As shown in the beggining of the thread except Strabo we have more literal evidence from the ancient writers:
"XI. War was at the same time proclaimed against the Tarentines (who are still a people at the extremity of Italy), because they had offered violence to some Roman ambassadors. These people asked aid against the Romans of Pyrrhus, king of Epirus, who derived his origin from the family of Achilles."
Eutropius
Or again:
"Arha Ellas apo Oricias kai arhegonos Ellas Epiros"
"Greece starts at Oricus and the most ancient part of Greece is Epirus."
Claudius Ptolemy
Truth be told, the Epirotes then, as today, wanted nothing to do with the Illyrians:
"When Harrybas, king of the Molossians, was attacked in war by Bardylis, the Illyrian, who commanded a considerably larger army, he dispatched the non-combatant portion of his subjects to the neighbouring district of Aetolia, and spread the report that he was yielding up his towns and possessions to the Aetolians. He himself, with those who could bear arms, placed ambuscades here and there on the mountains and in other inaccessible places. The Illyrians, fearful lest the possessions of the Molossians should be seized by the Aetolians, began to race along in disorder, in their eagerness for plunder. As soon as they became scattered, Harrybas, emerging from his concealment and taking them unawares, routed them and put them to flight." Dionysius of Halicarnnasus
Translation: "The deluge in the time of Deucalion, for instance,
took place chiefly in the Greek world and in it especially about
ancient Hellas, the country about Dodona and the Achelous, a river
which has often changed its course. Here the Selli dwelt and those
who were formerly called Graeci and now Hellenes." Also keep in mind that the oracle at Dodona was the oldest Hellenic oracle and in terms of importance for ancient Greeks it was second only to the oracle at Delphi.
They could be athird group, united to Greeks by latter history and partial assimilation. Just an idea to divert...
Is known that before the archaelogical findinings in Dodona in the end of the 18th cent Epirotans considered from the majority of the Greeks as Hellenized Illyrian tribes.
So your idea is good. That's is my point of this thread.To hear any opposite oppinion
The Epirotans were Greeks and especially the Mollosians were relatives
of the Dorian Macedonians.There is no doubt about their being Greeks.
Only in northern Epirus,present day southern Albania were there Greek
tribes of Pelasgian origin like the Haones who were speaking both their
Greek dialect and possibly an Illyrian dialect.The Haones and the
Dassarites must have been billinguals.
They could be athird group, united to Greeks by latter history and partial assimilation. Just an idea to divert...
Is known that before the archaelogical findinings in Dodona in the end of the 18th cent Epirotans considered from the majority of the Greeks as Hellenized Illyrian tribes.
So your idea is good. That's is my point of this thread.To hear any opposite oppinion
But the question would be: Dodona, while surely going back several centuries more, dates its oldest buildings from 350 BCE only. Greek ethnicity has been the dominat one in Greece since at least 1600 BCE. How do you fill that gap? The Molosses or Epirotes could still be a non-Greek tribe that was Hellenized in the course of centuries.
Moreover, I think that some have suggested a simmilar origin for Dorians themselves: Urnfields tribes that became Hellenized. The fact tat Dorians practiced funerary cremation could help this viewpoint. So, after all, Dorian presence in Epirus by itself doesn't seem to prove the Hellenicity of this region.
I feel that Greeks tend "naturally" to see their country as a continuous thing since the shadows of Prehistory. And that's basically correct, as History only starts when Greeks are solidly stabilished and the names of Pelasges, Leleges, Curetes, Trojans and others are but a shadowy memory.
But, on the other hand, it's also quite clear that the Bronze and Early Iron Ages' processes in Greece, including ethnogenesis and possible submission and assimilation of other peoples, are far from settled. So one may consider Epirotan origins in this general lack of definition. Epirotans were Greeks in the 3rd century BCE and before... but how long before? When did they become Greeks? As soon as the other Greeks, in the early or middle 2nd milennium? Before? Later?
The question is nt wether they were Greeks but since when?
But, on the other hand, it's also quite clear that the Bronze and Early Iron Ages' processes in Greece, including ethnogenesis and possible submission and assimilation of other peoples, are far from settled. So one may consider Epirotan origins in this general lack of definition. Epirotans were Greeks in the 3rd century BCE and before... but how long before? When did they become Greeks? As soon as the other Greeks, in the early or middle 2nd milennium? Before? Later?
The question is nt wether they were Greeks but since when?
At Dodona was a prehistoric oracle devoted to the Greek God Zeus and the Mother Goddess identified at other sites with Rea or Gaia but called Dione The shrine of Dodona was the oldest Hellenic oracle, according to the fifth-century historian Herodotus and in fact dates to proto-Hellenic times, perhaps as early as the second millennium BCE. Priests and priestesses in the sacred grove interpreted the rustling of the oak (or beech) leaves to determine the correct actions to be taken. Greek oracles are often misconstrued as having predicted the future.
At Dodona, Zeus joined a pre-Greek name to his own and was worshipped there as "Zeus Molossos" or as "Zeus Naios." Originally an oracle of the Mother Goddess, the oracle was shared by Zeus and Dione (whose name, like "Zeus," simply means "deity"). Many dedicatory inscriptions recovered from the site mention both "Zeus Naios" and "Dione." Elsewhere in Classical Greece,Dione was relegated by Classical times to a minor role, an aspect of Zeus's more usual consort, Hera.
When Homer wrote the Iliad (circa 750 BCE), no buildings were present, and the Priests slept on the ground with ritually unwashed feet. Not until the 4th B.C., was a small stone temple to Zeus added to the site. By the timE Euripidesmentioned Dodona (fragmentary play Melanippe), and Herodotus wrote about the oracle, priestesses had been restored. Though it never eclipsed the Oracle of Apollo atDelphi, Dodona gained a reputation far beyond Greece. In Apollonius of RhodesArgonautica, a retelling of an older story of Jason and the Argonauts, Jasons ship, the "Argo", had the gift of prophecy, because it contained an oak timber spirited from Dodona.
Archaeological excavations over more than a century have recovered artifacts, Many now at the National Archaeological Museum, Athens, and some in the archaeological Museum at nearby Ioannina.
As you see Maju there are a lot of archaelogical and litteral evidence that proof the Greek infuence before the 4th cent.Epirotans as like and Macedonians had a lot of diffrents with the rest Greeks such as governor rule and education. This is the reason that called them as barbarians, reasons that I have already explain manytimes in this forum.
I'm just curious. I wonder if the temple, as it stood before 2000 BCE, when it was an oracle of Gaia was Greek (understood as Greek-speaker) or it was pre-Hellenic. A cult centered on Gaia rather talks of pre-IE times, when a cult to a Mother Godess was very apparent in both the Balcans and Central Europe, as well as in the Near East and probably in most other places from India to the Atlantic.
To me the transfer to Zeus is probably the very sign of Hellenization, understood as assimilation of the pre-IE natives into the IE-speaking Greek culture. I'm not very sure about the dates of IE (Greek-speaker) infiltration in the different regions of Greece but they seem to start pretty early maybe c. 2000 BCE too. Of course Epirus, being mountainous and economically secondary, had a god chance of evading the first waves and be assimilated later and in a less intense way.
Zeus worshipped at the oracle of Dodona was also called
Pelasgios(=Pelasgian).So maybe there is really a connection with pre-IE
natives,or maybe the term pelasgian when used by the Greeks of the
classical era meant just something very very old.
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
Posted: 17-Apr-2006 at 14:38
Achilles offers sacrifice to Zeus and calls him:
" , , , , , , ..."
Meaning:"Zeus of Dodona, Pelasgic one, who lives afar ruling in cold Dodona and there live the Selloi, your prophets, sleeping on the ground and never washing their feet...". Greek heroes often consult Dodona before they start their endeavors and we see that from mythical times, such as the Argonautic journey or Kreon at the war described at 7 epi Thivas.
Some attribute the term (H)ellenas to the Selli (Elloi). Selloi, does not only mean the priests but also the residents of the Dodona area. The prophets were also called "Tomouroi", meaning "hyde-keepers". They were also called "Xamaikoites", (those who sleep on the ground) and apparently there was a whole sect of priests, with different ranks and priestesses also. One of their obligations was celibacy. Apparently similar arrangements existed in Vedic India at the time. Coincidence or common origin, is had to be determined. Maju, your input to this issue would be greatly appreciated as you have more knowledge than me on the matter.
The priests had to be in contact with the earth, that was the reason why they slept on the ground and had to walk barefoot and not wash their feet in order to keep this link. Zeus, in one of his forms, was worshipped as "Chthonic" (of the earth) and was linked to the growth of crops and fruits of the earth. Dione was considered either as a female representation of Zeus or as his wife and was also chthonic.
The decadence of the Oracle started after the unfortunate advise that the priests gave to the Athenians, regarding their disastrous Sicilian expedition, although the priests attributed the disaster to the misconception of the prophecy. The death blow was delivered by the Aetolian general Dorimachos, who destroyed it to punish the Epirotes, for entering the Achaen/Macedonian alliance.
Edited by Yiannis
The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics
Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
I think that Indo-Europe connections are not only Indo-European but many seem rather pre-IE, belonging rather to the Neolithic era, before IEs enter the scene. The Cthonic and Matristic forms of religion seem to belong to that age - wich seems to have left many reminders in Greek mythology, among others. I'm inclined to see in this one of the many connections of Greece with its own pre-Greek (pre-IE) period - of course it's open to interpretation.
Ancient Epirus, was a region of somewhat uncertain ethnic definition and various movements of populations. While it is certain for example by modern historians, that the Epirote royal houses, most notably the royal house of Molossis, had an greek genealogy, going back to Achilles, there are raised a few doubts over the ethnicity of the different Epirote groups/ethnes residing on Epirus region.
However there are certain tribes who were ilyrrizein as ancient historians claim, meaning were speaking ilyrrian, the vast majority of populations involved, evidentially seem to have been Greek-speakers, with first of all, Molossians. Eventhough they were not universally regarded as Greeks but were labeled by a few sources as barbarians, (i.e Thucydides), on the other hand they never were called Illyrians. The label barbarian could be explained perhaps by underlining their uncivilized culture - according to other greeks - in comparison with the general national civilization, which made the rest of Greeks to view Epirotes with a derogatory cultural view and a huge difference in their organization as they were organized in tribal groups called 'ethne' which were made up from smaller tribes (phylae) compared with the city-states of Greece.
Of course here we have to examine the ancient sources and archaeological findings that could easily give us a wider view of the ethnicity of Epirotes and their royal houses. For example, Pindar, obviously sang to the Molossians in Greek, which would be unlikeable if Molossians couldnt speak Greek.
Another case, worthy of mention, is the one of Kleisthenes, tyrant of Sikyon. At the begining of 6th Century, Kleisthenes, wished to find a husband for his daughter Agariste (he made the proclamation at Olympia, where presumably only Greeks were present) and one of the suitors was the Molossian Alkon, who is mentioned without a patronymic. Alkon could be easily a member of the royal house - even a King of Molossis, but this is not certain. If the case is that Alkon was one normal (non-royal) Molossian citizen, then we have a plain proof that Molossians, not members of royal house, were considered Greek by Greeks. If not, its the tip of the iceberg that members of the Royal house of Molossis (members of this royal house were among others, Olympias, the mother of Alexander the Great and Pyrrhus) were undoubtely Greek in the eyes of Greeks.
By the 5th century, we find Themistocles seeking refuge at the court of a Molossian King Admetus, having no problem to communicate and later we know that Tharyps - Admetus son - had been educated in Athens and brought new customs to his people.
In reference to archaeological findings, the conclusive evidence is in the decrees of the Molossian state, c. 369 BC which are entirely Greek in language, onomastics and tribal names such as Celaethi, Omphales, Tripolitae, Triphylae, etc. Furthermore these decrees were deposited at Dodona (perhaps the most famous Greek oracle and under Molossian control since the early fifth century) and they are Greek incriptions written not in a learned artificial language but in a nothern Greek dialect. Considering this, It would be again safe to conclude that Molossians were greek-speakers.
As the Molossian cluster of tribes in the time of Hecateaus included the Orestae, Pelagones, Lyncestae, Tymphaei and Elimiotae, we can say with confidence that these tribes were greek-speaking too, as it is incoceivable that such a cluster included tribes speaking different languages. Furthermore inscriptional evidence of the Chaones is lacking until the Hellenistic period but nevertheless Scylax, describing the region around 380, put the southern limit of the Illyrians just north of the Chaones, which indicates that Chaones didnt speak Illyrian. In addition the acceptance of Chaones into the Epirote Alliance in 330 suggests strongly that they were also greek-speaking.
Edited by Perseas
A mathematician is a person who thinks that if there are supposed to be three people in a room, but five come out, then two more must enter the room in order for it to be empty.
In the next generation Cleisthenes1 the tyrant of Sicyon raised that house still higher, so that it grew much more famous in Hellas than it had formerly been. Cleisthenes son of Aristonymus son of Myron son of Andreas had one daughter, whose name was Agariste. He desired to wed her to the best man he could find in Hellas. [2] It was the time of the Olympian games, and when he was victor there with a four-horse chariot, Cleisthenes made a proclamation that whichever Greek thought himself worthy to be his son-in-law should come on the sixtieth day from then or earlier to Sicyon, and Cleisthenes would make good his promise of marriage in a year from that sixtieth day. [3] Then all the Greeks who were proud of themselves and their country came as suitors, and to that end Cleisthenes had them compete in running and wrestling contests.
From Italy came Smindyrides of Sybaris, son of Hippocrates, the most luxurious liver of his day (and Sybaris was then at the height of its prosperity), and Damasus of Siris, son of that Amyris who was called the Wise. [2] These came from Italy; from the Ionian Gulf, Amphimnestus son of Epistrophus, an Epidamnian; he was from the Ionian Gulf. From Aetolia came Males, the brother of that Titormus who surpassed all the Greeks in strength, and fled from the sight of men to the farthest parts of the Aetolian land. [3] From the Peloponnese came Leocedes, son of Phidon the tyrant of Argos, that Phidon who made weights and measures for the Peloponnesians1 and acted more arrogantly than any other Greek; he drove out the Elean contest-directors and held the contests at Olympia himself. This man's son now came, and Amiantus, an Arcadian from Trapezus, son of Lycurgus; and an Azenian from the town of Paeus, Laphanes, son of that Euphorion who, as the Arcadian tale relates, gave lodging to the Dioscuri, and ever since kept open house for all men; and Onomastus from Elis, son of Agaeus. [4] These came from the Peloponnese itself; from Athens Megacles, son of that Alcmeon who visited Croesus, and also Hippocleides son of Tisandrus, who surpassed the Athenians in wealth and looks. From Eretria, which at that time was prosperous, came Lysanias; he was the only man from Euboea. From Thessaly came a Scopad, Diactorides of Crannon; and from the Molossians, Alcon.
From the book of "Royal genealogies" around the world, written in 19th C.
Conclusion is that as early as 580 B.C, it is obvious the Molossian king was considered Greek and his country a part of Hellas, as he was invited and participated as suitor, in a limited "only-for-Greeks" assembly.
A mathematician is a person who thinks that if there are supposed to be three people in a room, but five come out, then two more must enter the room in order for it to be empty.
The oldest archaelogical evidence that show the Greekness of the Epirotans was a Prehistoric vase as also and the tumulus consrtuction. Kantharos-shaped cup from grave 5 of tumulus A at Merope-Pogonion (district of Ioannina). Traces of black paint are preserved on the lower part of the body (h. 0,184 m.).Tumulus are built in the classical mucenean (as called) and found not only in Epirus but also and in Macedonia.
Both are dated to the end of the 11th or the beginning of the 10th century B.C.
I've got some material on this matter by Hilding Thylander [Swedish humanistic institution]. He
starts his book "The greek world" with a study on the pre-indoeuropean
cultures of Greece. "Back in 1958, new excavations were made in
Biotia, Elis (Fthiotida), Epirus, the Ionian Islands and Thessali. It's
clear that those lands were inhabited by Hellinic tribes before 20 000 B.C".
His statements agree with
George Rawlinson theories. Rawlinson has made a great research based also in the sayings of Herodotus:
This one is important...His report on the Cadmeians:
The Cadmeians were the Graeco-Phoenician race (their name merely
signifying "the Easterns"), who in the ante-Trojan times, occupied the
country which was afterwards called Boeotia. Hence the Greek
tragedians, in plays of which ancient Thebes is the scene, invariably
speak of the Thebans.
Now read the extract from his research about the Early Greeks:
Of all the answers that had reached him, this pleased him far the best,
for it seemed incredible that a mule should ever come to be king of the
Medes, and so he concluded that the sovereignty would never depart from
himself or his seed after him. Afterwards he turned his thoughts to the
alliance which he had been recommended to contract, and sought to
ascertain by inquiry which was the most powerful of the Grecian states.
His inquiries pointed out to him two states as pre-eminent above the
rest. These were the Lacedaemonians and the Athenians, the former of
Doric the latter of Ionic blood. And
indeed these two nations had held from very early times the most
distinguished place in Greece, the one being a Pelasgic the other a
Hellenic people, and the one having never quitted its original seats,
while the other had been excessively migratory; for during the reign of
Deucalion, Phthiotis was the country in which the Hellenes dwelt, but
under Dorus, the son of Hellen, they moved to the tract at the base of
Ossa and Olympus, which is called Histiaeotis; forced to retire from
that region by the Cadmeians, [1] they settled, under the name of
Macedni, in the chain of Pindus*. Hence they once more removed and came
to Dryopis; and from Dryopis having entered the Peloponnese in this
way, they became known as Dorians.
Since Cadmeians and Pelasgians are considered a pre-indoeuropean tribes that could fill the time gap we were talking about. Since those two tribes arrived that early at the cental parts of Greece, it wouldn't be that difficult to get to Epirus. From Dryopis the access to epirus is quite easy through the mountains of Oiti. However, I don't know if Epirus had a friendly climate by that time Thylander is talking about, since when those two tribes arrived, Europe was still going through it's last ice age. Epirus is no doubt a cold place.
Anyhow, the inhabitants of Phtiotis moved to Pindus according to Rawlinson and called themselves Macedni (Macedonians). Pindus is a natural border between Macedonia and Epirus which means that it's very easy for the Macedni to move to the greater areas of Epirus.
Since we are refering to an area of th Balkans, this may be of interest to readers here
...
I just saw on the Discovery Channel's Daily Planet that Amateur
archaeologist Semir Osmanagic recently announced that he has uncovered
proof that a four-sided hill in the town of Visoko, Bosnia, is an
ancient manmade structure.
Web searches has found more info on it but you can draw your own conclusions.
Since we are refering to an area of th Balkans, this may be of interest to readers here
...
I just saw on the Discovery Channel's Daily Planet that Amateur
archaeologist Semir Osmanagic recently announced that he has uncovered
proof that a four-sided hill in the town of Visoko, Bosnia, is an
ancient manmade structure.
Web searches has found more info on it but you can draw your own conclusions.
I've seen that too. However, nobody can deside about it's exact age. And the question is "Is it a real pyramid?". It looks more like a mountain formed in that shape. A similar mountain was found in Peloponisos and ofcourse people started saying it was 30000, 200000, 1 000 000 years old etc. In the end it was prooved that the pyramid was a naturaly formed mountain (extremely well shaped though) where people had created tombs within it.
Those pyramid things in the Balcans make people a bit too excited...don't know. Pyramids do exist in the Balcans but why are the real pyramids smaller if they were built in the bronse age? Why did they stop making them? Why did the Mychenean style of tombs get more popular?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum