Ghengis Khan

"Note my sentence again. By "it" I was describing Mongolia. Note that the noun closest to "it" is  Mongolia. Do you need a grammer lesson? And were you not just saying that China made Mongolia under its control more prosperous???"

I don't need any grammer lesson, its you that need to learn how to read, you clearly mentioned "outer mongolia" are you having memory problems coupled with stupidity and poor reading?

"I was talking about Hong Kong becoming more prosperous by the way not Brits.

Well, Hong Kong was taken over during 19th century so Brits have a good claim. Hong Kong is British according to your logic. "

No, because the British agreed to return it after 99 years, it was a lease not a gain. learn some history before you act stupid again.

"A lot of Hong Kongers detest Chinese takeover, that is why so many of them immigrated. "

And alot don't while the far majority didn't migrate.

"Did they have a system to vote governors? Yes... Do they now have a system to vote for their representatives? I don't think so. "

Oh well, they are lucky that they could vote at all.

"You were justifying Chinese takeover of Outter Mongolia, since int became much more prosperous. Thus British are also justified in taking over Hong Kong and in their whole Opium War. "

China never took over outer mongolia and become more prosperous you idiot, if you are talking about inner mongolia, there is nothing about taking over, the territory is formally recognized to be part of China. If you are talking about the 18th century, all countries in the world are taking over others when they have the chance, China is one of the least agressive ones for your stupidity.

"Thus they should have kept Hong Kong. Thus they should have taken over whole China and civillized it like they did in Hong Kong. Dosn't this resemble your arugment?"

If they could treat the Chinese as equals of British which they didn't yes, they should

"What did he lose in? In being stupid? And did you win?  It apparantly seems so. "

Yes

"Oh and by the way Brits did well in fighting Opium War - look at Hong Kong, how more civillized, advanced, sophisticated it is to China.  Isn't that your logic?"

yes, hong kong is more sophisticated, advanced, and civilized than China thats a fact, so what are you trying to prove? You bring up random topics like you always do.

And I didn't know you could tell the future, you must be a psychic or just an ignorant loser. And from what you've about mongolia been more progressive than PRC, its clear you're the later.

"True, the Han, Tang, Song and Ming lasted more than the Yuan, but they never controlled the total area now controlled by the PRC. "

Neither did the Yuan, xing jiang was not part of the Yuan empire.

"Too bad, you never mentioned the rich in the sentence or in the sentence before neither did you use a pronoun to reference them thus naturally "virtually all" means virtually all Chinese"

No,l since we are talking about the rich, it clearly means the rich, not my problem you don't understand it.

"I said I will read it tomarrow... how is that avoiding? "

You are avoiding the whole topic since I mentioned sui, Qin and jin were all shorter dynasties than Yuan, thus your statement of Yuan been short lived because its mongol is already proven invalid, and you're constantly avoiding it.