Connection Between Easter Island & Indus Scripts

Kindly go to the page six to see the similarity of Indus & easter Island scripts

What has the Indologists,Srchaeologists & linguists like Max mueller,,Ralph.T.H.Griffith ,Prof.Micheal witzel,Albrecht Weber,Nicholas Kazanas , John Marshall ,J.M.Kenoyer to do with Indus valley..?

Their rep[orts are considered to be the most authentic about Indus valley

Similarity of Idus Script & Easter Island script(rongorongo)

Comparative study of signages used by different civilizations

 

 

The difference is that European scholars are not bias, a tamil or south indian scholar will always try to connect south india with indus valley civilization, because they are convinced that indus valley was dravdian

Your statement that European scholars being not biased is not right.There are many who are biased.

And your concept about South Indian scholars is also wrong.I have no biase towards anything and have never claimed that Indus valley is dravidian.

They may be direct ancestors of people of Northwest India and pakistan.But their culture and religion now exists only in India.

And many branches of Indus saraswati valley people due to natural calamities and other reasons had migrated to gangetic plains and different parts of East & South India spreading the culture and religion from very early ages.

Tamil Scholars like Iravatham mahadevan who is a very strong proponant of Aryan Invasion is claiming the Indus saraswati Valley civilization to be dravidian and He & "Asko Parpola" had also put forth a dravidian decipherment of Indus valley scripts.

They say that Harappan wasa dravidian civilization and the blue eyed white skinned horse riding Aryans came from central Asia/Germany/Greece/Russia and destroyed all the harappan cities and conquered it resulting in the southward migration of dravidian speaking people.

This theory is not justified by even the earliest tamil literature.Genetis and Archaeology also is against such a theory.Genetical studies had proved consistancy in the skull(cranium) sizes of indus valley remains from a perion from 7000BC till 600BC showing no signs of an invasion or a genetical distortion or racial mixing.

To claim the Indus valley ancestry you dont need to justify the false theory of Aryan Invasion.

Harappan civilization was a very large civilization which spreaded on a very large land scape.The Rakhigarhi site is only a 100km from Delhi.ie Yamuna is only 100km away from this site Ganges(Meerut) is only 35 km North East of Delhi ie 135 Km or even closer to Rakhigarhi.There are many new arxchaeological sites excavated on the banks of ganges at different locations in Uttarpradesh and they have shown homogenity in utensils ,art & crafts and culture with that of Indus-saraswati valley.The archaeological sites of Jhusi and Lohardewa were of farming communities and were dated bck to 7100BC by well known archaeologists.

The first sites of the civilization to be uncovered were Moenjodaro & Harappa. Only time will tell the real span and impact of the civilization.

Proofs ...? proofs are plenty that too attested by archaeologists,Pashupati.Lakshmi idol,fire altars and many.. And those just mean they were following Vedic religion like us Hindus..,even if you disagree.

Will you provide some proof & photo graphs for the same... ie of other civilizations

For Idols  similar to that of harappan shivalinga,proto shiva,fertility goddess dating back to 3000BC and fire altars with kiln fired bricks placed in 5 layers in different patterns dating back to 2900BC..