Sanskrit and the people who spoke it?

I don't know which children stories are you reading, but there is 0.00 % evidence in your out of India theory. 10000 years ago (8000 BCE) people in the near-east were much more advanced (agriculture) than people in India! People from the Mesopotamia introduced agriculture to the Indus valley people. Even 2000 BCE people in the northern parts of the Mesopotamia were more advanced than people in the Indus valley. Aryans from Kurdistan introduced iron smithing to the Indus valley people around 1800 BCE. These are facts!!!

Edited by MediaWarLord - 29-Apr-2011 at 20:42

Originally posted by MediaWarLord I don't know which children stories are you reading, but there is 0.00 % evidence in your out of India theory. 10000 years ago (8000 BCE) people in the near-east were much more advanced (agriculture) than people in India! People from the Mesopotamia introduced agriculture to the Indus valley people. Even 2000 BCE people in the northern parts of the Mesopotamia were more advanced than people in the Indus valley. Aryans from Kurdistan introduced iron smithing to the Indus valley people around 1800 BCE. These are facts!!!

Edited by balochii - 01-May-2011 at 20:51

Originally posted by balochii but i think your posts are kurdish nationalistic too. In Balochistan, Pakistan at mehrgarh their is evidence of farming as early as 7000 B.C, which is 9000 years ago. I agree this has

So what, your posts are very nationalistic too. Even extreme, full of hatred toward India and her population!

^ what are the facts according to you? that india is the mother land of the world, i am not against indians only against indian or any other nationlistics who twist the facts to make their fantasies come true

To MediaWarLord:

Where is the evidence of Aryan Migration in Indian Subcontinent? Since you seem to believe in it give us the evidence please.

Aryan Migration is just a theory and NOT A FACT. Is that hard to understand? THE EVIDENCE FOR IT IS NON-EXISTENT.

I gave you a link where Out Of India theory has been explained. Did you read it ? If so, please explain what is so absurd about it. If you haven't read it, I suggest you read it first http://indo-european.eu/wiki/index.php/Out_of_India_theory.

You say that in 8000 BC people in the near east were much more advanced than in India. Do you have any facts to back up this claim?

The earliest Harappan settlement is Mehrgarh according to present evidence.
 
The earliest settlement at Mehrgarh—in the northeast corner of the 495-acre (2.00 km²) site—was a small farming village dated between 7000 BC to 5500 BC.

In April 2006, it was announced in the scientific journal Nature that the oldest (and first early Neolithic) evidence in human history for the drilling of teeth in vivo (i.e. in a living person) was found in Mehrgarh.

What makes you think that in 2000 BC the people in the northern parts of mesopotamia were more advanced than people in Indus Valley ? Can you give us some evidence for that claim of yours ?

You said "Aryans from Kurdistan introduced iron smithing to the Indus valley people around 1800 BCE. These are facts!!!". Can you provide me a source for this information of yours ?

Dear Balochi, didn't mean to hurt you, but I do think you sometimes draw extreme conclusions. I think India and Pakistan has shared history, few things happened in todays pakistan and few in present India but lots were shared with each other. 

Edited by innocent - 03-May-2011 at 07:57

Great thread guys.  Let's keep it going like this and keep our collective cool.

Edited by MediaWarLord - 03-May-2011 at 09:54

Indo-European origins: Neolithic Anatolia still the best hypothesis   http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2011/04/indo-european-origins-neolithic.html   http://dienekes.ifreepages.com/blog/archives/000434.html