Iranian, Turkic, Causcasian Language Grou

Found these a while ago, wanted to post it here give some people understanding

Turkic Language GroupLink


Caucasian Language GroupLink


Iranian Language GroupLink

and by this what do you mean?

"people who claim land over language language rights"

Balochi-Iran,Kurd-Iran/Irak/Turkey,Turks,Iranians, Georgia-Turkey, Armenia-Turkey ?

What really bug's me is 'Indo-Persian' idea because it seems to be more political than anything, if you look at the maps persian is exclusive to the area shown above and perhaps if you put in the scynthians it goes around the black sea also.. and thats it. But turkic languages stretch further across the globe, Im pretty sure that further research on the area's in Russia will show more population than shown on that map.

Now if persian had been a dominant language it would be more wide'ly spoken, but it isnt, I dont know Im not a linguist.. maybe all the well, any linguist here want to explain this situation? and pls no racist comments

And no, Iranian languages are not a political invention, Iranian languages have distinct similitarities which has led LINGUISTS and not NATIONALISTS to group them into one family. 

Persian is a dominant language. Dari/Tajiki/Farsi are mutually comprehensible and are essentially the same language, they are spread from almost the furthest West to the furthest East shown on teh map above.

And I don't know how you can be sure that evidence exists showing Turkic people were more widespread than already known when there is hardly even any circumstantial evidence for it.

 

adding to my post, I said please no racist arguments..

The word racist is just another way for the communists too shut us up.  Eveeryone in some degree or another is racist.  I'm a nationalist, if you have read some of my posts, it's obvious.  I don't mind being called.  Zagros, as I can tell from your eyes and nose, your persian.  (you have the same eyes and nose as my ex persian girlfriend). 

 

We shold always remember that race and language don't always have a coorellation.  Are Dominicans Spanish?  NOOOOO  Are hatians French?  NOOOOOOOO.  Race matters, don't fool yourselves people.

Originally posted by baracuda No area belongs to any-one, we live, work the land, produce, care for it defend it and then die on it.. thats all..

Well, I don't know about you, but I paid a very painful amount of money for half a hectar last year, and that land BLOODY BELONGS to me!

(I know, of course, that one day I will become fertiliser, but my offsprings will take over...)

that is not me, I fail to see how you can descern she is persian.

you can find me on this page: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=435& PN=1&TPN=11

I guess your PMs will stop now

Originally posted by baracuda Iranian Language GroupLink

 

This map is relatively correct, although its dated 1999 during the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.  Kabul is a multilingual town, and Dari and Pashto are both used interchangeably in business, while Dari is more predominate.  Also southwest of Kabul, in the province of Wardak, the province is primarily Pashto speakers.

I find this map to be much better:

I didnt post the first map, Baracuda did.  I was simply correcting the Afghan region part of the map, I know Im being rather nitipicky, but in a general term these maps are alright, but as a person who is from an area that is marked incorrectly, it doesnt make me feel any more confident about its accuracy.