What I meant is that it is ignorant to plainly say area x belongs to people x becxause of language when there may be millions of people y also living int he same area. it was a general statement.

And no, Iranian languages are not a political invention, Iranian languages have distinct similitarities which has led LINGUISTS and not NATIONALISTS to group them into one family. 

Persian is a dominant language. Dari/Tajiki/Farsi are mutually comprehensible and are essentially the same language, they are spread from almost the furthest West to the furthest East shown on teh map above.

And I don't know how you can be sure that evidence exists showing Turkic people were more widespread than already known when there is hardly even any circumstantial evidence for it.

where was i racist I was only stating it is ignorant to claim land as belonging to x or y based on whatever. Further, with regard to Turkic I said what is already known. I didnt expect u to take exception to what i said.

The word racist is just another way for the communists too shut us up.  Eveeryone in some degree or another is racist.  I'm a nationalist, if you have read some of my posts, it's obvious.  I don't mind being called.  Zagros, as I can tell from your eyes and nose, your persian.  (you have the same eyes and nose as my ex persian girlfriend). 

We shold always remember that race and language don't always have a coorellation.  Are Dominicans Spanish?  NOOOOO  Are hatians French?  NOOOOOOOO.  Race matters, don't fool yourselves people.

niceone what is your superior race?

that is not me, I fail to see how you can descern she is persian.

you can find me on this page: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=435&PN=1&TPN=11 - http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=435& PN=1&TPN=11

I guess your PMs will stop now

Communists did a righ thing. Some of their ideas are really sensible.

I totally agree. And I dont think Zagros was being anu racist at all. No need to get paranoid.

But anyway, Anatolia belongs to me, you can share anywhere else...

Originally posted by baracuda Iranian Language Group http://titus.fkidg1.uni-frankfurt.de/didact/karten/iran/irann.htm - Link

This map is relatively correct, although its dated 1999 during the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.  Kabul is a multilingual town, and Dari and Pashto are both used interchangeably in business, while Dari is more predominate.  Also southwest of Kabul, in the province of Wardak, the province is primarily Pashto speakers.

I find this map to be much better:

Originally posted by Afghanan Originally posted by baracuda Iranian Language Group http://titus.fkidg1.uni-frankfurt.de/didact/karten/iran/irann.htm - Link   This map is relatively correct, although its dated 1999 during the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.  Kabul is a multilingual town, and Dari and Pashto are both used interchangeably in business, while Dari is more predominate.  Also southwest of Kabul, in the province of Wardak, the province is primarily Pashto speakers. I find this map to be much better:

The 1st map you sent is not entirely true, around the Van lake there are Turkish speaking isolated areas, Van Agri and Bitlis(Tatvan) is not entirely Kurmanji speaking. In the north of Aras river there are only some small Kurmanji settlements, North of Aras is mostly Azeri Turkic speaking. In the western coast of the Van lake only in the shore there are Turkic speaking areas the rest is Kurdicized. Kurmanji is also spoken in the areas located westward from the Firat River towards Mediterranean Coast and into inner Anatolia but it is a result of recent immigrations after 1950s. Zaza speaking are is not so expanded but there are many isolated Zazxa speakers among Kurmanji spoken Areas.. That map seems to me a little wrong , if wanted I can e-mail you the true one.