Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

biggest casualties

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: biggest casualties
    Posted: 09-Sep-2004 at 19:39
In the American Civil War the bloodiest Battle was the Battle of Antetium Im not sure of the estimates and sorry for any mispelled words
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Sep-2004 at 02:54
how bout the ardennes campaign....any of you guys has the exact casualties of that one...i think it is as bloody as stalingrad....
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Sep-2004 at 15:30
not even close to Stalingrad...
Back to Top
Evildoer View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 434
  Quote Evildoer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2004 at 16:19

I think the Normandy thing posted on page 1 is Normandy Campaign, not Normandy landing - during the landing the Americans only took 2000 KIA's.

 

Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Sep-2004 at 13:59
even then, even the whole Western front after the landing are nothing compared to Stalingrad...
Back to Top
cavalry4ever View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator Emeritus

Joined: 17-Nov-2004
Location: Virginia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 589
  Quote cavalry4ever Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 11:45
Originally posted by Ralo

In the American Civil War the bloodiest Battle was the Battle of Antetium Im not sure of the estimates and sorry for any mispelled words


Town is called Antietam and it was one the bloodiest battles of the Civil War. On a single day (September 17, 1862) more soldiers were wounded or died in a single day than in any single day of any other battle of the Civil War. Losses (wounded + dead) 12,410 Union and 10,700 Confederate.
Another interesting fact is that US lost more soldiers in the Civil War than in all  wars combined during all of its history and up to the Vietnam War.
Back to Top
azimuth View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
SlaYer'S SlaYer

Joined: 12-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2979
  Quote azimuth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 12:01

i always thought the largest casulties were at the time of the Mongols somewhere in china

i will try to get the battel name

 

 

Back to Top
J.M.Finegold View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
  Quote J.M.Finegold Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 19:18
In two hours of battle Hannibal slaughtered 70,000 Romans on the fields of Cannae - bloodiest day in history. (other than natural disasters)
Back to Top
Ikki View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Guanarteme

Joined: 31-Dec-2004
Location: Spain
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1378
  Quote Ikki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 19:59

I think that Stalingrad.

Cannae for Sword era in Occident.

In Orient, I/Eye said Koguryo vs Sui, that

Back to Top
Murph View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
  Quote Murph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 21:27
Originally posted by Ralo

In the American Civil War the bloodiest Battle was the Battle of Antetium Im not sure of the estimates and sorry for any mispelled words


more people were killed at Gettysburg, but that took place over 3 days

i just whipped out my 2003 Guiness Book of World Records, and it lists the Bloodiest Ancient Battle as The Battle of Cannae (85,700 men)...it also mentioned a reported 250,000 killed at Plataea, but this is considered unreliable as are many other ancient battles

Bloodiest Modern Battle is listed as Stalingrad, with 1, 109,000 killed, along with ovef half a million Soviet wounded.  also mentions the Somme as having 1.22 million casualties (includes wounded)

i dont know, maybe Mr. Guiness is wrong, but thats what it says
Back to Top
TheOrcRemix View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 369
  Quote TheOrcRemix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 00:25
yea, Stalingrad sounds like a winner
True peace is not the absence of tension, but the presence of justice.
Sir Francis Drake is the REAL Pirate of the Caribbean
Back to Top
cattus View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1803
  Quote cattus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 01:49
i have always wondered how many soviets died in on the Russian Front on June 6, 1944.

Edited by Catt
Back to Top
Moller View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 63
  Quote Moller Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 05:49
Extremely difficult to say how many exactly fell at Stalingrad. The chaos and lack of correct reports from the Red Army makes it impossible, but I agree that Stalingrad is a clear winner.

If it counts I think that the siege of Leningrad is secpnd.
Back to Top
Murph View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
  Quote Murph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 17:53
guiness also lists leningrad as the largest seige of all time (including civilian casualties....i don't know how they decide civlian vs military on the russian front)
Back to Top
dark_one View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 04-Sep-2004
Location: Russian Federation
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 454
  Quote dark_one Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 18:18
20mil civilian
7 mil military
That's how it is here. Also up to Verdun Russia holds the records for the bloodiest battles of the 20th century makes me feel proud in a weird way, proud that we endured all that and survived.


Edited by dark_one
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 18:57
I can never understand nationalism, how can you feel proud over something you had nothing whatsoever to do with and weren even around to take part in?
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
demon View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Brazil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1185
  Quote demon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 19:00
Shiloh was pretty bloody, considering it a battle of 17th century.  One record claims that there were so many corpses that one could not step the ground.
Grrr..
Back to Top
Murph View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
  Quote Murph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 21:20
shiloh?

what shiloh is this, the only shiloh i know was in the american civil war (19th century)
Back to Top
dark_one View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 04-Sep-2004
Location: Russian Federation
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 454
  Quote dark_one Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Jan-2005 at 13:35
 Yeah I was gonna say that but I wasn't sure.
Back to Top
J.M.Finegold View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
  Quote J.M.Finegold Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Jan-2005 at 20:40

Originally posted by dark_one

20mil civilian
7 mil military
That's how it is here. Also up to Verdun Russia holds the records for the bloodiest battles of the 20th century makes me feel proud in a weird way, proud that we endured all that and survived.

 

Those casualties are for 1941-1945... total civilian casualties at Leningrad were about 1.6 million.  You probably meant it as so, but I just wanted to clear it up.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.