Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Topic: biggest casualties Posted: 09-Sep-2004 at 19:39 |
In the American Civil War the bloodiest Battle was the Battle of Antetium Im not sure of the estimates and sorry for any mispelled words
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Sep-2004 at 02:54 |
how bout the ardennes campaign....any of you guys has the exact casualties of that one...i think it is as bloody as stalingrad....
|
|
Temujin
King
Sirdar Bahadur
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Sep-2004 at 15:30 |
not even close to Stalingrad...
|
|
Evildoer
Baron
Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 434
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Sep-2004 at 16:19 |
I think the Normandy thing posted on page 1 is Normandy Campaign, not Normandy landing - during the landing the Americans only took 2000 KIA's.
|
|
Temujin
King
Sirdar Bahadur
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Sep-2004 at 13:59 |
even then, even the whole Western front after the landing are nothing compared to Stalingrad...
|
|
cavalry4ever
AE Moderator
Retired AE Moderator Emeritus
Joined: 17-Nov-2004
Location: Virginia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 589
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 11:45 |
Originally posted by Ralo
In the American Civil War the bloodiest Battle was the
Battle of Antetium Im not sure of the estimates and sorry for any
mispelled words |
Town is called Antietam and it was one the bloodiest battles of the
Civil War. On a single day (September 17, 1862) more soldiers were
wounded or died in a single day than in any single day of any other
battle of the Civil War. Losses (wounded + dead) 12,410 Union and
10,700 Confederate.
Another interesting fact is that US lost more soldiers in the Civil War
than in all wars combined during all of its history and up to the
Vietnam War.
|
|
azimuth
Caliph
SlaYer'S SlaYer
Joined: 12-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2979
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 12:01 |
i always thought the largest casulties were at the time of the Mongols somewhere in china
i will try to get the battel name
|
|
|
J.M.Finegold
Baron
Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 19:18 |
In two hours of battle Hannibal slaughtered 70,000 Romans on the fields
of Cannae - bloodiest day in history. (other than natural disasters)
|
|
Ikki
Chieftain
Guanarteme
Joined: 31-Dec-2004
Location: Spain
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1378
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 19:59 |
I think that Stalingrad.
Cannae for Sword era in Occident.
In Orient, I/Eye said Koguryo vs Sui, that
|
|
Murph
Consul
Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 21:27 |
Originally posted by Ralo
In the American Civil War the bloodiest Battle was the
Battle of Antetium Im not sure of the estimates and sorry for any
mispelled words |
more people were killed at Gettysburg, but that took place over 3 days
i just whipped out my 2003 Guiness Book of World Records, and it lists
the Bloodiest Ancient Battle as The Battle of Cannae (85,700 men)...it
also mentioned a reported 250,000 killed at Plataea, but this is
considered unreliable as are many other ancient battles
Bloodiest Modern Battle is listed as Stalingrad, with 1, 109,000
killed, along with ovef half a million Soviet wounded. also
mentions the Somme as having 1.22 million casualties (includes wounded)
i dont know, maybe Mr. Guiness is wrong, but thats what it says
|
|
TheOrcRemix
Consul
Joined: 28-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 369
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 00:25 |
yea, Stalingrad sounds like a winner
|
True peace is not the absence of tension, but the presence of justice.
Sir Francis Drake is the REAL Pirate of the Caribbean
|
|
cattus
Arch Duke
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1803
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 01:49 |
i have always wondered how many soviets died in on the Russian Front on June 6, 1944.
Edited by Catt
|
|
Moller
Knight
Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 63
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 05:49 |
Extremely difficult to say how many exactly fell at Stalingrad. The chaos and lack of correct reports from the Red Army makes it impossible, but I agree that Stalingrad is a clear winner.
If it counts I think that the siege of Leningrad is secpnd.
|
|
Murph
Consul
Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 17:53 |
guiness also lists leningrad as the largest seige of all time
(including civilian casualties....i don't know how they decide civlian
vs military on the russian front)
|
|
dark_one
Baron
Joined: 04-Sep-2004
Location: Russian Federation
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 454
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 18:18 |
20mil civilian
7 mil military
That's how it is here. Also up to Verdun Russia holds the records for
the bloodiest battles of the 20th century makes me feel proud in a
weird way, proud that we endured all that and survived.
Edited by dark_one
|
|
Tobodai
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 18:57 |
I can never understand nationalism, how can you feel proud over something you had nothing whatsoever to do with and weren even around to take part in?
|
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
|
|
demon
Chieftain
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Brazil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1185
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 19:00 |
Shiloh was pretty bloody, considering it a battle of 17th century. One record claims that there were so many corpses that one could not step the ground.
|
Grrr..
|
|
Murph
Consul
Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 21:20 |
shiloh?
what shiloh is this, the only shiloh i know was in the american civil war (19th century)
|
|
dark_one
Baron
Joined: 04-Sep-2004
Location: Russian Federation
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 454
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jan-2005 at 13:35 |
Yeah I was gonna say that but I wasn't sure.
|
|
J.M.Finegold
Baron
Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Jan-2005 at 20:40 |
Originally posted by dark_one
20mil civilian 7 mil military That's how it is here. Also up to Verdun Russia holds the records for the bloodiest battles of the 20th century makes me feel proud in a weird way, proud that we endured all that and survived.
|
Those casualties are for 1941-1945... total civilian casualties at Leningrad were about 1.6 million. You probably meant it as so, but I just wanted to clear it up.
|
|