Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Topic: America under Islam Posted: 25-Jan-2014 at 01:00 |
Originally posted by julian-the-apostate
The Spanish gained their rapid foothold in South America mainly because by sheer coincidence the Inca had a myth that their fair skinned creator god would return from the Western ocean bringing the last age of the Inca to an end, so when a few hundred fair skinned Europeans turned up from the West, the Inca didn't put up any resistance, they welcomed the Spanish as returning gods and surrendered their empire and civilisation.
By the time they realised they weren't gods it was too late.
Imagine if a few hundred dark skinned, turbaned guys had turned up looking for trouble instead? Do you think the Incan Empire would have been so friendly...? |
Maybe? But I doubt it!
Ron
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
|
julian-the-apostate
Immortal Guard
Joined: 11-Jan-2014
Location: Here
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2014 at 10:35 |
The Spanish gained their rapid foothold in South America mainly because by sheer coincidence the Inca had a myth that their fair skinned creator god would return from the Western ocean bringing the last age of the Inca to an end, so when a few hundred fair skinned Europeans turned up from the West, the Inca didn't put up any resistance, they welcomed the Spanish as returning gods and surrendered their empire and civilisation.
By the time they realised they weren't gods it was too late.
Imagine if a few hundred dark skinned, turbaned guys had turned up looking for trouble instead? Do you think the Incan Empire would have been so friendly...?
|
Carthago delander est
|
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Jan-2014 at 00:57 |
Yeah, so I can say anything regarding Islam here?
I doubt it!
Ron
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
|
KongMing
Knight
Joined: 09-May-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 58
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Dec-2013 at 16:10 |
Originally posted by Baal Melqart
No Rock n' Roll that's for sure...
|
Go forth and conquer the American Caliphate, dear Emperor!!!
|
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 30-Nov-2013 at 22:18 |
Huh? "Millions of Muslim slaves?" Well I do confess that it was Muslim leaders that did confine millions of persons in West Africa under their control and sell them to the highest bidders.
Is that what you had in mind to say?
regards, Ron
|
|
Don Quixote
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Jan-2013 at 07:37 |
I fully support my associate here. We are trying to secure a civil atmosphere here; and if someone, anyone, is dissatisfied, there is another level one can go to and voice his/her dissatisfaction.
Edited by Don Quixote - 20-Jan-2013 at 07:51
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jan-2013 at 16:30 |
Originally posted by Mountain Man
Originally posted by Mountain Man
Interesting topic, but against forum rules to openly discuss.
In my view, anything can be discussed as long as people remain civil
|
Not according to posts on this forum by administrators, and the sheer number of people banned or punished for relatively innocuous remarks. The preponderance of evidence is against you on this one, and Islam is a hot-button topic not amenable to criticism.
If you really want to have this as an open discussion, without arbitrary determinations of what is "civil", say so in print, right here, and I'll take you up on it, but remember, History can be a harsh and unforgiving mistress.
|
What is an innocuous remark or not; and what is subsequently viewed as a violation, which may or may not be acted on, or in what ever fashion...is not your responsibility to determine. Nor is it yours to determine what is 'civil' for the purpose of determining the aforementioned or in the moderation of the forum at large. You know this. I have been required to restate this on no less then four occasions this week. If this is your concern and you feel there has been an intemperate display and you have specific examples to defend your allegation...then you know the drill. PM the admin-owner is your option. Not open forum. I just stated it above. I wont do it again. For what ever reason you've decided to make it an issue and apparently decided to deliberately disregard my comment. The consequence? Do it again and I'll suspend you for trolling and failing to adhere to staff guidance. As of now your warned. Bl? If your no longer happy with being here then leave...or adhere to the decisions made by staff no matter who or why they were made. But what you wont be allowed to do is challenge the authority of the staff. CV
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|
Mountain Man
General
Joined: 16-Aug-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 873
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jan-2013 at 15:39 |
Originally posted by Mountain Man
Interesting topic, but against forum rules to openly discuss.
In my view, anything can be discussed as long as people remain civil
| Not according to posts on this forum by administrators, and the sheer number of people banned or punished for relatively innocuous remarks. The preponderance of evidence is against you on this one, and Islam is a hot-button topic not amenable to criticism.If you really want to have this as an open discussion, without arbitrary determinations of what is "civil", say so in print, right here, and I'll take you up on it, but remember, History can be a harsh and unforgiving mistress.
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
|
Mountain Man
General
Joined: 16-Aug-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 873
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jan-2013 at 15:37 |
Interesting topic, but against forum rules to openly discuss.
In my view, anything can be discussed as long as people remain civil
[/QUOTE]
Not according to posts on this forum by administrators, and the sheer number of people banned or punished for relatively innocuous remarks. The preponderance of evidence is against you on this one.
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jan-2013 at 15:19 |
Originally posted by Mountain Man
Originally posted by Nick1986
In an alternative history, Christopher Columbus is mocked and dismissed by both the Spanish and Portuguese, so he offers his services to the Turks. The sultan provides Columbus with a ship and promise of reward if he claims the new land for Islam. What would the USA be like today if it was colonised by Muslims rather than the English and Spaniards? Would Europe be more or less advanced, and would America be independent or remain under the caliph's control?
|
Interesting topic, but against forum rules to openly discuss.
|
If it was it wouldn't be. This is not a topic dealing with proselytization or extreme nationalism but of a historical alternate version of NA colonization....government...conditions...effects...repercussions and social cultural development....among a few. Iow. old dog don't create that which is not necessary.....if there's a beef ya know the drill.....take it PM.
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jan-2013 at 15:16 |
Originally posted by Mountain Man
Originally posted by Nick1986
In an alternative history, Christopher Columbus is mocked and dismissed by both the Spanish and Portuguese, so he offers his services to the Turks. The sultan provides Columbus with a ship and promise of reward if he claims the new land for Islam. What would the USA be like today if it was colonised by Muslims rather than the English and Spaniards? Would Europe be more or less advanced, and would America be independent or remain under the caliph's control?
|
Interesting topic, but against forum rules to openly discuss.
|
In my view, anything can be discussed as long as people remain civil
Edited by Nick1986 - 19-Jan-2013 at 15:17
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
Mountain Man
General
Joined: 16-Aug-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 873
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jan-2013 at 15:04 |
Originally posted by Nick1986
In an alternative history, Christopher Columbus is mocked and dismissed by both the Spanish and Portuguese, so he offers his services to the Turks. The sultan provides Columbus with a ship and promise of reward if he claims the new land for Islam. What would the USA be like today if it was colonised by Muslims rather than the English and Spaniards? Would Europe be more or less advanced, and would America be independent or remain under the caliph's control?
| Interesting topic, but against forum rules to openly discuss.
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
|
Baal Melqart
General
Joined: 28-Mar-2011
Location: UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 869
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jan-2013 at 13:39 |
Originally posted by Nick1986
Originally posted by Baal Melqart
No Rock n' Roll that's for sure...
|
I thought the four string guitar was a Saracen invention. The backbeat was originally derived from traditional African drumming
|
You're talking about Oud which has generally mellow and relaxed tunes. I don't think an Islamic America would invent something upbeat like Rock n' Roll but then that's my opinion.
|
Timidi mater non flet
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jan-2013 at 08:58 |
Originally posted by Baal Melqart
No Rock n' Roll that's for sure...
|
I thought the four string guitar was a Saracen invention. The backbeat was originally derived from traditional African drumming
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Jan-2013 at 09:36 |
Azita, if you want something to chew on, look into the evidence of Islamic influence in Pre-Columbian Southeast US. There are several scientists who have been researching this for the last 3-4 years. It was all started by an epigrapher who started looking at place names. Example, Tallahasee.
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
Azita
Pretorian
Suspended
Joined: 13-Oct-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 162
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Jan-2013 at 06:57 |
What religion would have been predominate in the the Arab-controlled Trans-Saharan region? BUT, the conversion to Islam would have been forced, so I concede that most of the slaves would not have been "true" muslims. The traders that the slavers deal with, many would be Muslims.
Muslims were not "supposed " to enslave other Muslims, im sure we all know how strictly the word of Allah is adhered too..........
millions of Muslims to America,? ok as a salve to the usual reaction, tens of thousands out of the millions. hope that makes things better.
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Jan-2013 at 00:01 |
Originally posted by Azita
OK, I confess that this comment is rather provocative, I hope the hard of thinking wont get too excited.
The USA was NOT colonised BY Muslims. But it was colonised USING Muslims, Millions of Muslims slaves, from British colonial time to the late 19th century.
Azita
|
Could you provide some credible sources for those numbers. I'm somewhat familiar with the slave trade, primarily dealing with various regions they came from and social and religious practices. The numbers don't jive with what I have read over the years. Particularly when some of the most active slavers were themselves Islamic, I think you will find the actual number quite low.
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
Baal Melqart
General
Joined: 28-Mar-2011
Location: UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 869
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Jan-2013 at 19:35 |
No Rock n' Roll that's for sure...
|
Timidi mater non flet
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Jan-2013 at 18:18 |
Originally posted by Azita
OK, I confess that this comment is rather provocative, I hope the hard of thinking wont get too excited.
The USA was NOT colonised BY Muslims. But it was colonised USING Muslims, Millions of Muslims slaves, from British colonial time to the late 19th century.
Azita
|
Not just the Brits...by definition that would also include Muslim slaves sold, after capture and prior to conversion, by Muslim slave traders in Africa the ME and India. Not to mention the same source servicing the French-Dutch-Spanish and Portuguese. Muslims made some of the greatest of slave traders.
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|
Menumorut
Chieftain
Joined: 02-Jun-2006
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1423
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Jan-2013 at 16:07 |
It would be a muslim territory and not many people would want to immigrate, including muslims, who also prefer free world.
|
|
|