Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

what if the nationalists didnt lose mainland china?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Herschel View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 30-Oct-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 172
  Quote Herschel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: what if the nationalists didnt lose mainland china?
    Posted: 27-Apr-2006 at 01:27
I'm surprised no one has mentioned a split China yet. I would predict a Communistic North and a Nationalist South.

Beijing vs. Shanghai
Yellow River  vs. Yangtze River
Wheat vs. Rice
Soviet sphere vs. NATO sphere
Back to Top
Killabee View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 01-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 269
  Quote Killabee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Apr-2006 at 19:57
All I can say at least 80 millions lives can be spared if KMT retained as the ruling party.
Back to Top
R_AK47 View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
  Quote R_AK47 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 13:42
Yes, the KMT would have been much better for China than the communists.
Back to Top
Killabee View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 01-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 269
  Quote Killabee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 19:12

Originally posted by Herschel

I'm surprised no one has mentioned a split China yet. I would predict a Communistic North and a Nationalist South.

Beijing vs. Shanghai
Yellow River  vs. Yangtze River
Wheat vs. Rice
Soviet sphere vs. NATO sphere

It was actually proposed by  Chiang's KMT when he was chased after by CCP but turned down by Mao who knew he could overthrow Chiang easily.

 



Edited by Killabee
Back to Top
poirot View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Editorial Staff

Joined: 21-May-2005
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1838
  Quote poirot Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 19:28

*actually, the KMT and the Soviets maintained on friendly terms, and Soviets did not officially recognize the PRC until it was evident that the PRC would prevail.  Generalissmo Chiang was actually quite anti-American in person, and only realist politics drove him to embrace pro-US policies.  Washington even plotted to supplant Chiang with General Sun Liren, a West Point graduate who was more pro-American and more controllable than the old man. 

China's turn toward communism was inevitable, and only a matter of time.  Nowdays, we blame the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, and indeed, they stymied progress, but if one took out those two from the equation, a socialist/communist regime worked better for China at the time.  China during the 1950s, right after the communist takeover and before Mao's mind became unhinged, was far better, on average, and for the average worker, than China during the 1940s under  KMT rule.

The best route would be communist takeover without the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. 



Edited by poirot
AAAAAAAAAA
"The crisis of yesterday is the joke of tomorrow.�   ~ HG Wells
           
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.096 seconds.