Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

what if the nationalists didnt lose mainland china?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
coolstorm View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote coolstorm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: what if the nationalists didnt lose mainland china?
    Posted: 02-Dec-2004 at 09:56
what would've happened instead?
Back to Top
babyblue View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174
  Quote babyblue Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Dec-2004 at 09:58
 oh....setting up this topic to give me heart attacks?
Back to Top
coolstorm View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote coolstorm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Dec-2004 at 10:02
why heart attacks?
Back to Top
mongke View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 02-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 105
  Quote mongke Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Dec-2004 at 22:09
The nationalist would have continued being a corrupt regime until a popular uprising breaks up their monopoly.  
Back to Top
Romano Nero View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
  Quote Romano Nero Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Dec-2004 at 23:45
They couldn't. If they could, China would end up as another US-NATO colonies in the third wirld, a large country, with endless resources, a corrupt regime and no policy of her own.
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 01:43

probably, but it could also have become an Asian tiger earlier with better free market policies, like South Korea or Japan and with Chinas resources and manpower it would easily eclipse those two.

"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
Liang Jieming View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 30-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 65
  Quote Liang Jieming Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 02:33
I agree with Tobodai.  It might have become a economic powerhouse by the 1970s, not hindered by the failures of the Great Leap Forward or the Cultural Revolution, and eclipsed everyone else in the region, including Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan and all the other "tigers" of SEA... but they would have had to clean up their house first though.  However, if Taiwan today is any judge of what might have been, it'd say this senario is not unlikely.

An earlier Chinese powerhouse would have made the Japanese economic miracle still-born and the Koreans and the rest of the region as support economies of the Chinese market, just like what China's current ascension is likely to do.

Jieming
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DragonSeedLegacy
Back to Top
Romano Nero View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
  Quote Romano Nero Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 03:21

This is an extremely optimistic scenario, which doesn't take into account the actual historical evidence. Taiwan and S. Korea are not comparable to China, by no means.

But still, the nationalists couldn't prevail.

Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 12:45

Originally posted by Romano Nero

China would end up as another US-NATO colonies in the third wirld, a large country, with endless resources, a corrupt regime and no policy of her own.

 

that's what mroe or less already has happened. it's basically the revival of Batista Cuba...

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 15:07

under the KMT's corrupt regime,

  • the scourge of opium addiction continues
  • uncontrollable populationn growth; China's population would be much higher than the current 1.3 billion
    • The Tibet region would almost be de-populated
      • continuing the alarming trend over the past centuries---owing to addherence to strict religious practice, under the Dalai Lama, of celibacy
  • much lower literacy rate

Thus, on this basis, China would most probably be no more successful than India.

 

Back to Top
Romano Nero View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
  Quote Romano Nero Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 16:05
Originally posted by Temujin

Originally posted by Romano Nero

China would end up as another US-NATO colonies in the third wirld, a large country, with endless resources, a corrupt regime and no policy of her own.

 

that's what mroe or less already has happened. it's basically the revival of Batista Cuba...

I think currently China pushes forward their own agenda. They are drawing capital from the west, selling (extremely) cheap their labor, creating a middle class... they are pulling together for a capitalist transformation.

Batista's Cuba was just a corrupt protectorate (not of the US government, but) of the US corporations and mega-sharks, not a sovereign nation.

Back to Top
mongke View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 02-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 105
  Quote mongke Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 22:06
I'm not quite sure that china would have developed much faster under KMT. It would have taken the regime and the country time to clean up their act. The problem is that Chiang Kai Shek eventhough he was a strong politician, he really did not have much of a track record on economic affairs. I would say that at best China would have begun the path of developing as it is now in the mid 60's. There just way too many things that needed cleaning up.
Back to Top
Liang Jieming View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 30-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 65
  Quote Liang Jieming Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 22:16
Originally posted by Romano Nero

This is an extremely optimistic scenario, which doesn't take into account the actual historical evidence. Taiwan and S. Korea are not comparable to China, by no means.

But still, the nationalists couldn't prevail.


hehehe, yeah fairly optimistic viewpoint though not that remote a possibility either.  All speculation anyways.  It depends on so many factors that your guess is as good as mine coz anything could have happened.  The opposite could also occur with the corruption and stranglehold of the old aristocratic houses styming progress since they would not have been swept away by the cultural revolution.

Jieming
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DragonSeedLegacy
Back to Top
warhead View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
  Quote warhead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2004 at 23:38

"probably, but it could also have become an Asian tiger earlier with better free market policies, like South Korea or Japan and with Chinas resources and manpower it would easily eclipse those two."

 

As if,

 

The growth under nationalist was anything but fast, infact it was stagnating;

The growth under communist was much faster with an average annual growth rate for 1953-1974 as 5.6 percent in GNP, 3.4 percent in GDP per capita; 10.5 percent in industrial production, 2.4 percent in agricultural production, 2.2 percent in population.
By its size, this growth has pushed China to higher level of global power. In 1976 China hand 4.7 percent of the world's share in GNP which is the 6th largest in the world. All this is comparing to a China prior to PRC which had virtually no industry and power. And this is not it. In scientific acheivement, the PRC produced its atomic weapon in 1964, its first space satellite in 1970, ballistic missiles at the same time. It became a major regional power a potential global power and an important actor in international politics, all of which was at its nadir during the nationalists.

The Chinese aren't stupid, they chose the communists over the nationalists for a reason.

The better question is what if there is no great leap forward or dultural revolution, skippking that time frame, China would have already been a economic superpower.

Back to Top
coolstorm View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote coolstorm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Dec-2004 at 02:52

"and eclipsed everyone else in the region, including Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan"

This is wrong. Taiwan has always been under control of the ROC. If the ROC didn't lost her control over the mainland, Taiwan and Mainland China would be united now.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Dec-2004 at 03:23

 If the ROC didn't lost her control over the mainland?

Haha,how can that be possible,if they didn't lose,we chinese people will go on fighting until it has been defeated.

Without US,Taiwan and Mainland China would be united long time ago.The KMT army is as weak  as a piece of glass.

Back to Top
R_AK47 View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
  Quote R_AK47 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2006 at 13:25

Originally posted by coolstorm

what would've happened instead?

China would be a far greater country today if the Kuomintang was still in power.  Chiang Kai-Sheck was a fair and just leader who ruled his country wisely.  Creating an alliance with the evil communist Mao Tse-Tung during WW2 was one of his few mistakes.  He should have crushed Mao first, then dealt with the invading forces of Japan.  Perhaps someday, the Kuomintang will return to mainland China and take back what is rightfully theres.

Back to Top
R_AK47 View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
  Quote R_AK47 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2006 at 13:26
Originally posted by imok

under the KMT's corrupt regime,

  • the scourge of opium addiction continues
  • uncontrollable populationn growth; China's population would be much higher than the current 1.3 billion
    • The Tibet region would almost be de-populated
      • continuing the alarming trend over the past centuries---owing to addherence to strict religious practice, under the Dalai Lama, of celibacy
  • much lower literacy rate

Thus, on this basis, China would most probably be no more successful than India.

Chiang and the Kuomintang were not corrupt.

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2006 at 13:56
Interesting topic. In a sense the evolution of the PRC is much like if it was ruled by the Kuomintang now. They are very capitalist and nationalist. They are corrupt too. But...

Originally posted by Tobodai

probably, but it could also have become an Asian tiger earlier with better free market policies, like South Korea or Japan and with Chinas resources and manpower it would easily eclipse those two.



The problem is that the Asian tigers evolved largely thank to the interest in the area caused by Russia-China-US tensions. Eventually, after the loss of mainland China, the USA had lost one of its most strategic "acquisitions" of WWII. Vietnam reminded the fragility of Western Capitalist domain later. The West, particularly the USA, had to react somehow and offering some benefits of the Capitalist system, allowing them to become 2nd level economies (1st level in the case of Japan) as a plus for remaining in their side in the "great game".

With this I don't want to deny the local merits, just to point out that macroeconomical geostrategical planning may have played a role. Obviously, as it happens now the West (US included) face the problem that they can't allow China to consume as much per capita as they do, not even a fraction if they can help it. Everybody knows that the planetary resources are scarce and there aren't enough for all. This issue would have been relevant as well for a KMT China. It could have made of China a Brazil or India or it could have caused heavy frictions between Beijing and Washington. Always with the USSR looking over there from Siberia.

It would be a curious scenario, indeed.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2006 at 18:43
it could also have become an Asian tiger earlier with better free market policies


Originally posted by R_AK47

Chiang and the Kuomintang were not corrupt.


Errrmmmm ... the reality of the KMT is FAR different from the views some apparently ill-informed persons have been expressing ... they seem to have not heard of the 228 Incident, the White Terror, the fact that Taiwan was a one-party state for most of its history under the KMT, or the fact that right now it is the richest political party on the planet because as the government, it took control of most of the economy: banks, manufacturing, television and radio, most of it was (and much of still is) not privately owned but owned by the KMT.

The KMT was an authoritarian dictatorship with a centrally planned economy (and still has one of the world's highest levels of state ownership) ... it did not espouse communism but it was in effect still a totalitarian system for much of its history.

Edited by edgewaters
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.082 seconds.