Mongol Khans : Images and info
Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: General History
Forum Name: Historical Pictures Gallery
Forum Discription: Post and discuss images of historical places, arts and maps...
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6368
Printed Date: 20-Apr-2024 at 12:25
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Mongol Khans : Images and info
Posted By: Chingis
Subject: Mongol Khans : Images and info
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2005 at 05:14
|
Check here! http://forum.mongolforums.com/index.php?showtopic=6 - http://forum.mongolforums.com/index.php?showtopic=6 ------------- The 800th Anniversary of the Great Mongolian State Great Mongolian State (1206-2006 >>>>> 
|
Replies:
Posted By: Seko
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2005 at 08:55
|
They have a Chinese style look to them. Do you know where the artists were from? ------------- |
Posted By: Chingis
Date Posted: 22-Oct-2005 at 05:44
|
I don`t know the artist... it was posted in MongolForums mongolian forum, if u want i can ask from the person who posted it... ------------- The 800th Anniversary of the Great Mongolian State Great Mongolian State (1206-2006 >>>>>
|
Posted By: Jhangora
Date Posted: 22-Oct-2005 at 08:43
|
Nice pics Ghingis. -------------  Jai Badri Vishal
|
Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 22-Oct-2005 at 20:46
| Nice pictures, but all their names are distorted. |
Posted By: tadamson
Date Posted: 22-Oct-2005 at 21:42
|
The pictures are from the Imperial portrait gallery, they were painted during the Yuan dynisty ------------- rgds. Tom.. |
Posted By: Chingis
Date Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 03:42
|
Someone said Hubilai khans image is more like chinese, and its possible that its painted by Chinese artist, and he doesn`t look alike what Marco polo described him in Yuan Dynasty`s book... ------------- The 800th Anniversary of the Great Mongolian State Great Mongolian State (1206-2006 >>>>>
|
Posted By: poirot
Date Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 03:59
|
No, Hubilai Khan's image does not resemble the chinese, nor does Chingghis Khan and Ogedei Khan. Hublai Khan's features are distinctly non-Chinese. However, I think Guyuk Khan and Mongke Khan do look Chinese and are not realistic in their images. Especiallky Mongke Khan. Therefore I conclude that Mongke Khan probably does not look like his painting. ------------- AAAAAAAAAA "The crisis of yesterday is the joke of tomorrow.� ~ HG Wells |
Posted By: DayI
Date Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 07:52
|
where is subudei's pic? ------------- Bu mıntıka'nın Dayı'sı http://imageshack.us - [IMG - http://www.allempires.com/forum/uploads/DayI/2006-03-17_164450_bscap021.jpg - |
Posted By: HistoryGuy
Date Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 16:00
Does anyone have a picture of what Chingis Khaan, and other Khaan's looked like? ------------- هیچ مردی تا به حال به شما درباره خدا گفته. |
Posted By: kotumeyil
Date Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 17:16
|
Did you have a look at Chingis's link in the first post? ------------- [IMG]http://www.maksimum.com/yemeicme/images/haber/raki.jpg"> |
Posted By: HistoryGuy
Date Posted: 28-Oct-2005 at 07:18
|
Doesn't work
------------- هیچ مردی تا به حال به شما درباره خدا گفته. |
Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 19-Nov-2005 at 18:40
 History falsification. Genghis Khan was not a Mongol. (i.e. in a meaning as having a relation to modern Khalkha-Mongols). All his the so-called "Mongols' - Kereits, Naimans, Onguts, Jalairs, Qongyrats, Merkits, etc, - they all were Turkic speaking tribes (and now they are parts of modern Kazakhs). Read Paul Ratchnevsky (Germany), Tu Ji (China), Rene Grousset (France), J.J.Saunders (USA), and other historians. |
Posted By: Turkic10
Date Posted: 19-Nov-2005 at 18:50
|
It's more likely that the modern Mongols are mixed breed (Mongol/Chinese) and not true Mongols. ------------- Admonish your friends privately, praise them publicly. |
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 12-Dec-2005 at 11:58
|
It doesn't work. Do they look anything like these gentlemen here?
http://img445.imageshack.us/img445/3199/genghis86nm1hu.jpg"> |
Posted By: Imperator Invictus
Date Posted: 12-Dec-2005 at 12:03
|
Nice find. Where is that family tree from? National Geographic?
------------- |
Posted By: Temujin
Date Posted: 12-Dec-2005 at 17:03
|
i also found that pic once, but can't remember where.... ------------- |
Posted By: vulkan02
Date Posted: 12-Dec-2005 at 20:01
Heres a very clear picture ------------- The beginning of a revolution is in reality the end of a belief - Le Bon Destroy first and construction will look after itself - Mao |
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 12-Dec-2005 at 23:33
|
It has been in my collection for a while now. I have not been able to find where I got it originally from but here is one place you could find it: http://www.sbceo.k12.ca.us/~vms/carlton/page23.html - http://www.sbceo.k12.ca.us/~vms/carlton/page23.html |
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 12-May-2006 at 12:31
|
mogol also got difference. ------------- |
Posted By: Erdene
Date Posted: 13-May-2006 at 10:32
I am afraid my friend if you knew a little of our history and the Mongolian mentality....you wouldn't make silly comments like that. We are the true Mongols and Mongols look Asian...Mongols do not look turkic. I don't know why some Turkic people imply that Mongols were really Turkic looking and speaking people but thats just nonsense. ------------- |
Posted By: bigtoothbrush
Date Posted: 13-May-2006 at 10:54
|
mongols all are mongoloid. there's nothing to do with truks which belong to caucasian. northern chinese, korean, japs and mongols belong to northern mongoloid, while southern chinese, viets, Filipinos belong to southern mongoloid. only the huns might be caucasians, but most already been killed out or eascaped to the west. the only caucasians left in east asia are people like uyghurs. |