Print Page | Close Window

There is something fishy about this Mohammed movie

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Regional History or Period History
Forum Name: Post-Classical Middle East
Forum Discription: SW Asia, the Middle East and Islamic civilizations from 600s - 1900 AD
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=32425
Printed Date: 28-Mar-2024 at 05:56
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: There is something fishy about this Mohammed movie
Posted By: Alcebiades
Subject: There is something fishy about this Mohammed movie
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2012 at 21:18
I think the people who are behind this video are Al Qaeda and/or the U.S Military Industrial complex, and they want to increase the militancy of muslims and anti-western sentiment on the Middle East. 

I mean, they hired an entire film crew and lied to them, really? Anyone actor with the smallest scope of historical insight would know that this movie couldnt be about 1st century Egypt because 1-) Egypt was under the romans and 2-) Egyptians arent nomads, they dont live on desert tents, they have been civilized way longer than the west.

Its obvious the movie was about Mohammed, I dont believe the actors at all when they say they were in the dark. Also, thisNakoula Bassoulay Nakoula fellow, how come there is so little info on him? The media is expert at digging up stuff, when James E. Holmes went on a shooting spree they came up with his entire life in 2 hours, including his college transcript and stuff like that.The 

If you think about it, a war is good both for radical islamists and the military industrial complex. Islamic radicals and dictators will maintain domestic order by finding a common, external enemy.The military industrial complex gets to sell Tomahawks and JDAMs. The common rable of each side does the fighting. Both elites win and the people lose.

I mean, it isnt unheard of for hawkish politicians to throw kerosene on the fire.



Replies:
Posted By: Nick1986
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2012 at 21:25
Why did you post a duplicate of this thread in the AE tavern?

-------------
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!


Posted By: Baal Melqart
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2012 at 22:18
Originally posted by Alcebiades

I think the people who are behind this video are Al Qaeda and/or the U.S Military Industrial complex, and they want to increase the militancy of muslims and anti-western sentiment on the Middle East. 

I mean, they hired an entire film crew and lied to them, really? Anyone actor with the smallest scope of historical insight would know that this movie couldnt be about 1st century Egypt because 1-) Egypt was under the romans and 2-) Egyptians arent nomads, they dont live on desert tents, they have been civilized way longer than the west.

Its obvious the movie was about Mohammed, I dont believe the actors at all when they say they were in the dark. Also, thisNakoula Bassoulay Nakoula fellow, how come there is so little info on him? The media is expert at digging up stuff, when James E. Holmes went on a shooting spree they came up with his entire life in 2 hours, including his college transcript and stuff like that.The 

If you think about it, a war is good both for radical islamists and the military industrial complex. Islamic radicals and dictators will maintain domestic order by finding a common, external enemy.The military industrial complex gets to sell Tomahawks and JDAMs. The common rable of each side does the fighting. Both elites win and the people lose.

I mean, it isnt unheard of for hawkish politicians to throw kerosene on the fire.



Why believe the actors to begin with? They knew the movie was about Muhammad and still accepted to act in it. After they saw all the trouble it caused, they decided to save their image by claiming ignorance.... Alternatively, they didn't know and they seem like historically unknowledgeable people to me, yes they don't know that Egypt was under the Romans back then nor that it's not a desert! In fact, many people I meet don't even know that Cleopatra was Macedonian, so imagine!


-------------
Timidi mater non flet


Posted By: Centrix Vigilis
Date Posted: 21-Sep-2012 at 00:05
Originally posted by Nick1986

Why did you post a duplicate of this thread in the AE tavern?
 
 
Move it to the one in Modern History.


-------------
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'



Posted By: Nick1986
Date Posted: 21-Sep-2012 at 06:34
I deleted the duplicate Centrix and added an amendment to clarify our position:
http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6512&PID=682607#682607 - http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6512&PID=682607#682607


-------------
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!


Posted By: Centrix Vigilis
Date Posted: 21-Sep-2012 at 08:21
Yup..saw that. ntl this is a topic already under discussion in Modern History. We didn't need another thread reference the same subject matter. Why it....the thread.... should be moved into the exsisting thread. As the question and point is legit enough. Or lock it and refer the question to the earlier.
 
But do what ya want.


-------------
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'



Posted By: Nick1986
Date Posted: 21-Sep-2012 at 20:27
Thread locked. The Mohammed film can be discussed in the link below:
http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=32396 - http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=32396


-------------
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com