Print Page | Close Window

PRC Military

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: General History
Forum Name: All Battles Project
Forum Discription: Forum for the All Battles military history project
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=31942
Printed Date: 20-Apr-2024 at 01:19
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: PRC Military
Posted By: Centrix Vigilis
Subject: PRC Military
Date Posted: 25-Jun-2012 at 17:58
For updates on the continuing expansion of the Communist Chinese Military..see: http://www.sinodefence.com/ - http://www.sinodefence.com/

-------------
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'




Replies:
Posted By: Toltec
Date Posted: 25-Jun-2012 at 22:07
If its economy continues growing one day the Communist Chinese Military may be larger than the Socialist American Military.


-------------
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?

http://historyplanet.wordpress.com - History Planet Website
<br /


Posted By: Centrix Vigilis
Date Posted: 26-Jun-2012 at 03:42
In terms of availability in manpower and current active components manpower availability...it already is ...to include numerous combat equipment systems. But I forgive your not knowing that.... your basic lack of knowledge in current military affairs.. tis obviously not your fortayWink. Other relative parameters and criterion, comparison and contrast of assets of the Reds and their surrogates.. for example the DPRK...  and other nations... may be viewed here:
  http://globalfirepower.com/available-military-manpower.asp - http://globalfirepower.com/available-military-manpower.asp

-------------
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'



Posted By: Toltec
Date Posted: 26-Jun-2012 at 06:17
When I said larger I was using it to summerise having a bigger budget, better equipment quality and so on. Not a straight head count of troops. Then again perhaps your superior military knowledge to mine has come to the conclusion that having large numbers of poorly trained and equipped infantry is the most important thing an army can have and more advanced equipment secondary.


-------------
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?

http://historyplanet.wordpress.com - History Planet Website
<br /


Posted By: Centrix Vigilis
Date Posted: 26-Jun-2012 at 06:54
Originally posted by Toltec

When I said larger I was using it to summarize having a bigger budget, better equipment quality and so on. Not a straight head count of troops. Then again perhaps your superior military knowledge to mine has come to the conclusion that having large numbers of poorly trained and equipped infantry is the most important thing an army can have and more advanced equipment secondary.
 
nah I knew what ya meant.....and contrary to popular belief they are neither poorly trained in the fundamentals nor poorly organized nor poorly led necessarily, when one considers the dogma of their ideologies and past military experience. Certainly their re-analysis as regards the fundamental requirements of their force and their training and doctrinal development and adjustments and ongoing expansion and upgrading and addition of systems proves this.
 
 
 
The very technological expertise necessary to  successfully 'maintain and fight' modern equipment (to include that which might even be three decades old) and stay abreast of the tactical and strat and logistical knowledge, necessary to do so, especially with 21st ce versions, also confirms it. Tho much of that is thru theft and absorption and reverse engineering. 
 
 
 
 
That earlier was the consensus of 20 years ago my socialist Amigo. Consequently, my superior military experience, knowledge and research and innumerable contacts still in and or working for the DoD as well as foreign nationalists in the same arena, long after being in the game, continues to keep me not only in 'it' but ahead of the vast majority.
 
To be fair I've been at this over 40 years.....
 
But I have to work this week..... (judging livestock...to bad ya aint here it would fun) therefor must let ya go.... so until later in the week...I urge ya to continue your military research and maintain yer jovial nature.LOL


-------------
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'




Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com