Print Page | Close Window

Affinity between ancient Iranic peoples

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: General History
Forum Name: General World History
Forum Discription: All aspects of world history, especially topics that span across many regions or periods
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=27357
Printed Date: 27-Apr-2024 at 12:47
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Affinity between ancient Iranic peoples
Posted By: calvo
Subject: Affinity between ancient Iranic peoples
Date Posted: 07-Jun-2009 at 16:14

Iranian-speaking peoples had once occupied a region much greater than they do today: Persia, Afghanistan, Turkestan, Southern Russia, and Eastern Europe.

Among Iranian peoples there were a certainly degree of diversity: from the sedentary, urban Persians who had founded one of the greatest civilizations, to the steppe nomads like Scythian and Samartians.
I sometimes wonder whether these distinct peoples, leading such contrasting lifestyles, had anything else in common other than language.
Did the Scythians and the Persians, for example, share any common beliefs, social structure, art, and norms of conduct. Did they feel any certain degree of kinship between them?
 
could the relation be compared to that of the Iranians today with other Iranian-speakers such as Kurds, Ossetians, and Tajiks?
 
 



Replies:
Posted By: Cyrus Shahmiri
Date Posted: 07-Jun-2009 at 16:53
It is important to know a region in the eastern Iran and souhern Afghanistan is known as Sakestan/Sistan (the land of Scythians) from the ancient times too and the people of this region are called Saksi/Sagzi, the famous red-haired national hero of Iran, Rostam-e-Sagzi is said to be from this region, however it is very hard to believe that the desert region of Sistan could be woodland, as described in Shahnameh, so we have to say the origin of these stories was from another land.
 
http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/f/abolqasem-ferdowsi/tragedy-of-sohrab-and-rostam.htm - http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/f/abolqasem-ferdowsi/tragedy-of-sohrab-and-rostam.htm
 
 
For example this famous tragedy of Rostam and his son Sohrab can be seen to be almost the same the Lay of Hildebrand in Germanic: http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/c4/c20188.jpg - http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/c4/c20188.jpg


-------------


Posted By: douglasfrankfort
Date Posted: 12-Jun-2009 at 17:23
Maybe the caste system; there is a theory that all proto-Indo-European speakers had once lived in the same 'society classes' system: priest/warrior/farmer.


Posted By: King John
Date Posted: 12-Jun-2009 at 17:27
Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri


For example this famous tragedy of Rostam and his son Sohrab can be seen to be almost the same the Lay of Hildebrand in Germanic
In what way(s) are the two almost the same?


Posted By: douglasfrankfort
Date Posted: 13-Jun-2009 at 02:18

Rostam had to battle with his son; and so did Hildebrand. 



Posted By: King John
Date Posted: 13-Jun-2009 at 08:06
So did Arthur, Oedipus (with his father), Zeus, Odin, and others.  So how is this not just Indo-European mythological similarities?  There are many stories that have fathers battling their sons, surely theirs more of a connection then that.  Saying that the story of Rostam and the Lay of Hildebrand are almost the same has to include more then just the fact that fathers battled their sons.


Posted By: Suren
Date Posted: 13-Jun-2009 at 10:17
Add Suren to the list! Wink

-------------
Anfører


Posted By: gcle2003
Date Posted: 13-Jun-2009 at 12:14
Sympathies, Suren.
 
Also of course there is the modern-day myth of the Mars family, where the father and son quarrelled and the father split off the tiny British part of his kingdom and gave it to the son to rule. And the young Mars greatly increased his kingdom until the day when he returned and conquered his father's kingdom, at last reuniting the two.
 
But you still can't buy British Mars bars in the US or American Milky Way bars in Britain.
 
I don't think myths (or true stories) of fathers battling sons are restricted to ancient Indo-Europeans. Didn't David have a bit of a problem with Absalom?


-------------


Posted By: douglasfrankfort
Date Posted: 13-Jun-2009 at 12:18
Originally posted by King John

So did Arthur, Oedipus (with his father), Zeus, Odin, and others.  So how is this not just Indo-European mythological similarities?  There are many stories that have fathers battling their sons, surely theirs more of a connection then that.  Saying that the story of Rostam and the Lay of Hildebrand are almost the same has to include more then just the fact that fathers battled their sons.
 
I agree with you. For Lay of Hildebrand, there are only some fragments left; since you asked what the similarities between them were, I picked the only one that I can found.Embarrassed
 
And I heard that native Americans also had some myths about antagonism between father and son.


Posted By: King John
Date Posted: 13-Jun-2009 at 18:29
I didn't ask for similarities I asked in what way are they, the Lay of Hildebrand and the Roskam story, almost the same as Cyrus claims.

This has more to do with Cyrus's theories about Germans being Iranian people or rather having a Scythian origin than anything else.


Posted By: Cyrus Shahmiri
Date Posted: 13-Jun-2009 at 21:03

What are the differences between them? even in details, if you know?

1. father and son, the leaders of two armies
2. after 30 years
3. invasion to the motherland
5. two armies meet each other on the frontier
4. a face-to-face battle between the father and son
5. listing the family tree
6. arm-ring
7. deceiving
8. killing the son


-------------


Posted By: gcle2003
Date Posted: 13-Jun-2009 at 21:51
IIRC in the Mars story
1 - yes given that the 'armies' are modern organisations. Myths conform to their environments in detail
2 - a bit less than 30 years
3 - same
5 (!) - the frontier is in the courts
4 - the father dies before the son returns
5 (!) - the family tree is clear
6 - no arm ring
7 - no deception
8 - it's the father who dies
 
 


-------------


Posted By: douglasfrankfort
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2009 at 02:14
Originally posted by King John

I didn't ask for similarities I asked in what way are they, the Lay of Hildebrand and the Roskam story, almost the same as Cyrus claims.

This has more to do with Cyrus's theories about Germans being Iranian people or rather having a Scythian origin than anything else.
 
The similarities can't indicate that Germanic peoples have Iranian origin. They indicate at most that Germans and Iranians may have common origin. While according to mythology, some mythic topics are shared by most nations of human. Since non-Indo-European peoples also have such topic as father-son struggle in their myths, the similarities between Rostam and Hildebrand even can't confirm that Germanic and Iranian peoples have the same root.....Confused


Posted By: King John
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2009 at 03:44
I'm glad you said that douglasfrankfort, I have been telling that to Cyrus for a while now in many threads; at least I know it's not just me who thinks this.

Cyrus, you just outlined a good deal of Arthurian Legend, as well as a whole bunch of other non-Indo-European mythology.  Similarities in plot don't show relationship, as I have said to you multiple times.


Posted By: Cyrus Shahmiri
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2009 at 14:09
I also believe Germanic and Iranian peoples have a common origin, you can call it Iranian, Germanic or Irano-Germanic, anyway the obvious fact is that they differed from other Indo-European peoples, they were a people who believed in Goda (Middle Persian word for God [Modern Persian khoda]) and Kianig (Middle Persian word for king [Modern Persian Kian/Kiani), these are still the most holy words in the Persian culture.

-------------


Posted By: King John
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2009 at 18:26
Your right they did have a common origin, they originated from the Indo-European people.  in regards to god it comes from the Indo-European word *ghut-.  Similarities in vocabulary doesn't prove anything this has been explained to you, all these similarities in vocabulary prove is a common Indo-European origin of the Germanic and Iranian languages.


Posted By: douglasfrankfort
Date Posted: 15-Jun-2009 at 08:25
Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri

I also believe Germanic and Iranian peoples have a common origin, you can call it Iranian, Germanic or Irano-Germanic, anyway the obvious fact is that they differed from other Indo-European peoples, they were a people who believed in Goda (Middle Persian word for God [Modern Persian khoda]) and Kianig (Middle Persian word for king [Modern Persian Kian/Kiani), these are still the most holy words in the Persian culture.
 
It is very inaccurate to say that Germanic and Iranian peoples have a common origin called 'Irano-Germanic'. That's impossible. When their ancestors separated from proto-Indo-European peoles,  there was no 'Germanic' or 'Iranian' race groups. At that time, proto-Indian-Iranians were not divided; and Germanic peoples might be still in a greater human group composed of ancestors of Germanic, Slavic and Celtic. So there was no 'Germanic' or 'Iranian' concept then.


Posted By: calvo
Date Posted: 15-Jun-2009 at 09:11
rather than discussing the similarities between German and Iranian, let's keep to the subject on the affinities between different Iranian groups.

For example, the Scythians and Samartians, although Iranian-speakers, were steppe nomads, who led a lifestyle very similar to the Turk-Mongol nomads living to their East.
Therefore, would Scythians and Samartians share more cultural elements with Turko-Mongol peoples than with sedentary Persians?

Is there any relation between the Slavs and the Iranian peoples of Eastern Europe?
How similar is Slavic to Iranian?


Posted By: Cyrus Shahmiri
Date Posted: 15-Jun-2009 at 12:57
You can hardly find any relation between original Iranian-speaking peoples and Indian, Slavic or Turko-Mongol peoples, of course there were some influences from one culture to another during a long contact between these peoples, but Iranian culture can be just related to Germanic culture, not other ones, it doesn't important Iranians believed in Ahura Mazda, Zurvan or Allah, they have always said "be name Goda/khoda" (in the name of God), and also it doesn't matter that their ruler was a khshaya/shah, basileus, malik, caliph, imam, ... they have always defended their kianig/kian (king, generation), if you find something in Iranian culture unsimilar to Germanic, you can consider that it is either from an non-Iranian origin or invented by Iranians in the later periods.

-------------


Posted By: gcle2003
Date Posted: 15-Jun-2009 at 14:50
You mean like the German rulers were called Kaiser from the first Karl to the last Karl? Or is 'Kaiser' also going to be on your list of Persian words now that it's come up?

-------------


Posted By: Cyrus Shahmiri
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2009 at 20:26
I don't know what you mean, "Kaiser" seems to be a loanword from Latin (Caesar), of course the Middle Persian word is the same as the German word, I think Persians were the first nation who called all Roman emperors "Kaiser".

-------------


Posted By: cavalry4ever
Date Posted: 12-Jul-2009 at 12:01
Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri

however it is very hard to believe that the desert region of Sistan could be woodland, as described in Shahnameh, so we have to say the origin of these stories was from another land.

It all depends how far back in time these stories go. There was heavy rainfall in Egypt in 4th -3rd millennium.
There is a theory about rain erosion of Sphinx and debate over date it was build. This means that climate few thousand years ago, in that region, was probably different that it is now. Of course a different climate in Egypt does not mean region you mention had a different one too. 


Posted By: Cyrus Shahmiri
Date Posted: 12-Jul-2009 at 12:15
You are right, the climate could be different in very ancient times but the south of Iran could be near the north pole, as we read in Shahnameh!!
 
Rostam and Daeva (Demon)


-------------


Posted By: cavalry4ever
Date Posted: 12-Jul-2009 at 13:03
You got a point.
Another thought I have is how far back oral tradition can go. We know many accounts of floods of catastrophic proportions. Now we know that in the Black Sea region that happened about 7,000 years ago. Maybe oral accounts of events can travel through more millennia than we think.
Maybe these stories have origin in the Ice Age. Of course this is just a speculation and guys making up these stories, while smoking some powerful stuff, maybe another one.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 13-Jul-2009 at 07:05
Originally posted by calvo

rather than discussing the similarities between German and Iranian, let's keep to the subject on the affinities between different Iranian groups.


One thing that has been fairly well documented for almost all of the groups is their affection for horses.

We see this phrase repeated a few times on the inscriptions in Persepolis

"thâtiy Dârayavaush xshâyathiya iyam dahyâush Pârsa tyâm manâ Auramazdâ frâbara hyâ naibâ uvaspâ umartiyâ" which translates into "King Darius says 'This great country Parsa which Ahuramazda bestowed upon me, possessed of good horses, possessed of good men...'"

And it's also see on a few other places, where it is attributed to older kings (though it is unclear if they were responsible for it themselves).  The following is from a gold tablet found in Hamedan (although it is suspected to be a "forgery").

"thâtiy Ariyâramna xshâyathiya iyam dahyâushi Pârsâ tya adam dârayâ miy hya uvaspâ umartiyâ manâ baga vazraka Auramazdâ frâbara vashnâ Auramazdâha adam xshâyathiya iyam dahyâush amiy" translating into "King Ariaramnes says 'This country Persia which I hold, which is possessed of good horses, of good men, the Great God Ahuramazda bestowed it upon me. By the favor of Ahuramazda I am king in this country.' "

Horses are also featured fairly prominently in scythian art and coins. Sarmatians, Cimmerians and Parthians are all documented to have been equestrian societies (especially in their style of warfare.)


Posted By: cavalry4ever
Date Posted: 13-Jul-2009 at 07:38
The affinity to horses is common to all steppe cultures and in itself may not indicate close relationship among them. i think only linguistics can determine how close or distant different tribes are.



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com