Print Page | Close Window

quality of life of ancient Egyptian peasants

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Regional History or Period History
Forum Name: Ancient Mesopotamia, Near East and Greater Iran
Forum Discription: Babylon, Egypt, Persia and other civilizations of the Near East from ancient times to 600s AD
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=24103
Printed Date: 28-Apr-2024 at 00:30
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: quality of life of ancient Egyptian peasants
Posted By: calvo
Subject: quality of life of ancient Egyptian peasants
Date Posted: 10-Apr-2008 at 13:22

Recent excavations of peasants' and workers tombs at the city of Akenaton (1300 B.C) has revealed that the vast majority of ancient Egyptian civilians lived extremely precarious lives. Most people died young (excluding infant mortality) and few lived beyond the age of 30. Skeletal remains has revealed a poor diet with a lack of protein and vitamins and many have suffered spinal injuries as an indication of back-breaking labour. The average height of males did not even exceed 160cm.

On another website I have come across a census made during Roman times.
http://www.digitalegypt.ucl.ac.uk/age/roman.html - http://www.digitalegypt.ucl.ac.uk/age/roman.html

Males

age

village

town

total

0-4

24

26

50

5-9

16

26

42

10-14

7

16

23

15-19

13

23

36

20-24

13

18

31

25-29

14

12

26

30-34

16

19

35

35-39

10

6

16

40-44

12

6

18

45-49

13

11

24

50-54

4

6

10

55-59

11

3

14

60-64

3

3

6

65-69

5

2

7

70-74

6

3

9

75-79

2

0

2

80-84

0

1

1

all ages

169

181

350

           

Females

age

village

town

total

0-4

28

8

36

5-9

18

18

36

10-14

24

14

38

15-19

21

11

32

20-24

15

20

35

25-29

13

17

30

30-34

18

6

24

35-39

22

9

31

40-44

9

9

18

45-49

11

3

14

50-54

13

5

18

55-59

4

2

6

60-64

6

1

7

65-69

3

1

4

70-74

5

2

7

75-79

1

0

1

all ages

211

126

337

 
which seems to reveal that a significant number of people apparently did make it beyond the age of 40 and that life was not as short as if was 1300 years earlier under Akenaton.
If these census figures were reliable, would it indicate that the quality of life of Ancient Egyptian peasants had improved under Roman times?
 
There is another article here,
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/history/resource-library/ugrad_fox_thesis.pdf - http://www.columbia.edu/cu/history/resource-library/ugrad_fox_thesis.pdf
that analysis the economic conditions of day labourers under Roman Egypt, which implies a precarious life for Egyptian day labourers where very few made it to the age of 40. However, wealthier Egyptians lived considerably longer and better.
 
How reliable are these analysis?
 
 
 
 



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com