Print Page | Close Window

Mormons - how many wives were they orignally..

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Scholarly Pursuits
Forum Name: Philosophy and Theology
Forum Discription: Topics relating to philosophy
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=23086
Printed Date: 09-Jun-2024 at 18:27
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Mormons - how many wives were they orignally..
Posted By: eaglecap
Subject: Mormons - how many wives were they orignally..
Date Posted: 05-Jan-2008 at 22:05
..allowed by your prophet Joseph Smith and Brigham Young?
Was it like Islam limited to a certain number or as many as they, in the 1800's, could support?

I realize today the main stream Mormon Church only allows one wife per man but there are a few sect who pratice it.
I have also heard rumors that some Mormons marry one wife legally and the others they secretly marry in the church and live with them.
True or false
I realize that this is not true about most Mormons but a few might do it.

what do you know about the God-Adam belief?
We now have two Mormon temples in the cities of Spokane- Spokane Valley with that golden angel on top blowing the trumpet.

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε



Replies:
Posted By: Cryptic
Date Posted: 07-Jan-2008 at 16:50
Originally posted by eaglecap

..allowed by your prophet Joseph Smith and Brigham Young?
Was it like Islam limited to a certain number or as many as they, in the 1800's, could support? 
 
It was as many as they could support.  The Mormons were attempting to re create many of the cultural / religous practices of ancient Israel.  This included a new chosen people (Mormons), with new prophets (Joseph Smith, Young etc), new revelations (Book of Mormon, Pearl of Great Price, Doctrine and Covenant), new temples and of course, polygamy.
 
Utah was presented as the new promised land and the Mormon forced migration to Utah as identical to that of the  Isrealities escaping  from Egypt to Israel.  For many years, Mormons called non Mormons "gentiles". 
Originally posted by eaglecap


what do you know about the God-Adam belief? 
Nothing, but bear in mind that Mormonism as been steadily mainstreaming since 1970.  Several of the more ehr..."unusual" beliefs have been quietly either  "de emphasized", modified  or dropped.    The Mormon faith today is not the same faith as it was prior to 1970.


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 07-Jan-2008 at 19:41
I think it would have evolved differently if the US Government had not taken over the Mexican territories and intervened with them such as polygomy. I know the US goverment threatened to cede them back to Mexico unless that changed this doctrine. I do believe it was their Prophet Brigham Young who suddenly had a revelation and suddenly changed it to one wife only.

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: Cryptic
Date Posted: 07-Jan-2008 at 21:23
Originally posted by eaglecap

I do believe it was their Prophet Brigham Young who suddenly had a revelation and suddenly changed it to one wife only.
 
Yes, it was Brigham Young.   The issue of sudden revelations aside, Brigham Young was a very capable and wise leader.  When faced with changes ordered from outside powers, many other theocrats would have ordered their followers to fight a holy war rather than change the religion or surrender their own authority.
 
Young, however, saw the "writing on the wall".  Utah was eventually going to become a state instead of a Mormon theocracy.   The rest of the USA was not going to accept polygamy.   Armed resistance (holy war) was futile, would result in the loss of many Mormon lives and would probably result in the destruction of Mormonism as a functioning religion.
 
Brigham Young then took the big step by renouncing alot of his personal power and by banning polygamy through a sudden revelation.   No lives were lost and the Mormon religion survives and thrives.
  


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 18-Jan-2008 at 23:26
Young, however, saw the "writing on the wall". Utah was eventually going to become a state instead of a Mormon theocracy.   The rest of the USA was not going to accept polygamy.   Armed resistance (holy war) was futile,

I agree with this and yes the face of Mormonism would be different today, a theocracy for sure. Most Mormons today embrace seperation of chruch and state and the US constitution but under a true Mormon theocracy it would have been different, very different.

I will have to look it up but there was a slaughter of innocent settlers by a group of Mormons and their Indian allies- can anyone recall this incident?

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: Kevin
Date Posted: 19-Jan-2008 at 21:14
Originally posted by Cryptic

Originally posted by eaglecap

I do believe it was their Prophet Brigham Young who suddenly had a revelation and suddenly changed it to one wife only.
 
Yes, it was Brigham Young.   The issue of sudden revelations aside, Brigham Young was a very capable and wise leader.  When faced with changes ordered from outside powers, many other theocrats would have ordered their followers to fight a holy war rather than change the religion or surrender their own authority.
 
Young, however, saw the "writing on the wall".  Utah was eventually going to become a state instead of a Mormon theocracy.   The rest of the USA was not going to accept polygamy.   Armed resistance (holy war) was futile, would result in the loss of many Mormon lives and would probably result in the destruction of Mormonism as a functioning religion.
 
Brigham Young then took the big step by renouncing alot of his personal power and by banning polygamy through a sudden revelation.   No lives were lost and the Mormon religion survives and thrives.
  


Remember the controversy over polygamy was also one of the reason's why Utah didn't become a state until the practice was abandoned by the Jesus Christ Church of Latter-Day Saints. However they doesn't stop many especially more fringe elements in the state from still continuing the practice even to this day in many areas of the state.


-------------


Posted By: JanusRook
Date Posted: 20-Jan-2008 at 03:07

I will have to look it up but there was a slaughter of innocent settlers by a group of Mormons and their Indian allies- can anyone recall this incident?


Of course that would be the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_War - Mormon War http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_War - or perhaps the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_War - Utah War .


-------------
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 20-Jan-2008 at 04:21
Originally posted by JanusRook

I will have to look it up but there was a slaughter of innocent
settlers by a group of Mormons and their Indian allies- can anyone
recall this incident?
Of course that would be the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_War - Mormon War http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_War - or perhaps the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_War - Utah War .


It was the Utah war or the Mountain Meadow massacre.
The confrontation between the Mormon militia and the U.S. Army involved some destruction of property but no actual battles between the contending military forces. However, at the height of the conflict, more than 100 California-bound settlers from Arkansas were killed by Mormon militia allied with local Paiutes, in what was later called the Mountain Meadows massacre.

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: Cryptic
Date Posted: 22-Jan-2008 at 18:20
Originally posted by eaglecap

However, at the height of the conflict, more than 100 California-bound settlers from Arkansas were killed by Mormon militia allied with local Paiutes, in what was later called the Mountain Meadows massacre.
 
As a side note, almost all the settlers were killed after they surrendered and were in Mormon custody.   It is very hard to find unbiased information on the incident.  I have read some accounts stating that there were very few Piautes present during the siege and that there were none present when the settlers surrendered.
 
 
 
 


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 23-Jan-2008 at 19:32
Originally posted by Cryptic

Originally posted by eaglecap

However, at the height of the conflict, more than 100 California-bound settlers from Arkansas were killed by Mormon militia allied with local Paiutes, in what was later called the Mountain Meadows massacre.


As a side note, almost all the settlers were killed after they surrendered and were in Mormon custody. It is very hard to find unbiased information on the incident. I have read some accounts stating that there were very few Piautes present duringthe siege and that there were none present when the settlers surrendered.






It happened and it is now history and the Mormon church has greatly reformed since then. I know there are some sects or off shoots that still practice polygomy. I also heard rumors that some Mormons will marry in the church more wives but this could be false or more likely some offshoots. I do not think the main stream Mormon church would allow this. There use to be several Mormons on this site- what happened?

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: confessor
Date Posted: 03-Mar-2008 at 19:30
well, what happened to the mormons on this site, was that one i dont know, he just stopped posting completely, while the other left on a mission to arizona.
 
about the mountain meadow massacre, all, it was a "venture" i guess you could say, that was unsantctioned by the leaders, and the members of that "venture" were excummicated for what they did.
 
about God being Adam, no, mormoms do not, nor ever believe that Adam was God.
 
and about polygamy, it was not Young that had the revaltion about ending polygamy, it was President Wilford Woodfruw(sp) that had the revaltion.
 
lets see, was there anything else i missed? let me see...


Posted By: confessor
Date Posted: 03-Mar-2008 at 19:31
just curious, what
"Several of the more ehr..."unusual" beliefs"
 are you refering to?


Posted By: Omar al Hashim
Date Posted: 03-Mar-2008 at 23:43
Originally posted by eaglecap

I will have to look it up but there was a slaughter of innocent settlers by a group of Mormons and their Indian allies- can anyone recall this incident?

Innocent settlers?


-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 06-Mar-2008 at 05:42
I have been a member of the LDS church for 16 years, which by no means makes me an expert in Mormon history.  For what its worth I have a few random comments relating to the previous posts:

Yes, the Mountain Meadows Massacre was a brutal slaughter of unarmed men, women, and children.  Yes it was organized and carried out by local church members.  No, there is no good evidence indicating that church leaders beyond the local level were involved.  Brigham Young condemned the act after the fact.  The church has erected a memorial, but has never apologized or admitted responsibility (for which it has received much criticism).

The practice of polygamy by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is prohibited.  Those who break this law are excommunicated.  There are several groups who identify themselves as "Mormon" that practice polygamy.  These groups are in no way affiliated with the LDS church.  On the contrary, they are a thorn in the church's side because every time one of their leaders rapes a 13-year-old the press gets the story and doesn't make the effort to distinguish between the mainstream LDS church and the group that is committing the crime.

Wilford Woodruff received the revelation banning plural marriage.  Brigham Young had over 50 wives and he never gave any indication that the practice should be discontinued.

Past LDS leaders have stated that the US Constitution was a divinely inspired document.   As a group, Mormons are politically conservative and very patriotic.

The angel on the temple is Moroni.

As previously stated, LDS doctrine does not teach that Adam was God.  We believe in God the Father, in Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost like all Christians.  However, the doctrine parts from "orthodox" Christianity in that we believe the three are separate personages (ie Jesus is not the mortal manifestation of God the Father, but rather his son).  This was never difficult for me to accept, but I suppose it could be considered one of the "unusual" beliefs.

P.S.- Would also like to add my kudos to this thread.  While not all the info is 100 percent accurate, I found the questions to be genuine and the posts to be respectful.  In my limited experiences on other boards, this is not typically the case.  Thanks.


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 10-Mar-2008 at 18:23
Past LDS leaders have stated that the US Constitution was a divinely inspired document.   As a group, Mormons are politically conservative and very patriotic.

My old hiking partner was a very devote Mormon and he use to tell me this all the time. He moved to Salt Lake City to find a wife. I hope he found a good one and is still married.



As previously stated, LDS doctrine does not teach that Adam was God. We believe in God the Father, in Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost like all Christians. However, the doctrine parts from "orthodox" Christianity in that we believe the three are separate personages (ie Jesus is not the mortal manifestation of God the Father, but rather his son). This was never difficult for me to accept, but I suppose it could be considered one of the "unusual" beliefs.

That is interesting and I respect your beliefs. Rejecting the belief that Jesus is the manifestation of God or the unity of the Trinity is why the main stream churches- Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox- think Mormonism is a heresy. In America you have the right to believe whatever convicts you in my humble opinion and most Mormons are really good people so I hope your faith blesses your life. We have two temples in Spokane and many Mormons. I grew up Protestant (Lutheran) and Greek Orthodox.

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 17-Mar-2008 at 20:16
I wonder why if God told their Prophet that many wives were ok but when they came under pressure from the US government Brigham young suddenly said God changed his mind and now you can have only one wife-???
I wonder how much their doctrine has changed over time?
I was shown a 1950's version of the book of Mormon and then a newer one and some versus were totally omitted- why??
I do not care what one believes and today many Mormons live a good Christian lifestyle but still I wonder. I do believe that if they had remained isolated Mormonism would be different today. I should ask these of my Mormons friends but I avoid religion with them to prevent conflict.

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 17-Mar-2008 at 22:41
Originally posted by eaglecap

I wonder why if God told their Prophet that many wives were ok but when they came under pressure from the US government Brigham young suddenly said God changed his mind and now you can have only one wife-???


As above, Brigham Young did not ban polygamy, Wilford Woodruff did.  In either case, the saints faced prosecution and occupation by the federal government if the practice was not discontinued.  Whether the revelation ending polygamy was divinely inspired or just a pragmatic decision is a matter of faith.  This is no different than any religious belief.

Originally posted by eaglecap

I wonder how much their doctrine has changed over time?


The fundamental principles of the gospel have not changed.  Certainly the focus has shifted over time, but the beliefs and principles are the same.  As far as plural marriage goes, the practice has been discontinued, but the fundamental beliefs about Celestial marriage have not changed.


Originally posted by eaglecap

I was shown a 1950's version of the book of Mormon and then a newer one and some versus were totally omitted- why??


The changes from the 1830 edition are well documented.  They are mainly grammatical and syntactical, but there were some verses changed to clarify content.  I do not believe that any of the changes changed the fundamental doctrinal content.  The same criticism can be made of any scripture.  The Bible has been extensively redacted and edited, but people of faith still believe it to be the word of God.  As for the 1950's version, I have never heard of any such changes in such a recent edition (not even by the most severe critics).  I would be interested to know the specific verses you refer to.

Originally posted by eaglecap

I do not care what one believes and today many Mormons live a good Christian lifestyle but still I wonder. I do believe that if they had remained isolated Mormonism would be different today. I should ask these of my Mormons friends but I avoid religion with them to prevent conflict.


Any faithful member who knows his religion should be able to answer your questions in an intelligent manner without conflict (especially if you are friends).  The LDS religion is truly a way of life.  Faithful Latter-day Saints who are living their religion view themselves as Christians, and attempt to emulate Christ and His teachings.  Some of the doctrines may seem strange, but when considered objectively are they any more peculiar than any other religious beliefs?  The difference is one of perspective.

Last week the church opened a http://jesuschrist.lds.org/ - new webpage coinciding with the annual Easter edition of the Ensign (church magazine) which is solely about Christ.  Anyone who questions whether Mormons are Christians should give it a look.


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 19-Mar-2008 at 00:51
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

Originally posted by eaglecap

I will have to look it up but there was a slaughter of innocent
settlers by a group of Mormons and their Indian allies- can anyone
recall this incident?
Innocent settlers?


Meaning the attack was unprovoked!

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 19-Mar-2008 at 00:54
Originally posted by Vir0n


Originally posted by eaglecap

I wonder why if God told their Prophet that many wives were ok but when they came under pressure from the US government Brigham young suddenly said God changed his mind and now you can have only one wife-???
As above, Brigham Young did not ban polygamy, Wilford Woodruff did. In either case, the saints faced prosecution and occupation by the federal government if the practice was not discontinued. Whether the revelation ending polygamy was divinely inspired or just a pragmatic decision is a matter of faith. This is no different than any religious belief.
Originally posted by eaglecap

I wonder how much their doctrine has changed over time?
The fundamental principles of the gospel have not changed. Certainly the focus has shifted over time, but the beliefs and principles are the same. As far as plural marriage goes, the practice has been discontinued, but the fundamental beliefs about Celestial marriage have not changed.
Originally posted by eaglecap

I was shown a 1950's version of the book of Mormon and then a newer one and some versus were totally omitted- why??
The changes from the 1830 edition are well documented. They are mainly grammatical and syntactical, but there were some verses changed to clarify content. I do not believe that any of the changes changed the fundamental doctrinal content. The same criticism can be made of any scripture. The Bible has been extensively redacted and edited, but people of faith still believe it to be the word of God. As for the 1950's version, I have never heard of any such changes in such a recent edition (not even by the most severe critics). I would be interested to know the specific verses you refer to.
Originally posted by eaglecap

I do not care what one believes and today many Mormons live a good Christian lifestyle but still I wonder. I do believe that if they had remained isolated Mormonism would be different today. I should ask these of my Mormons friends but I avoid religion with them to prevent conflict.
Any faithful member who knows his religion should be able to answer your questions in an intelligent manner without conflict (especially if you are friends). The LDS religion is truly a way of life. Faithful Latter-day Saints who are living their religion view themselves as Christians, and attempt to emulate Christ and His teachings. Some of the doctrines may seem strange, but when considered objectively are they any more peculiar than any other religious beliefs? The difference is one of perspective.Last week the church opened a http://jesuschrist.lds.org/ - new webpage coinciding with the annual Easter edition of the Ensign (church magazine) which is solely about Christ. Anyone who questions whether Mormons are Christians should give it a look.


good reply

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 19-Mar-2008 at 01:07
Originally posted by eaglecap

good reply
 
Thanks.


Posted By: Akolouthos
Date Posted: 19-Mar-2008 at 14:57
Interesting note, with regard to the recent candidacy of Mitt Romney for president. I was reading an article, where the author noted that Romney was one of a select few of the Republican candidates who did not practice what the author called "serial bigamy", or the taking of many wives (through divorce and remarriage). One wonders whether or not it matters that "mainline" (and I do think the term mainline is apt, but for the purposes of this discussion I will place it in quotes) denominations proclaim the monogamous New Covenant standard if we continue to ignore it. One also wonders what purpose there is to floating rumors about a candidates religion officially endorsing polygamy -- which it has not for years -- while one continues to tacitly endorse it.
 
Anyway, I think I will start a "Mormonism" thread, if no one has any objections. There are certainly a variety of topics to speak of that go beyond the subject of this thread.
 
-Akolouthos


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 19-Mar-2008 at 21:04
Originally posted by Akolouthos

Interesting note, with regard to the recent candidacy of Mitt Romney for president. I was reading an article, where the author noted that Romney was one of a select few of the Republican candidates who did not practice what the author called"serial bigamy", or the taking of many wives (through divorce and remarriage). One wonders whether or not it matters that "mainline" (and I do think the term mainline is apt, but for the purposes of this discussion I will place it in quotes) denominationsproclaim the monogamous New Covenant standard if we continue to ignore it. One also wonders what purpose there is to floating rumors about a candidates religion officially endorsing polygamy -- which it has not for years -- while one continues to tacitly endorse it.

Anyway, I think I will start a "Mormonism" thread, if no one has any objections. There are certainly a variety of topics to speak of thatgo beyondthe subject of this thread.


-Akolouthos


Probably the media tearing him apaert but his faith should not take away who he really is and whether he would make a good candidate or not. I frankly, Mormon or otherwise, believe he is a much better choice than McCain. He shared many of the same values I do such as family, pro life and marriage between and man and a women or so he says. I don't fully trust any politician and he could be just another globalist puppet like Bush.
Do we all remember, "Read my lips! No new taxes!!" right!!


-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: confessor
Date Posted: 20-Mar-2008 at 18:23
about polygamy, the reason why it ever put into play, if you will, is because we believe that God want to "raise up a righteous seed unto himself"
 
sometimes, there is a massive difference between the amount of women vs the amount of men, and becasue of this, this goal of God's is unable to be achomplished by the normal means of one wife for one husband, and such was the case with the early saints.
 
as a sidenote, noone of the early saints choose to have more than one wife, every case of polygamy was, well, "assigned" (though that isnt exactly a good word for it, but i cant think of a better one right now) to have more than one wife.
 
also, if you look at how many people practised polygamy, it never more than even 1% of the population of the early mormons, the vast majority of people only had 1 wife, and in general, most peoples ideas of how "widespread" polygamy was amongst the early mormons is completely out of proportion.
 
 


Posted By: confessor
Date Posted: 20-Mar-2008 at 18:28
its true, of all the Republican candidates, he was one of just a few who had never been divorced, and there was almost no mudsligging at him(that i saw) besides trying to cast aspersions(sp?) on mitt Romney's religion.
 
about starting a "mormonism thread" go ahead, just tell me where it is. it could be good.
 


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 08-Apr-2008 at 21:40
Any comments about the wierd Mormon polygomy offshoot or sect in Texas that was raided by the police and children put under protection by the state????

I have seen it on the news and I know the main stream Mormon church stands against this behavior.

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 09-Apr-2008 at 02:08
My only comment is to echo the statement that the LDS Church condems this.  Any member of the church involved in polygamy or sexual abuse is excommunicated.  The church recognizes this as both a criminal act and a violation of God's revealed law.  In the Book of Mormon, the unauthorized practice of polygamy is clearly condemned.  I can understand how both members and nonmembers could have difficulty accepting authorized polygamy as part of God's law, but I suppose it is what it is. 


Posted By: confessor
Date Posted: 12-Apr-2008 at 18:54

my comments are,

good for the government, they are finally getting after this horrible sect. i just wish the government would do more to stamp out that sect.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 12-Apr-2008 at 21:29
Originally posted by confessor

good for the government, they are finally getting after this horrible sect. i just wish the government would do more to stamp out that sect.

 
Maybe another Waco?  The government doesn't have a very good track record when it comes to "stamping out" religious organizations, and in the end I bet this will not be an exception.  The authorties will cross the line between protecting children and interfering with freedom of religion.  The sect and their lawyers will turn it into a civil rights battle, and the whole issue of child abuse will become clouded.


Posted By: red clay
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2008 at 15:42
Polygamy- many wives,   Bigamy- 2 wives,  One wife- monotony.
 
Personally, all moral judgments aside,  you have to be some kind of mutant to want more than one wife. Tongue  Given an opportunity for a "do over", I wouldn't have any.
Listening to all of "that stuff" in monaural is bad enough, but Quadraphonic?ConfusedEvil%20Smile
 
 


-------------
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.


Posted By: confessor
Date Posted: 14-Apr-2008 at 16:51
Originally posted by Vir0n

Originally posted by confessor

good for the government, they are finally getting after this horrible sect. i just wish the government would do more to stamp out that sect.

 
Maybe another Waco?  The government doesn't have a very good track record when it comes to "stamping out" religious organizations, and in the end I bet this will not be an exception.  The authorties will cross the line between protecting children and interfering with freedom of religion.  The sect and their lawyers will turn it into a civil rights battle, and the whole issue of child abuse will become clouded.
 
no, they might not, and what you say i agree, is probably likely to happen, but hopefully what you say will not happen.


Posted By: Cryptic
Date Posted: 27-May-2008 at 19:39
Originally posted by confessor

just curious, what
"Several of the more ehr..."unusual" beliefs"
 are you refering to?
Sorry for the delay, I thought the thread had faded. I was referring to t he following:
 
1970s-  Belief that Blacks are inherently impure spiritually and thus cannot be full Mormon priests is ended by revelation. 
 
Early 1990s- Temple initiation ceremonies are changed. Obviously Masonic derived symbols and verbage (reveal secrets X and the punishment is Y) are discarded. An individual dressed as the devil is no longer used to symbolize Protestant pastors.  
 
2000 (est) Mormon concept of non Mormons as "gentiles" (and by extension, belief that Mormons are somehow a divenely chosen ethnic grouop) was de emphasized after elderly Mormons (a difficult group in any religion) were boycotting non Mormon, "gentile" stores in Illinois.  Mormonism may still officially view non Mormons as Gentiles, but I seriously doubt that Mormon Bishops use that term when describing non Mormons. Historical use of the terms is that all non Jews, including Mormons, are gentiles.
 
2003 (est) Bishop Hinckley states on 60 Miniutes that Joseph Smith (and by extension follow on Mormon prophets) was a "frail human being, and not every teaching of a prophet is a divine revelation".  At the time, Bisphop Hinckley did not specifially state which of Joseph Smith's, or other leaders teachings were in question
 
2004 (est) In a closed door meeting, Bishop Hinckley is rumored to have greatly de emphasized traditional Mormon teachings that God was married, Jesus was married, God was literally once a man, people can become Gods, God resides on an identifiable planet, etc etc.  As the meeting was closed doors the exact details are not known, the available description, however, does match Hinkley's earlier statements in the 60 Minutes interview.
 
2006- Following DNA tests, Mormon leadership no longer claim that all Native Americans, Meso Americans and South Americans are of Isrealite descent.  Modified teaching is that the actual number of such people is very small.


Posted By: Kerimoglu
Date Posted: 28-May-2008 at 08:56
I lived with Mormon family for a year.

They're ok. Look like Muslims. Only they eat pork and do not drink cofein.

Beliefs are wierd though.


-------------
History is a farm. Nations are farmers. What they planted before will show what is going to grow tomorrow!


Posted By: Vorian
Date Posted: 28-May-2008 at 13:54
Do they sleep with all their women together or one at a time?Cool



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com