Print Page | Close Window

Should Teachers Be Allowed to Pack a Gun?

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Scholarly Pursuits
Forum Name: Intellectual discussions
Forum Discription: Discuss political and philosophical theories, religious beliefs and other academic subjects
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=21768
Printed Date: 24-Apr-2024 at 07:32
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Should Teachers Be Allowed to Pack a Gun?
Posted By: red clay
Subject: Should Teachers Be Allowed to Pack a Gun?
Date Posted: 18-Sep-2007 at 21:41
I'm starting to hear rumbles like this in our area.  The majority of the talk is about protecting the kids.  What I worry about are the few who think it's to protect themselves from the kids.
 
 
Should teachers be allowed to pack a gun?

By Brad KnickerbockerTue Sep 18, 4:00 AM ET

In court documents, she's known as "Jane Doe." Innocuous enough, but the woman behind that pseudonym pushes one of the nation's hottest political buttons: guns and school safety.

What Ms. Doe wants to do is take her Glock 9-mm pistol to the high school in Medford, Ore., where she teaches.

She's licensed to carry a concealed weapon and she has what many supporters say is a legitimate reason for being armed: a restraining order against her ex-husband based on threats he's allegedly made against her and her children.

But district policy prohibits anyone except a law-enforcement officer from bringing a weapon onto campus. When word got out that she had a concealed-carry permit, administrators reminded her of that policy. There's the political rub: According to state law, "any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition, is vested solely in the Legislative Assembly."

Backed by gun-rights groups, Doe intends to challenge the school district in state court this week. Meanwhile throughout the country, lawmakers are filing bills that would make it legal for adult school employees to carry firearms, in some cases providing special weapons safety training for those who want to be part of their school's security force in addition to their classroom teaching duties.

Gun-rights groups and school boards around the country are paying close attention to the Oregon case.

"There's a specific state statute that prohibits local governments, including school districts, from passing laws or policies prohibiting people from owning or possessing firearms," says James Leuenberger, the Portland, Ore., lawyer representing the teacher.

"Jane Doe," who agreed to be interviewed by phone on condition of anonymity, says she does not want to be viewed as an "Annie Oakley." Trying to extricate herself from an abusive relationship led her to buy her first gun just a few years ago, she says. Prior to that she had not been an activist in defense of the US Constitution's Second Amendment provision regarding "the right to keep and bear arms."

But as a veteran teacher, she has come to believe strongly that having responsible armed adults on campus could have prevented tragedies such as those at Columbine High School in Colorado, Thurston High School in Oregon, and Virginia Tech University last April.

"I have no doubt at all that any time a criminal has gone into a school intending to commit violence they did so knowing nobody was going to be able to stop them," she says. "We've seen what happens when teachers do nothing or can do nothing, and that's not acceptable to me."

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 37 states have laws specifically banning guns at schools. In general, administrators, teachers' organizations, and law-enforcement agencies favor such laws. In the confusion of a school shooting, police officials have said, adding guns to the situation just makes the predicament more dangerous.

The state panel investigating the April 16 shootings by a mentally disturbed student who killed 33 people at Virginia Tech University (the nation's deadliest school shooting) agrees.

"If numerous people had been rushing around with handguns the possibility of accidental or mistaken shootings would have increased significantly," the panel wrote.

But that has not stopped a push by the NRA and other gun advocates to allow guns on school property as a safety measure.

In Michigan last week, 16 state lawmakers sponsored legislation allowing teachers, administrators, and other school employees to carry concealed weapons on school property. Ohio has a similar bill pending.South Carolina, Alabama, and Virginia are among several other states that have considered lifting school campus gun bans this year, according to Stateline.org, which tracks state issues.

Louisiana lawmakers refused to pass a bill that would have outlawed guns in college dormitories, and legislators in Maine similarly killed a bill that would have given colleges the authority to prohibit guns on campuses.

Anthony Stavros, a member of the Nevada State Board of Regents governing higher education and a Las Vegas police captain, has proposed deputizing university employees as reserve officers, trained and qualified to carry weapons. The Iowa Board of Regents is close to allowing campus police to be armed.

But efforts to allow guns in grade schools and high schools tend not to get very far in state legislatures. The South Carolina measure failed. Administrators and the state teachers' union in Michigan have voiced strong opposition to the proposal there.

So far, just one state - Utah - allows concealed weapons on campus. Utah's law applies to public colleges and universities. The University of Utah opposed the 2004 legislation that allows weapons on campus (including those owned by students with concealed carry permits), but lost in the state supreme court.

For high school teacher "Jane Doe," who takes her case to court this week, the issue is very personal.

"I have two children in school," she says, "and I would like to think that if something like that ever happened, there would be somebody there to do the right thing to protect my kids."

var ADFadids = "-1,1030392"; function ADFlaunch() {var w; var l="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12f8vaaa7/M=224039.1983420.3465435.1919853/D=news/S=96828302:FOOT/_ylt=ApwcVy9awZ.quTbp7Y4NskeOe8UF/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1190171744/A=1030392/R=0/id=adfeedback/SIG=12geo6gbh/*http://surveys.yahoo.com/user_ad_feedback?source=96828302:FOOT&.q28=news&.q26="+ADFadids; w=window.open(l,"AdFeedbackWin","toolbar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable,location=no,height=400,width=640"); }
Copyright 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
 


-------------
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.



Replies:
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 18-Sep-2007 at 22:26
No guns in the classroom. I am as pro-gun as they come, but teachers are supposed to teach, not be poster gals for the NRA. If their is a danger, than the school should be responsible for collective security.


-------------


Posted By: Seko
Date Posted: 18-Sep-2007 at 23:10
Wow! I recently read this stuff in the papers too and got to thinking of the times we live in. Can you imagine a stressed out teacher spraying some buckshot at a few kids?
 
Anyhoo, I agree with Sparten. The school needs to implement safeguards as best as possible. On the other hand maybe all students should be packing. Let's see some deviant open fire then. Nothing like the return  fire as a deterrent.


-------------


Posted By: Justinian
Date Posted: 19-Sep-2007 at 00:03
No.  If you want to keep students and teachers safe, put security at the doors with metal detectors.  What happened to this new era of Tasiers? Allowing teachers to have guns is the (every expletive I have ever heard) idea I have ever come across.  Besides, disgruntled students can just take the guns from teachers, especially female ones, and then you have a problem thats many times worse than the hypothetical one you are trying to prevent.  Violence solves nothing.

-------------
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann



Posted By: JanusRook
Date Posted: 19-Sep-2007 at 00:42
If you want to keep students and teachers safe, put security at the doors with metal detectors.


You do understand there are major problems to this proposal first off schools that have done this have basically turned schools into prisons, and the time spent in line waiting to walk inside can get tedious depending on the class size (every wait to go through security at an airport).

Also who's going to pay for the security and metal detectors? Public funds for schools are all ready quite thin thanks to parent's "not my job" mentality towards public education. I guess that means EVERY music and art department gets cut, as well as most other after school programs, just to "feel safe" when in reality these situations are quite rare.

Anyway, it's stories like this that make me more and more adamant towards home schooling my children.


-------------
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.


Posted By: ArmenianSurvival
Date Posted: 19-Sep-2007 at 01:49

     Can I see a show of hands of whoever didn't do the homework for Chapter 8?

     Four of you? *BOOM* *BOOM* *BOOM* *BOOM*  *points gun to own head*.... *BOOM*

      I don't see how such a law wouldn't create more problems than its "solving". The NRA is supposedly afraid of mentally ill people handling guns at school but they want that spooky English teacher or that weird art instructor to carry one.

     Would anyone seriously trust all their teachers carrying a hand-cannon? One day we're going to really flip our lids and start arming the clergy to make the choir boys feel safe.

     And theres not many people who have the ability to be a good teacher AND safely handle a firearm while keeping their cool in a tense situation (in case another student decides to go apesh*t). If people are that scared for their children, they can just home-school them. Theres no need to increase expenses and lower the quality of teachers while making the campus a more unpredictable place.



-------------
Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Resistance

Քիչ ենք բայց Հայ ենք։


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 05:50
Personally I find that all posts thus far in this thread are a sad reflection on American culture. The fact that you even have to consider arming staff or placing metal detectors on all the doors is a sign that the culture itself has failed. The government is primarily responsible, but the flaws go back as far as the war of independence.

-------------


Posted By: Omar al Hashim
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 06:22
If teachers have guns its only a matter of time before a student steals a teachers gun, and well, you guess is as good as mine.

-------------


Posted By: malizai_
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 08:44
Originally posted by Seko

Wow! I recently read this stuff in the papers too and got to thinking of the times we live in. Can you imagine a stressed out teacher spraying some buckshot at a few kids?
 
 
I think most of us can relate to ur concern.
 
Parents with guns is bad enough, but teachers??
I have two sisters that teach, and even they shouldn't be trusted with guns. If anything, the biggest danger would be to their own health.


-------------


Posted By: Penelope
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 09:08
Originally posted by JanusRook

If you want to keep students and teachers safe, put security at the doors with metal detectors.


You do understand there are major problems to this proposal first off schools that have done this have basically turned schools into prisons, and the time spent in line waiting to walk inside can get tedious depending on the class size (every wait to go through security at an airport).

Also who's going to pay for the security and metal detectors? Public funds for schools are all ready quite thin thanks to parent's "not my job" mentality towards public education. I guess that means EVERY music and art department gets cut, as well as most other after school programs, just to "feel safe" when in reality these situations are quite rare.

Anyway, it's stories like this that make me more and more adamant towards home schooling my children.
 
I totally agree.


Posted By: Mortaza
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 11:15
Funny. If teachers will protect children, why do we give money for police?


Posted By: Seko
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 11:56
Good question Mortaza. Many US cities underpay their Police and teachers. Then you don't have enough police patroling hot spots. Failed economy and local politics is the hinderance.
 
Even more devious, those underpaid police officers are susceptible to breaking the law and covering their violations from the public. Corruption is this issue.
 
Schools do need regular public safety. The more the better.
 
 


-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 14:03
Originally posted by Seko

 
Even more devious, those underpaid police officers are susceptible to breaking the law and covering their violations from the public. Corruption is this issue.

Let's hope that that idea doesn't catch on with underpaid teachers:
"Didn't make your homework? That's $20, mate!"


-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 14:27
Originally posted by Seko

Good question Mortaza. Many US cities underpay their Police and teachers. Then you don't have enough police patroling hot spots. Failed economy and local politics is the hinderance.
 
Even more devious, those underpaid police officers are susceptible to breaking the law and covering their violations from the public. Corruption is this issue.
....
 
Yes. Underpay police is the worst a country could have. That's why the police of Mexico and Guatemala really sucks. However, other reason for it is the lack of discipline in the formation of the police.


Posted By: Justinian
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 18:38
Originally posted by JanusRook

If you want to keep students and teachers safe, put security at the doors with metal detectors.


You do understand there are major problems to this proposal first off schools that have done this have basically turned schools into prisons, and the time spent in line waiting to walk inside can get tedious depending on the class size (every wait to go through security at an airport).

Also who's going to pay for the security and metal detectors? Public funds for schools are all ready quite thin thanks to parent's "not my job" mentality towards public education. I guess that means EVERY music and art department gets cut, as well as most other after school programs, just to "feel safe" when in reality these situations are quite rare.

Anyway, it's stories like this that make me more and more adamant towards home schooling my children.
 
Yes I know, I don't think schools should have metal detectors or anything of the kind, I simply think if people are that paranoid about safety that is a better alternative to arming the teachers.


-------------
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann



Posted By: konstantinius
Date Posted: 30-Sep-2007 at 00:37
NO!! A gun could be taken and used against the original carrier. Sheriff's Deputies here in the US do not carry their side-arm into the court room during trial for the same reason. It would create more problems than it would solve. 

-------------
" I do disagree with what you say but I'll defend to my death your right to do so."


Posted By: Comet
Date Posted: 30-Sep-2007 at 02:53
As a teacher, I would not even think of keeping a weapon in the classroom. I think a lot of the problem lies with the way teacher's incorporate students into their school culture and environment. For example, at the beginning of this school year I told my kids that my classroom should be like a family setting...no put downs are allowed, lifting up each other was the goal. I think a teacher who hammers this and instills this into the minds of our students, it might reduce the number of conflicts amongst the student body. So far so good...no one in my room makes fun of another student and a lot of students tend to help others when they need help.

Of course, this can only work if the kids buy into the concept :)


-------------
History is never clear cut...there are hardly any absolutes


Posted By: Paul
Date Posted: 30-Sep-2007 at 03:10
My experience of school was that teachers should be armed with a shovel and a clear set of instructions on how to use it. Manouvering certain stuff found in a cow field from a spot dubbed 'a' to another location labelled 'b'. In my experience many teachers would struggle to carry out this function.
 
 


-------------
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk - http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk - http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk


Posted By: red clay
Date Posted: 30-Sep-2007 at 04:27
What I am finding interesting is everyone seems to be focusing on the students as the source for the requests for carrying guns.  If you re read the article you'll find it's more concern for protecting the students.  The day before this article there was an incident at a school about a mile from the one I teach at.  An adult male in a ski mask fired several shots at the school.  Fortunately no one was injured.  This was the topic of the day the next day in our staff lunchroom.  I know I'm not thrilled with the idea.
Last year our school had a shooting incident of another type but it caused the school to tighten things up.  We now have electronic locks on our doors as well as some other precautions.  We also have gone through some intensive training in crisis intervention and prevention.  I believe that's the best and safest route, training and preparation.  Armed teachers would make a good plot for a FOX cop show, but not in a real school, in real life.   


-------------
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.


Posted By: Comet
Date Posted: 30-Sep-2007 at 21:34
Originally posted by red clay

What I am finding interesting is everyone seems to be focusing on the students as the source for the requests for carrying guns.  If you re read the article you'll find it's more concern for protecting the students.  The day before this article there was an incident at a school about a mile from the one I teach at.  An adult male in a ski mask fired several shots at the school.  Fortunately no one was injured.  This was the topic of the day the next day in our staff lunchroom.  I know I'm not thrilled with the idea.
Last year our school had a shooting incident of another type but it caused the school to tighten things up.  We now have electronic locks on our doors as well as some other precautions.  We also have gone through some intensive training in crisis intervention and prevention.  I believe that's the best and safest route, training and preparation.  Armed teachers would make a good plot for a FOX cop show, but not in a real school, in real life.   


I don't think it matters what the source for the conversation is...what matters is that someone is suggesting that we take weapons into our classrooms. This suggestion puts more students at risk than someone coming into the school with a weapon. I agree with you wholeheartedly...crisis training and preparation is the best way to keep students safe. Bringing weapons to school will only put every student at risk and could also encourage them to bring weapons to school as well.


-------------
History is never clear cut...there are hardly any absolutes


Posted By: Ulrich Wolff
Date Posted: 01-Oct-2007 at 15:30
How much preparing can you make for a crisis situation? When a man busts down your schoolroom door with an AK-47 in his hand, I don't think theres going to be a lot you can do. But, I don't think this has happened enough to start arming teachers. Maybe a few security guards.


Posted By: Seko
Date Posted: 01-Oct-2007 at 20:56
Seems that our larger issue in general is just another reactionary measure that tries to tackle societal problems. Today guns are more common among youth then they were in my day. Why? Not sure but just the same, parents were as protective then as they are now too. Just not as nuts about the whole thing. The diff? Back then we were not blasted by violence 24/7. Reason? Cable tv wasn't around. Less of a chance to become neurotic if your bad news is taken in manageable quantities from the mornings and between 5:00 pm-7:30pm, with an occasional erruption at 11:00 at night. Now we have the boogeyman squirted onto our screens by the likes of CNN, MSNBC, FOX, BBC, Local News, and they all like to scatter our brains with running tape of nonsense too. Highlights of the day's mischief broadcasted to anxiety provoking levels. TERROR ALERT. "Oh my, Martha. It's another terror alert. Quick go hide the fruit because I think this one is ORANGE". We are bombarded with even more NEWS ALERTs! The blood in Nichol's car was from...OJ! NEWS ALERT - "Osama farted. Did you smell that?" If this doesn't get you all riled up then we always have those judgemental leaders who won't hesitate to call you a coward the minute you fail to show hatred or fear of the enemy. Not them themselves. Just the enemy. Black or White. But never Grey!  
 
This is a summary of my two cents. A) Today gangs carry guns and don't hesitate to use them. Inner city schools are full of 'colors'. They be packin' too. B) The media is friggin violent. News shows were and are still the biggest culprit. Aside from your 'mainstream' average war footage being shown you may have the beatings of protestors or 'caught on tape' style police abuse; we also have missing baby McCann posted on the screen and some chick in Aruba that never made it back to her home safely. That and the occasional COPS show sung to the tune of "bad boys, bad boys!. Folks we are made into a bunch of scared pigeons. Even worse, adults have that deer in the headlights look. To top this anxiety all off, many youth have become desensitized to our BS (well deserved in some part). Whew! That was only the cynical part of me talking. Things do look better.
 
Maybe I should put those rose colored glasses of mine back on and chill. Afterall, I do see less concerned mothers at the bus stop dropping little Billy off every morning. That is a good sign. If mothers of America aren't too worried about everything then me neither, especially since I'm not a teacher at the local school.Wink


-------------


Posted By: Justinian
Date Posted: 02-Oct-2007 at 03:28
Originally posted by Seko

Afterall, I do see less concerned mothers at the bus stop dropping little Billy off every morning.
That's because they are all at work.Wink 
 
Though I do agree that our society completely de-sensitizes us with the endless cavalcade of violence from every direction.


-------------
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann



Posted By: Ulrich Wolff
Date Posted: 02-Oct-2007 at 17:01
I'm 17 years old, I've played every kind of gory video game, and watched all the gory movies. First time I gutted a animal I vomited. Desensitized?


Posted By: red clay
Date Posted: 05-Oct-2007 at 03:15
Seko wrote 
 
   A) Today gangs carry guns and don't hesitate to use them. Inner city schools are full of 'colors'.
 
 
I attend seminars on gangs given by the State Police and DOC for teachers, all levels, not just high school.  Ugly stats-
 
Every school district in every county of New Jersey has evidence of gang activity of one kind or another.
 
There are 6 other states with the same activity level and a bunch bringing up a close 2nd.
 
An aquaintance heads an inner city med. daycare ctr.  She has 3-4 year olds who communicate using gang signs.
 
But gangs are no longer just an inner city problem.  I've spotted gang signs just about everywhere I've been in the last 2-3 years.
 
 
  
 


-------------
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.


Posted By: Justinian
Date Posted: 05-Oct-2007 at 06:13
Originally posted by Ulrich Wolff

I'm 17 years old, I've played every kind of gory video game, and watched all the gory movies. First time I gutted a animal I vomited. Desensitized?
I guess it varies from person to person.  I have relatives that hunt and fish and have seen the insides of animals and fish since quite young.  That probably had as much to do with it as the video games.


-------------
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann



Posted By: toyomotor
Date Posted: 04-Feb-2014 at 05:28
Originally posted by

Personally I find that all posts thus far in this thread are a sad reflection on American culture. The fact that you even have to consider arming staff or placing metal detectors on all the doors is a sign that the culture itself has failed. The government is primarily responsible, but the flaws go back as far as the war of independence.
 
 
I agree with the above. This matter has become very topical in the past few weeks as there have been news reports that in fact some US schools are arming teachers in classrooms, and providing firearms training.
 
The number of shooting incidents in US schools has become almost an epidemic, and receives world wide publicity. The US needs a very strong shot of reality in the gun ownership debate.
 
In Australia, our worst ever mass shooting resulted in 35 dead and more wounded. The Federal Government at the time almost immediately introduced very sensible Gun Registration and Ownership laws.
 
There has been no occurrence of mass shootings ever since.
 
No one, I repeat no one, apart from the Military and Law Enforcement should have access to assault rifles and fully automatic, or for that matter semi-automatic, weapons with large magazine capacities. 
 


-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com