Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Next king super power.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Next king super power.
    Posted: 25-Nov-2004 at 18:50
Originally posted by Genghis

Doesn't the former create the latter though?


that depends. If most people are able to benefit from economic developements it does. But if only a small part of the population benefits, the population is not going to be happy.
Back to Top
coolstorm View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote coolstorm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Nov-2004 at 20:13

I agree. Democracy is a good thing but wealth or prosperity, in my perspective, is way more valuable than democracy. An ideal society would be democratic as well as prosper. But, we also have to evaluate the situation with the consideration of the fact the countries might differ in terms of social structure, stage of development.

To take mainland China as an example, its one child policy, to me, seems to be a good policy. It is a good way of limiting the growth of population, benefiting the entire country's population and the world as well. However, such a policy is said to be against human rights by many. It is certainly not allowed in India as it is a democracy. India with its early development of democracy, is not able to enforce a policy that could solve its population problems. On the other hand, corruption is still a major problem in the country. Democracy is not a solution to everything. Especially in developing countries, an early adoption of democracy might actually be an obstacle for country planning and economic development.

Things are not always so ideal. Each country has to go through a stage of absolutism such as the absolute monarchy of Europe. All western European nations today were at a certin point in history ruled by a dictatorship or monarchy. Countries are just at different stages of political and economic development. To push the development of democracy without considering its impact on the country's development, in my perspective, is not a wise approach.



Edited by coolstorm
Back to Top
MengTzu View Drop Down
General
General

Retired Moderator

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 957
  Quote MengTzu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Nov-2004 at 23:47
Originally posted by Genghis

Doesn't the former create the latter though?

Not always.  It's in hindsight, after having computers, cell phones, and a bunch of crap we never really needed that we say, "it's so hard to imagine life without these things."  But human beings have lived for millenia without these things.  Perhaps the blissful ignorance of the past people about what technology would've evolved to today was enough to make them happy.  Do you seriously think that depression rate is lower than the past because we have new technologies?  It's not like wars and such don't exist today (worse, wars are more terrible than ever.)

Back to Top
MengTzu View Drop Down
General
General

Retired Moderator

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 957
  Quote MengTzu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Nov-2004 at 23:49
Originally posted by MengTzu

Originally posted by Genghis

Doesn't the former create the latter though?

Not always.  It's in hindsight, after having computers, cell phones, and a bunch of craps we never really needed that we say, "it's so hard to imagine life without these things."  (I'm relating technology and inventions to economic development they are a part of modern development.  Modern development is no longer about self-sufficiency and producing for subsistence, but rather, producing for gain, and an inevitable part of that is constant technological advances.)  But human beings have lived for millenia without these things.  Perhaps the blissful ignorance of the past people about what technology would've evolved to today was enough to make them happy.  Do you seriously think that depression rate is lower than the past because we have new technologies?  It's not like wars and such don't exist today (worse, wars are more terrible than ever.)

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.