Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Ancient city found underwater

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
AlokaParyetra View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 28-Aug-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 140
  Quote AlokaParyetra Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Ancient city found underwater
    Posted: 30-Aug-2005 at 18:42

Vast sunken city found off India: experts stunned

Powered by CDNN - Cyber Diver News Network

India sunken city - map
 

INDIA (19 Jan 2002) -- Marine scientists say archaeological remains of a huge lost city some five miles long and two miles wide has been discovered 36 meters (120 feet) underwater off the western coast of India.

The vast city located in the Gulf of Cambay could be over 9,000 years old, and, if so, predates the oldest known remains in the subcontinent by more than 5,000 years.

Debris recovered from the site - including construction material, pottery, sections of walls, beads, sculpture and human bones and teeth have been carbon dated and found to be nearly 9,500 years old.

However, Archaeologist Justin Morris from the British Museum cautioned that more work would need to be undertaken before the age of the site could be confirmed.  He noted that the C14 carbon dating process is not without its error margins.

The find is unprecedented, and may force historians and archaeologists to radically reconsider their view of ancient human history. It is believed that the area was submerged as ice caps melted at the end of the last ice age 9-10,000 years ago.

The site was discovered by chance last year by oceanographers from India's National Institute of Ocean Technology, while conducting a survey of pollution using sidescan sonar.

Author and film-maker Graham Hancock, an expert on the discovery of long-lost cities, reports that, "Cities on this scale are not known in the archaeological record until roughly 4,500 years ago when the first big cities begin to appear in Mesopotamia."

"Nothing else on the scale of the underwater cities of Cambay is known. The first cities of the historical period are as far away from these cities as we are today from the pyramids of Egypt," he added.

Dr. Morris agreed. "Culturally speaking, in that part of the world there were no civilizations prior to about 2,500 BC. What's happening before then mainly consisted of small, village settlements."

The Indian Minister for Human Resources and ocean development said a group had been formed to oversee further studies in the area. "We have to find out what happened then ... where and how this civilization vanished," he said.

Exploring the area has been extremely difficult because the remains lie in highly treacherous waters, with strong currents and rip tides.

 

Incredible find. Though, it did occur 3 years ago....

Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Aug-2005 at 18:56
Yea, I was gonna say, isn;t that old news? But fascinating nevertheless.
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Aug-2005 at 19:39
Do you have a link, Aloka?

Seems intersting indeed.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
cattus View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1803
  Quote cattus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Aug-2005 at 21:10
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Aug-2005 at 06:58
Thanks for the links, Cattus. 

The second one has most interesting stuff: first of all the excavation as not been undertaken by any archeologist but has been done through dredging . The page titled Questions which need to be answered through further research says:

No archaeologist, nor diver, has seen the underwater site. No underwater photographs were taken. The artefacts were recovered by a mechanical dredge that trawled large sections of the sea-bed. The decision to dredge the sea-bed was made by the Department of Ocean Development.

(...)

Professor K.V. Raman, former head of the Department of Archaeology, University of Madras, and former Superintending Archaeologist with the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), says that the site needs more probing. On the pre-Harappan label being attached to the site, he says, "I am really sick of the politicisation of matters like this. It destroys the integrity of my profession."


NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Cywr View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6003
  Quote Cywr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Aug-2005 at 07:31
An old but very intresting story.

This however bothers me:

Debris recovered from the site - including construction material, pottery, sections of walls, beads, sculpture and human bones and teeth have been carbon dated and found to be nearly 9,500 years old.


I was under the impression that carbon dating was next to useless on stuff that has been under sea water for a long time (something to do with absorbed CO2 in water contaminating the samples or something).
Arrrgh!!"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.