Dispelling Afrocentrist myths, North africans

I am caucasoid, but my skin is such that if I go under the sun for long enough I will look as dark as TutanKhamun up there.  Skin colour cannot be used to prove or disprove race.

Another thing I would like to point out is this: Negroid genes are dominant, caucasoid genes are recessive, Egypt was one of the most populace areas in the world at any given time in ancient history.  How can such relatively few military invaders lighten them?  Have a look at Brazil and the mulattoes there some have more white genes than black but they still do retain their african features over their white features.

You yourself said Coptics looked like Ethiopians, now that I show u they look like MEers you say they are Greeks!!! Egypt as a whole was a coptic country prior to the Islamic invasion.  The Bantu population in Egypt can be explained by the Arab slave traders.

Ancient Egyptians were most probably, and as shown above, caucasoid with Nubian admixture; this would be natural after all given the adjacency (but not Bantu).

 I made the confusion with coptic and orthodox ethiopians. Coptic also having a christian tradition would indicate they are foreign to the land previously but the ethiopian would have more acquired the religion through extrenal contact.

 The coptic must have been foreign to the civilisation, it is obvious such an environment would not generate such light skin people unless through migration, further it is extremely rare for the very ancient egyptians to be portrayed with light skin , this would consist evidence enough that the coptic does originate from this place.

Here's how the Egyptians themselves viewed the race issue:

The one on the right is Egyptian. Not quite "black", not quite "white"...

Let's take a look at Nefertiti.

Notice that the women are always depicted as lighter than men. I think that this is because they did not spend as much time in the sun, so they're closer to their natural skin color. Note that in the papyrus below, some of the women look like slaves. Still, the nude dancers are representive.

 Celtic haplotype is set of genes that are inherited as one block, it is very frequent among the people relate to a celtic culture. Celtic Haplotype is crude term and can be labelled as something like H-167. Are you getting this. It's a crude term from my part.

 Actually the first picture clearly back my claims, the egyptian looks like an Ethiopian to me and most african does have the skin colour that match the egyptian, certainly they don't look middle eastern. In fact south african bushmen have much lighter skin colour than that.

 That's an ethiopian man

A sudanese man

 Notice the clear difference in facial as well as skin colour. .

 Ethiopian women (hahhaha some of them looks real good, I've met one once )

 For me these would be how the egyptian would have look in the northern part, even darker more closely ressembling nubian in the first cataract.

 Bushman

 Notice the yellowish brown colour skin, flat noise, nothing to do with sudanese or ethiopian.

Bantu still another race with typical phenotype and greatly different genotype

Zulu (you don't want to fvck with these one usually tall)

 And the list can go on, there is no such thing as negroid race, or Africans as one people. It is a modern invention.

 I disagree on this point. There is no such as a dominant negroid type, that genetically speaking. Suppose an average bantu is the typical "negro" (No racism implies here just to make they don't ban me for racism lol). This specimen would have a set of physical attributes, such eye colour, skull shape, a typical average height, teeth structure, blood groups, etc the list can go on  and on . But here many of these physical attributes are simply continuous rather than discrete(discrete means either they expressed themselves in the offspring or not). Brown eye is a discrete and dominant  trait so if the bantu specimen mate with a blue causasoid specimen, the offspring will be all brown eyes hybrid. that only one of the case of the dominant feature. But skin colour traits are continuous, the offspring will have a skin colour in btw the bantu specimen and the caucasoid specimen. there will be other traits where the caucasoid will be dominant (it could be blood group for instance). So it is wrong to say the negroid type is dominant, because he comes with set of the features some dominant, some recessive and some continuous (that is going to be added). And I can back my theory, portugal used to have in an early time a large population of black, now they have been assimilated by the vast white population. there is no trace of them physically speaking. Same thing with america, most black in american are not even black and has little in common with say a bantu. Infact if trends persist, very few black will exist in american in say 200 years.