Originally posted by qirt
Are Turkic writers changing world history or world historians - "enemies" of the Turkics changing the Turkic history? They complaining that world historians falsificated their history.
|
History is not technical science, it is social. That's why there is no such thing as true World History.
Example:
Changing ruler of Constantinople, this is historical thing but when you call it "Fall of Constantinople" or "Conquest of the Istanbul", you choose a side.
I have been in India. Their idea is that the homeland of democracy is India, so actually many people are ignoring history which was written by Pan Europeans
Common history is full with European perspective and in same way not all pan-turkic is objective, these ideas shouldn't turn super race theory as in Hitler's Germany.