Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Putin: Soviet collapse greatest century’s catastrophe!!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Putin: Soviet collapse greatest century’s catastrophe!!
    Posted: 03-Aug-2005 at 15:16

"November Revolution of 1917 is the honour of humanity."

The revolution created a heavily nationalistic state whose interest was pure imperialism, disregarding any rights a person today seems to need. The Soviet Union failed on his first day as Uljanov had no idea what Marx was trying to say and therefore his country had nothing to do with communism . Just a terrorist state whose elite was just as bad as the modern American corporate leaders. How long will people believe the long dead lie of the Soviet Union being a socially more legal state. Soviet leaders cared as much about social rights as a rabbit cares of the space. Grrrr.....

"The USSR caused some unfortunate deaths at Stalin's time, but it also defeated the nazis with a lot of sacrifices."

The nazis acctually learned everything from propaganda to creating demise form the USSR, and the USSR helped the nazis get so far with the holocaust and conquering of the Lebensraum. Very easy to forget that part i think.

There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
Illuminati View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949
  Quote Illuminati Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Aug-2005 at 22:04

The November revolution only worked to replace one oppressive government with another. The intentions on Lenin was good, but communism is fundamentaly flawed and thus was bound to fail.

Communists are among the most imperialist in history. They finance guerrila groups, incite revolutions, invade innocent nations, and commit crimes just as much as the western nations they love to point fingers at. I see them as the ultimate hypocrites. 

Personally, I believe Communism has done more damage in the 20th Century than Fascism has. More people died under Communist rule than the Fascism ever killed. I guess its just Ironic that a system created from wonderful and peaceful ideas turns out to be the more damaging than Fascism, which is an evil and unfair system to the very core. There may have not been as much inequality and poverty in the USSR, but could Soviet citizens freely leave the USSR?? Could they openly and publicy criticize their govt?? No. They could not. In my mind, then debate ends there.

Communists always try and sperate themselves from other horrors of humanity's past by preaching of their humanisic ideals. But I believe it just proves true one of the most common trends history has shown us.....

It is often done with good intentions.

 



Edited by Illuminati
Back to Top
kotumeyil View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1494
  Quote kotumeyil Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 02:33

Kalevipoeg wrote:

"The revolution created a heavily nationalistic state whose interest was pure imperialism, disregarding any rights a person today seems to need. The Soviet Union failed on his first day as Uljanov had no idea what Marx was trying to say and therefore his country had nothing to do with communism . "

Throughout the life of the USSR sometimes the Russian nationalism got stronger, but as a state policy, the USSR never oppressed the identities of its nations, on the contrary it encouraged them.

Imperialism is a phase of capitalism, nothing to do with socialism. You may say expansionist, but not imperialist.

Lenin just adopted Marx's views in a semi-industrialised peripheral capitalist society so it cannot be expected that he would apply just the same things that Marx say about the central states of the capitalist system, i. e. England and France...

Disregarding any rights any rights a person today seems to need?! Do you think that the rights a person need are just voting for some bastards and overconsuming? Then today nobody needs employment, social security, free health care, free education, better working hours, etc...

Kalevipoeg wrote:

"...and the USSR helped the nazis get so far with the holocaust and conquering of the Lebensraum. Very easy to forget that part i think."

You are talking about the pact between Germany and the USSR. The USSR had to gain time for preparing its defence. Without that time it would be tottaly overwhelmed. Thanks to that defence that it could defeat the Nazis. D Day, etc. are just little tales when compared to the size of war on the eastern front.

Illuminati wrote:

"Communists are among the most imperialist in history. They finance guerrila groups, incite revolutions, invade innocent nations, and commit crimes just as much as the western nations they love to point fingers at. I see them as the ultimate hypocrites."

As I mentioned above, its not imperialist, you may say expansionist...

"There may have not been as much inequality and poverty in the USSR, but could Soviet citizens freely leave the USSR??"

At least they travelled money-free. Today they have the right to leave the country, but how many of them have the money for that travel? And thanks to this free movement, their women can come to our country for prostituting! How tragic and embarrassing for humanity... 

"Could they openly and publicy criticize their govt??"

You can publicly critise Bush, but he continues killing people in Iraq... 

 



Edited by kotumeyil
Back to Top
Kynsi View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 15-Apr-2005
Location: Finland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 73
  Quote Kynsi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 07:09
Originally posted by kotumeyil


Throughout the life of the USSR sometimes the Russian nationalism got stronger, but as a state policy, the USSR never oppressed the identities of its nations, on the contrary it encouraged them.



Not entirely true.

For example in Estonia the power was consentrated to the Estonia's communist party whose party leaders were mostly
Russians and was in the direct controll of Moscow. Thousands of Estonians deported to Siberia and their lands confiscated.

I think our friend Kalevipoeg could address you more about how Estonia was oppressed by the USSR.

And If I am not entirely mistaken thease kind of politics were executed in all of baltic countries.

Eaven in todays Russia some of the minorities are being oppressed for example the the mari people and the government turns the blind eye.
If you keep one eye on the past then you are blind in one eye, but if you
forget the past then you are blind in both eyes -old russian saying
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 07:19

Communism is not flawed, men are flawed.

--------

Originally posted by kotumeyil

November Revolution of 1917 is the honour of humanity. Collapse of the USSR left the world defenseless against the neoliberal policies and exploitation. Unemployment, poverty are now the reality of ex-soviet people (except Russian mafia and petrol billionaires.) Also in the western world, all social rights given by the welfare state started to be taken away. The USA began acting as a shameless aggressive imperialist power.

What USSR brought to the world was the strength of leftist groups all over the world. All the social rights, social insurances were taken by this strength.

The USSR caused some unfortunate deaths at Stalin's time, but it also defeated the nazis with a lot of sacrifices. The last times of USSR wasn't bloody except the war of Afghanistan, which was the hot face of the cold war (it was implicitly between the USSR and the USA, i. e. bin Ladin)

What democracy are you talking about?!? The representative democracy is in crisis today, because although you elect your governments, all important decisions are taken by the global multi-national companies and financial capitalists. Or are you talking about the "democracy" in Iraq, which caused more than 100.000 deaths since March 2003!

After the Cold War, the USA invented another "evil" other: the terrorists. It attacks anywhere it wants and your civilised and lawful EU couldn't say even anything about the obvious violation of the international law (by the way, I don't believe that there is anything like this). 

^  Well said.

Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 07:40
Originally posted by kotumeyil

Imperialism is a phase of capitalism, nothing to do with socialism. You may say expansionist, but not imperialist


Hello Comrade kotumeyil!
How good and refreshing it is to have an old-style, orthodox commie on board,... seriously. I'm looking forward to lively discussions and you might want to get your, metaphorical, ice-pick out!

There are tendencies on the left who define the Stalinist Soviet-Union as 'state-monopol-capitalism" where the ownership of the means of production have not been transfered to the working-class, but are held by the state which emerges as the sole and total capitalist. As the workers still do not have any control over production, the character of the capital remains, and the exploitation of the workers is continued.
This form of capitalism was prominent in the Imperialist countries, where transport, arms manufacture, etc, had been monopolised by the state in order to advance their progress in the Imperialist race.
If you understand the Stalinist Soviet-Union as a state-capitalist society, then you could call Stalin's expansionist plans, Imperialist after all.

Edited by Komnenos
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
Constantine XI View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
  Quote Constantine XI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 08:25
A few months ago when in a class we were asked who was really important, the alpha or beta male. To everyone's surprise the tutor answered the beta male, simply because if the beta male is weak the alpha male will slide into decline due to lack of opposition.

The USSR kept the USA on its toes, kept it focused on a very worthy and noble mission, of preventing the world's people of falling to totalitarian dictatorships. Now that that threat is gone the USA seems to be a nation poised for action, with no mission to embark on. As bad as the USSR was, it brought out so much of what was best in the USA. But today the alpha male lacks his rival, can he really be expected to be the impressive example of progress and prowess he once was?
Back to Top
kotumeyil View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1494
  Quote kotumeyil Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 10:11

Originally posted by Komnenos

Originally posted by kotumeyil

Imperialism is a phase of capitalism, nothing to do with socialism. You may say expansionist, but not imperialist


Hello Comrade kotumeyil!
How good and refreshing it is to have an old-style, orthodox commie on board,... seriously. I'm looking forward to lively discussions and you might want to get your, metaphorical, ice-pick out!

There are tendencies on the left who define the Stalinist Soviet-Union as 'state-monopol-capitalism" where the ownership of the means of production have not been transfered to the working-class, but are held by the state which emergence as the sole and total capitalist. As the workers still do not have any control over production, the character of the capital remains, and the exploitation of the workers is continued.
This form of capitalism was prominent in the Imperialist countries, where transport, arms manufacture, etc, had been monopolised by the state in order to advance their progress in the Imperialist race.
If you understand the Stalinist Soviet-Union as a state-capitalist society, then you could Stalin's expansionist plans, Imperialist after all.

So hello to you comrade!

I think, as well as the ownership of the means of production, the main characteristic of the capitalist system is the endless accumulation of capital in private hands. I think this was not the case.

As for the state capitalism: I think this concept can be used for the capitalist countries in which the state implements etatist economic policies in order to create and develope a bourgeoisie and flourish the industries or where the state favours a group of capitalists against others by the means of state power. In both of these, the entrepreneurs have a legal and legitimate basis but in the USSR this wasn't the case. State owned the means of production and although some administrators had better economic conditions, there wasn't an endless accumulation of capital in their hands.

By the way, I don't say that the USSR didn't make any mistakes. If it didn't, sure it wouldn't collapse. But I'm against degrading one of the best accomplishment of the lower classes... 

Back to Top
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 13:31

Kotumeyl wrote: "Throughout the life of the USSR sometimes the Russian nationalism got stronger, but as a state policy, the USSR never oppressed the identities of its nations, on the contrary it encouraged them."

Indeed? That must be why we had to sing Russian songs on our National Song festival that has gathered hundreds of thousands of Estonians together since 1869. under one banner to sing folk songs. But the Soviets had to fill even that with some brainwashing songs that would even creep Hitler out. But acctually made me laugh when i saw it on TV. Russian was compulsory and everyone had to learn Russian, nobody of the Russians ever learned Estonian, Latvian and so on. There was no supporting of different cultures. Everything slowly Russiafied. The leader of the Estonian Communist state (the ENSV) who came to power in 1978., couldn't even speak a word of our native language. Once a year he attempted to say something in Estonian when the 1st May celebrations were in town. Pityful acctually.

There was also mixing of nations. Russians were brought in everywhere as workers. Not a good way of keeping alive different cultures huh. And about equality: When the Russians came in by hundreds of thousands to a country where the natives (Estonians) numbered a mere million, the Russians were given immidiate accomodations, but Estonians were put on standby. Estonians were second rated citizens whose needs were not state priority. Entire towns were filled with Russian populations in many cases. My grandmother and uncle live in Kohtla-Jrve, a city where to this day 80% are Russians. Russians were prefered everywhere, every day.

Although Stalin was Georgian and honored his native cooking, singing and wine - he was utterly pro-Russian in the way of spreading culture across the USSR. I seem to remember that he more than once kept his cronies from speaking their native languages, like Beria, or Mikoyan for example and ordered Russian to be spoken in the USSR.

The Soviet Union leaders had created a new type of man - a better person that had better morals, ethics and surpassed every other man, other than a fellow bolshevik. The Soviet leaders themselves thought of themselves as the prime examples. The Molotov family for example is somewhat as the Goering or Goebbels family in Hitlers Germany - a model family. All of this was totally equivalent to Hitlers uber-mensch (did i spell it right), the Arian race madness. There was little room for nationalism or for different nations at all.

Venestamine - Russiafication is a common word known by most Estonians who are now rid of it, at last.

Kotumeyl wrote: "You are talking about the pact between Germany and the USSR. The USSR had to gain time for preparing its defence. Without that time it would be tottaly overwhelmed. Thanks to that defence that it could defeat the Nazis. D Day, etc. are just little tales when compared to the size of war on the eastern front."

And about the fact that the USSR trained nazi officers, helped to put together airplanes for Hitler and favouring of its policies as it was, in Stalins eyes, something that prevented the Westerm powers of attacking the USSR. Stalin had many delusions you know.

Stalingrad happened due to the incompatance of the USSR, why does everyone only put pressure on its heroic victory, its a half truth this way.

Kotumeyl wrote: "Disregarding any rights any rights a person today seems to need?! Do you think that the rights a person need are just voting for some bastards and overconsuming? Then today nobody needs employment, social security, free health care, free education, better working hours, etc..."

I don't think anyone would choose the USSR  over todays Scandinavian countries.

And nobody likes KGB snoops watching over their shoulders over every so called "suspicious action" . And am i wrong when saying that the USSR had camps to send differently thinking people to, up to the 1980's? 

And atleast now i can go to a store and buy meat products, instead of walking into a store during Soviet time and see just half store full of one type of veggies which acctually was the case way too often. And i don't have to have relatives or friends as storekeepers to get hands on some sausage or meat for birthdays.



Edited by Kalevipoeg
There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
kotumeyil View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1494
  Quote kotumeyil Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 14:19

I don't say that the USSR was a heaven but I'm against degrading all of its accomplishments. Was learning Estonian banned? Even the smallest ethnic minorities had their own autonomous administrations, at least nominally. Many people all over the world lacks even these. of course there were Russian nationalists and this isn't an adorable thing but Russian was the lingua franca of the Eastern bloc. And today in this "free" world English is the lingua franca. If you don't know it you cannot be employed or you cannot even write on this forum. This is a de facto problem.In the USSR the Russians were the majority so they actually dominated it. Again I'm saying, I don't defend such policies. also I don't defend the "police state" of the USSR.

On the other hand you are talking about the variety of goods you can consume, as an example of freedom. I know a lot of people who cannot have medical care because they have no money. They even don't have the freedom to live. There are many people who cannot find even a dry bread. Just because of you lacked some luxury of finding a variety of goods you shouldn't degrade what the November Revolution gave to the world.

also appreciate the social policies of the Scandinavian states but even there the social rights are started to be questionned after the collapse of the USSR...  

 

  



Edited by kotumeyil
Back to Top
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 18:54

"I don't say that the USSR was a heaven but I'm against degrading all of its accomplishments."

All it accomplished here, was creating xenophobia towards Russians and funny stories and anecdotes about Soviet stupidity. And then there are of course the large number of elderly Russians who they forgot to take along across the eastern border when their country shattered under the weight of fredom. And those elderly Russians are still under a seventy year long propaganda rush! Really dandy to see this mob on TV on the May 9th every year. Thank you very much.

"Was learning Estonian banned?"

No.

"Even the smallest ethnic minorities had their own autonomous administrations, at least nominally. Many people all over the world lacks even these."

And only nominally it remained, remains and will remain for the near future.

"of course there were Russian nationalists and this isn't an adorable thing but Russian was the lingua franca of the Eastern bloc."

Russian nationalism was the state policy, certainly not on paper, but it was therre for a person who lived it for half a century.

"On the other hand you are talking about the variety of goods you can consume, as an example of freedom. I know a lot of people who cannot have medical care because they have no money. They even don't have the freedom to live. There are many people who cannot find even a dry bread. Just because of you lacked some luxury of finding a variety of goods you shouldn't degrade what the November Revolution gave to the world."

Having normal food like bread, cheese, milk or meat on your table is a right aswell. How long do those, or excuse me, THAT veggie last? Having free healthcare was wonderful, but todays medicine is a business and therefore, life has a price now. Greed is prospering in capitalism, but it was just as powerful during the timefrmae from Uljanov to Gorbatschev among the bolsheviks. It prospered during the USSR only the people weren't allowed to see it, or allowed to talk about it. The Soviet elite was just as todays - greedy, fancy cars, government cash for personal joy, pink poodles on fat mens laps and so on.

"Just because of you lacked some luxury of finding a variety of goods you shouldn't degrade what the November Revolution gave to the world."

It resulted in a government and a country, where a former peasant, a prisoner, a murderer, a craftsman instantly got to a high ranking job which he wasn't qualified for and used his newly found authority for personal pleasures of degrading his fellow countrymen for personal fun. It resulted in a cleansing of the society where everybody was a target without even caring who you were killing, starving to death. It resulted in a new way of terror that man has difficulty finding words to describe. It resulted also in a mass hysteria and hypnosis of the new country of terror and hubris - similar of what Hitler created in 1933. 

I WOULDN'T ACCEPT FREE HEALTHCARE IF COUNTLESS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WERE MURDERED, AMONG MANY MY OWN KINSMEN, DUE TO MADNESS BY THE SAME ADMINISTRATION.

There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
kotumeyil View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1494
  Quote kotumeyil Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 20:23

Don't misunderstand me, I respect your thoughts against oppression. What I want to say is that the November-October revolution brought some ideals to the world's agenda and for me they have utmost importance. The soviet experience wasn't successful and it couldn't realise most of its ideals but this doesn't make these ideals bad. Because you are an ex-soviet citizen you may have negative thoughts about it but the ideals brought by the revolution are humane and universal. I can't nevermind these and I can't accept what you said:

Originally posted by Kalevipoeg


 todays medicine is a business and therefore, life has a price now.

[IMG]http://www.maksimum.com/yemeicme/images/haber/raki.jpg">
Back to Top
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Aug-2005 at 12:38

Yes, ideals are wonderful, but they would have been just as wonderful without the revolution and waste of i don't know how many tens of millions of people.

And about medicine - a modern business. Medical companies of the west would keep the vaccine for AIDS from reaching the people if they didn't get their dollars first. Poor people are victims of a business of life and death. My grandmother needs about three or four different medicines, but she told me that she only buys one, because she can't afford more. Medical company holders or leaders or who ever they are, are probably as wealthy as oil magnates.

I don't see medicine as a humane industry in the west.

There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
kotumeyil View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1494
  Quote kotumeyil Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Aug-2005 at 15:10
Originally posted by Kalevipoeg

And about medicine - a modern business. Medical companies of the west would keep the vaccine for AIDS from reaching the people if they didn't get their dollars first. Poor people are victims of a business of life and death. My grandmother needs about three or four different medicines, but she told me that she only buys one, because she can't afford more. Medical company holders or leaders or who ever they are, are probably as wealthy as oil magnates.

I don't see medicine as a humane industry in the west.

This is just what I meant...

[IMG]http://www.maksimum.com/yemeicme/images/haber/raki.jpg">
Back to Top
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Aug-2005 at 17:16

Good to agree with someone!

Not much else to talk about anymore, or what...?

There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
kotumeyil View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1494
  Quote kotumeyil Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Aug-2005 at 17:37

Of course we can talk but it is obvious that it isn't likely that we will

have an agreement on politics...

[IMG]http://www.maksimum.com/yemeicme/images/haber/raki.jpg">
Back to Top
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Aug-2005 at 05:32

Well, i don't even have a clear political preference really.

Maybe if we don't keep talking about the USSR's fall, the subject will be closed or we banned.

There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Aug-2005 at 09:46
Even if Putin has a point, what did he do to stop it? He backed Yelsin who was the one that declared the independence of Russia, causing the break out of the Soviet Union... he favors mafia capitalism instead of social policies... he's doing nothing of use in favor of Russia and it's lost might... and he licks the boots of GWB all the time.

I liked Gorbachev...
Back to Top
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Aug-2005 at 10:41
I don't like anything Soviet!
There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.