The 'Great One' speaks

Message Share Topic Printable Version Google Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks reddit Facebook MySpace Newsvine Furl Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic

And Obama ducks as his attempted intimidation viz FDR is id' and exposed as an obammite devotee's counter to judicial activism. Obviously these lads don't know the difference between the former and the duly authorized and historical responsibilities of the court since it's foundation and as described in the constitution. 
Not to mention Case law since Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).

Well...no they actually do...but that don't mean they would abide by it or recognize that there are a few of us out here who can  still see attempted leftist-socialist politics in action.

''In the hearing, Judge Smith says the president's comments suggesting courts 
lack power to set aside federal laws "have troubled a number of people" and that 
the suggestion "is not a small matter."

The bottom line from Smith: A three-page letter with specifics. He asked DOJ 
to discuss "judicial review, as it relates to the specific statements of the 
president, in regard to Obamacare and to the authority of the federal courts to 
review that legislation."

"I would like to have from you by noon on Thursday -- that's about 48 hours 
from now -- a letter stating what is the position of the Attorney General and 
the Department of Justice, in regard to the recent statements by the president," 
Smith said. "What is the authority is of the federal courts in this regard in 
terms of judicial review
 see: http://www.marklevinshow.com/goout.asp?u=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504564_162-57408827-504564/appeals-court-fires-back-at-obamas-comments-on-health-care-case/

Edited by Centrix Vigilis - 04-Apr-2012 at 15:19