Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

What is the most powerful empire ever to grace us?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 91011
Poll Question: Wich empire could kill the rest?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
8 [15.09%]
20 [37.74%]
1 [1.89%]
3 [5.66%]
2 [3.77%]
3 [5.66%]
0 [0.00%]
4 [7.55%]
6 [11.32%]
4 [7.55%]
2 [3.77%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Voskhod View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Oct-2008
Location: Melbourne
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 98
  Quote Voskhod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: What is the most powerful empire ever to grace us?
    Posted: 08-Dec-2008 at 11:53
Both democrasy and seperation of state and religion, come from the Hebrew bible, as does Evolution, Entropy, Medicine and the oldest active and most accurate calendar: both the day and the week were introduced in Genesis.


Joseph, it would be really nice for you to actually quote something from the Bible that supports what you claims.
"All the true heroes of history will be forgotten and all the villains will be remembered as heroes."
- Leo Tolstoy
Back to Top
IamJoseph View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 20-Sep-2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 296
  Quote IamJoseph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Dec-2008 at 13:41
Originally posted by Voskhod

Both democrasy and seperation of state and religion, come from the Hebrew bible, as does Evolution, Entropy, Medicine and the oldest active and most accurate calendar: both the day and the week were introduced in Genesis.


Joseph, it would be really nice for you to actually quote something from the Bible that supports what you claims.
 
Sure, I quoted many things from a document which many know and are familiar with. I quote these references because I did not invent them and these are not my personal opinions. Whether one accepts them as correct or not is their own position.
 
With regard democrasy, and that it is insufficient to base this solely on a majority ruling without applicable qualification, does not result in democrasy. Firstly, there is a mandated law in the Hebrew Bible which says a majority must first be of free choice without enforcement or coersion - which is deemed a corrupted majority [evil, in biblespeak], and the other factor is we have this stated in a document which predates any Greek writings. This means before a majority votes, there must be means to allow their free voting choice, and there must be no gifts or threats. Democrasy is greek for majority or multitude of the population:
 
EX/23/2 Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou bear witness in a cause to turn aside after a multitude to pervert justice.
 
Re. Seperation of state and religion, this is seen in numerous instances of the Hebrew bible, for example between King David and the Prophet Nathan, the former represents the ruling party [state, king, president, etc] and the latter the law [religion; din]. Here, when David commited an act against the law, he was taken to task before the people and a death sentence was issued - which is unseen in any other scripture the law is made applying equally to king as to a commoner, namely where a state's greatest king is made to be subserviant to common law of the people [Equal justice for all]. David was thus sentenced before the people by the law by Nathan [2 Samuel Chapter 12], and David accepted this sentence. This is an example of seperation of state [ruler] and religion [which is the law].
 
Re. Evolution. Genesis 1/1 lists the chronological emergence of life forms, from sea, air, land, animals, human; transit mamals, virus and bacteria are also represented in the list, as well as precedent anticipatory elements and forces such as seperation of water from land, and light from darkness. This is the first recording of what Darwin used to make his theory - which is varied from only one factor: Genesis' limited speciation [within their kind - sea, air or land based], as opposed Darwin's unlimited speciation [retrovirus as the bases of all life].
 
Entropy is formless to form, Gen 1/2; and the universe being finite is in the opening V1 [there was a Beginning].
 
Re. Medicine. The first seperation of medicine from occultism is with the example of Leprosy, which lists factors such as malignancy [incurable], chronic and temporary conditions, its identification & quarantine. The subject  of contagiousness, of virus and bacteria, and the burning by fire all porous materials such as clothes and wood, is also listed here for the first time:
 
'If the plague be dim, and the plague be not spread in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him clean: it is a scab; and he shall wash his clothes, and be clean. 7 But if the scab spread abroad in the skin, after that he hath shown himself to the priest for his cleansing, he shall show himself to the priest again. 8 And the priest shall look, and, behold, if the scab be spread in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is leprosy. This description is long and protracted, covering many pages. More: Leviticus 13.
 
Re Calendar. The Hebrew calendar, being 5787 years, is the oldest active calendar, and also regarded the world's most accurate one, operating by the solar, lunar & earth movements. This records everything in history to the extent there is no history outsde this calendar.
 


Edited by IamJoseph - 08-Dec-2008 at 13:42
Moses - the First Zionist.
Back to Top
dud View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jan-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 19
  Quote dud Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Jan-2009 at 23:39
I honestly think that the Romans did not make as much of an impact as they were given credit for. Among the best of the Roman innovations are the Republic (which was really an aristocracy that was highly oppressive on the lower classes, NOTHING like the concept of modern republics), a gigantic coinage, and innovations in business.
 
I think that the second Assyrian Empire was among the greatest of empires considering the time period (roughly 2000-1200 BCE). They were masters of propaganda; although they probably did not invent it, it might be said that they perfected it. Also, the Assyrians had sophisticated techniques of administration and of assimilating conquered peoples including displacement (according to nationality and skills: a farmer would be sent to an agricultural area for example). Also the Assyrians were among the first states to exploit the desert spanning camel for trade purposes. Assyrian ideology placed the supreme god in support of the empire with the king being his human medium. Most notably, they were (debatedly) the first empire by definition in human history (though others were close). I could go on and on
Back to Top
pebbles View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 12-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 409
  Quote pebbles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Mar-2009 at 06:31
 
I say America Empire,its imperial claw reaches every corner of the earth militarily politically culturally and impact far greater than British one.
 
 
 
Back to Top
Iuris Civilis View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 25-Mar-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote Iuris Civilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2009 at 16:15
Angrywhat a  shame there is no greatest greatest is Ottoman for now,before we found greaterWink
When we become again we,
you cannot see slave,
than you see your leaders
Back to Top
nuvolari View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 14-Jul-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 269
  Quote nuvolari Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Mar-2009 at 16:36
There is little doubt that the Roman Empire brought many benefits to the World as it was known at that time. However, several points are relevent here (a) The Roman Empire at its peak was only ever one third of the size of the British Empire (b) It ended in blood and fire with barbarians at the Gates of Rome(c) Adolf Hitler, who was somewhat of an expert at the subjugation of nations, intensely admired the British Empire, not least for its ability to administer the whole of India and all of its disparate races and religions, with just 10,000 civil servants and soldiers.  Measuring the British against the Roman Empire, it is clear that the benefits of the former by far outweigh those of the latter, all the more so since in its restructured form of the Commonwealth, the British Empire (greatly modified) still lives on today largely in harmony and with crucial benefits to all of it many members.
Back to Top
Panther View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 20-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 818
  Quote Panther Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Mar-2009 at 21:25
Yup... your still upset!Rolling Eyes
Back to Top
tigloon View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 06-Apr-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
  Quote tigloon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Apr-2009 at 05:08
Correct me if I am wrong, but I could not see anything about Ottoman Empire. Wasn't it great enough to discuss in here?This is my first post in here so pardon me if I am wrong.
'Peace at home, Peace in the world' Gazi M. Kemal ATATÜRK
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Apr-2009 at 11:34
Originally posted by nuvolari

There is little doubt that the Roman Empire brought many benefits to the World as it was known at that time. However, several points are relevent here (a) The Roman Empire at its peak was only ever one third of the size of the British Empire
size isn't the only measure or we can simply talk about mongol/turkic empires which at times were vast. The technology advantage wasn't so drastic in the roman times to the roman advantage.


Originally posted by nuvolari

(b) It ended in blood and fire with barbarians at the Gates of Rome
how did it end for the british? The empire fell apart and the Uk was given a helping hand from a former vassal the USA


Originally posted by nuvolari


(c) Adolf Hitler, who was somewhat of an expert at the subjugation of nations, intensely admired the British Empire, not least for its ability to administer the whole of India and all of its disparate races and religions, with just 10,000 civil servants and soldiers.
yet he attacked and ravaged that very power. Lets face it being admireed by a failed fascist that was deluded in so many ways is not a tick of appoval.

Originally posted by nuvolari

Measuring the British against the Roman Empire, it is clear that the benefits of the former by far outweigh those of the latter, all the more so since in its restructured form of the Commonwealth, the British Empire (greatly modified) still lives on today largely in harmony and with crucial benefits to all of it many members.
Simply not true. That is an exaggeration




Edited by Leonidas - 06-Apr-2009 at 11:36
Back to Top
nomooon View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 03-Nov-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 20
  Quote nomooon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Nov-2009 at 20:52
Originally posted by Count Belisarius

 
 
They had to be doing somehting right since they lasted a thousand years and the byzantines lasted another thousand years not to mention the fact that in the early htird century the romans were christian and only a few officers and rulers were that depraved and you're forgetting that everyone is different and unique


how de f did u reach the number Roman had 2k years of history?  Roman Kingdom was founded in 750s B.C., nearly 250 years short of 1k, and 250 years is alot

btw i think this thread is about comparison among empires, not among civilizations, Roman Empire techinically existed since 27 B.C. according to its first Emperor.
Back to Top
nomooon View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 03-Nov-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 20
  Quote nomooon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Nov-2009 at 21:41
this is not true.  There are couple of experts I found in your Far Eastern forum who seem to be very resourceful, and I recommend them to you that you may know more about Far Eastern military history; you might not be interested in it, but it matters when you are trying to make comparison between a subject you know thoroughly and a subject you know almost nothing about ( using a novel as a basis :D might as well use Chinese myth and say Chinese kungfu monkeys pwn rest of world ez)
Back to Top
M.Scaevola View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 22-Oct-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
  Quote M.Scaevola Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Nov-2009 at 03:34
Originally posted by Leonidas

Originally posted by nuvolari

There is little doubt that the Roman Empire brought many benefits to the World as it was known at that time. However, several points are relevent here (a) The Roman Empire at its peak was only ever one third of the size of the British Empire
size isn't the only measure or we can simply talk about mongol/turkic empires which at times were vast. The technology advantage wasn't so drastic in the roman times to the roman advantage.


Originally posted by nuvolari

(b) It ended in blood and fire with barbarians at the Gates of Rome
how did it end for the british? The empire fell apart and the Uk was given a helping hand from a former vassal the USA


Originally posted by nuvolari


(c) Adolf Hitler, who was somewhat of an expert at the subjugation of nations, intensely admired the British Empire, not least for its ability to administer the whole of India and all of its disparate races and religions, with just 10,000 civil servants and soldiers.
yet he attacked and ravaged that very power. Lets face it being admireed by a failed fascist that was deluded in so many ways is not a tick of appoval.

Originally posted by nuvolari

Measuring the British against the Roman Empire, it is clear that the benefits of the former by far outweigh those of the latter, all the more so since in its restructured form of the Commonwealth, the British Empire (greatly modified) still lives on today largely in harmony and with crucial benefits to all of it many members.
Simply not true. That is an exaggeration





Being a huge admirer of both the British and Roman Empires, I'd have to agree with Leonidas that the Roman Empire was far more important and powerful in the scope of world history. In fact I'd even go so far as to suggest that the British Empire was basically a direct heir of the Roman Empire in modernity, far more true to the spirit and vision of Rome than pretentious would-bes that are so abundant in European history (Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire being the two major examples that come to mind).
Back to Top
opuslola View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
  Quote opuslola Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2009 at 13:43
I voted other, for one reason, America never conceived itself as an "Empire" of any sort! And, from about 1942 CE, onward was the most powerful force in the world, even without Nukes!
Any of you might realize that if America had been changed into a dictatorship, its designs upon an Empire could not have been impeeded anywhere in the world!
As General Patton is said to have believed; he wanted to continue the war in Europe and attack the Soviets. He realized that all of Europe was so indebted to the US, and were attached to America's teats like nursing piglets, that it would be easy.

Even the vaunted Soviet forces, would have been mostly helpless due to America domination of the seas, and the air.

Japan could have easily been starved out, isolated from everone and everything, until they finally came out either begging or committing suicide! It was the US supply lines that kept the Soviet Army and Air Force moving. Their stockpile of supplies were, I would guess, only good for 90 days or so! Does anyone really think that they could push America and its allies out of Europe in 90 days?
Some of may well not realize that as soon as the war ended in Europe, and Japan was stuck back on their little island, most of the American people began to demand that their sons "come home", and that sentiment would have been seen in the votes, if we had not started an immediate reduction of force, and especially after the two bombs were dropped. As a matter of my own surmise (as well as that of others I am sure) this strong force of "come home" might well have forced us to use the Bomb? After all, it (actually they, since there were two differing bombs developed) had never been tested by being dropped from an aircraft!
So, where is the American Empire today? Lets see, we still control Puerto Rico, and a few small Islands in the Pacific and the Indian Ocean, and we still have bases around the world, from which we would certainly abandon if anyone asked, and a small enclave in Cuba!

So, just what empire did we build and control after WWII? The only answer is that we controlled the "World Wide Economic Empire!"

But, sadly, with our new administration, not much longer!

Edited by opuslola - 12-Nov-2009 at 13:49
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
Back to Top
sooty View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 05-Dec-2009
Location: Cheshire
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10
  Quote sooty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2009 at 04:10

This is a hard question.  Part of me thinks it could be the Hellenistic empire, simply because that paved the way for the Roman empire, which paved the way for western and to a certain extent eastern culture.  The Hellenistic empire began the process of widespread conquest of the known world to a level not known before.  Alexander the Great was keen to incorporate some of the cultural and religious ideas of those he conquered into his rulership (wore trousers, took an interest in Eastern religion etc).  So, by the time the Romans came along, the process of widespread interchange of cultures and religions had already begun. 

http://www.mythologyhellenic.com
Back to Top
opuslola View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
  Quote opuslola Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2009 at 15:32
Dear "Sooty!", it is interesting that you included some factoid I had never been aware of, that is that Alexander "(wore trousers!" How cool! But, did you know that the wearing of such devices only became regular and customary in the 16th century CE?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trousers

There are other sources that concur with the above!

Seems about 1000 years happened before dressing like Alexander became fashionable!

Regards,
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 91011

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.