QuoteReplyTopic: High middel ages - causes of growth? Posted: 21-Nov-2007 at 12:03
Hi,
What do you think caused the rapid growth in population during the high middel ages? Did lack of wars lead to earlier marrages and increased birth rates? Or did it produce lower death rates, due to fewer battle deaths and less illness?
New technology and methods in agriculture made population growth possible, but did it also cause it? Perhaps more and better farmland made people feel more safe, and plan bigger families?
These are some of the questions I need to get a grasp on befor my exam. Thanks in advance:)
Well, the cause of population growth is still being debated, of course. In fact, in certain circles, it is still debated whether or not there actually was population growth.
In general, there are a number of theories:
M.M. Postan, in his Medieval Agrarian Society in its Prime: England takes a very Malthusian (and for years, influential) perspective. He states that a rapid 'colonization' of the excess land in Europe lead to a great supply of agricultural production, until the land was used up and left exhausted. This 'land hunger,' he claims, was enough to sustain the population of England in the thirteenth century equal to the amount in the eighteenth century. It was only after the population expanded too fast that it overworked its own resources.
Conversely, Bruce Campbell, in his Arable Productivity in Medieval England: Some Evidence from Norfolk, takes a different stance. He criticizes the Postanian perspective by attempting to show that one cannot infer from the specific to the general in terms of population growth. To prove this, he cites the example of the estates of Norfolk, which themselves suffered independent growth or decline simultaneously. He further goes on to show that environmental factors - soil quality, seed yields, etc - determined growth where there was some.
Now, the article by Richard Easterline, Malthus Revisited: The Economic Impact of Rapid Population Growth attempts to go in a third direction. Easterline basically thought that improving economic conditions (from the Commercial Revolution of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries) meant that there was population growth because of the availability of these new opportunities, and that as the population grew, enough intelligence was generated to in turn develop more and more opportunities for expansion (in land, commerce, etc). In this regard, he takes more of a Boserupian stance than a Malthusian one.
So, I hope that wasn't too much, and hopefully answered your question somewhat. Good luck with your exam.
It seems like the major debate is about the chronology of the correlation. Did more land/better crops cause population growth, or was it the other way around?
My textbook seems to favor the theory that better economy and lesser wars/invasions caused more safety and prosperity. That again favored earlier marriages and more children - and so they had to expand their agriculture.
That's probably true, although it's a very Wrigley and Schofield-ian perspective (I'm not surprised that their theory would be dominant in textbooks). They basically state what you just said, that better economic conditions led to earlier marriages and more children, and less of so when there were poorer times. In fact, Wrigley was knighted for developing this theory.
You're right about the chronology debate, too. The authors I mentioned certainly peg the growth rate at varying times, and then there's Barbara Harvey, who says essentially that there was no real population decline before the Black Death - unlike Postan and some others.
What class is this for? It seems almost like an economic history course.
It's just European history, from the ancient greece until the industrial revolution in Britain. College class.
It's so much stuff to get a grasp on, especially to me who did not have any history back in high school. The middle ages is such a mess, politically. I try focusing on the economic development, because the lecturer have stressed that alot.
So I try to get the big picture on the development from the high middle ages, concequenses of the great plague, the rise of commerce, mercantilism and the industrial revolution.
But you never know, they might just as well throw the athenian democracy, persian wars, alexander the great, rise and fall of rome, charlemagne, reformation, or the french revolution in our faces tomorrow.
It's all such a mess to me, but slowly the pieces fit together. Hopefully tomorrow morning it will all be clear:D
Bartlett in his book Conquest, Colonisation and Cultural Change in the European Middle Ages,
considers the population explosion of the High Middle Ages to be a
direct consequence of intensive rural administration and cultivating
previously derelict land. The early medieval period saw power and
administration decentralised, falling into the hands of local magnates
such as abbots and knights. The gravity of power and focus of the
rulers was no longer chiefly on the cities as it had once been in
antiquity, micromanagement of agricultural expansion saw swamps
drained, forests felled and settlements properly fortified against
attack.
Unlike in the Late Roman Period, where the centralised Roman army had
great difficulty stamping out roving bands of armed predators
throughout the countryside, the feudal system provided even small
villages with a form of localised defence which was typically quick to
respond. In case of attacks which were too formidable to defend
against, the local ruler could usually move most valuable property
inside a properly defensible bastion and call upon his feudal superior
for reinforcement. This improved form of localised security ensured
less devestation overall than occurred in the Late Roman period.
Effective local security and intensive micromanagement of agriculture
provided the environment for population growth, with the High medieval
period seeing the population of Northern Europe surpass that of the
Mediterranean world for the first time.
Just dropping by to say that I had to write an essay on european demography from 700 to 1700 on my exam today. Thats out of all possible issues from ancient greec until the industrial revolution. So your help was of good use! Thanks.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum