Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Why was Rome called Chin in Han dynasty?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
babyblue View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174
  Quote babyblue Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why was Rome called Chin in Han dynasty?
    Posted: 12-Feb-2005 at 02:24
Originally posted by ChineseManchurian

 

you waatched cartoon so much. also in Chinese history book record that Han have fought with Roman legion in middle Asia and crush them by 5000 against 20000.

   not that i doubt our heroic Han warriors, but..20000 legions? that's like half of Rome



Edited by babyblue
Back to Top
babyblue View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174
  Quote babyblue Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Feb-2005 at 02:24
Originally posted by ChineseManchurian

 

you waatched cartoon so much. also in Chinese history book record that Han have fought with Roman legion in middle Asia and crush them by 5000 against 20000.

  

    not that i doubt our heroic Han warriors, but.. 20000 legions? that's like half of Rome...



Edited by babyblue
Back to Top
babyblue View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174
  Quote babyblue Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Feb-2005 at 02:27

Originally posted by chaeohk



thats impressive, can you show any source that says that and maybe more info

   likewise

Back to Top
lars573 View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote lars573 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Feb-2005 at 10:42
Originally posted by ChineseManchurian

Mulan live in the period of Tang dynasty, which she lead an army defeat Turks, not Huns...

you waatched cartoon so much. also in Chinese history book record that Han have fought with Roman legion in middle Asia and crush them by 5000 against 20000.

That battle was against the Parthians. They used captured Roman troops from the Legions of M. Licinius P.f. Crassus from the battle of Carrhae.

The battle of Carrhae (53 BC), where 20,000 out of 36,000 legionaires may have died, the greatest Parthian victory against Rome, was a very bad moment in Roman history and a very good moment in Parthian history. Even more intriguing, however, is how it may also represent a moment in Chinese history. There are Chinese records about a subsequent battle between the Chinese and the Parthians in Central Asia, where the Chinese describe apparent Roman Legionary tactics -- i.e. locking shields to make a wall. The Parthians may have been using captured Romans to fight where they could not simply desert and return to Rome. The Chinese, as it happened, captured a number of these soldiers themselves and returned to China with them. This, indeed, would have been an extraordinary fate in the 1st century BC, to have been a Roman legionnaire, captured by the Parthians, then captured by the Chinese, and then living out one's life in China. If this is what actually happened, it is shame not to have some memoires from the men themselves. Since Han China and Rome traded silk for gold by way of Parthia, which endeavored to conceal knowledge of each from each other, any occasions for common knowledge would be extraordinary.

From http://www.friesian.com/iran.htm#parthian

Back to Top
eaglecap View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 15-Feb-2005
Location: ArizonaUSA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3959
  Quote eaglecap Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Feb-2005 at 03:02
http://depts.washington.edu/uwch/silkroad/texts/texts.html
Back to Top
Sharrukin View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
  Quote Sharrukin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Feb-2005 at 10:16

"The inhabitants of that country are tall and well-proportioned, somewhat like the Han [Chinese], whence they are called Ta-ts'in."

From the Hou-Han-Shu, chs. 86, 88 (written 5th Century C.E.), for 25 - 220 C.E.:

http://depts.washington.edu/uwch/silkroad/texts/romchin1.htm l

Back to Top
warhead View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
  Quote warhead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Feb-2005 at 15:20

"That battle was against the Parthians. They used captured Roman troops from the Legions of M. Licinius P.f. Crassus from the battle of Carrhae."

 

No, it was against the Western Xiong nu and the Kang Gu.

Back to Top
warhead View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
  Quote warhead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Feb-2005 at 15:21

"Mulan live in the period of Tang dynasty, which she lead an army defeat Turks, not Huns..."

 

I'm inclined to believe Mulan lived during the Northern Zhou dynasty and fought against the Tujue. Or the Northern Wei and fought against the Rouran.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Mar-2005 at 13:30

I'm inclined to believe Mulan lived during the Northern Zhou dynasty and fought against the Tujue. Or the Northern Wei and fought against the Rouran.          ;           ;           ;

         Right !

Back to Top
Drunt Ba'adur View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 18-Mar-2005
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Drunt Ba'adur Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Mar-2005 at 09:53
This is what i've found

Crassus's legions were no match for the Parthian archers, nimble horsemen who could loose their arrows off even as they turned. Of the 42,000 Romans who set out, 20,000 were killed and l0,000 were captured in the battle of Carrhae, in modern Turkey; it was one of the most spectacular losses of Roman military history. According to Pliny the Elder, the Roman prisoners were used by the Parthians as guards on their eastern frontier in what is today Turkmenistan. From there, Dubs conjectured, some escaped and joined the Huns as mercenaries. In 36BC, Chinese troops on a punitive venture defeated the Hun ruler Zhizhi in today's Uzbekistan. Among their captives they found 145 Romans. Dubs says the Chinese kept the ex-legionaries as frontier guards, installing them in a specially created town called Liqian in what is now Gansu.

If only there were proof. Dubs's theory rests mainly on tantalising hints found in ancient Chinese historiography, none of which refers specifically to Romans. There is a reference to the use of a "fish-scale formation" by soldiers in Zhizhi's army, which Dubs said described the testudo formation of overlapping shields "made only by Roman soldiers". And Zhizhi's town had a double wooden palisade outside its wall - a type of fortification he said was often used by Romans and not by the Huns. Then there is the name of the town, Liqian, which may have been used at the time to refer to the Roman empire. In 9AD the name of Liqian was changed for a few years to Jielu, which may mean "prisoners captured in storming a city". In the sixth century Liqian ceased to be used as a placename.

Dubs was not the only one to believe in the Roman connection. Guan Yiquan, a Chinese scholar in Lanzhou, the capital of Gansu, also became convinced that Liqian had links to Rome. From 1978 until his death 20 years later, he laboured on a huge 450,000-character tome on Liqian. According to his son, Guan Heng, it was not until 1988 that he saw a copy of Dubs's lecture, which happened to dovetail with his own views. Unfortunately, as the younger Mr Guan admits, it too contains no clincher.

Chinese officials would probably not have cottoned on to the tourist- pulling potential of the Roman story had it not been for an Australian writer and adventurer, David Harris. Mr Harris, virtually penniless and upset by the break-up of his marriage, decided to set out for China in search of the town mentioned by Dubs. With the help of the elder Mr Guan, he narrowed his search to the village of Zhelaizhai. His experiences are described in his travel book, "Black Horse Odyssey". Mr Harris's efforts drew attention from the media, as well as from the authorities. Even the Communist Party's main mouthpiece, the People's Daily, carried an approving article. But there were sceptics aplenty. Liu Guanghua, a retired professor at Larizhou University, says the name Liqian derives from the second and third syllables of the word for Alexandria, the Egyptian city sometimes used by the Chinese as a term for the Roman empire in general. Yet Alexandria was not conquered by the Romans until 30BC, and it was only after this date that the Chinese began to use the name in this way. Some scholars also think Liqian was founded well before the Romans were supposed to have settled there.

As for the somewhat foreign-looking faces of a few Yongchang residents, it would hardly be surprising to find some mixed racial features in the county, given that it straddles what was once a major trading route and borders on Central Asia, whose peoples look quite different from the Han Chinese. For a few among the people of one of China's poorest provinces, there is perhaps romantic consolation in the thought that they share their blood with Caesar. But the abandoned shell of a new luxury hotel and the dark empty corridors of the main guest-house in Yongchang suggest the romance is proving slow to take hold more widely.


or that http://www.pip.com.au/~paceman/ROMANS%20IN%20CHINA.html

Back to Top
Nick1986 View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Mighty Slayer of Trolls

Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
  Quote Nick1986 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-May-2012 at 19:03
The "fish scale formation" was also the first thing that came to mind when i saw this topic. It was thought Roman legionaries were captured by the Persians and sold as slaves. They somehow managed to escape (or were freed) and hired themselves out as mercenaries to the Xiongnu
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-May-2012 at 19:36
Originally posted by Nick1986

The "fish scale formation" was also the first thing that came to mind when i saw this topic. It was thought Roman legionaries were captured by the Persians and sold as slaves. They somehow managed to escape (or were freed) and hired themselves out as mercenaries to the Xiongnu
 
 
 
and
 
 
 
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.