The Battle of Agincourt, 1415
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother;
- Shakespeare, "Henry V" 4.3.21-69
The
Hundred Years War has its roots over 400 years earlier[1],
and the events leading up to it were typical of claims to power and
inheritance. The English ruled over a larger part of France than the French at one
stage, but this dramatically reverted after a series of internal and external
conflicts. The French Kingdom once again regained its lands in the North,
including Normandy.
The English had to settle with their remnants in Gascony (which was very valuable and
profitable nevertheless).
The
ongoing tumultuousness and hostility between the two Kingdoms went on for
centuries, with the English claiming rights to the French throne as their
ancestors did. The French King died without any heirs, and King Edward III of
England expressed his claim to the French throne, through his mother, Eleanor
(The French Kings aunt) Sooner or later, a large scale war was going to break
out, and in the year 1337AD French ships began raiding and causing turmoil in
coastal English settlements.
At this
point in history (1337AD) the French Kingdom contained approximately 17-18million (along
with the greatest number of Knights in Europe),
while the English had little more than 4million.
The first
major engagement occurred at Sluys, where the English
convincingly defeated the French fleet, in a battle aboard the ships, rather
than between them. The first attempt at invading England
had failed, and Edward III now had every right to march on France. The army he conglomerated
was one of very high standards, being veterans and willing mercenaries. His
diverse and well-trained troops proved to be the most effective army Europe had seen since the Romans[2].
Two significant engagements in terms of revolutionary tactics were fought in
the remained of what is known as the Edwardian War (specific [first] part of
the Hundred Years War) The battle of Crcy and the Battle of Poitiers. In
both cases, the French were annihilated by the outnumbered English, through
effective use of the Longbow[3].
Periods
of peace and war continued well into the next century, but in 1415, King Henry
V of England
had his sights set on the French Crown believing himself again to be a
rightful heir. Henry set off over the English Channel with no more than ten
thousand men, - taking advantage of a civil war within France to reassert his
position to the French throne. He arrived at the French coast, and head
straight for the fortress of Harfleur.The siege
lasted a month, from his landing in August until the 22nd of
September. It had come at a cost; Henrys army was ravaged by dysentery. He
left a garrison of a few hundred men (under the control of the Earl of Dorset),
and set off for Calais.
With
eight days provisions for his 5-6000 archers and 1,000 men-at-arms, Henry
headed off on October the 8th. The army was sick and tired, as well
as very hungry. Henry divided his army into three segments; the party out front
was lead by Sir Gilbert Umfraville and Sir John Cornwall, the centre by Henry
himself (in conjunction with the Earl of Huntington and the Duke of Gloucester)
and the rear was headed up by the Duke of York and Earl of Oxford[4].
The whole
time, the two French armies were in hot pursuit of the withering English invaders.
One blocked the river Somme, so Henry turned
south-east heading for a ford at Bellencourt. The French deployed cavalry as a
form of resistance as the English attempted to cross at Voyennes, but were
unsuccessful. The English army crossed on the 19th of October, 11
days into the march 3 days overdue of rations.
Henry and
his army were become more and more demoralized by the minute. Henry even went
to the extent of offering Harfleur back to the French in return for safe
passage to Calais.
The French rejected and demanded the English return all provinces except for Guyenne[5].
Henry disapproved greatly, and showed his discontent. The terms Henry wanted
were not viable with the French, and Henry returned in the night to his forces. On the
eve of the battle, the English were silent and obliging, despite almost certain
death on the battlefield the next day. They lit few fires, and slept out the
cold and rainy night. On the other hand, the French were up gambling and
drinking till the early hours of the morning so confident in victory they
were.
Dawn, and
the French took up a disadvantageous position, keeping with the rules of
chivalry. The recently ploughed field separating the two armies was sodden,
with mud up to waist height in some places, but ankle-knee deep in most. The
French were under the command of Charles DAlbret, Constable of France.
He assembled his forces into the conventional French formation under his
command. The first two battle lines were composed of dismounted men, numbering
about 7-8000 each. The third line was made up of mounted Knights and nobles,
the elite of the elite French Cavalry. On each flank, 600 mounted Knights were
positioned, with the sole command to destroy the English Longbowmen.
The French had immense distaste towards the English Longbowmen by this stage,
as they saw their practice as not chivalrous a lower class man being able to
take out an elite mounted (and heavily armoured) noble, with some rudimentary
training. One example of the French hatred towards these infamous bowmen was
succeeding the Siege of Soissons, where 300 of the Longbowmen were captured,
humiliated and hung.
3000 Genoese[6]
Crossbowmen, plus some artillery, were present at the battle but proved
literally useless, as they were deployed at the very rear. DAlbret and his
army waited, everything was in their favour; numbers, mobility, resources and
circumstance.
Across the field, Henrys well rested and fed men were being deployed in the
typical English combined arms formation of the day. The English arranged
themselves into a concave shape, with the centre comprised of dismounted
men-at-arms. The 750-1000 men-at-arms wielded a range of weapons, such as bill hooks, halberds, long swords, daggers, axes and flails. They were rather
heavily armed and armoured, and were a formidable force to reckon with,
especially under the direct command of Henry V.
Flanking the centre were the 5-6000 Longbowmen, split between each side. The
left was under the command of the Lord of Camoys, while the right came under
the control of Edward, Duke of York. The archers extended out slightly from the
line to form the concave and were flanked by the Woods of Agincourt and
Tramecourt.
Four hours passed, and no move was made. DAlbret stood motionless, remembering
Crcy and Poitiers,
and how they turned out. He maintained his defensive stance, allowing the
English to make the initial move, or starve. It was now that Henry decided upon
making his move. The army marched towards the French and came to just within
firing range.
The Longbowmen prior to the battle were ordered to
sharpen stakes to jam into the ground in front of them in battle, acting as a
physical barrier to halt charges and disrupt formation. The dismounted English
could easily navigate through the maze of stakes, but cavalry and charging
infantry would find it a tad more challenging.
The sharp stakes were placed into the ground, facing outwards, and the archers
let loose. The repetitive and deadly volleys unleashed were already eating away
at the French front line, which had no counter, with the Crossbowmen at the
rear. Charles had no option but to order an advance. While the Longbowmen were
firing, the flanking Knights saw it a prime opportunity to take out the
occupied archers.
They charged furiously, each trying to outpace and outdo his rival. Camoys
left flank managed to repel the cavalry through arrow fire even before any
Knights had engaged, and routed their opposition. On the other flank, the
Knights largely avoided the arrow fire and managed to arrive at the stakes.
They were promptly impaled, thrown from their mounts or picked out by the
English, and the remnants withdrew.
The front line of the French pushed on in their advance through the sodden
field. Lead by Charles himself, the force should have been able to destroy the
English single-handedly. However, the terrain played a significant role in the
playing out of the battle. The enclosing woods acted as a funnel, compressing
the French who were unable to effectively wield their weapons[7].
As the two sides engaged, the fresh English men-at-arms clearly had the upper
hand. The Longbowmen even joined in the massacre. Already half destroyed by
rider-less horses and routing horsemen, plus the tiring march, the French were
annihilated and withdrew. Many were taken as prisoners.
As the first line withdrew, the second approached an engaged in mle. This
fighting was a lot more intense, with the 800 or so English men-at-arms holding
their ground with difficulty against the 8000 Frenchmen. As the fighting
progressed, more and more men succumbed to the fate of falling/tripping and
drowning or being trampled. The Duke of York died in this fashion. The masses
of downed French infantry were killed off by the lightly armoured and agile
Longbowmen, with a quick stab through the eye-slit (with a dagger) or by
beating to death (maul or hatchet).
A legendary tale has arisen from this, that Sir Peers Legh
was severely wounded, but his Mastiff[8]
stood over him until the end of the battle. Legh later died of his wounds, but
the dog returned to Sir Peer's residence[9].
So effective was the English method of fighting, that the second French force
was destroyed despite the bloody conflict. One group under DAlencon was
assigned to killing Henry or dying trying to do so. They failed miserably, and
Henry gained heroic status in the process, saving the Duke of Gloucester. With
the defeat of the Second line, the third loomed in the distance, unmoving.
Henry sent out heralds to call it quits, but the arrogant and glory-seeking
nobles of the Third line turned it down in spite of some objection. One
commander, known as De Fauquemberg led a daring assault with the remaining
Knights, straight at the English. Henry and his army were very confident now,
even though they were still outnumbered by this final battle line.
To Henrys surprise and discontent, the lord of Agincourt,
Isembert accompanied a cavalry charge from the rear into the English Camp,
plundering Henry remaining rations and treasures. Funnily enough, this was
only a minor occurrence and Henry kept focused on the approaching Knights. Many
of the French prisoners were killed to free up men to fight. The Longbowmen
unleashed a final deathly reign of arrows upon the French, who took the easy
option and withdrew before even engaging.
The French were defeated. Over half of the French nobility had been lost in one
battle 3 Dukes, 90 Noblemen and 1560 Knights[10].
200 were further taken prisoner. It is believed that the English only lost 400
men, mainly the very front line of men-at-arms and some Longbowmen. A lot of
these were due to drowning/trampling and disease/starvation rather than from
fatal wounds.
After the battle, Henry met with a French Herald[11]
to decide upon a name for the battle. They agreed on The Battle of Agincourt
because of the nearby Agincourt castle. It was
a tactically sound victory, proving that a smaller force of disciplined men can
far outdo a huge force of disorderly and glory-hungry nobles.
Agincourt was a symbol of a changing time,
the era of the mounted Knight and chivalry was drawing to a close and after a
string of defeats on their hands, the French begun to reconsider their manner
and mindset in battle. The started promoting lower classes into the military,
as the English had done, and managed to find success in the rest of the war.
Henry had beaten Frances
largest field army and now marched on Calais
to winter. Triumph was sweet for the English, whilst defeat proved bitter for
the French.
Longbow: Super weapon?
Long has the Battle of Agincourt been a battle decided by
the invincible Longbow. Until recently, this has been the case; however
historians are now questioning and investigating the actual decisiveness and
importance of the legendary English Longbow.
The typical English Longbow had a maximum range of 350m
but was only effective as a killing weapon at 250m. A bodkin point arrow could
penetrate full plate armour at 50m[12].
The archers in the English Army at the time of Agincourt
were fully professional soldiers of the Yeoman class.
It is said, that within 50m, a Longbowman could aim for the head, a hit. Another
tactic of the Longbowmen was to fire volleys at an almost 90 degree angle over
their own battle line. The arrows would hit the apex and descend straight down
onto the opponents heads and horses backs.
The English triumph at the Battle of Agincourt has long been attributed to the
Longbow. However, new evidence has proven that it was not the sole deciding
factor in the English victory.
The terrain of Agincourt
was much in favour of the smaller English force - flanked by dense woods, and a
large ploughed field separating the two armies. The English could not be outflanked
and possibly (though not likely) put some archers in the woods. Also, the days
before Agincourt, torrential rain poured down.
This made for a very soggy battlefield, with some mud up to waist height. For
the French, this was terrible their heavy plate armour would be very disadvantageous.
On the other hand, the lightly clad (cloth and padded leather) Longbowmen could
easily navigate their way through the muddy field.
Another factor leading up to Henrys victory was on the French part. The French
were impetuous and glory-seeking. Each Knight wanted to outdo his fellow
Knight. This led to serious ordering and positioning of units problems. The
French were raring to go, and though their charge would be furious, it was to
be rather disorderly and promptly repelled.
Also, the French were tired and hungry from staying up late and sleeping in.
In conclusion, the English victory did have a lot to do
with the accuracy, rate of fire (up to 13 per minute) and power of the Longbow.
Nevertheless, the terrain and mindset of the French were very significant as
well. Furthermore, Henrys avid and endurant nature, along with his
enlightening charisma, was monumental in the gallant English victory at the
Battle of Agincourt.
Reference List
Literature
Devries, K. Dougherty, M. Dickie, I. Phyllis, J. Christer, J. (2006). Battles of the Medieval World 1000 ~ 1500 pp176-187. Published by
Amber Books Ltd, London.
Grant, R.G. (2005). Battle A visual journey through 5,000 years of combat
Published by Dorling Kindersley Limited, London.
Shakespeare, W. (1599). "Henry V" 4.3.21-69
Websites
Beck, S. (2001). "The Agincourt Campaign" <http://www.geocities.com/beckster05/Agincourt/AgCampaign.html> Retrieved 24/3/07, 25/3/07 and 27/3/07
Agincourt Computing. (2004). "The Battle of Agincourt" <http://www.aginc.net/battle/> Retrieved 23/3/07
Daniel, W. (1999). "The Battle of Agincourt Resource Site" <http://home.austin.rr.com/wdaniel/agincourt/> Retrieved 23/3/07 and 24/3/07
Documentaries
Knights, A; Runge, S. (2006) "The Battle of Agincourt, 1415"
[1] For
further information see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rollo_of_Normandy>
Rollo the Viking was allowed by Charles the Simple to settle in what he named Normandy.
[2]
According to <http://www.theotherside.co.uk/tm-heritage/background/100yearswar.htm>
[3] One of
the most decisive elements of the Hundred Years War, climaxing at Agincourt
[4] Three
segments determined from <http://www.geocities.com/beckster05/Agincourt/AgCampaign.html>
[5] Guyenne
is a region in south-western France
along the Atlantic Ocean and the Pyrenees mountain range on the border with Spain
[6] Though France did hire Genoese mercenaries for Agincourt, many were French levies and middle class
crossbowmen
[7] Though
usually exaggerated, two-handed weapons such as bearded axes and halberds were
deemed useless in this situation
[8] Mastiffs
are a large and stocky breed of dog, often accompanying the English in battle.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastiff>
[9] This dog
gave rise to the Lyme
Park mastiffs. They
symbolized loyalty and bravery, and are still existent today. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyme_Park>
[10] According to Devries, K. Dougherty,
M. Dickie, I. Phyllis, J. Christer, J. Battles of the Medieval World 1000 ~ 1500 (2006) Published by Amber
Books Ltd. London.
These numbers vary among sources but remain high nevertheless
[11] Source: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle>
[12] These figures are taken from Devries, K. Dougherty, M.
Dickie, I. Phyllis, J. Christer, J. (2006). Battles
of the Medieval World 1000 ~ 1500 pp176-187. Published by Amber Books Ltd,
London.
Edited by Knights - 30-Mar-2007 at 19:06