Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Genghis and Hitler

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567
Author
BigL View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
  Quote BigL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Genghis and Hitler
    Posted: 27-Jan-2006 at 03:05

You guys dont understand Genghis Khan was completely non racist like hitler, He was destined to take over the world he had to take over by any means possible.

In fact Genghis was open to all cultures and religions this is why he has philosphical talks with monks of china ,and develops spiritually in his life

Back to Top
Constantine XI View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
  Quote Constantine XI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jan-2006 at 03:29
Originally posted by BigL

You guys dont understand Genghis Khan was completely non racist like hitler, He was destined to take over the world he had to take over by any means possible.

In fact Genghis was open to all cultures and religions this is why he has philosphical talks with monks of china ,and develops spiritually in his life



True but the Mongols practiced another form of discriminatory mass slaughter. They utterly hated the peasant classes, reviling them as lowly animals that scratched an existence from the dirt. Such people were worthless compared to the proud steppe horsemen. Consequently they were inclined to massacre them with little provocation or reason. Such a thing was especially terrible in an age and place where most people just so happened to be peasantry.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jan-2006 at 04:31

......



Edited by Detective
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jan-2006 at 04:34
Originally posted by Constantine XI

Originally posted by Detective

Originally posted by Alkiviades

Alexander HAD conquered the world.

Really?   

What the Greeks considered the "known" or "civilised" world. By modern standards it would be like conquering everything except Greenland, Siberia, Canada and Antarctica.

  Genghis Qaan's "world" was much wider than that of Alexander's.   Moreover, was Alex the Gay in China?   Or do you think that China didn't belong to the "civilized" world?  

 

PS: It is senseless to compare Genghis, the oceanic Qaan with Alex the Gay. 



Edited by Detective
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jan-2006 at 04:35

...

Back to Top
Voyager View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian


Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 151
  Quote Voyager Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jan-2006 at 17:47
This thread is just another round on what seems to be the favorite debate for a lot of members in tis Forum: "East vs West: who's the best?".
This time the purpose is to know who was the biggest butcher of humans: if someone from the West (Hitler) or if someone from the East (Genghis).
The West says Genghis, the East and the politically correct troop of the West say Hitler.
Is this all you can do with History?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.