Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Are the Tatars Turk or Mongol?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Urungu Han View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 17-Jul-2006
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 130
  Quote Urungu Han Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Are the Tatars Turk or Mongol?
    Posted: 11-Aug-2006 at 06:02
I have a research from Prof.Dr.R.Trkkan about Tatar Turks.I wil write it later to finish this topic.
And remember,Tatar heads are brakisefal =)


Edited by Urungu Han - 12-Aug-2006 at 07:32
Back to Top
GrandTurk View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 16-Dec-2006
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote GrandTurk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 01:24
I have been to Tataristan many times.
 
They are Turkish!
"If you wanna taste the war,you should fight with Turks" English General
Back to Top
ephestion View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard


Joined: 14-Dec-2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote ephestion Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 02:29
No they are not Turksih. Turkey or Turkish exists post 1926.

They are not Ottoman either they were a Tripartite alliance of Arab, Persian and Turkomen.

Tartars are one of many tribes that contributed to the formation of the Turkish speaking people along with Mongolians. They were re-turked post 1000AD during the Mongolian invasion which re-spread and scattered the Turks in places they normally didnt exist. The reason being they were traditionally hired as Mercenaries na dserved in some of the most disrespected armies of history Hun, Mongols and so forth.


Back to Top
GrandTurk View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 16-Dec-2006
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote GrandTurk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 03:50

This is not true.

Also please remember that first country who used Turk word is Gk Trk in 630.
"If you wanna taste the war,you should fight with Turks" English General
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 05:12
Turkish = people assoc with turkey

Turkic is is much more accurate as it is linguistic/cultural based description of the broader group including (but not limited to) turkey.

Its a small but important detail one should be mindful of.
Back to Top
EGETRK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 16-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 300
  Quote EGETRK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 05:21
i dont use ''turkish'' word...İt separeate Trk world from Trks of Trkiye
The lands of the of the West may be armored with walls of steel,
But I have borders guarded by the mighty chest of a believer...
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 07:26
uzbeks-tatars-karakalpaks-azeries-kazaks-tuvas-sakas(yakutistan)-kırım turks(avars and tatars)-gagavuz(gokoguz)-oguz turks(turkies turks)-ahıska-nokaies-some of bulgars and onoguz(macars)[macar and bulgars had mixed with slavs and other people] but tatars turk-mongol are in fenotype but in turkish genotype...
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 07:27
uzbeks-tatars-karakalpaks-azeries-kazaks-tuvas-sakas(yakutistan)-kırım turks(avars and tatars)-gagavuz(gokoguz)-oguz turks(turkies turks)-ahıska-nokaies-some of bulgars and onoguz(macars)[macar and bulgars had mixed with slavs and other people] but tatars are in turk-mongol fenotype but in turkish genotype...
Back to Top
omergun View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 24-Sep-2006
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 106
  Quote omergun Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 17:04
Originally posted by Leonidas

Turkish = people assoc with turkey

Turkic is is much more accurate as it is linguistic/cultural based description of the broader group including (but not limited to) turkey.

Its a small but important detail one should be mindful of.

No, dividing these two terms, is nothing else than a imaginary variaton made on purpose. All Trks are the same and they are called Trks, either they live in Trkiye, Central, Middle, East, West, North Asia, Balkans or East Europe.
Making such variatons based on English language is ridiculous. Look at how all those Trks everywhere think about who they are, then youll understand.
For example, you can call someone in Kazakistan a Kazak, or someone in Azerbaycan a Azeri, but its not right to say they are Trkic, Trkish or another variaton used, they are all Trks.
ATTİLA
Back to Top
Huncuk View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 17-Dec-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 65
  Quote Huncuk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 21:31
Turks are 5000years old race =).
 
Well,the tatars of Xianbei was Mongol,but they all slaughtered by Ghengis.
 
Tatars of Ghengis army and today are all Turkic named Tatar.They are ethnicly Kipchak and Karabulghar Turks.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.