QuoteReplyTopic: Congress backstabbed our real heroes Posted: 06-Aug-2006 at 03:20
This is to discuss the
legendary back stabbing of our real heroes of India, byt the Congress
party.
It is well known that Congress did'nt do enough to protect
Bagat Singh, and Jawaharlal openly divluges secrets to the British
about the movements of Subash Chanda Bose...
Now we didnt know is another back Stabbing of the Alluri
Sita Ram Raju, who led a rebellion with the tribals of "Agency area" in
the Northern Andhra Pradesh. It took British 2 years to crush the
rebeliion and a comapny of Assam Riffles and malabar Special Forces. What the movement needed was publicity but guess whatthe Congress controlled media of that day has done "
" A
part from the Raj, quite a few plains leaders, including top
Congressmen, opposed him. Several in 1922-24, called for suppression of
his revolt. In the Madras Legislative Council, leaders like C.R.Reddy
opposed even an inquiry into the causes of the revolt until it was
crushed. "
" Even the 'nationalist press', as historian Murali Atluri
points out, was hostile. The Telugu journal, The Congress, said it
would be "gratified" if the revolt could be put down. The Andhra
Patrika attacked the rebellion. "
The irony is after he was shot dead without trail at
the age of 27, as all ways the Congress Praised him as a martyr, but
when he was alive it accused and damned and sugested the British to
crush the movement.
Now Alluri Sita Rama Raju is a hero and of the Andhra
people, who sacrificed his life for the independence of hi mother
land. HE organised the tribals who were severly persecuted by the
British by bannign them from entering forest for their living and
exploting themas slaves, Rama Raju took upon his self and declared full
scale war for independece starting with bows attacking Police stations
and then accquiring arms and gun powder.
The nationalist press then desisted from advertising thus killing the publicity of the uprising...
Congress also played a vital role in the Partition of india.
Indepndence of India was in progress (1944-1947)
M A Jinnah & Sardar Patel were the obvious candidates for Prime ministership as per seniority. But it was decided by the high command (Gandhi) to give this seat to JawaharLal Nehru in 1945-46 During all party summits held at Mumbai and Lahore.
Gandhi could easily avoid partition by electing Jinnah as PM of India.
Regards
Ashok Harsana
The Real Ranas, The Real Emperors of India. http://ashokharsana.proboards107.com/index.cgi?board=gurjars
I agree Ashok,
Jinnah may not have been needed to be elected PM, but it was Gandhi's
involvment and influence in Congress which caused the muslim league to
split off.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum