Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

De Reuter (de Ruyter) - greatest admiral of the 17th century?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: De Reuter (de Ruyter) - greatest admiral of the 17th century?
    Posted: 15-Mar-2006 at 12:56

Originally posted by Cywr

Which Dutch admiral was said to have defeated pirates with butter? (By rubbing the gunwale with the stuff)

Vincent van Oleo?   Haaarrgghhh!

Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Mar-2006 at 13:17
Could you tell us something about him?
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Mar-2006 at 15:58

Originally posted by rider

Could you tell us something about him?

Sorry.  its a joke.  Vincent van Gogh

                               Vincent van Oleo (oleo=margerine/butter)

Should have been van Goleo.  I know, its lame. 

 



Edited by pikeshot1600
Back to Top
Ponce de Leon View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Lonce De Peon

Joined: 11-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2967
  Quote Ponce de Leon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Mar-2006 at 10:44
I am surprised so many people on this history forum do not know much about the great sea battles that have happened, along with the battles that have occured on land. I believe that whoever controls the sea, controls the game
Back to Top
Maharbbal View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 08-Mar-2006
Location: Paris
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2120
  Quote Maharbbal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Mar-2006 at 18:38
Ola Ponce (mi gusta corrida tambien but Leon is not a nice place)
I don't know, I find this assertion (who rules the sea rules the world)
slightly too old to be true. People are saying so all over since Pericles and
I guess that if it was so true states would just try to be great seapowers
and that's it.
Also they don't. I think actually seapower is a cause and not a
consequence of a country's great strenght. indeed, it is a constant and
very costly effort to have an efficent navy. And even money is not
sufficent; for it you need manpower and various skills.
Then who ever controls the sea is only proving he can do so and thus
expend. And even this is not sufficent some times to conquer the shores.
For instance: from 700 to 900 muslims controlled the sea but never
managed to take Italy, Northern Spain or Sourthern France. In the same
way Italian city-states were almost unchallenged on sea from 1000 to
1500 (with some Spanish exceptions) but never managed to hold
Palestine or Anatolia or Greece very long. Finally, Dutch, English and
American seapower rised after their commercial/industrial power.
Hence, I think saying "who controls the world controls the sea" is at least
as true as the contrary. (but of course I may be wrong)
Hasta luego hombre. Lo siento se te molesto.
I am a free donkey!
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Mar-2006 at 00:55
Well, but anyone who has sufficent funds to hold a created fleet has his shores protected against those that oppose him with fleets..
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Apr-2006 at 08:59
De Ruyter was great admiraral, because of his tactics, the way he fought.Don't forget that Dutch man-of-war was quite smaller than the British with less guns and the guns were lighter than the British!
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Apr-2006 at 16:19

Originally posted by King Kaloian of all Bulgarians

De Ruyter was great admiraral, because of his tactics, the way he fought.Don't forget that Dutch man-of-war was quite smaller than the British with less guns and the guns were lighter than the British!

Yes, a requirement of the Dutch was that their naval ships be able to escort a lot of coastal merchant vessels that traded in shallower waters, particularly the Baltic.  For the Dutch navy, smaller, shallower draft ships were more useful. 

Gunpower disadvantage in combat was often offset by quite large fleets of the smaller ships, and the disbursement of risk among smaller ships, rather than concentrating it in large ships assisted surviveability of the fleet. 

 

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Apr-2006 at 04:07

If you want to see details about  British and Dutch sailing ships, their firepower size and etc take a look at this link:

http://sailingwarships.com/

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.