Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Mameluke
Janissary
Joined: 15-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Why invincible Mongol Empire was defeated? Posted: 21-Feb-2006 at 08:04 |
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim
Originally posted by Drunt Ba'adur
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim
The Mongol Empire, broke up because of infighting after Genghis Khans death. The various mongol Khanates, were often never defeated but gradually blended into the conqured populations. The last fragment of the mongol empire, the Mughal Empire was overthrown in 1857 by the British. |
I think the last 'mongol heir'(and that would be very doubtful) died a few time later. It was a sovereign of Bukhara or some city near there
and I think that we shouldn't consider Babur dynasty a heir of Mongol Empire
|
When did the Russians get control of Central asia? Oh, wait, Bukhara was a dependency until soviet times so your probably right. Babur and his decendents always considered themselves Mongols, and at the time of conquest Indians considered Babur to be a mongol. I just put a big post on the thread about the maps about it.
|
Actually I beg to differ. The word Mogul is actually a misnomer. It is simply Persian for Mongol and the Moguls always considered themselves Turks. Although to us they are both the same, in those days a sharp distinction was made between them. The Turks always considered themselves more civilized and spoke a different dialect from Mongols proper. Babar himself belonged to the Turkish Barlas tribe.
Mameluke
|
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war
|
|
Iranian41ife
Arch Duke
Joined: 24-Dec-2005
Location: Tajikista
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Feb-2006 at 17:40 |
nobody is invincible. it is ridiculous to say so.
the mongols were defeated because they got greedy, fought each other, and after ghenghis did not have a good enough leader to keep them united and strong.
the romans used to claim they were invincible to, but they got defeated many many times. no one is invincible.
|
"If they attack Iran, of course I will fight. But I will be fighting to defend Iran... my land. I will not be fighting for the government and the nuclear cause." ~ Hamid, veteran of the Iran Iraq War
|
|
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 03:46 |
Originally posted by Mameluke
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim
Originally posted by Drunt Ba'adur
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim
The Mongol
Empire, broke up because of infighting after Genghis Khans death. The
various mongol Khanates, were often never defeated but gradually
blended into the conqured populations. The last fragment of the mongol
empire, the Mughal Empire was overthrown in 1857 by the British.
|
I think the last
'mongol heir'(and that would be very doubtful) died a few time later.
It was a sovereign of Bukhara or some city near there
and I think that we shouldn't consider Babur dynasty a heir of Mongol Empire
|
When
did the Russians get control of Central asia? Oh, wait, Bukhara was a
dependency until soviet times so your probably right. Babur and
his decendents always considered themselves Mongols, and at the time of
conquest Indians considered Babur to be a mongol. I just put a big post
on the thread about the maps about it.
|
Actually I beg to differ. The word Mogul is actually a misnomer. It
is simply Persian for Mongol and the Moguls always considered
themselves Turks. Although to us they are both the same, in those days
a sharp distinction was made between them. The Turks always considered
themselves more civilized and spoke a different dialect from Mongols
proper. Babar himself belonged to the Turkish Barlas tribe.
Mameluke |
Babur wanted to reconquer timurs empire and rule from samarkand. Thats
pretty Mongol. The truth is probably more along the lines he was both a
turk and a mongol. I don't think the distinction could have been that
sharp after 300 years of intermixing.
|
|
malizai_
Sultan
Alcinous
Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Feb-2006 at 11:36 |
There was also the spread of bubonic plague, with devestating effects.
|
|
Maljkovic
Earl
Joined: 27-Feb-2006
Location: Croatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 294
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Feb-2006 at 11:15 |
Maybe because it never existed? Ghengis did conquer the nomadic areas and had begun the attack on China, but all later expasions were of his sons and grandsons who had khanates of their own.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Mar-2006 at 12:55 |
Was Khwarezm nomadic area?
|
|
Imperator Invictus
Caliph
Retired AE Administrator
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3151
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Mar-2006 at 02:54 |
Maybe because it never existed? Ghengis did conquer the nomadic areas
and had begun the attack on China, but all later expasions were of his
sons and grandsons who had khanates of their own. |
The Mongol Empire was a single empire under a single Great Khan until
1259. At that time, almost all of the conquests had been completed,
except for Song China.
|
|
tadamson
Baron
Joined: 25-Jul-2005
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 451
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Mar-2006 at 09:15 |
Originally posted by Detective
Was Khwarezm nomadic area? |
Yes and no
The towns, cities and agricultural land were heavily settled, but
between them were areas of steppe inhabited by nomadic tribes.
This overlap was one reason for the continuing unrest in the region.
|
rgds.
Tom..
|
|