Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

John Walker Lindh

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: John Walker Lindh
    Posted: 05-Feb-2006 at 01:58
They want a pipeline so they can transport caspian sea oil through Afghanistan and Pakistan so they don't have to rely on Russia or Iran. Probably also to reduce the dependence on the middle east

They keep having problems but becuase Afghanistan is never stable


Edited by Omar al Hashim
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Feb-2006 at 01:47

I didn't know there was a pipeline project, learn something new everyday.

But doesn't the US buy most of it's oil through OPEC in the middle east? How would this work exactly if the pipeline went through?

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Feb-2006 at 01:44
Yes, I would agree with most of that.
Pakistan supported the Taliban on US behalf.

Another reason for supporting the Taliban was so they could build that pipeline america wants.  They wanted to secure the country to make it possible, but the taliban wasn't ever providing that much security.

I'm sure there are more reasons too.
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Feb-2006 at 01:29

The only reason I could think the US government would support them is because another major faction was supported by the Russians and since Pakistan supported the other faction, the Taliban, the US probably gave money to support them.

Other then that I honestly believe the US government wiped their hands of them when they were sure the region was secure and the Russians didn't get their chosen faction in place, thus winning a small war so to speak. If they continued to support them, they were probably doing so to get their hands on Osama for the 1993 attack.

Other then that, their was no real strategic reason to support them. Well, as far as I could see anyways. I'm not sure if I gave the best reasoning, I'd like to think their was a good reason other then dumping money into countries for no apparent reason, example: Israel...

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Feb-2006 at 01:17
Originally posted by SearchAndDestroy


The Ice Skating Institute supported tha Taliban? Those bastards! Whats the ISI?

lol
ISI is the Pakistani Intelligence Agency.
Pakistan the UAE and Saudi Arabia are all governments that are very close to the americans. Funding was passing though the Saudi's to the Taliban, support throught Pakistan etc.
I have read strong evidence that convinced me of this point, but for the life of me just when I need it I can't find it again.
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Feb-2006 at 21:28

The Ice Skating Institute supported tha Taliban? Those bastards! Whats the ISI?

Only three countries recognized the Taliban, Pakistan, Unite Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia.

If the US did support them for whatever reason, it would have been because of Pakistan did since the US would prefer a Pakistan supported government rather then a Russian Northern Alliance supported faction. It was a civil war. Omar, the leader of the newly formed faction of the Taliban went to Pakistan in 1994 where they got training and weapons.

I wouldn't say anybody knew how the Taliban would turn out compared to all the other factions. And theres really no evidence of the US supporting the taliban at all. Just speculation.

Besides, we sent a Cruise Missle into Afghanistan in 1998 to destroy a Al Qaida terrorist camp. If we had any form of diplomatic relations with the Taliban, I doubt we would do that.

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Feb-2006 at 03:25
Originally posted by Illuminati


America gave way for the taliban to take power becuase the taliban was rather anti-soviet.

Maybe you didn't realise, I was talking about the Taliban. They didn't exist until 1995. They didn't fight the soviets at all.

The taliban were created by ISI and the CIA to stabilise Afghanistan, I am not sure of why american wanted afghanistan stable but I am dead certain of their involvement in supporting them.

There is one site. Hopefully I can find more.
http://us.altnews.com.au/nuke/print.php?sid=3586

The wtc attack in '93 was before the Taliban even existed.
Back to Top
Illuminati View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949
  Quote Illuminati Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Feb-2006 at 02:43
America gave way for the taliban to take power becuase the taliban was rather anti-soviet. Everyone knows that. My point was that the US didn't keep on supporting the taliban like you claimed they did.

You hardly cared about "al-qaeda" or bin laden before sept 11.

Clinton didn't order the CIA to kidnap Bin Laden in 1998 jsut for the hell of it.

and I suppose that America just kept on not caring about bin laden even afer he tried to blow up the WTC in 1993.

I have yet to see one reason why America would not care about al qaeda after 1993. The Communists were all but done for, and no other government could be worse than the taliban. What is the plus side to america continuing to support the taliban? And why would america not care about al qaeda after they tried to level the WTC? Your argument is illogical.




Edited by Illuminati
Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Feb-2006 at 01:10
How can you guys not know this? I thought it was common knowledge. America set the taliban up. The countries that had taliban embassies were Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE, all governments with heavy american influence. America funded the taliban, you got them to destroy the poppy crop. American installed them. America used ISI to create the taliban. You hardly cared about "al-qaeda" or bin laden before sept 11. 
Back to Top
Illuminati View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949
  Quote Illuminati Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 23:32
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

Originally posted by Genghis


Originally posted by Omar al Hashim


Secondly, America went from primary supporter to arch enemy of the Taliban in less than a month. When he joined the taliban he was supporting US foriegn policy and couldn't therefore be a traitor, America then reversed its stance to the taliban and he may not have even known about the american attack. Once he did it may not have been possible to leave the armed forces of the taliban.

We had always had terrible relations with the Taliban, we had supported groups like the Taliban throughout Afghanistan but when the Soviets left and their puppet regime fell, the State Department basically washed their hands of Afghanistan.

No, America installed the Taliban in the mid '90s with Pakistani help. The taliban until september 11 thereabouts, were propped up by america. Which means the when John Walker Lindh joined the taliban he was supporting american foriegn policy and wasn't a tratior at all.
Originally posted by flyingzone


That is a very interesting theory. But even so, the personal transformation from a hardcore partier to someone who embraces Islam in its most puritanical form is still "remarkable" in a very bizarre kind of way.

Actually its not bizarre at all. Its quite common. It shows a person who is going to take whatever he does to an extreme. Before he was a muslim he took parting to an extreme, and when he did become a muslim he took not parting to an extreme.


That's pretty much all wrong. America was running missions agaisnt al qaeda in Taliban territory during teh 90's.

Clinton authorized a CIA mission to go in and nab Bin laden in 1998. America wasn't supporting teh Taliban up until sept. 11th.  The US was allied with teh northern Alliance during the late 90's and up until the taliban fell. The Northern alliance aided the CIA numerous times before 9/11. America knew al qaeda was a threat after the failed 1993 WTC attack. If you think America was supporting the taliban past that time while they were harboring al qaeda, you're really lost.




Edited by Illuminati
Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 19:12
Originally posted by Genghis


Originally posted by Omar al Hashim


Secondly, America went from primary supporter to arch enemy of the Taliban in less than a month. When he joined the taliban he was supporting US foriegn policy and couldn't therefore be a traitor, America then reversed its stance to the taliban and he may not have even known about the american attack. Once he did it may not have been possible to leave the armed forces of the taliban.

We had always had terrible relations with the Taliban, we had supported groups like the Taliban throughout Afghanistan but when the Soviets left and their puppet regime fell, the State Department basically washed their hands of Afghanistan.

No, America installed the Taliban in the mid '90s with Pakistani help. The taliban until september 11 thereabouts, were propped up by america. Which means the when John Walker Lindh joined the taliban he was supporting american foriegn policy and wasn't a tratior at all.
Originally posted by flyingzone


That is a very interesting theory. But even so, the personal transformation from a hardcore partier to someone who embraces Islam in its most puritanical form is still "remarkable" in a very bizarre kind of way.

Actually its not bizarre at all. Its quite common. It shows a person who is going to take whatever he does to an extreme. Before he was a muslim he took parting to an extreme, and when he did become a muslim he took not parting to an extreme.
Back to Top
Genghis View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2656
  Quote Genghis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 11:34

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim


Secondly, America went from primary supporter to arch enemy of the Taliban in less than a month. When he joined the taliban he was supporting US foriegn policy and couldn't therefore be a traitor, America then reversed its stance to the taliban and he may not have even known about the american attack. Once he did it may not have been possible to leave the armed forces of the taliban.

PS: Is that a picture of you Genghis or someone else?

We had always had terrible relations with the Taliban, we had supported groups like the Taliban throughout Afghanistan but when the Soviets left and their puppet regime fell, the State Department basically washed their hands of Afghanistan.

Yes, that is a picture of me.

Member of IAEA
Back to Top
flyingzone View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 11-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2630
  Quote flyingzone Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 09:04

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

Secondly, America went from primary supporter to arch enemy of the Taliban in less than a month. When he joined the taliban he was supporting US foriegn policy and couldn't therefore be a traitor, America then reversed its stance to the taliban and he may not have even known about the american attack. Once he did it may not have been possible to leave the armed forces of the taliban.


That is a very interesting theory. But even so, the personal transformation from a hardcore partier to someone who embraces Islam in its most puritanical form is still "remarkable" in a very bizarre kind of way.

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

PS: Is that a picture of you Genghis or someone else?

Yes, that's Genghis, if I am not mistaken.

Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 07:12

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

When your judging this guy I think two things should be remembered.
Firstly it is impossible to renouce american citizenship. I have some diplomat friends whose mother is american. They never wanted american citizenship and nver took it up, when their father got a posting to america they tried to get visas for ameica, they were told that whether they liked it or not they were american citizens becuase there mother was born in america.

That's not quite true. If they were born outside America, they would be American citizens (like it or not) if

a) a parent was a US Citizen who had resided in America before the childs birth

AND (b) after the birth the baby was taken to a US consulate and a declaration of citizenship sworn out

AND (c) the child spent a certain amount of time living in the US before the age of 18 (I forget exactly how long).

As I understand it, if both parents were US citizens, then (c) is not required.

But I agree that once a citizen it's pretty impossible to opt out again.

There is more information that you would probably care to know about at

http://foia.state.gov/masterdocs/07fam/07m1130.pdf

(I'm fairly familiar with this because of  my stepdaughter's situation, and my involvement with the expatriate US community here.)

 

Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 01:07
When your judging this guy I think two things should be remembered.
Firstly it is impossible to renouce american citizenship. I have some diplomat friends whose mother is american. They never wanted american citizenship and nver took it up, when their father got a posting to america they tried to get visas for ameica, they were told that whether they liked it or not they were american citizens becuase there mother was born in america.

Secondly, America went from primary supporter to arch enemy of the Taliban in less than a month. When he joined the taliban he was supporting US foriegn policy and couldn't therefore be a traitor, America then reversed its stance to the taliban and he may not have even known about the american attack. Once he did it may not have been possible to leave the armed forces of the taliban.

PS: Is that a picture of you Genghis or someone else?


Edited by Omar al Hashim
Back to Top
Genghis View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2656
  Quote Genghis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 23:53
Originally posted by flyingzone

Of course he's a traitor and should be punished accordingly.

While I was reading his brief biography, I could not but ask myself, "What drove him to make such bizarre decisions in his life?" (I am not defending his actions and I have no sympathy for him.) Sometimes in life, it just takes us a momentary decision to start digging a hole that, once dug, becomes deeper and deeper that it finally reaches a point of no return.

I am pretty sure quite a few of us have experienced moments in our lives when the boundary between sanity and insanity isn't that clear cut anymore. Thankfully, most of us won't cross over to the "other" side. But John Walker Lindh did.

He's only 25 years old, probably just about the same age as quite a lot of the forumers here.  

That's very true, and a very good question.  I recall that he used to be a really hardcore partier and a big fan of gangster rap and stuff, but eventually rejected it and went to the opposite end of the spectrum by embracing puritanical Islam. 

It would be interesting to read a psychoanalytical analysis of him.

Member of IAEA
Back to Top
flyingzone View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 11-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2630
  Quote flyingzone Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 23:45

Of course he's a traitor and should be punished accordingly.

While I was reading his brief biography, I could not but ask myself, "What drove him to make such bizarre decisions in his life?" (I am not defending his actions and I have no sympathy for him.) Sometimes in life, it just takes us a momentary decision to start digging a hole that, once dug, becomes deeper and deeper that it finally reaches a point of no return.

I am pretty sure quite a few of us have experienced moments in our lives when the boundary between sanity and insanity isn't that clear cut anymore. Thankfully, most of us won't cross over to the "other" side. But John Walker Lindh did.

He's only 25 years old, probably just about the same age as quite a lot of the forumers here.  

Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 11:50
There's a lot of parallels here with the case of Thomas Paine who was treated very differently on his return to England after the AWI. Perhaps he should have been strung up the instant he returned.
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Mortaza View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
  Quote Mortaza Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 08:13
kill him, isnt  this punishment of traitors?
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 07:47

Basically I go with Constantine on this. But it^s not too easy to renounce one's citizenship unilaterally.

William Joyce ('Lord Haw-Haw') claimed to be not a British subject when he was broadcasting for the Nazis, but he was nevertheless hanged for treason after the war.

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.