Best leader of a Muslim country at present?

well,the human nature makes the humans to seek the best host for their children,and nationalism and cultural uniformism come from this point,coz instinctively the humans want to have a partner that shares the same origin with them thus knowing the habits/behaviours of their partners and serving as the fittest host for their breed...

IT is one of someone's major rights to determine and guarantee the lives of his/her children... and it is not racism(maybe to a point but not more,but obviously not FASCISM!) and posing it as a danger is a "biiiig silly" unless that behaviour poses a threat

For example,I dont want to have sex with a darker skinned girl or someone other than a Turk,and it is not something wrong or offending, it is just sexual selection

I think it is over

Thanks

well,but everyone should respect the other's choices ....

And what is it to me if some crazy guys came and killed lots of innocent people for racial purity...Did I kill them?

its my opinion,and I can like/love or dislike ANYONE whom I want,and forcing someone to change his views on people is just like taking them to "the death camp of tolerance"

The elected Iraqi Prime minister Dr.Ibrahim Al-Jaafri.

he is very decent and calm man.

Not just a member.  The Head of the organization is a Turk, too!

Salaamz Mortaza,

Yes, I was referring to "Islamic country," as in ruled by Shariah law.  You are right; most countries are not Islamic.  Also, some countries are self-declared Islamic republics, such as Iran and (former) Afghanistan.  Whether they are or not is debatable.

Also, I agree with your statement: Islam does play a role not only in Turkish politics, but in every day culture and life.

Thank you for your response.

Mortaza, Kemalism is a left-wing ideology.

So you thing  so, Infact It is complately  right winged ideology, It resist every type of changing, It limits a lot freedom.(not only  talking  minority rights but also majority rights)It  is a world-closed(If there is such word) ideology.

Infact It is not even an ideology but It is something like a religion.

you can tell anyone "Ataturk said this!!!", and discussion is closed. What  Ataturk said is holy, and even after 100 year, you cannot change this.

I know this is not what Ataturk want, but what kemalism becomed is this.

for economical point, kemalism is something between capitalism and socialism. I think Ataturk didnt follow any -ism- but only opportunism.(like a good leader)

I voted for Talat. He used to be a Communist in university, maybe he still is. And along with Erdo�an, he is actually elected, unlike the others up there. 

I think Kemalism is not an ideology, but a modernisation program, based on full Westernisation (not just modernisation) and nation building and aims at a European style social-liberal democratic state. Socialism is internationalist, not nationalist, and aims at a socialist economy where Capitalism is abolished (Social Democrats believe that this can be achieved step by step, radical leftists believe in revolution). Kemalism doesn't share these aims. Economically it is to the left of an imaginary centre, but this is not enough to make its program socialist. So I don't consider CHP a leftist party, not even Social Democrat. It is way too Nationalistic and Authoritarian, but not very Socialist. Also, as Murtaza writes its support does not come from, and its politics are not based on, the working class.

He has serious problems in managing the country. His party is very inexperienced, and way too friendly with the foreign capital. His misdeeds include attempting to let the Americans to station troops in Turkey (failed to clear the parliament). Attempting to send Turkish troops to be stationed in the Sunni triangle in Iraq after the invasion (offer rejected by Americans). Privatising profitable state industries because 'even the ex-communists have privatised everything'. Making the rich richer and the poor poorer. Attempting to introduce Islamic laws and practices now and then. Attempting to turn religious schools (which are not for teaching Islam, but for training priests) into an alternative education system parallel to the secular one. Filling positions in state institutions with Islamists.

Grossly mismanaging the Ministry of Health: Coming up with a law which united  two separate hospital commands in Turkey (SSK and Ministry of Health) literally overnight. Insider sources (Medical trade associations) estimate that 8000 to 10000 patients died because of the chaos that ensued. Patients couldn't get the medicine they needed, there were long queues, failures in management etc... Which were not reported in the media, most of which is owned by the Liberal capital which loves Erdo�an as long as he doesn't try to ban alcohol or adultery. And just as I am typing, and additional 1000 patients are estimated to be dying, because AKP changed the system in employing nurses in hospitals (probably to get their people in), and there was a one month gap between the coming of the new nurses and the leaving of the old ones because they are idiots who can't manage anything. I know for a fact that one of the biggest hospitals in �stanbul (and thus in Turkey), and possibly many others, are not accepting any non-urgent patients due to a lack of nurses... 

AKP is a lot like American neo-cons. A completely capital friendly, socially conservative bunch of losers who can't manage sh*t to save their own lives. Erdo�an is a big enemy of the poor people.

There are no Islamic aspects in Turkish law that I am aware of. Turkish law is based on European systems since the Republic.