Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The Sandzak

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Mortaza View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
  Quote Mortaza Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Sandzak
    Posted: 14-Mar-2006 at 14:08

who are the gorani muslims ?are they too much different than bosniaks? how do they call themself?

 

Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
  Quote Mila Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Mar-2006 at 18:12
They're different from Bosniaks, yes. They speak Serbo-Croatian but not as a first language. They have a completely different culture, by Balkan standards - it's still Ottoman as everything else from the outside looking in.
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Mar-2006 at 03:56

Originally posted by Mortaza

who are the gorani muslims?

Few links about the gorani(goranci) muslims:

http://www.answers.com/topic/gorani - in english

http://www.aimpress.ch/dyn/pubs/archive/data/200206/20619-00 1-pubs-sko.htm - in "macedonian"

http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery;jsessionid=2fdgpnp692j2c ?method=4&dsid=2222&dekey=Gora+%28region%29&curt ab=2222_1&sbid=lc02a&linktext=Gora  - short, in english about Gora

http://www.viaggiareibalcani.org/kossovo/gorani.htm - in italian

http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Gorani_(Kosovo) - in english

http://www.osservatoriobalcani.org/article/articleview/3281/ 1/43/ - in italian

http://p083.ezboard.com/fbalkansfrm34.showMessage?topicID=32 .topic - a forum in english

http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goranci_(narod) - in Croatian Wikipedia - " U enskoj goranskoj nonji postoji slinost s nonjom kod bugarskih Pomaka, to su tradicionalne duge crne jakne, ukraene zlatnim vezom."

http://www.kosovakosovo.com/forum/reactions.php?id=2066 - read this: "mije sme GORANCI i samo GORANCI ni sme ni srbi ni albanci ni turci, we are GORANI, WELCOME TO GORA, bidi samo svoj goranac, ostaj kucica neka lajet, srbi i albanci ZIVIO ZELENA GORA"

http://www.start-press.com/arhiva/12/25/RG-07-20051225.asp - Goranci postali Bugari!

http://www.geocities.com/gorani_bg/index.htm - in bulgarian

A map of the distribution of the gorani bulgarian muslims. But there are a few more gorani villages is the southern part of Prizren district in Kossovo, near to the macedonian border.

http://www.geocities.com/gorani_bg/Statii.htm - few links in bulgarian

http://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD% D1%86%D0%B8 - in bulgarian

http://wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%89%D0%B8_%D 1%81_%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5_ %D0%B2_%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%B8_%D0%96%D1%83%D0%BF%D0 %B0 - in bulgarian

 
These links i have found today.


Edited by The Chargemaster
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Mar-2006 at 04:04

Hello, Djamila

What is your opinion about the wearing of yashmaks? In bulgarian "yashmak" is "feredje"(i think that this is turkic word).

What you think about the engagement of the muslims for the praying to Allah five times in the day?



Edited by The Chargemaster
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Mar-2006 at 02:59

Please, can someone answer me: When exactly and why and how(in what way) the ancestors of the today`s bosniaks in Bosnia and Sandzak were converted to Mohammedanism(Islam)?

And the second question: What was this conversion to Islam - "of their own free will"(voluntarily) or "by violence"(forcibly)?

I think, that this will be an interesting information for this topic.

Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
  Quote Mila Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Mar-2006 at 10:10
I can't speak universally, but in this part of the world when the Ottoman forces were invading they would offer cities the chance of fighting or surrendering. If they fought, and lost - they lost, everything. If they surrendered, they could keep everything and simply pay taxes to the Ottoman authorities.

Several cities in Bosnia and Herzegovina fought and several others surrendered. Jajce and Soli would be the most famous. Jajce fought for decades than the rest of the country and Soli surrendered before the Ottomans even reached their region, they sent a messenger out as far as I know.

Overall, most of Bosnia - whether it fought or surrendered - fell very quickly. They still say Bosnia fell "with a whisper" here.

The conversion to Islam happened very quickly as well. Central and northeast Bosnia were almost fully Islamic by the mid 1500s. The rest of the country slowly caught up so that by 1700 a vast majority of Bosnia's people, I believe over 80%, were Muslim.

Most of the first conversions happened as a way to ensure security. The Bosnian church was constantly being attacked by Rome and the forces of Byzantium and people were eager for protection.

Most of the later conversions happened to take advantage of tax breaks and these sorts of things. Conversions for this purpose continued right up until the end of the Ottoman Empire.

There had the be forced conversions somewhere, it'd be stupid to think there weren't - but I know of no examples.

EDIT: Janissaries were forced conversions! But Muslims here insisted their children participate as well, so it wasn't always a conversion.


Edited by Mila
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Mar-2006 at 04:06

Overall, most of Bosnia - whether it fought or surrendered - fell very quickly. They still say Bosnia fell "with a whisper" here.

Unfortunately all bulgarian states fall VERY QUICLY too. The town where i was living before was surrender in 1388 year. The citizens send a messenger to one turkish pasha with supplication/request to send some military contingent to occupy and to hold the castle. In fact the forces of this turkish pasha was situated 120 km(!) in the south from the town of these cowardly people. And is interesting that never before turkish army did`nt reach so "near"(!) to this town.

But on the other hand, i justify their bearing because that was a choice between the survival and the heroic death. Is another question would the turkish army reach up to this town in that military campaign... But anyway...

In fact, the first time when the ottoman turks has capture some castle in the Balkans, was in 1352 year - the castle of Gallipoli. And ONLY 44 years after that - up to 1396 year, all Bulgarian States were also captured from/by the turks...

And because of that is interesting to me to know this: How many years the Bosnian(and Hercegovina) State resist the turkish invasion?

I know that the resistance in Bosna was continued also after the fall of  the Bosnian State, because the hungarian army recapture from the turks one part of the lands of the Bosnian Kingdom only few years after the death of the last Bosnian king. And this bosnian king give a written order to all bosnian fortresses for voluntarily surrender to the turkish invaders. But is the resistance against the turkish invaders after the fall of the Bosnian Kingdom "bosnian", or is "hungarian", or "croatian", or mixed(i think)?

Maps with the medieval Bosna and Croatia can be seen here - http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f266/NikeBG_History/Histor ical%20maps/Encyclopaedia%20History%20of%20Bulgaria/16-Voini tenaTsarKaloian1197-1207.jpg , here - http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f266/NikeBG_History/Histor ical%20maps/Encyclopaedia%20History%20of%20Bulgaria/22-Sapro tivasreshtuOsmanskitenashes.jpg  and here - http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6670& ; ; ;PN=1&TPN=3

And what was the title of the medieval bosnian rulers - always "kral"(king) or  different titles in the different periods?



Edited by The Chargemaster
Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
  Quote Mila Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Mar-2006 at 13:41
The title they themselves used was usually Ban, Chargemaster. It was only when complete and total separation from Hungary was achieved in the later years of the Bosnian Kingdom that King was used by these rulers at the time they ruled.

These days, most everyone says King to refer to them all. There is also a strong recognition of Croatia's Kings as well, carried over from our close relationship. One of the main streets in Old Sarajevo is King Tomislav Street.

As for resistence to the Ottoman Empire - it was certainly weak here. There was no major rebellion in the major population centers to speak of until the 1800s. In rural areas, there were certainly uprisings - especially since the 20 per cent of Bosnians who were Christian at this time were overwhelmingly rural people.

The only thing I can find as a pattern has nothing to do with the Ottoman Empire but more with local rulers. In cities such as Trebinje, where the surrounding Christians were taxed unfairly and by all accounts treated as the lowest of the Empire's subjects, there were uprisings. In cities such as Gradacac, where local leaders treated Christians fairly and in most cases well, there were none.

It was only when that very city, Gradacac, started an uprising - led by it's Muslim leaders and supported by the Christian peasantry - that the resistence spread to the towns and cities.

But I mean...

You could interview all the generations of a family from Sarajevo, or Mostar, or wherever else - and ask them if they've ever experienced any significant violence against the Ottoman Empire and they'd all tell not from their own people. Sarajevo was attacked several times by Western Europe, and completely destroyed once - so there was that kind of resistence. But it never came from within.

That's as much as I know about it.
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
ill_teknique View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 28-Jun-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 636
  Quote ill_teknique Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 02:18
Personally, I dont understand why they call themselves Bosnjaks, they are Serbian Muslims, that just helps to further this idea that the Muslims in Bosnia are "poturceni."
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 04:33

Well, why don't you call yourself a Serb Muslim then? Since you are so concerned what serbs think. I don't know what it has to do with the fact that they call Muslims in Bosnia "poturice"., they would still do it. In the eyes of people like that Bosnia won't be less "Serbian land".

Bosniaks from Bosnia have been denied a status of a nation for a long time, they shouldn't deny others the same, and knowing a lot of Bosniaks from Sandzak, I would say that they in general have a higher (Bosniak) national consciousness than  Bosniaks from Bosnia. From what I know, many of them emmigrated to Sandzak from Hercegovina and Podrinje. I think that national conscioussness is most important here, because people on the Balkans, and especially in Bosnia, I would guess, are so mixed that talking about genetic similarities between Bosniaks today and those who lived there 500-600 years ago is ridiculous.

Personally, I don't understand why people are bothered with how others call themselves.

 

Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 05:21

Thanks, Mila

Who were the famous bosniak leaders in the times of the turkish rule?

I remember that one of them was living in XVI century and his title was "pasha" and he has lead many military campaigns against Hungary. I think, that his name is Mehmed Sokolovich, or some similar.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 05:47

Chargemaster, Sokolovic was Serb.



Edited by zelda
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 06:32

Originally posted by Zelda

Chargemaster, Sokolovic was Serb.

No problem. Can you post some sources with information about Mehmed Sokolovic? And if he was a serb, is interesting to me: Are living today somewhere in Yugoslavia, in Bosnia, in Croatia or in Montenegro some muslims who are serbs or croats, but not bosniaks? And what part of the medieval serbs and croats become a muslims? Because i think that all of the today`s muslims in the lands of former Yugoslavia consider themselves as "bosniaks", but not "serbs" or "croats". Your opinion is interesting to me, just like the opinion of Djamila.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 07:23
Originally posted by The Chargemaster

Originally posted by Zelda

Chargemaster, Sokolovic was Serb.

No problem. Can you post some sources with information about Mehmed Sokolovic? And if he was a serb, is interesting to me: Are living today somewhere in Yugoslavia, in Bosnia, in Croatia or in Montenegro some muslims who are serbs or croats, but not bosniaks? And what part of the medieval serbs and croats become a muslims? Because i think that all of the today`s muslims in the lands of former Yugoslavia consider themselves as "bosniaks", but not "serbs" or "croats". Your opinion is interesting to me, just like the opinion of Djamila.

He was born in the village Sokolovici near Visegrad in an Othodox family. I don't know what he called himself, but at that time people were divided by their religion, they didn't have any national conscioussness.

And yes, there are Muslims who consider themselves Serbs, Montenegrins and Croats. About 80% of the Muslims in Croatia are Bosniaks, most of them came there after the recent war. The rest are Albanians, some other minorities and insignificant number of Croats. I went to school in Croatia for a year, and in my class there was Muslim Croat girl.

You also asked me the number of medieval Serbs and Croats who converted to Islam; I don't the exact number, nobody does, but most of the Muslims from Serbia and Croatia settled in Bosnia after the decline of Ottoman empire, like many Muslim families from Hungary did. A significant number of Bosniaks can trace their origins back to Hungary.

I have also two questions for you:

1. Why are you interested in Muslim Slavs from ex-Yugoslavia?

2. I had a conversation with a Turkish guy long time ago. Some of his ancestors were Pomaks. Now, I thought that Pomaks are Islamized Bulgarians, but he said they are of Turkic origin and that his ancerstors spoke Turkish. Is he right or wrong?

Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
  Quote Mila Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 09:22
Originally posted by The Chargemaster

Originally posted by Zelda

Chargemaster, Sokolovic was Serb.

No problem. Can you post some sources with information about Mehmed Sokolovic? And if he was a serb, is interesting to me: Are living today somewhere in Yugoslavia, in Bosnia, in Croatia or in Montenegro some muslims who are serbs or croats, but not bosniaks? And what part of the medieval serbs and croats become a muslims? Because i think that all of the today`s muslims in the lands of former Yugoslavia consider themselves as "bosniaks", but not "serbs" or "croats". Your opinion is interesting to me, just like the opinion of Djamila.



She's right, he was a Janissary as far I know? He was definitely Serb though.

EDIT: Nevermind, everything else I wrote is just rambling.


Edited by Mila
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
  Quote Mila Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 09:25
Originally posted by zelda

I went to school in Croatia for a year, and in my class there was Muslim Croat girl.


So you know Emina Arapovic then? Or is there two? Kidding.

I can't tell which nationality you are from your posts - which is very, very, very nice. I hope you'll stick around and share what you know!
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 10:08

Originally posted by Zelda

1. Why are you interested in Muslim Slavs from ex-Yugoslavia?

The reasons are different. In principle i am interested in the people who are living in interesting countries. Also i am interested in people whose origin is disputable for other people(in example: the bulgarian textbooks explain the origin of the Muslim Slavs in Bosnia thereby/in that way - all of them are "serbs & croats" ) . Also i am interested in the opinions of the people who are living today in ex-Yugoslavia about the roots of the war. Also is interesting to me what are the today`s relations between croats, serbs and bosniaks in BiH: have they chance for a common future? Also for me is interesting to know more about the historical proofs for the existing of "bosniak people"- different from the serbs and the croats.

And your second question is relevant to THE OTHER BIG REASON which caused my interest about the Bosnian muslim slavs. Just some people say that the pomaks are not bulgarians, but are a "pomak people" - just as the bosniaks are not serbs & croats. But this(about the pomaks) is not the truth.

I promise, i will write more, but later, because now i have not more time. And i don`t know for sure about you and about Djamila, but for me this conversation is really interesting.



Edited by The Chargemaster
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 10:13

So you know Emina Arapovic then? Or is there two? Kidding

Hehe, I've heard about her. What's her background story?

 

Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
  Quote Mila Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2006 at 13:49
Originally posted by The Chargemaster

Originally posted by Zelda

1. Why are you interested in Muslim Slavs from ex-Yugoslavia?

The reasons are different. In principle i am interested in the people who are living in interesting countries. Also i am interested in people whose origin is disputable for other people(in example: the bulgarian textbooks explain the origin of the Muslim Slavs in Bosnia thereby/in that way - all of them are "serbs & croats" ) . Also i am interested in the opinions of the people who are living today in ex-Yugoslavia about the roots of the war. Also is interesting to me what are the today`s relations between croats, serbs and bosniaks in BiH: have they chance for a common future? Also for me is interesting to know more about the historical proofs for the existing of "bosniak people"- different from the serbs and the croats.

And your second question is relevant to THE OTHER BIG REASON which caused my interest about the Bosnian muslim slavs. Just some people say that the pomaks are not bulgarians, but are a "pomak people" - just as the bosniaks are not serbs & croats. But this(about the pomaks) is not the truth.

I promise, i will write more, but later, because now i have not more time. And i don`t know for sure about you and about Djamila, but for me this conversation is really interesting.



It is very interesting, Chargemaster. I don't have many opportunities to interact in a positive way with people from your background and with your world views.

As for a common future for Bosnia and Herzegovina... it is possible and it will happen if moderate voices are heard as loudly as nationalist ones.

Whoever started the war, and you know my views on that, is irrelevent when it comes to the future. The war made all three sides nationalist. There are people in Mostar who are sick to their stomachs to see Bosnian Serbs return just as there are among other groups and against other groups in Banja Luka and Stolac.

The political structure makes it very easy for these people to represent all people and that's something that needs to change.

But a united future will be possible. The Bosnian Army's weaponry lies mainly among government loyalists, among all three groups. And our neighbors are no longer equipped to invade. Left to sort this out for ourselves, we will.

We have never had a single conflict that cannot be linked directly to outside pressures and influences, and we have never have a single reconciliation that was imposed.

It's the natural flow of things here, and whatever the appearance now, they will hopefully take hold.

This war was different, though, there's no doubts about that. When Dubrovnik was shelled, when the Mostar bridge was blown up, when the Ferhadija mosque was blown up...it was very clear this war was for keeps. We've never resorted that far before.
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Mar-2006 at 14:57

Originally posted by zelda

I had a conversation with a Turkish guy long time ago. Some of his ancestors were Pomaks. Now, I thought that Pomaks are Islamized Bulgarians, but he said they are of Turkic origin and that his ancerstors spoke Turkish. Is he right or wrong?

Well - here you can read this about the turkish point of view about the pomaks:

Today, Turks in Bulgaria have neither  political nor religious unity. Since the 1990s, Turks are in the zone of interest of various Christian missioners. In this regard, Pomak Turks and Muslim Gypsies compel their special interest. Moreover, the Bulgarian administration tries to organise Pomak Turks into a different religious structure; this compromises the Turkish unity in Bulgaria.

The turks always want to assimilate the other muslims: pomaks, albanians, kurds or bosniaks ===> i have relatives who consider themselves as turks!!! You can be sure that the bosniaks who are living today in Turkey will be assimilated after 2-3 generations...

 

And - the truth about the pomaks:

The British specialist in Balkan minority-studies Hugh Poulton writes: 'The Bulgarian Muslims (i.e. the Pomaks) are a religious minority. They are Slavic Bulgarians who speak Bulgarian as their mother tongue, but whose religion and customs are Islamic.' (Poulton 1994:111)

Read the full text here: http://www-gewi.kfunigraz.ac.at/csbsc/ulf/pomak_identities.h tm

Yes! They are a religious minoity, but not an ethnic minority!

It is important to be marked the fact, that THE ONLY DIFFERENCE between the pomak - bulgarians and the other bulgarians is their religion. In the old historical sources are preserved many pieces of information about the time and the methods of the forcible coversion to mohammedanism of these AUTHENTIC BULGARIANS.

The older pomaks call the christian bulgarians "kaur" which comes from Turkish "gâvur" (infidel). In Pomak dialects there is no word for "Bulgarian". So - those people don't have a sense of ethnic, but just religious difference with christian bulgarians.

Pomaks--a term that loosely translates as collaborators- -were the descendants of ethnic Bulgarians who accepted the Islamic faith during Ottoman rule, mostly between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries. In 1990 about 150,000 Pomaks lived in mountain villages in southern and southwestern Bulgaria. They were chiefly employed in agriculture, forestry, and mining. Because of their relative isolation in the mountains, the Pomaks did not become mixed with the Turks during the turkish rule, and because of that, one big part of them were not assimilated from the turks, and they retained their bulgarian physical features. Because the Ottoman Turks showed little interest in Pomak lands, and because the Pomaks were converted rather late, most of their traditional Bulgarian customs remained intact. Thus, for example, the Pomaks never learned to speak Turkish.

 

AND MORE(IN ENGLISH):

 

The covercion to mohammedanism was not only "with sword". The other factor "was the economic pressure and the temptation of privileges and tax reductions received for adopting Islam" - this is one characteristic feature of the Turkish Empire.

Read more here: http://www.coronetbooks.com/books/moha8413.htm

 

Also read this:

Muslim Bulgarians

 

Muslim Bulgarians (also Bulgarian Mohammedans, bul:-; local: Pomak, Ahrian, Poganets, Marvak, Poturnak) are descendants of Christian Bulgarians who were forcibly converted to Islam by the Turks, during the 16th and the 18th century. The word pomak is derived from Bulgarian dialectal pomaka (torture) and pomacen (tortured). Those who accepted Islam voluntarily are called Poturnak, meaning "One who turned into a Turk".

Muslim Bulgarians live mostly in the Rhodopes the Smolyan region, the Southern part of the Pazardzhik and Kurdzhali regions and the Western part of the Blagoevgrad region in Southern Bulgaria and the Xanthi and Rhodope provinces in Northeastern Greece. They also live in a group of villages in the Lovech region in Northern Bulgaria.

Muslim Bulgarians speak a variety of archaic Bulgarian dialects. Under the influence of mass media and school education, the dialects have been almost completely unified with standard Bulgarian among Muslim Bulgarians living in Bulgaria. As Greece has tended to regard its Muslim minority as only Turkish-speaking and has allowed only education in Turkish, the Muslim Bulgarian community in Greece has become largely bilingual and the mother tongue of some of its members now is Turkish. The spoken language of those members of the community who have preserved the dialect as their mother tongue has been influenced to a large extent by Turkish and Greek and shows many aberrations from formal Bulgarian.

Pomaks in Bulgaria do not represent a homogenous community. Pomaks living in the eastern part of the Rhodopes tend to be non-practising Muslims and usually have Christian names. A large number of them, especially those living in the municipalities of Zlatograd, Nedelino, Krumovgrad, and Kirkovo, converted to Christianity in the 1990s. Pomaks in the western part of the Rhodopes are, on the hand, strongly religious and have preserved the Muslim name system, customs and clothing. Whereas the majority of the Pomak community has identified itself as Bulgarian in the population censuses in 1992 and 2001, a certain minority in the western Rhodopes has opted for Turkish ethnicity although its mother tongue is also Bulgarian. The name Pomak is strongly pejorative in Bulgarian and is resented by most members of the community, especially by non-practising Muslims. The name adopted and used instead is Bulgarian Mohammedans (Muslim Bulgarians).

The Muslim Bulgarian community in Greece has been largely Turkified. Since the 1990s Greece has made tentative attempts to promote a separate "Pomak" identity, partly because of the advanced Turkification of the non-Turkish members of its Muslim minority (Muslim Bulgarians and Roma) and partly for fear of the growing percentage of Muslims in Thrace in the past couple of decennia. A Greek-Pomak dictionary has been issued and Muslim Bulgarians have frequently been described by Greek authorities as "an amalgamation of Bulgarians, Greeks and Turks" or even as "Muslim Slavophone Greeks".

There is also a substantial Muslim Bulgarian community in Turkey, estimated at some 120,000 people. These are not recognized by the Turkish government as an ethnic minority and have been largely Turkified. Some of them have Turkish or distinctive "Pomak" self-consciousness.

Source: http://pomaks.biography.ms/

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.