Again, a contribution from Natalie. Thank you!
Excerpt | Boudicca: What Do We Really Know?
Cities were sacked and thousands lay dead and "moreover, all this
ruin was brought upon the Romans by a woman, a fact which in itself
caused them the greatest shame."[1] In 60 and 61 C.E. a woman is
reported to have led a rebellion of the Iceni in Roman Britain which
ultimately resulted in three Roman cities razed to the ground,
thousands of Romans and Britons alike killed and the slaughter of
thousands of the Iceni perpetrators in a final battle with Roman
soldiers.[2] This woman, whom is credited with this catalog of crimes,
is known to history as Boudicca. Boudicca herself is a mysterious
figure; her only record of existence lies within the written words of
two men. These accounts vary in quality and details, leaving the reader
with a limited, scant impression of who this person was.
Primary sources on Boudicca and the revolt are limited. There are
only three sources which mention her and the uprising, and two of these
are written by the same man, the Roman historian, Tacitus.[3] Dio
Cassius is the other Roman historian who wrote of an account of the
Iceni queen and the revolt she led.[4] There are several issues which
need to be known about these two authors and their work which will be
discussed in the opening section. However, these three versions of the
revolt and its leader, Boudicca are all we have in written form. The
Celts did not write anything down in this period that is available to
us today and so no information from them concerning this event is left
for historians to pick over. Archeology (including the use of coins)
will also be employed in this paper and it seems fitting to include
these items under primary sources. Overall, the primary sources are
scant and archeology has yielded only so much thus far.
Secondary
sources present a problem when one realizes that they rest mainly on
the aforementioned primary sources. There are many books which discuss
the Celts and some[5] have been used in this paper. Antonia Fraser's
The Warrior Queens , is another monograph used but not depended on
exclusively. A problem which I found in some of these secondary sources
was that the authors drew conclusions about Boudicca based on Celtic
law.[6] The problem with this is that the law texts which are used by
these authors are either Irish law texts written down mainly by
Christian monks between the 7th and 10th centuries or Welsh law which
was not committed to writing until about the 12th century.[7] These law
texts are centuries removed from the time period of Boudicca and are no
doubt tainted by later influences on the island from Christianity, any
invading cultures and unknown elements. There may be some evidence of
what Celtic customs were like during Boudicca's time that were left in
these law texts, but to decipher what exactly they may be is difficult,
if not impossible.[8]
Complete Article:
http://www.allempires.com/article/index.php?q=boudicca