| Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
R_AK47
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Topic: The True Cross after Hattin Posted: 22-Oct-2005 at 20:08 |
|
Here is another question I have been trying to find answers to. I know that a large portion of the True Cross was carried into the battle of Hattin by the Kingdom of Jerusalem during the Middle Ages. Apparently, this was a large part of the original True Cross that was discovered by Helena, the mother of Constantine the Great. This piece was encased in gold and kept in Jerusalem. I have read that the muslims captured the relic after Hattin and that Richard the Lionheart later attempted to recover it (during the 3rd crusade) but no mention of what happened to it since. Was it destroyed or is it still out there somewhere?
|
 |
Komnenos
Tsar
Retired AE Administrator
Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4367
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 00:50 |
|
Apparently after Hattin that particular piece of the cross disappeared completely from history.
However, there had been many other fragments of the cross in circulation, and after the mysterious disappearance of that particularly large chunk, the trade in pieces from the cross further increased.
There are so many splinters of the "True Cross" in the world now, to make a dozen crosses or so from.
|
|
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
|
 |
shurite7
Knight
Joined: 14-Oct-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 91
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 02:43 |
The accounts that I have read is Salah al-Din took/sent the fragment of the "true cross" to Damascas. There it is reported the fragment was buried at the entrance of a mosque so that it could be walked over by all those who entered and left the mosque. Whether it is still there or not is unknown.
At the time of the crusades there were believed to be 3 fragments of the "true cross". The one in Jerusalem, another in Constantinople with the Byzantines and the other, if my memory serves me right, in Rome. The last one may be wrong but I believe it was given to the pope sometime before the crusades.
Cheers
|
 |
R_AK47
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 14:50 |
|
Does anyone know what happened to the pieces from Constantinople and Rome? I'm guessing that the one in Constantinople was stolen during the 4th crusade, but what about the piece in Rome?
|
 |
shurite7
Knight
Joined: 14-Oct-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 91
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Oct-2005 at 21:57 |
Originally posted by R_AK47
Does anyone know what happened to the pieces from Constantinople and Rome? I'm guessing that the one in Constantinople was stolen during the 4th crusade, but what about the piece in Rome? |
The piece in Constantinople was taken by Bishop Nivelon of Soissons who also stole/took/acquired numerous other "relics" from the Church of the Blessed Virgin at Pharos during the sack of the Constantinople. Where he took the "relics" my sources to not state.
Going back to the other 2 pieces. When Helen "found" the true cross it was cut into 2 pieces. One piece went to Constantinople and the other Jerusalem. That was in the 4th century. Sometime later, I forget which CE, the piece in Jerusalem was taken by the Muslims. Later around the 7th or 8th CE it was found again by a Bishop who divided into 2 pieces. One piece went to Jerusalem and the other sent....my sources don't say. I thought it was Rome, which would make sense, but I could be wrong.
|
 |
Dalsung Hwarang
Knight
Joined: 24-Oct-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Oct-2005 at 22:30 |
|
Well from what I know, during the time of Hattin countless numbers of
fake objects called "relics" were sold in ridiculous prices. Objects
such as the true cross is not certain if it is real or just plain
bs.
|
|
"He who seeks death shall live, and he who seeks life shall die." --Admiral Yi.
|
 |
Loknar
Colonel
Joined: 09-Jun-2005
Location: Somalia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 666
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Oct-2005 at 19:44 |
This cross that was discovered under the Holy Sepulcher I doubt is the real thing. The wood was probably reused more than once on more than 1 prisoner then discarded once its use was lived up. The Cross we think of is a renissance image, but the real cross probably looked different.
She probably found 2 pieces of wood, but that doesnt mean it was the orgional crucifx.
|
 |
shurite7
Knight
Joined: 14-Oct-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 91
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 01:15 |
|
I also agree that the wood is not the true cross. Same with the lance, that pierced the side of Christ, which was "found" in Antioch during the first crusade. To have the troops of the army believing such a relic is authentic gives quite a boost to morale, especially back then.
|
 |
R_AK47
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 11:41 |
|
We could endlessly debate over whether or not it was really the True Cross, but I would still like to know where the larger pieces of it are. Seems strange that a relic of such importance has vanished.
|
 |
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Mississippi
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3851
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Feb-2010 at 04:58 |
|
Perhaps the answer you are looking for can be found here?
http://www.templarhistory.com/cross.html
Regards,
|
|
Ron Hughes
"History, a distillation of rumour." Thomas Carlyle
|
 |
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Mississippi
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3851
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2010 at 19:18 |
|
And, perhaps my answer above was not the correct one? But, of course R_AK47 is also perhaps dead an buried by now?
This is my stupidity in making any attempt to reply to old posts! That is, the only one (besides the original poster and myself), who might well have any opinion is is "time!?"
|
|
Ron Hughes
"History, a distillation of rumour." Thomas Carlyle
|
 |
DreamWeaver
Colonel
Joined: 02-May-2010
Location: Wales
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 558
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-May-2010 at 08:19 |
|
It remains as an item in negotiations and politiking long after 1187. Al Kamil in 1221 is still offering it as part of a peace treaty during the 5th Crusade. Though it is continually referenced and believed to be in Muslim possession during the 13th Century, it just disappeares. A mystery.
|
|
Oh foolish race of Man, How overwhelming is thy ignorance!
Dante Alighieri
Contrary to popular belief the plural of anecdote is not fact.
|
 |
DreamWeaver
Colonel
Joined: 02-May-2010
Location: Wales
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 558
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-May-2010 at 06:22 |
|
Maybe the True Cross is located in a handbag?
Edited by DreamWeaver - 31-May-2010 at 06:23
|
|
Oh foolish race of Man, How overwhelming is thy ignorance!
Dante Alighieri
Contrary to popular belief the plural of anecdote is not fact.
|
 |
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Mississippi
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3851
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Jun-2010 at 14:16 |
|
DW, in reality, if there ever really existed a true "cross", then you have to also look at the hundreds or thousands of religious sites across the world, who, at one time at least, claimed to have a "piece" of the "True Cross!"
Certainly if the "true Cross" was taken, then it would be quite logical to suppose that pieces of it were sold to the thousands of "Franks", who made the pilgramage to the Levant!
A good trader knows a "gold mine" when he sees one!
Regards,
|
|
Ron Hughes
"History, a distillation of rumour." Thomas Carlyle
|
 |
DreamWeaver
Colonel
Joined: 02-May-2010
Location: Wales
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 558
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Jun-2010 at 15:55 |
Yes, much like the the Berlin Wall theres alot of it, enough to make up thousands of them. But whether or not it was a fragment of the true cross or no is irrelavent. It was an item, a symbol that had menaing and people belived it was. The case in particular here is the True Cross fragment that existed in the Kingdom of Jerusalem and that was lost after Hattin and then used as a bargaining chip in politcs between Crusaders and Ayubbids fro the next few decades. What then happened to that cross? Perhaps if we buy some of the above hand bags we may then discover. I see no other reason for it postin here
|
|
Oh foolish race of Man, How overwhelming is thy ignorance!
Dante Alighieri
Contrary to popular belief the plural of anecdote is not fact.
|
 |
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Mississippi
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3851
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Jun-2010 at 07:37 |
As I said above, if their actually was such an item, (we cannot be sure if the accounts of its discovery or transportation are true) then it was probably either burned, buried, or cut into small pieces and sold to tourists, etc.!
It is all mere speculation! Its existance, speculation, its ultimate resting place, all, speculation!
|
|
Ron Hughes
"History, a distillation of rumour." Thomas Carlyle
|
 |
DreamWeaver
Colonel
Joined: 02-May-2010
Location: Wales
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 558
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Jun-2010 at 10:46 |
|
Ofcourse its all speculation because it disappears from history. I dount it would have been done away with initally atleast in the cnetury after Hattin since it was such an important negotiating piece, it certainly is still being talked of and used in the late 1220's.
|
|
Oh foolish race of Man, How overwhelming is thy ignorance!
Dante Alighieri
Contrary to popular belief the plural of anecdote is not fact.
|
 |