Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedATATURK!!!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4567>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Topic: ATATURK!!!
    Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 09:30
I agree, fortunately they don't live in Turkey.
Back to Top
ISLAMIC EMPIRE View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 06-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 09:42

SECT IS HARAM AND IS IN THE HELLFIRE....

QURAN <--- WORD OF ALLAH (SUBHANA WA TEALA)

1. Allaah says: "And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allaah (i.e., this Qur'an), AND BE NOT DIVIDED among yourselves." Surah Aali-`Imraan [3:103]

2. And He says: "And do not be among the polytheists. Of those who split up their religion and became SECTS, each SECT rejoicing in that which is with it." Surat-ur-Room [30:31-32]

3. The Messenger of Allaah said: "I counsel you to have Taqwaa of Allaah and to hear and obey, even if an Abyssinian slave were to command you. For, verily, whoever amongst you lives (to grown old), he will see many differences. So stick to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided khaleefahs. Cling tightly onto it and hold onto it with your molar teeth. And beware of newly invented matters. For, indeed, every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is a thing that leads astray, and everything that leads astray is in the Hellfire."

4. And he also said: "Indeed those from before you from the People of the Book divided into SEVENTY-TWO GROUPS. And, indeed, this group (Muslims) will divide into seventy-three. SEVENTY-TWO GROUPS will be in the HELLFIRE and one of them will be in Paradise. And it is the Jamaa'ah (group)."

And in another narration, he said: "Everyone of them in the Hellfire, except for one group that which I and my companions are upon."

5. Ibn Mas'ood said: "The Messenger of Allaah drew a line for us and then said: 'This is the Straight Path of Allaah.' And he drew lines on the left and right of it, and then said: 'These are paths of which there is not one except that there is a devil upon it calling towards it.' Then he recited the statements of Allaah : 'And verily, this is My Straight Path, so follow it, and do not follow (other) paths for they will separate you away from His path."

6. The Saved Sect does not become fanatical with the words of anyone, except for the words of Allaah and His Messenger, the one protected from sins and who do not speak from his own desire (MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK - LISTENS TO KNOW-ONE AND DECIDED EVERYTHING ON HIS BEHALF) . As for other than him from among mankind, no matter how high his degree may be, then he is prone to error and sin. This is due to the statement of the Messenger: "Everyone of the tribe of Adam sins. And the best of the sinners are the ones who (CONSTANTLY) make repentance (MUSTAFA KEMAL ATAURK PROBABLY DIDNT KNOW OR CARE OF HIS SINS AND SO WOULD NOT HAVE REPENTED TO ALLAH, DID HE WORSHIP ALLAH ? 5 TIMES A DAY... AL SANA NAHHH)."

Allaah, has commanded us to hold tightly onto the Glorious Qur'an, and to not be like the polytheists who divide their religion into SECTS AND PARTIES. And the honorable Messenger has informed us that the Jews and the Christians have divided into many SECTS, and that the Muslims will divide into more SECTS than them. And that these groups will subjected to the  entrance into the Hellfire due to their deviation and their distancing away from the Book of their Lord and Sunnah of their Prophet. He also informed us that one SAVED SECT from among them will enter Paradise, and it is the Jamaa'ah (group), those who cling tightly onto the book of Allaah and the authentic Sunnah, and the actions of the companions of the Messenger of Allaah.

There are many made up systems or altered ones and these will all go to HELLFIRE. Allah(SWT) gave us the perfect system which is Islam. And the correct explantion is in the QURAN of how to live this system properly. Thos ignorant and selfsided people create there own SECTS. What is democracy?Capitalism?Socialism?Communism?KEMALISM? There all man-made systems. And so are ALL in the Hellfire. Allah has shown us the right path. Those who dotn accept it and are ignorant to the truth ALLAH has put a seal on there eyes and ears so that they may never walk on the straight path.

 

life it seems will fade away
drifting farther every day
all i gotta do is pray
nothing matters, no-one else
simply nothing more to give
there is nothing more for me
i need the end to set me free
Back to Top
OSMANLI View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 24-Nov-2004
Location: North Cyprus
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 740
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 10:14

 Ma$allah, for once iam hearing da truth. The word of Allah, that is.

It should also be stated that creating Bida' (Religious Inovation) is haraam. so by making new rules that clearly are against the Sharia is Haraam (unlawfull), be it kemalizm, ulkucu, communism whatever.

Ataturk had a right to his opinion on politics, but had no right to forcefully installing his ideollogy which the majority opposed. This is openlly known through out the world except in places were kemalizm is practised.

The women in Europe (except. France) have more rights then the ones in Turkey, why?

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 10:20
What kind of rights are you talking about?

Please don't say anything about hijab, I am fed up with that.

Edited by Barış
Back to Top
oTToMAn_TurK View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 19-Sep-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 186
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 10:44

his talking about the rights on how an intelligent student goes so far in her studies only to be disregarded in university becoz of her HIJAB

his talking about how a mother can not watch there son graduate from a military school becoz of her HIJAB

his talking about the discrimination of muslims woman made in government intitutions becoz of there HIJAB

Yes the HIJAB, the thing dedicated muslim woman wher to show there loyalty to tehre religion, to show there love for Allah.

This is a normal human right in which no individual shud be stript from it. any country who has a bit of democracy knows that. thats why turkey will never develope. they make the most unimportant things like hijab a political issue.

you might be fed up with it baris, but dont forget, SO AM I

BTW, u didnt say anything about sultan vahdettin im assuming u agreed

Either your a slave to what MADE-MAN
Or your a slave to what MAN-MADE
Back to Top
ISLAMIC EMPIRE View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 06-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 10:57

Originally posted by oTToMAn_TurK

his talking about the rights on how an intelligent student goes so far in her studies only to be disregarded in university becoz of her HIJAB

his talking about how a mother can not watch there son graduate from a military school becoz of her HIJAB

his talking about the discrimination of muslims woman made in government intitutions becoz of there HIJAB

Yes the HIJAB, the thing dedicated muslim woman wher to show there loyalty to tehre religion, to show there love for Allah.

knowing the hijab is a law by Allah and should be accepted as normal its something that MKA removed permanently in public whereas thats the place where the hijab is supposed to be worn which brings us to todays discrimination of it.

Here is a guidline for the hijab.....(read if you want to learn)

Most Muslims are familiar with the various reasons that Allah has required women to wear hijab: The hijab reflects modesty, purity and respect; it lessens temptation so that more serious sins will be avoided; it protects women from the harm and molestation of evil men; a woman who wears hijab will be evaluated for her intelligence and skills rather than her appearance.

Allah says: "O Prophet, tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their outer garments around them. That is more suitable that they will be known (as Muslims and chaste believing women) and not be abused."
[Qur'an, 33:59]

The Virtues of Hijab

1.An act of obedience. 

The hijab is an act of obedience to Allah and to his prophet (pbuh), Allah says in the Qur'an: `It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His messenger have decreed a matter that they should have an option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, has indeed strayed in a plain error.' (S33:36). 

Allah also said: 'And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things) and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts, etc) and not to show off their adornment except what must (ordinarily) appear thereof, that they should draw their veils over their Juyubihinna.'(S24:31).  

2.The Hijab is IFFAH (Modesty).

Allah (subhana wa'atala) made the adherence to the hijab a manifestation for chastity and modesty. Allah says: 'O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) over their bodies (when outdoors). That is most convenient that they should be known and not molested.' (S33:59). In the above Ayaah there is an evidence that the recognition of the apparent beauty of the woman is harmful to her. When the cause of attraction ends, the 
restriction is removed. This is illustrated in the case of elderly women who may have lost every aspect of attraction. Allah (swt) made it permissible for them to lay aside their outer garments and expose their faces and hands reminding, however, that is still better for them to keep their modesty. 

3.The hijab is Tahara (Purity) 

Allah (swt) had shown us the hikma (wisdom) behind the legislation of the hijab: `And when you ask them (the Prophet's wives) for anything you want, ask them from behind a screen, that is purer for your hearts and their hearts.' (S33:53). 

The hijab makes for greater purity for the hearts of believing men and women because it screens against the desire of the heart. Without the hijab, the heart may or may not desire. That is why the heart is more pure when the sight is blocked (by hijab) and thus the prevention of fitna (evil actions is very much manifested. The hijab cuts off the ill thoughts and the greed of the sick hearts: 

`Be not soft in speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease (of hypocrisy or evil desire for adultery, etc) should be moved with desire, but speak in an honorable manner.' (S33:32) 

4.The hijab is a Shield 

The prophet (pbuh) said: "Allah, Most High, is Heaven, is Ha'yeii (Bashful), Sit'teer (Shielder). He loves Haya' (Bashfulness) and Sitr (Shielding; Covering)." The Prophet (pbuh) also said: "Any woman who takes off her clothes in other than her husband's house (to show off for unlawful purposes), has broken Allah's shield upon her. "The hadith demonstrates that depending upon the kind of action committed there will 
be either reward (if good) or punishment (if bad).

5. The hijab is Taqwah (Righteousness) 

Allah (swt) says in the Qur'an: `O children of Adam! We have bestowed raiment upon you to cover yourselves (screen your private parts, etc) and as an adornment. But the raiment of righteousness, that is better.'(S7:26). The widespread forms of dresses in the world today are mostly for show off and hardly taken as a cover and shield of the woman's body. To the believing women, however the purpose is to 
safeguard their bodies and cover their private parts as a manifestation of the order of Allah. It is an act of Taqwah (righteousness).

6.The hijab is Eemaan (Belief or Faith) 

Allah (swt) did not address His words about the hijab except to the believing women, Al-Mo'minat. In many cases in the Qur'an Allah refers to the "the believing women". Aisha (RA), the wife of the prophet (pbuh), addressed some women from the tribe of Banu Tameem who came to visit her and had light clothes on them, they were improperly dressed: "If indeed you are believing women, then truly this is not the dress of the believing women, and if you are not believing women, then enjoy it." 

7. The hijab is Haya' (Bashfulness) 

There are two authentic hadith which state: "Each religion has a morality and the morality of Islam is haya'" AND "Bashfulness is from belief, and belief is in Al-Jannah (paradise)". The hijab fits the natural bashfulness which is a part of the nature of women. 

8.The hijab is Gheerah 

The hijab fits the natural feeling of Gheerah, which is intrinsic in the straight man who does not like people to look at his wife or daughters. Gheerah is a driving emotion that drives the straight man to safeguard women who are related to him from strangers. The straight MUSLIM man has Gheerah for ALL MUSLIM women In response to lust and desire, men look (with desire) at other women while they do not mind that other men do the same to their wives or daughters. The mixing of sexes and absence of hijab destroys the Gheera in men. Islam considers Gheerah an integral 
part of faith. The dignity of the wife or daughter or any other Muslim woman must be highly respected and defended.

life it seems will fade away
drifting farther every day
all i gotta do is pray
nothing matters, no-one else
simply nothing more to give
there is nothing more for me
i need the end to set me free
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 11:10
Hmm, what should I write about now? Hijab or Vahdettin?

OK, let's start with Vahdettin. I don't think he had bad intentions about his people. But he could have saved them as being their emperor, whereas Atatrk saved our forefathers' lives as being no more than their army's general.

And about hijab... As I mentioned I don't want to discuss it anymore. Anyway, we can't discuss it under this rather irrelevant topic, even if I wanted to do so.
Back to Top
OSMANLI View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 24-Nov-2004
Location: North Cyprus
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 740
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 12:14

The issue was not about whether women should or should not wear the hijab.

I was simply giving an example of how MKA said that he was trying for a democracy yet forbade this basic human right.

Try telling a non-Turk that our nation has a hat revolution and they will laugh at you.

Who installed him into power, thanks to who is there a strong millitery presence that dont know when to stay out of politics. I dont remember any one asking for the Caliphate to be removed. I could go and on.

Now what is the word iam looking for, you know when somebody tells others to do something (democracy) whilst doing something totally diffrent themselves (militaristic dictator)?

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 15:26
Originally posted by OSMANLI

Try telling a non-Turk that our nation has a hat revolution and they will laugh at you.

There had been dress-code revolutions in Ottoman Empire too. Are you aware of them?

Yeah, I'm sure Ottoman Emperors always asked their people what to do next.

Edited by Barış
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 17:49

but had no right to forcefully installing his ideollogy which the majority opposed.

When the majority is ignorant, you need a wise society to enlighten them. Jahalah is the origin of all sins isnt it?

BTW, I should say I have nothing against women wearing hijab, I believe they should wear it whenever or wherever they wish. It is up to her to wear hijab or mini skirts, not anyones business. But please dont macth the ideology banning hijab in government courts with Ataturk's revolution. He, himself didnt declare such laws banning or prohibiting it. He was a true intellectual of his time. Women were able to vote in Turkey before they got the same chance in any European country such as France. We should all be thankful to him, no matter what our religious or political views are...

Back to Top
ok ge View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Aug-2005
Location: Saudi Arabia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 19:01

Originally posted by Oguzoglu

When the majority is ignorant, you need a wise society to enlighten them. Jahalah is the origin of all sins isnt it?

I think i heard Saddam saying something similar. Like "majority of Iraqis are ignorant and they for sure need a wise man with wise ideas". Something like the crap above 

D.J. Kaufman
Wisdom is the reward for a lifetime of listening ... when youd have preferred to talk.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 19:18

Well, ignorants are generally te majority in most societies, but if they gain the power, then the situation is no good.

We witnessed in history when majority of some society, which was truely ignorant have gained the control of the whole society. For example during the WWII, we all know that majority of German society was ignorant about Hitler, they were mostly supporting it. During WWI, Arabs were mostly ignorant, they were fighting with British against their caliphate, though I guess they couldnt imagine that someday those British would help the Jews establishing their state in some Arab terratory.

Same situation for Turks during the late Ottoman period. Most of the Anatolian population was ignorant, more likely kept so. But they didnt have the chance to rule/control themselves. Their so called masters in Istanbul used to do it. They were ignorant, because Anatolia was the backgarden of the empire, where the most brainwashed, most fanatic religious society was grown up. It was hungry, it was poor, and it was dying. It was full of buds declaring themselves messiahs or shiks. So we simply needed a revolution, and some wise ones, who could help us and save us from hundreds of years of ignorance.

Back to Top
oTToMAn_TurK View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 19-Sep-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 186
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 19:37

Originally posted by Bar


OK, let's start with Vahdettin. I don't think he had bad intentions about his people. But he could have saved them as being their emperor, whereas Atatrk saved our forefathers' lives as being no more than their army's general.

well, atleast u admit that,  but what i can tell from ur reply is that you dont exactly know the true history of that era except for what ataturk told the people. which is understandable becoz in order to get in power he had to do some propaganda against the sultan to abolish him. but since it has been over 80 years, i think me explaining sultan vahdettins true history would not offend anyone. i hope  

ill try to keep it breif, these are facts but ill just try to make it logical so u can except.

consider the timing in which sultan vahdettin got into power 1918-1922. the end of world war one and the surrender of all ottoman allies. this sultan went into power at the worst time in all ottoman history, he didnt have to except but sultan vahdettin was a very intelligent man and most pasa's would rather see some one like him on the throne. he didnt let them down and accepted. an example of his intelligents and politeness was when he visited vienna before WW1, everyone there admired his politeness. anyway, our lands were being occupied from every corner. Britain, France, Italy, Greece, Armenia all wanted there share in the ottoman "cake". the british and french occupyers would ride on medieval style horses all around istanbul just to piss the turks off. this is understandable as the muslim turks were a long time challenger of european powers. this is when Vahdettin started preparing for the war of independants. Sultan Vahdettin and Mustafa Kemal pasa knew each other. The sultan asked one of his viseires to make a list of all the pasa's at that time. when he saw the list he noticed that Mustafa Kemal Pasa wasnt on the list. the sultan asked "why isnt Mustafa Kemal on this list" the man replied "this man is a republican and that he wants bring down the ottoman empire down and form a republic". Sultan replied with anger, pointing at the hundreds of enemy ships circuling the bogaz, he said "listen to me, u see those ships, it is really getting to me, seeing my lands under enemy occupation, i dont care if this nation becomes a republic, just as long as its saved". after a while the sutlan vahdettin and msutafa kemal pasa had a one on one convosatian. mustafa kemal was very arrogant towards the sultan. the sultan said this to him "PASA! what you hav done before this is all in here (holding a history book in his hand), the only thing that will count now is what you will in the future when i send you to samsun". yes, it was the sultan who convinced ataturk to go to samsun. when the enemy forces were putting pressure on teh sultan to stop the uprising in central anatolia, the sultan in coded language in front of the enemy told, his Pasa's (inc. ataturk) to head off to samsun "to stop the uprising" which atually meant "increase it".

1 and 2, lets skip a few

when ataturk and his people came to istanbul he declared the last ottoman sultan "a traitor to the nation". which even today people obvuiosly believe. when he was exiled the only thing the sultan took with him was his jacket. no jewels, no money. what kind of a traitor would do that? he trades his nation yet he wont even take anything in return. Sultan Vahdettin was indeed a very unfortunate man who was only one of the many who suffered under ataturks hands.

 

Either your a slave to what MADE-MAN
Or your a slave to what MAN-MADE
Back to Top
oTToMAn_TurK View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 19-Sep-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 186
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 19:39

Sultan Mehmet Vahiduddin was not angry to anyone for the unlucky things that he underwent. One day his chief assistant, Mr Avni, asked a very interesting question to him:

If one day victoriously, you return homeland, what will you do to Mustafa Kemal?

Before answering the question Sultan Mehmet Vahiduddin closed his eyes and after a short time he answer the question:

My ancestor, Yavuz Sultan Selim departed to make a war with the Persians. His soldiers suffered from the long expeditions. At the end the soldiers decided to kill Yavuz Sultan Selim Khan to rescue from campaign. One of them said that he would kill the Sultan. He concealed himself on the Sultans way. As Sultan Selim was coming on his horse, with a great majesty and pomp. The soldier, who decided to kill him, saw the Sultan as if a lion and could not have killed him. He left his sword and appeared from his place. Then started to implore in tears.

My sultan, kill me, I have engraved it. Because I had decided to kill you. Yavuz Sultan Selim took pity on him and said:

Go, I forgive you, we always need a such courageous soldiers as brave as to kill us.

How my ancestor Sultan Selim Khan forgave that soldier, I would forgive Mustafa Kemal, as well. Since my armies need a brave soldier like Mustafa Kemal, so I forgive Mustafa Kemal and send him to the service of the nation.

Either your a slave to what MADE-MAN
Or your a slave to what MAN-MADE
Back to Top
Seko View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Spammer

Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Oct-2005 at 20:50
Originally posted by ISLAMIC EMPIRE

SECT IS HARAM AND IS IN THE HELLFIRE....

QURAN <--- WORD OF ALLAH (SUBHANA WA TEALA)

1. Allaah says: "And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allaah (i.e., this Qur'an), AND BE NOT DIVIDED among yourselves." Surah Aali-`Imraan [3:103]

2. And He says: "And do not be among the polytheists. Of those who split up their religion and became SECTS, each SECT rejoicing in that which is with it." Surat-ur-Room [30:31-32]

Splitting a religion and making sects happened to every religion that I am aware of. To say that a secularist government is a sect doesn't make sense. First of all, a secular government does not make laws soley based on religious dogma. Secondly, Islamic nations have created many sects themselves over the course of history: Sunni, Shi'a, Alevi, Bektashi, Four schools of thought (sunni), Nachabandi, Wahhabi, etc.

Allaah, has commanded us to hold tightly onto the Glorious Qur'an, and to not be like the polytheists who divide their religion into SECTS AND PARTIES.....He also informed us that one SAVED SECT from among them will enter Paradise, and it is the Jamaa'ah (group), those who cling tightly onto the book of Allaah and the authentic Sunnah, and the actions of the companions of the Messenger of Allaah.

Where does it say in the Koran that the saved sect will be those who cling to the Book of Allah and the (authentic) Sunnah of the Messenger?

"And the messenger says,"O my Lord, my own people have forsaken the Koran." (Koran 25:30)

This quote does not mention sunnah.

Back to Top
Mortaza View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 02:49

Because quran is most important thing,  this does not make sunnah unimportant.

Try telling a non-Turk that our nation has a hat revolution and they will laugh at you.

Well we should not forget Ataturk was an ottoman officer, and an ottoman intellectual. Most of  ottoman intellectuals used force for their ideas. This is way of ottomans at their decline. As people think, he is not son of cumhuriyet, but son of Ottomans.

Most of the Anatolian population was ignorant, more likely kept so. But they didnt have the chance to rule/control themselves. Their so called masters in Istanbul used to do it. They were ignorant, because Anatolia was the backgarden of the empire, where the most brainwashed, most fanatic religious society was grown up. It was hungry, it was poor, and it was dying.

Well how do you know this? I dont think people of anatolia was so fanatic. Crimes against christians didnt made by anatolian people but elites of istanbul(or selanik). Main problem was elites of ottomans were ready for using force. So Ataturk used force too.

Maybe beneficial way, but do he have right that to force people change their all life style is another question. He created democracy of Turkey, but he himself was not a democrat, he is another ottoman elite.

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Top
OSMANLI View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 24-Nov-2004
Location: North Cyprus
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 740
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 07:04

Baris i know my user name is OSMANLI but i do not want to see a return of them. They were not perfect, since your implying that i somehow think that they did no wrong. And yeah iam aware of the revolutions that had happend prior (eg. Turban replaced by fes) but that comes under westernisation of the Ottoman upper class.

Oguzoglu if the women of Turkey want to wear a skirt or hijab then they should be allowed in a country claiming for a western style democracy.

Anywho, how about the changing of the alphabet to latin. The Arabic alphabet was more than fine it was used for a thousend plus years. And for all those Pan-Turks out there majority of Turkic people also had this alphbet inc. the Uyghur.

Check this link: http://islamharfleri.com/

teaches to read in Turkish Arabic script (which is unique only to Turks)

Or check the worlds first website writtain completly in the Turkish old script (thus proving that this system of writting can still be used by Turks)

http://islamharfleri.com/osmanlica/

This act deprived the Turks of previous knowledge of their national and religious doctrines/culture. On top of that the early Turks were made to feel ashamed of their Ottoman heritage. When MKA came up with the idea he said to the intelectuals that they may discuss this topic as much as they want, he will allow this. However no matter what conclusion they come to the change will be done. Wow, what a leader, he was generous enough to let the Turks discuss the issue, but not contribute in the future of their nation.

The Turks were ignorent, please an answer like that will not fool me. The Ottomans were infact educated to much higher levels then those of the republic.

If MKA was trying for a democracy then an important decision like the removal of the Caliphate should have gone through a referendom.

Or at the very least if it was that bad then give the position to anouther nation, for the Caliphate is not a Turkish post but the Muslims open to all.



Edited by OSMANLI
Back to Top
sedamoun View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 18-Oct-2005
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 480
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 10:03

7. The hijab is Haya' (Bashfulness) 

There are two authentic hadith which state: "Each religion has a morality and the morality of Islam is haya'" AND "Bashfulness is from belief, and belief is in Al-Jannah (paradise)". The hijab fits the natural bashfulness which is a part of the nature of women. 

I do not agree. 

To wear or not to wear a Hijab should be up to women. You can not force a person into religious practices - if you do, the religious message becomes only a blur (a reason to make a person do something she/he would not do in otherwise).

Look at France, they are so afraid of youg muslim girls wearing hijabs at school that they made it forbidden (in schools only, not universities and other public places). THIS IS WRONG, the French GVT was not able handle the problem with their northafrican and saharian (Tchad, Mali, Niger, Senegal...) immigration feeling rejected by the white society, hence they turn to whats left of their roots (or should i say their parents' roots) - Religion.

I am not saying that they are extremists of any kind, they just want to differ from the french that reject them.   

Did you know that religion evolves with its time?

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 10:38
Originally posted by oTToMAn_TurK

Sultan Vahdettin and Mustafa Kemal pasa knew each other.

What? Am I supposed to be shocked now?

Originally posted by oTToMAn_TurK

yes, it was the sultan who convinced ataturk to go to samsun

The sultan ordered Atatrk to crush the rebellion of Rums in that region, not cleanse the country from the invaders and build a republic in the Ottoman borders. Don't be ridiculous. He even ordered Atatrk's execution.


Edited by Barış
Back to Top
DayI View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar

Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 10:59

vahdettin whas an english spy, a traitor!!

He left Istanbul with an english ship....

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4567>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.