QuoteReplyTopic: new student Posted: 26-Sep-2005 at 18:46
let me give you a quick brief on myself.
I am a 1st year at u of calgary and im in a tough situation. I have to
come up with a term paper topic for the 19th of nov on prehistory,
which states something new to the world of archaeology. my challenge
lies with choosing a strong topic.
some suggestions of the prof were evolution, stone tools, writing
sytems, paleolithic art, the imprtance of sites such as great zimbabwe,
machu picchu, stonehenge, ur, tikal.
i assure myself that most of you, if not all know a great deal more
about prehistory than myself, so i ask if you were/are a prof,
what would you like to hear about.
if you are still reading, thank you very much for your time. if any of
you have a suggestion on a bold focal point for a paper, i would
appreciate your imput. thanks again...new arky student
I am a 1st year at u of calgary and im in a tough situation. I have to come up with a term paper topic for the 19th of nov on prehistory, which states something new to the world of archaeology. my challenge lies with choosing a strong topic.
some suggestions of the prof were evolution, stone tools, writing sytems, paleolithic art, the imprtance of sites such as great zimbabwe, machu picchu, stonehenge, ur, tikal.
i assure myself that most of you, if not all know a great deal more about prehistory than myself, so i ask if you were/are a prof, what would you like to hear about.
if you are still reading, thank you very much for your time. if any of you have a suggestion on a bold focal point for a paper, i would appreciate your imput. thanks again...new arky student
You are not in a tough situation. Most of us have been there before.
I would say choose Stonehenge. There should be tons of archaeological information available....IN THE LIBRARY! Do not waste your time on line. Most of what is on here is crap.
I suggest using Stonehenge as an example of the focus of a prehistoric culture. If the thing truly was an astronomical "observatory" or a tool for the retrieval of the facts of seasonal change, for planting, etc. (and that might be your call in the paper) I think you may have a very interesting paper.
Stone tools are in the Limelight now with Solutrean theory about early American Indian tools in full swing. You could even visit the origin of the theory, the Smithsonion.
Stonehenge is a good suggestion, the amount of recent research of how it was built is huge. The culture around needed to build it and the various theses of it's 1,500 year construction. But don't get into the debate of what it's for, what it's not (druid temple, obsevatory, calender, burial ground and so on) can be proven, but what it's for barely a shred of evidence exists.
If I read you correctly you must think up a new idea for the Archaeological world. A bt strong for a 1st year paper (a PHD maybe). Try the 1000 other stone circle that exist in Britain..... and find a common link........... EG: about half a dozen have astronomical alignments, the rest don't. 4 - 5 have had fire in the centre, the rest none. 3 - 4 have burials and 6 - 7 red ochre has been found inside. A few have alterstrones? 99% don't. Some circles are clustered together most apart. Some are inside others. Several have entrance archway and a few larger stones at one end, some henges others none...... But whatever you find the rule is always you find a link between half a dozen cirlces it dozen exist in the other 99%.
Findind a common link is the holy grail of British stone age archaeology and anyone can try.
So far only one common link had been found. Some cirlces are perfect cirlces, other elipses and some egg shaped. Could be chance but when you date the circles three destinct periods arise where all circle were built to the same shape so it's deliberate.
If you want something that is poorly studied, then try to get a good
book on the Chalcolitic "Portuguese" culture of Vila Nova de Sao Pedro.
I can't find any info on this culture online that is not my own
Wikipedia article but it's (from my viewpoint) extremely interesting
and probably pretty much central in Megalithism and Beaker-Vase
phenomena. It's a very badly studied culture and at the same time sooo
interesting...
If you want something that hits the public (what the heck: it's only
going to be read by an old bored professor, but anyhow), suggest that
it is both Atlantis and the Eritia of the Heraklean myth (I think it
actually is, so you would just have to ask me why I think that).
suggest that it is both Atlantis and the Eritia of the Heraklean myth (I think it actually is, so you would just have to ask me why I think that).
I have not chosen a topic yet but i would like to thank you all for your time. All suggestions have given me insight into my project but one stuck out very much...this abviously refers to caliph. i have read up on the articles on wikipedia, but i still cannot fathom on the portuguese culture being the lost city of atlantis...please explain
suggest that it is both Atlantis and the Eritia of the Heraklean
myth (I think it actually is, so you would just have to ask me why I
think that).
I have not chosen a topic yet but i would like to thank you all for
your time. All suggestions have given me insight into my project but
one stuck out very much...this abviously refers to caliph. i have read
up on the articles on wikipedia, but i still cannot fathom on the
portuguese culture being the lost city of atlantis...please explain
Take this with a grain of salt, of course, but take also old legends and accounts with the same healthy skepticism.
The culture of Vila Nova de Sao Pedro (VNSP) evolved in Portuguese
Chalcolithic and is paralell to SE Spanish Los Millares and its
successor El Argar, which shows clear Greek influence in its late
stages. It's most notable characteristics are:
Geographical extension: the Portuguese region of Estremadura
(Lisbon) and nearby areas. It is a peninsula (rather two), which could
be taken as islands by someone coming from the south. Anyhow some of
the earliest legends don't say nesos (island) but perirruthos (something
surrounded by flow - waters), a more ambiguous term. It is clearly
beyond the Gibraltar strait, not too close and not too far, in the
route to the tin mines of NW Spain and Britain.
Fortified towns, most notably the large fortified city of
Zambujal (in Torres Vedras), which shows great complexity and is about
the distance of the sea as that said about Atlantis in Plao's
description. This capital city of Zambujal is also in a mountain in the
center of the peninsula (see map below).
Neo-Megalithic tombs (artificial caves): exactly 10, just as the supposed kings of Atlantis.
Fluid commercial contacts with all Atlantic Europe (amber), North
Africa (ivory and ostrich egg-shells) and, of course Iberia (the
Hesperides). While the VNSP region itself is not particularly rich they
had easy access to many riches, including the many minerals of Iberia.
Strong cultural/religious connections to all those regions via
the Megalihic phenomenon, which most probably originated in Portugal as
well.
Advanced astronomical knowledge, as seem to have been decifered recently from cryptic calendars (slate idols).
They were able to predict every single lunar ecclipse, even those that
they couldn't see. Some Greek legends point to astronomy to have been
invented by the kings of Atlantis.
VNSP-II (since c. 2200 BCE) is defined by the presence of
bell-shaped beaker phenomenon. Between c. 2100-1900, VNSP was the main
European center producing this pottery, which spread to all Iberia and
SW France. This is posibly the moment of apogee of VNSP.
When, c. 1800, El Argar takes over the SE Iberian cultural region,
replacing Chalcolitic Los Millares, several interesting things happen:
VNSP continues bt it is almost the only culture of the area
not to have a bronze industry. Still, like Ancient Egypt, it could be
powerful even without Bronze weapons.
The flourishing towns of southern portugal disapear and instead
strange poorly defined groups with some bronze weapons appear there.
When, c. 1500, El Argar enters a new phase (El Argar B), characterizedby Greek-like burials in pythoi, something else happens:
The semidesertic region of La Mancha is colonized by people close
to the El Argar civilization (Bronze of Levant), building many
fortifications known as motillas
but very few towns. I suspect that this is an organized attempt to
secure the route to the North via the plateau, skipping the naval
control probably exerted by VNSP and their allies.
I think this is the period (1500-1300 BCE) when the adventures of Herakles in the Hesperides take place (the two works could
be a redundant account of the same feat). It is a time when
Mycene/Greece is prowerful, having just conquered Crete. Also, Iberia
is the only truly interesting place to go in western direction. There's
no civilization (properly speaking) elsewhere in the Western
Mediterranean, Iberia has many riches of it own and also is the gate to
the Ocean and the now very important tin mines, a gate that is
controlled at least partly by VNSP.
Some centuries later, with a less civilized Iberia (due to Celtic
invasions partly), Phoenicians would repeat the intent, founding their
first offshore colony right on the opposite side of the Mediterranean:
in Cdiz (Gadir). So the importance of Iberia in the Ancient World and
the Bronze industry should not be undervalued.
If I'm right, the Greek expedition related both in the Heraklean legend
and Plato's account of Atlantis would be an expedition of succour to hellenized El
Argar against their rivals of the Atlantic coast (VNSP). The Greeks (El
Argar) won and that would account for the disapearance of VNSP. Wether
there was a catastrophe such as a tsunami or hurricane or not
(something in which the Greek legend and the Egypto-Platonian account
differ) I can't say. The fact is that c. 1300, coincident with Celtic
(Urnfields) invasions in NW Spain (but also reaching to the El Argar
region, as some isolated burials give account of), VNSP vanishes.
General map of Iberia c. 1500 BCE:
Map of VNSP and SW Iberia in the Chalcolithic period (until 1800 BCE):
Detail of VNSP area, showing Zambujal (square), towns (circles) and main tombs (dolmen shape):
(Note: not all the cities existed at the same time).
Some complementary links:
Megalithic economy (good stuff on how Megalithic cultures were most likely)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum