Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Europe and asia

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 11>
Author
Demetrios View Drop Down
Knight
Knight


Joined: 20-Nov-2004
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 65
  Quote Demetrios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Europe and asia
    Posted: 20-Nov-2004 at 19:58

  There is no mention of middle age in the first thread. It is not to you to reduce the subject to this period.

"Middle East? what does that have to do with Europe?"

 Middle east is the link between europe and asian. Their records are full of informations about both europe and asia

"What can you say to someone that lost the invention of the horse collar?"

 What do you mean, i don't understand?  must be my english 

Back to Top
Omnipotence View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 494
  Quote Omnipotence Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Nov-2004 at 20:14

"There is no mention of middle age in the first thread. It is not to you to reduce the subject to this period."

Well, that's true, but so far that's what everyone's been arguing about, but I guess you can take it to another time period.

"What do you mean, i don't understand?  must be my english "

Sorry for not being clear, but I meant that for a brief period of time the Europeans in the dark ages lost the invention of the horse collar, or some other collar, I forgot which.

Back to Top
Demetrios View Drop Down
Knight
Knight


Joined: 20-Nov-2004
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 65
  Quote Demetrios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Nov-2004 at 20:26

  Ok true but horse collar has nothing to do with warfare ,it's an agrarian tool.

 By the way you mentionned sino-dutch war. can you give me dates and circunstances. Can't see what you're talking about

Back to Top
Omnipotence View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 494
  Quote Omnipotence Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Nov-2004 at 18:41

"Ok true but horse collar has nothing to do with warfare ,it's an agrarian tool."

Supply lines.

"By the way you mentionned sino-dutch war. can you give me dates and circunstances. Can't see what you're talking about"

 

This is when the Ming(who's being kicked by the Qine) kicked the Dutch out of Taiwan. Don't really know the date but I'm pretty sure you can find it in google.

 

Back to Top
warhead View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
  Quote warhead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 01:08

"2-Every asiatic countries(except for Japan) were once part of an european empire. Not any european territory ever was part of an asiatic empire."

 

With the exception, of Thailand, China, Korea, Arabia, Tibet, East Turkestan, Ryukyo, and the list goes on.

Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
  Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 06:58
Originally posted by warhead

"2-Every asiatic countries(except for Japan) were once part of an european empire. Not any european territory ever was part of an asiatic empire."



With the exception, of Thailand, China, Korea, Arabia, Tibet, East Turkestan, Ryukyo, and the list goes on.


Well, since I'm so utterly bored, I made a little map over countries that has been in European hands sometime during the last 500 years. You might recognize the format

Link

Edited by Styrbiorn
Back to Top
Demetrios View Drop Down
Knight
Knight


Joined: 20-Nov-2004
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 65
  Quote Demetrios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 07:30

 "With the exception, of Thailand, China ......."

Those who say china wasn't european's puppet after the opium wars deny history.

 This was unfair of european's but they did control china even if there was still an emperor



Edited by Demetrios
Back to Top
TJK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 367
  Quote TJK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 10:00

Since the "battle of Lepante" in 1571 where the turkish fleet was wiped out:

1- Western europeans never lost a single war against non-european countries.

Austria and Venice have actually lost many wars against Ottomans in XVII century - the last one even in XVIII century Austro-Ottoman War, 1737-1739 and what about Vietnamese-French war 1945-1954 ?

Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 12:05

and even more recently the French-Algerian war...

Back to Top
warhead View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
  Quote warhead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 15:24

"Those who say china wasn't european's puppet after the opium wars deny history.

 This was unfair of european's but they did control china even if there was still an emperor"

 

Opium war did no more than opening up China and leagalize certain trade. It was far from controlled politically, as can be seen by the fact that it faught more wars with Britain, France, Russia respectively afterwards. Japan at this time is no different from China, also signing unequal treatise and building their own arms. The correct date of mercy would be post Boxer's rebellion in which it was divided into sphere of influence, but then Japan also had a share and the area in northern China south of the yellow river north of the Yangze and west of Shang Dong along with Xing jian and Qin Hai was not within the sphere. Not to mention Japan itself had a sphere.

 

"Well, since I'm so utterly bored, I made a little map over countries that has been in European hands sometime during the last 500 years. You might recognize the format "

 

Yes, but Japan is also occupied by the United States after world war 2, which is no different to any European power.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 15:46
Yes, but Japan is also occupied by the United States after world war 2, which is no different to any European power.

In that case North Korea should be red as well, it was occupied by the Soviet Union 1945-1948.
Back to Top
warhead View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
  Quote warhead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 17:06
so would manchuria
Back to Top
Demetrios View Drop Down
Knight
Knight


Joined: 20-Nov-2004
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 65
  Quote Demetrios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 18:42
  Regarding "decolonisation wars": i knew it would be mentioned, but i'm wondering if it's not a bit risky to go on on the subject......
Back to Top
coolstorm View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote coolstorm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 19:56

"Opium war did no more than opening up China and leagalize certain trade"

This is wrong. Hong Kong was actually ceded to Britain as a result of the Opium War. Hong Kong surely plays a major role in world's economy today and is the most advanced Chinese city out of all the Mainland and Taiwan cities and Singapore if you consider it as one.

Back to Top
warhead View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
  Quote warhead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2004 at 22:07
Hong kong is but a poor ragged minor city back then of no economic importance, it was strateigically important to the British.
Back to Top
coolstorm View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote coolstorm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Nov-2004 at 00:30

"Hong kong is but a poor ragged minor city back then of no economic importance, it was strateigically important to the British. "

Your wording is kinda confusing.

If you are talking now, you are definitely wrong. Hong Kong is the richest Chinese city and one of the most advanced financial centers of great economic importantce.

If you are talking about back then, Hong Kong not only served as a major British colony in the far east but also a cellor for Chinese refugees, capitals, and businessmen when China was in turmoil. 100,000 nationalist troops fled to Hong Kong after China was captured by the communists. The founding father of ROC that overthrew the Qing also treated Hong Kong as a base for his revolution. He also recieved his medical education in Hong Kong. It is true that Hong Kong was not as important as it is today back then but saying that it was a totally unimportant figure to China that could be neglected is definitely wrong.

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Nov-2004 at 00:43
Originally posted by TJK

[QUOTE]

Since the "battle of Lepante" in 1571 where the turkish fleet was wiped out/FONT]


1- Western europeans never lost a single war against non-european countries.



Austria and Venice have actually lost many wars against Ottomansin XVII century - the last one even in XVIII century

Ask to General Barradas and his 3,500 men expedition to Tampico in 1829 or to Maximilian and Napoleon III.

Edited by Jalisco Lancer

Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
  Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Nov-2004 at 04:11
Originally posted by coolstorm

"<!-- Message -->Hong kong is but a poor ragged minor city back then of no economic importance, it was strateigically important to the British. "


Your wording is kinda confusing.


If you are talking now, you are definitely wrong. Hong Kong is the richest Chinese city and one of the most advanced financial centers of great economic importantce.


If you are talking about back then, Hong Kong not only served as a major British colony in the far east but also a cellor for Chinese refugees, capitals, and businessmen when China was in turmoil. 100,000 nationalist troops fled to Hong Kong after China was captured by the communists. The founding father of ROCthat overthrew the Qing also treated Hong Kong as a base for his revolution. He also recieved his medical education in Hong Kong. It is true that Hong Kong was not as important as it is today back then but saying that it was a totally unimportant figure to China that could be neglected is definitely wrong.



He's saying that Hongkong was a little and completely unimportant rock with a little fishing village or two before the British found it and developed it. Which, AFAIK, is correct.
Back to Top
coolstorm View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote coolstorm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Nov-2004 at 02:16

"He's saying that Hongkong was a little and completely unimportant rock with a little fishing village or two before the British found it and developed it. Which, AFAIK, is correct. "

Hong Kong wasn't developed by the British but the people there and the capitals from the Chinese mainland.

Since the 80's, many British MN firms were taken over by local Hong Kong businessmen. An example would be Hutchison Whampao.

GDP on a per capita basis of Hong Kong has also been higher than that of the UK since 90's. It is still higher as of today.



Edited by coolstorm
Back to Top
ChineseManchurian View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 23-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
  Quote ChineseManchurian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Nov-2004 at 02:21
Hong Kong is only a small city in China  around 1840, British use it for the most important port to control Asia
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.061 seconds.