Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Why Iran will lead to World War 3

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why Iran will lead to World War 3
    Posted: 13-Aug-2005 at 16:33
Good news for the Iranians, and the rest of the world:

Germany attacks US on Iran threat   

German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has warned the US to back away from the possibility of military action against Iran over its nuclear programme.
His comments come a day after President Bush reiterated that force remained an option but only as a last resort.
Iran has resumed what it says is a civilian nuclear research programme but which the West fears could be used to develop nuclear arms.
Germany, France and the UK have led efforts to end the crisis peacefully.
Mr Schroeder directly challenged Mr Bush's comment that "all options are on the table" over the Iran crisis.
"Let's take the military option off the table. We have seen it doesn't work," Mr Schroeder told Social Democrats at the rally in Hanover, to rapturous applause from the crowd.
Mr Schroeder said it remained important that Iran did not gain atomic weapons, and a strong negotiating position was important.
"The Europeans and the Americans are united in this goal," he said. "Up to now we were also united in the way to pursue this."
Mr Schroeder reiterates his views in an interview to be published Sunday in the German weekly Bild am Sonntag, labelling military action "extremely dangerous".
"This is why I can with certainty exclude any participation by the German government under my direction," Mr Schroeder tells the paper. (BBC, 13/8/05)

BBC News
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 23:13
I want to sign up just so I can get some of the soldiers out of there, the whole rotation is screwed up so soldiers are staying months after their tour of duty. I feel bad for them.
"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 23:00

Well yeah, if THEY were doing the picking...

Stil part of me almost wants to go, because part of me feels I simply must see everything "on the ground" but thats a very small part of me.

"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 22:47
Tobodai if they did pick a political group to go, it'll be their decision and I think it'd be the people like you and me that'll be first on that list...
"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 21:16
Originally posted by Zagros

I think its a better idea if the first group to get drafted are all the males that voted for Bush in the last election. They chose him, let them deal with his BS. Hell, let them send the women that voted for Bush too...being ignorant is not gender-exclusive. At least this way the army would be more loyal, because half of those U.S. soldiers dont even agree with the war, especially after they experienced it.

 

 

I also agree with this sentiment, the only people that should pay for this war are those who so vehemently want to fight it.  Oh and they should have to pay for it too, wheras my taxes can go to something cooler like research.

"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 19:59

North America produces alot of oil itself, the thing is even if the Alaskan fields were cheaper then they are to open now, M.East oil would most likely still be cheaper and we would still buy it. The US can produce enough oil for itself, but the companies are trying to make a huge profit and the best way of doing this is selling US produced oil and buying M.East oil for the American consumer.

That is why I believe the Iraq war was to have greater control over oil so China won't have the chance to buy enough oil to sustain its military as well as the US could.

I'll be honest I didn't know about that Iran pipeline issue, but thinking about it, it fits into the theory. I don't know how good of allies Iran and China are, but Russia and Iran are allies. Russia has helped the Iranians build their nuclear power plant. The US government keeping that in mind probably going along with the future strategy of Iraq thought that they could supply China with oil in the future, becoming a major ally of China and a stronger enemy for the US. This is just a theory.

Honestly I don't know the truth, I can say its easily for the oil as the whole world does, or go on a theory that makes sense in thinking about the countries future and the gov't look for any means to keep its super power status from others. We can point fingers and argue for hours, but we don't have any of the information that the governments do have and it could be that both things we are saying are far from the truth, like I said we'll know why its happening the way it is in the future, only time will tell.

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 19:36

The fact of the matter is that consumption is rapidly closing in on production - how long will it take to exploit alternative sources how much will it cost? If Alaskan oil was cheap to produce they would already be doing it and saving themselves from the variables of ME oil, but despite those variables, the biggest factor affecting prices is demand.

Why was Iraq even invaded? There was just no need based on what was being said and everyone in the US government knew it, remember that ridiculous show put on by Powell at the UN? Everyone there knew it was complete BS, a school teacher wouldn't even indict a suspect pupil based on evidence as shakey as that.  How the hell were the American public duped so readily and easily?

Iraq, with one of the largest known oil reserves, was invaded to eventually boost global oil production and more importantly, destin it for the US market. 

The US is doing everything it can in a mini cold war vrs China and Russia to make good on its foothold in central asia (founded on the basis of the war on terror) and get its companies contracts for oil industry development in that area.

Why was the US bothered about the fact that Azerbaijani oil was going to run over Iranian territory  to a Turkish port?  Why did it pressure the Azeris and others to build the pipeline over a MUCH more expensive route?  Because in case of conflict with Iran, Iran could turn off the pipeline and affect global supply and thus the price of oil.

I feel like what I am saying is a little incoherant, but I hope you can get the general idea that i am trying to put across.



Edited by Zagros
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 19:13

Well its the first time in about 15 years Americans are watching how much they spend on oil and its because of the prices, but in reality we aren't running out of any oil, not that you said  that, but big companies have found away to make money and blame it on the war.

China already kinda taunts America right now, how do you think they'll be on equal footing with us. I hope they make a better world power then we are right now, the alternative I think would be them being more agressive then us.

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 17:42

Oil demand has nearly caught up with oil production, the economy of every nation runs on the back of oil.

You have to take economics of extraction into account, I hear the Alaskan oil would be far too expensive to extract compared to regions elsewhere, that is a huge consideration. 

The US needs a counter to give balance to world politics, it would certainly be much worse if the Chinese were a sole superpower, but as a counter they will be productive.

 

Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 16:43

We get rescources from those countries? The US isn't even in dire need for rescources and won't be for along time. The only way Iran can hurt the US is by taking Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, and I guess now Iraq if they sell us oil because those three sit on the largest oil fields. But Saudi Arabia is the country we have the deal with and they give us more then enough of oil. On top of that the US is in the top 10 or even 5 oil producers and we haven't even opened up oil fields in Alaska yet. Honestly the US doesn't have to worry about oil, our profit comes from selling our own oil and buying Saudi Arabian oil.

But I do like the theory of America trying to control the oil fields in the Mid.East because of China, its the only thing that really makes sense. I don't know how China is going to be as a Super Power, hopefully they'll be better then my country so we don't have to have these debats lol. We'll know more as the years go on though.

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 15:50
It is in other issues such as Caspian oil, in which Iran would gain leverage over weaker US backed states such as Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, it is that sort of competition, for resources.
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 15:40

Having nuclear power won't do anything except maybe causing a few nuclear explosions in the wrong hands, who has the wrong hands, I don't know but I wish America would stay out of this decision. The US I'm guessing is worried about Israel, but can't that country handle itself now? That country really is dragging us down...

The competition America needs to worry about is China and India and not Iran, because supposedly they are the next super powers and China is supposed to become stronger then the US from what I hear.

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
ArmenianSurvival View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1460
  Quote ArmenianSurvival Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 14:45
A first step to imposing their will on foreign nations that might become healthy competition in the near future, and which might damage u.s. imperial interests. I think thats what he meant, could be wrong.
Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Resistance

Քիչ ենք բայց Հայ ենք։
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Aug-2005 at 08:37

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Former Iranian president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani said on Friday he was astonished at the unanimity of a call by the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog for Iran to halt enrichment activities, calling it a cruel decision.

In a resolution on Thursday, the governing board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) unanimously asked Iran to resume suspension of all nuclear fuel related activities and asked the agency to verify compliance by Tehran.

"It was astonishing and really strange...that eventually what Europeans and America wanted was approved with unanimity. How is it possible?" Rafsanjani told worshippers at Friday prayers at Tehran University.

"We didn't think that an international organization, before the eyes of the whole world, would sanction that Iran should stop everything," he added in a sermon broadcast live on state radio. "The decision was a cruel one."

Iran, which has denied Western accusations that its atomic programme is a front for covert bomb-making, resumed work at its uranium conversion plant in Isfahan on Monday.

Rafsanjani, head of the Expediency Council which arbitrates on legislative disputes between parliament and a hardline watchdog body, said Iran's decision to resume uranium conversion was irreversible.

"I am telling you to know that you could not treat Iran like Iraq or Libya," Rafsanjani told worshippers who chanted "death to America."

President Bush said the IAEA resolution was a positive first step.

The resolution, drafted by Britain, Germany and France, requests IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei "to provide a comprehensive report on the implementation of Iran's NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) Safeguards Agreement and this resolution by 3 September 2005."

The text did not say Iran should be referred to the U.N. Security Council, which has the power to impose sanctions.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said he would use September's U.N. General Assembly to bring Iran's new leader face-to-face with his Western critics if no deal on Tehran's nuclear programme was reached by then.

Hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad plans to participate in the next U.N. General Assembly, providing U.S. officials issue him with a visa.

Officials from Britain, France and Germany are next supposed to meet Iranian officials at the end of August.

About 1,000 Iranian worshippers rallied after the Friday prayer sermon, urging their leaders to press ahead with enrichment activities. They chanted "Down with Europe," a slogan heard for the first time after the 1979 Islamic revolution.

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews& amp;storyID=2005-08-12T114019Z_01_EIC241952_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-N UCLEAR-IRAN-RAFSANJANI-DC.XML 

President Bush said the IAEA resolution was a positive first step.

A first step to what?  

Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Aug-2005 at 19:15

I think its a better idea if the first group to get drafted are all the males that voted for Bush in the last election. They chose him, let them deal with his BS. Hell, let them send the women that voted for Bush too...being ignorant is not gender-exclusive. At least this way the army would be more loyal, because half of those U.S. soldiers dont even agree with the war, especially after they experienced it.

 

Back to Top
ArmenianSurvival View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1460
  Quote ArmenianSurvival Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Aug-2005 at 18:27

If the U.S. happens to attack Iran, it wont be another Iraq....there will be more casualties in a much shorter period of time than there is in Iraq.

And the domestic situation in the U.S. if we happen to go to war with Iran will be one of a Nazi-dictatorship posing as a democracy. After 9/11 the government passed the Patriot Act, which gives the government the right to break into ANY home at ANY time, and they dont even have to have a reason to do it (one of the many Nazi-esque laws in the Patriot Act). This is the makings of a domestic police-state similiar to the SS and Gestapo of Nazi Germany. If a war with Iran ensues, the domestic situation will only be worse, with more outrageous domestic laws being passed under the guise of "protection from terrorism". Also, the economy will go to sh**.

And also, if the U.S. goes to war with Iran, chances are they will bring back the military draft. They are currently trying to pass it in the senate and congress, but with no success. But i think the rule is that in a wartime situation the president can decide 'what is best' because the U.S. president is also the Commander-in-Chief of the Army. There is already a shortage of soldiers in Iraq, and if we start a war with Iran, its almost certain that they will reinstate the military draft.

For all you U.S. citizens in the forum, here are the most common age groups to be drafted into the military, according to their system of drafting soldiers.

1. If your 20th birthday is in the same year as the draft, you will have the largest chance of being drafted.

2. If your 21st birthday is in the same year as the draft, you will have the second-largest chance of being drafted.

3. 22nd b-day
4. 23rd b-day
5. 24th b-day
6. 25th b-day....after this it goes to the 25 and older group. 18-year olds and those turning 19 will probably not be drafted. But i wouldnt be surprised if they change this order before wartime. Afterall, they change anything they want when its convenient for them.

Im gonna be 20 in 2006, so im probably going to be shipped to Tehran or Esfahan or Tabriz or any one of those great places. Problem is my job will be to blow up innocent people. Id rather serve jail-time or leave the country.

I think its a better idea if the first group to get drafted are all the males that voted for Bush in the last election. They chose him, let them deal with his BS. Hell, let them send the women that voted for Bush too...being ignorant is not gender-exclusive. At least this way the army would be more loyal, because half of those U.S. soldiers dont even agree with the war, especially after they experienced it.



Edited by ArmenianSurvival
Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Resistance

Քիչ ենք բայց Հայ ենք։
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Aug-2005 at 16:08

And what is that supposed to do? Bush is already pushing for digging in Alaska just to get people off our back about the US trying to take the middle east for oil.

Make produce alot of oil, but we buy it from the Mid.East and sell ours to other countries to make a profit. We buy our oil from Saudi Arabia who sells it to us for a good price and we don't have to worry about them running out of oil. The US has plenty of oil, its going to be China from what I understand thats going to be desperate.

I really do believe we didn't need this war at all. We did make some Iraqi's happy, but there was and is to much blood shed for something that wasn't even apart of the objective and that was to prvent Terrorist from having a safe haven to train in. The only way I can think of for the purpose of this war was to get our presence in Iraq to prevent China from being supplied oil. Using the war on terror to justify this action I think was just a cloak for the larger strategy and was planning ahead, but honestly I don't know the truth, but I do know we really aren't having oil problems.

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
strategos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 09-Mar-2005
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1096
  Quote strategos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Aug-2005 at 01:26
Originally posted by pikeshot1600

For a similar reason that Greece does not export oil.

Try doing without it.

Maybe they should stop storing a certain percent of there oil.

Or dig in Alaska.

http://theforgotten.org/intro.html
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Aug-2005 at 21:47

I agree...as oil consumption increases, nuclear generation becomes more attractive.  Three Mile Island, and Chernobyl are becoming victims of that 'cultural amnesia' that afflicts us all.

It is pointless to argue the merits of "alternative" energy sources.  The reality is what it is......we continue to exist in the oil age, and all the ramificationas of that will have to be dealt with somehow.

A great concern is that those who think they can exert control over this commodity by some degree of military capability (Iran) will force a confrontation that may be far more devastating to their own interests than it will be to those of others......Take that for what you will; the West, and the increasingly industrialized East will have what they require, and, if conflict arises, the majority of the real price for that will be paid for by someone else.

Back to Top
Miller View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 487
  Quote Miller Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Aug-2005 at 21:33
 

The more populous and developed a a country is the more oil it consumes. The reason many arab countries can export so much of their oil is that most have very low population and are not very high on development scale. As oil becomes more expensive it make other sources of energy like nuclear more cost effective and that is why there is an effort to increase the use nuclear power in the use and cut back on oil consumption in the US

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.