Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Topic: July 25th, 1461- Conquest of Trebizond Posted: 10-Aug-2005 at 14:37 |
So those of you who like the idea of a united Turanian state dislike Ataturk? |
Well, the idea of Turan was just a political purpose for that time. And it was an impossible purpose, a purpose which drove the empire to the end. Ataturk was against it because he was for being busy with the new republic's inner works and reforms, rather than imperialk Pan-Turkish missions. Turan was a harmful dream, beautiful but impossible, because it was used as a puppet.
I always tought Chamli Hemshinlis were Georgians, their looks, their traditions are very similar with Georgians of the region. But yes, it says they are Armenians. Anyway, I know they arent Turks.
|
|
Artaxiad
Baron
Joined: 10-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 488
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Aug-2005 at 14:25 |
Ataturk was a member of Itthad ve Terakki once, but his ideas were totallu against theirs. Ataturk was all against Turan and Enver Pasha was his rival. He was declared a traitor by the Ottoman government, so practically, he was against both. |
So those of you who like the idea of a united Turanian state dislike Ataturk?
I think you're referring to Chamli Hemshin, a region east of Rize. There lives no Armenians or Rums there, but Islamicized Georgians and Laz. Most of the Muslim Rums live around Trebizond, but there arent any significant numbers of Armenians. |
In wikipedia the Hemshinli are cited as the only ethnic group related to Armenians. Some of them even know an Armenian dialect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenians
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamshenis
Edited by Artaxiad
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Aug-2005 at 14:10 |
Ataturk was a member of Itthad ve Terakki once, but his ideas were totallu against theirs. Ataturk was all against Turan and Enver Pasha was his rival. He was declared a traitor by the Ottoman government, so practically, he was against both.
But he developed some of the ideas of Young Turks, such as nationalism and secularism. He was influenced with their purpose of creating a modern Turkish nation from the multiethnical, collapsed structure of the empire. His other actions were against the purposes of Young Turks.
I think you're referring to Chamli Hemshin, a region east of Rize. There lives no Armenians or Rums there, but Islamicized Georgians and Laz. Most of the Muslim Rums live around Trebizond, but there arent any significant numbers of Armenians.
The Sevres treaty gave the cities of Trebizond and Erzincan to Armenia, but those cities didnt have major Armenian populations. As I said, Erzurum, Kars, Bitlis, Ardahan were the most Armenian populated cities.
|
|
Artaxiad
Baron
Joined: 10-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 488
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Aug-2005 at 12:01 |
Before 1915, most of the area given to Armenia was obviously majority Armenian, or Turks formed a minority.
I always thought that the Young Turks were closer to Ataturk than to the Sultanate. Wasn't Mustapha Kemal himself a Young Turk at one point?
In the Black sea coast there are still Islamicized Greeks and Islamicized Armenians, called Hamshentsi or Hemshinli.
Edited by Artaxiad
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Aug-2005 at 11:26 |
Trebizond had a major population of Laz, people related with Georgian but not Georgian. Laz still occupy most of the population in Trebizond and eastern regions. They have been inhabiting the region since even before Milet colonies.
Armenians have never been a dominant popuylation in Trebizond, Rums and Laz were. So Armenian claims on that city werent sensible. The Russian wanted Armenia to claim Trebizond so that they would have a rich trading Black Sea dock in the south. The main Armenian population of that time was dispersed around the Eastern province, Erzurum, Kars, Van, Bitlis, Tunceli etc. During Ottoman reign, Sivas was a dominantly Turkish city, then Kurd and Armenians.
The Treaty of Sevres was sharing the lands with dominant Turkish populations btw other states. The Ottoman dynasty have signed it, but the new authority of Ankara, the founders of Turkish Republic werent any related with Ottoman authority, they were even wanted by the Padishah. But they didnt accept that treaty, fought with the Greek army. Then the Itlaf States had to leave Turkey. With Ataturk's leadership, there happened lots of battles btw Turks and Greeks. Turkey won its independence (not Ottoman Empire), and signed the Lausanene Treaty, which is internationally recognized. And then, Ataturk's government exiled the Osmanogly dynasty, declared the republic, ended the sultanate and caliphate.
So practically, as it's internationally recognized, Ottoman Empire signed the treaty of Sevres, but Turkey didnt. And naturally, Turkey isnt the total succesor state of Ottoman Empire, and isnt responsible with the treaties it signed, or the actions it took.
|
|
Artaxiad
Baron
Joined: 10-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 488
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Aug-2005 at 10:34 |
I'm not very sure about that either. They might have moved there during the Ottoman years.
Out of Armenia itself, Armenians had a large presence in Sebastia (Sivas), Cilicia and Edessa areas during the Byzantine days.
|
|
Belisarius
Chieftain
Suspended
Joined: 09-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1296
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Aug-2005 at 09:13 |
Thanks for your responses.
How large was the Armenian community in the Byzantine Empire? I have
not heard about many of them being in Trebizond. I was under the
impression that Trebizond was heavily Georgian.
Edited by Belisarius
|
|
Phallanx
Chieftain
Joined: 07-Feb-2005
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1283
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 15:53 |
Originally posted by Belisarius
While we are on the subject of Hellas, does anyone know what the word means? |
Hellas: formed by the words "elion"="to grasp, to hold" or "elios"=
"sun and the word "laas" = "rock". Most agree on the "sun" version
giving the meaning of "land of sun"
|
To the gods we mortals are all ignorant.Those old traditions from our ancestors, the ones we've had as long as time itself, no argument will ever overthrow, in spite of subtleties sharp minds invent.
|
|
Yiannis
Sultan
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 05:43 |
Originally posted by Belisarius
While we are on the subject of Hellas, does anyone know what the word means?
|
The Hellenes considered themselves the descendants of one common ancestor, Hellen, the son of Deucalion and Pyrrha. To Hellen were ascribed three sons, Dorus, Xuthus, and AEolus. Of these Dorus and AEolus gave their names to the DORIANS and AEOLIANS; and Xuthus; through his two sons Ion and Achaeus, became the forefather of the IONIANS and ACHAEANS. Thus the Greeks accounted for the origin of the four great divisions of their race. The descent of the Hellenes from a common ancestor, Hellen, was a fundamental article in the popular faith. It was a general practice in antiquity to invent fictitious persons for the purpose of explaining names of which the origin was buried in obscurity. It was in this way that Hellen and his sons came into being; but though they never had any real existence, the tales about them may be regarded as the traditional history of the races to whom they gave their names. http://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/hi story-of-ancient-greece-2-origin.asp
|
The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics
Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
|
|
Artaxiad
Baron
Joined: 10-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 488
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-Aug-2005 at 00:54 |
Armenians claim Trabizon (Drabizon in Western Armenian) because it should have been a part of Armenia according to the Svres treaty (1920). Svres was accepted by the Ottoman Sultan but was rejected by the rebels led by Mustafa Kemal. However, Armenians were unable to take over the whole territory because of ''certain reasons'' even though Trabizon and other parts of Western Armenia was legally attributed to Armenia.
The Svres map was drawn by President Wilson (of the US). He gave the Trabizon area to the Armenians, so that they would have access to a much needed seaport.
Historically, Armenians had a large presence there, notably during the Byzantine and Ottoman periods. Their population was 73 000 in the Ottoman province of Trebizond. (according to 20 voices)
http://www.atlas-of-conflicts.com/areas/armenia-and-karabakh /turk_arm_war-1-1920.php
|
|
Jazz
Baron
Joined: 29-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 410
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 06-Aug-2005 at 04:39 |
Originally posted by Yiannis
Originally posted by Oguzoglu
Trebizond was ethnically consisted of Rums . |
Rums? What is this nationality? |
Originally posted by Mortaza
<>we call greeks who live in Turkey or Cyprus as Rum. And greek who live in Greece are Yunan.
> |
Rum - from "Rome" (specifically, "Rome in Asia"). Contemporary
Turkish name for all Anatolian lands (and their peoples) that once
belonged to the East Roman Empire.
|
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 04:53 |
Not deep into Anatolia, but only the western Aegean coasts, and some Milet colonies on southeastern Black Sea coasts. Inner Anatolia was never Hellenic.
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 01:39 |
I have a vague memory of it being to do with two twins in mythology.
One of whom was dropped into the Bosphorus while flying over it, the
name of that child being Hellas apparently. But that's my vague memory
on it, to be honest I have very little idea.
Lol and yes, I have seen the other threads debating the ethnicity of
the Anatolians. If they want to try and prove me wrong I say bring it,
I'm in need of a challenge .
|
|
Belisarius
Chieftain
Suspended
Joined: 09-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1296
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 00:07 |
Originally posted by Constantine XI
Regardless of what they called themselves, a large Greek population existed from ancient until modern times from the Western Balkans deep into Anatolia. |
You know, there is a surprising large amount of people here in AE who would really disagree with you about this, call you crazy and spend hours of their lives trying to prove and convince you otherwise. Why? Nobody knows... Perplexing!
While we are on the subject of Hellas, does anyone know what the word means?
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Aug-2005 at 12:10 |
Well it has long been a region known as Hellas. But the Greeks used the
terms in ancient times, the late Byzantine period and in modern times.
The other Byzantinists have already pointed this out. Regardless of
what they called themselves, a large Greek population existed from
ancient until modern times from the Western Balkans deep into Anatolia.
|
|
kotumeyil
Chieftain
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1494
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Aug-2005 at 10:01 |
But the usage of the name "Hellen" as the name of a modern nation dates about the second half of the 17th century I think...
|
|
Belisarius
Chieftain
Suspended
Joined: 09-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1296
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Aug-2005 at 13:38 |
I thought that the term 'hellene' was used by the ancient Greeks to
describe their people as a whole. The Greeks banned the term because
they thought of it as having pagan connotation, as you said Byzantine
Emperor. When the Byzantine Empire was reduced to only is Greek
elements, the term Hellene was used again to inspire nationalism in
what remained of the empire.
|
|
Byzantine Emperor
Arch Duke
Kastrophylax kai Tzaousios
Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Aug-2005 at 12:56 |
Originally posted by kotumeyil
The Greeks living on the Muslim lands are and were called "Rum" meaning the "Romans", but I think Rums call themselves both "Romios" and "Hellen" in Greek language. Am I wrong?
|
"Rum" was the term that the Ottomans used for the actual Orthodox Church, specifically the Patriarchate in Constantinople.
"Rhomaioi" was the term that Byzantines used to describe themselves ; it did mean "Romans". Up until the fall of Constantinople and Trebizond the Byzantines viewed themselves as Romans, part of the imperial tradition that began with Augustus.
The term "Hellene" did not creep into usage until the late Byzantine period, first by prominent humanists such as Gemistos Plethon and Manuel Chrysoloras. Hellene soon lost its former pagan, non-Christian connotations and was used as a nationalistic term by Byzantine Greeks and post-Byzantine Greeks.
|
|
|
kotumeyil
Chieftain
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1494
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Aug-2005 at 08:08 |
I said in the previous post, Greeks in the Muslim lands are called "Rum". They are seen as the remains of the Roman Empire. Also it is us who call Greeks in the Greece as "Yunan". As far as I know, they don't differ between "Rum" and "Yunan". They say "both are Hellens"...
|
|
Mortaza
Tsar
Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Aug-2005 at 04:32 |
dont they call themself as yunan? and why do we call cypriot as rum?
|
|