9/11 Pentagon plane crash

Standard procedure at an airplane crash site, unless they get there before the resuce services/authorities.

Would leave tell tale signitiures, chemical residue, plus explosives tend to blow outards, where as a large mass with follow through even if not intact, momentum and all that.

Could a small plane have done as much damage?

Well....those images are pretty convincing, but I still think there was a plane. Not a missile. I remember seeing little pieces of airplane and stuff on the news after it happened.

But why did the CIA stole all these videos for?

They didn't


It was the FBI.

But how did that small hole in level c happen?

I believe someone said it was from one of the engines that did not burn up in a fireball.

Ya, but they said they didnt find any evidence of a plane...

actually, there were heaps of small pieces from the plane lying all over the place... but of course, those flash animations choose not to show such things... it'd kinda blow a hole in their whole premise.

Ya, but they said they didnt find any evidence of a plane...

Except that they did.
Have a good look around, there are plenty of pictures with debris from the plane lying around.
No they are not huge chunks of plane, they are little chunks of plane, things made of aluminium tend to get ripped to shreds when they crash in to reinforced concrete at 500 Mph.

Ya, but they said they didnt find any evidence of a plane...

but other than that, how did the plane cross the highway which is right next to the Pentagon, then stay 2 feet off the ground at over 500 mph, when all the pilot schools said that the guy flying the plane was a horrible pilot?

Ya, thats the part that i really started to wonder about. How could a 757 punch those neat little holes not much bigger than a doorway into the Pentagon?

I've seen those theories before. I didn't think they were convincing.