Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
minchickie
Shogun
Joined: 03-Jul-2005
Location: Hungary
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 241
|
Quote Reply
Topic: who were the (original) Slavs? Posted: 17-Jul-2005 at 07:58 |
This is one that seems to confuse me alot. Although I have read numerous information on the Slavic peoples and their history, it still seems that I'm uncertain when it comes to knowing where exactly did the first Slavs originate from?
|
|
|
Zagros
Emperor
Suspended
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2005 at 09:36 |
must have been turks.
|
|
minchickie
Shogun
Joined: 03-Jul-2005
Location: Hungary
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 241
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2005 at 10:12 |
haha very funny
|
|
|
Cyrus Shahmiri
Administrator
King of Kings
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2005 at 11:48 |
Slavs mostly live in the same region where ancient Scythians and Sarmatians lived.
|
|
|
TheodoreFelix
Colonel
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 694
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2005 at 12:00 |
http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3330& ;PN=3
Read one of the last posts in this topic, it explains it really well.
|
|
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2005 at 12:30 |
They got defined in the Baltic Bronze culture, along with Baltics.
Later they developed the Lausitz culture, separated from that of the
Baltic peoples. I'm not very sure about the Iron age, but guess they
suffered the Germanic expansion as much as Celts (though maybe later).
But, at difference of these, they weren't annihilated (fully
assimilated). Eventually, when Goths and all those Eastern Germanic
tribes migrated westward, they could retake their lands.
So guess their origin is basically in Poland and nearby regions.
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2005 at 12:55 |
I always thought the Slav's were the ancient Greeks of Plato and Alexander's time.
After they got kicked out of ancient Greece they headed east, became nomadic barbarians for a few centuries and returned to Europe as the Slav's.
|
|
|
TheodoreFelix
Colonel
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 694
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2005 at 13:01 |
I always thought the Slav's were the ancient Greeks of Plato and Alexander's time.
After they got kicked out of ancient Greece they headed east, became nomadic barbarians for a few centuries and returned to Europe as the Slav's. |
How did you ever get to that idea?
|
|
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Jul-2005 at 12:20 |
Hey, looking for something else, I've found one link that seems to explain Slavic origins quite well: http://www.slavicsword.cjb.net/
A map from that site.
|
|
Harry Potter
Samurai
Joined: 16-Jul-2005
Location: Macedonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 106
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Jul-2005 at 20:56 |
Originally posted by Maju
|
interesting map, look good at Greece
|
Macedonian swear in 1903 wars: With the blood we shed all over Macedonian fields and forests, we serve freedom, as the Macedonian army of Alexander of Macedon did, with our slogan Freedom or Death!
|
|
Menippos
Chieftain
Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 06:46 |
Harry Potter, you as so attracted to fiction, as your name also clearly indicates.
Of course there were slavs who came into the Hellenic territory and even settled and intermixed with the locals.
Don't forget, that peaceful interaction was never opposed by the
Greeks. If you had a peaceful reason to be around (trade, marriages,
emissaries, travellers, immigrants), nobody persecuted you.
Therefore, your scoptic comment was actually quite misplaced.
|
CARRY NOTHING
|
|
TheodoreFelix
Colonel
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 694
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 12:56 |
Slavs didnt enter into the heart of Albania then.... It wouldnt happen until the Bulgarian Empire...According to this ridiculous map. All these people who dont share similar genetics with the Slavs are slavic...
|
|
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 13:56 |
I don't think the map can be taken too seriously in its inclussion of
all peoples and lands east of the red line (which is accurate)
Obviously Lithuanians, Finns, Albanians and Greeks weren't Slavs and
those areas shoul have been left uncolored or colored with less intense
brown, meaning sparse penetration. Obviously whoever draw that map was
kind of pan-Slavist... still the essential concepts reflected in it are
valid.
|
|
Thracian
Knight
Joined: 01-Feb-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 97
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Aug-2005 at 23:06 |
the Slavs have simply been in the east/ central european areas since the beging just like the germanaic peoples in west/ cent. europe
|
|
Sharrukin
Chieftain
Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Aug-2005 at 14:29 |
A version of that same map is found in Harper Collins Atlas of World History, edited by Geoffrey Barraclough. Definitely not Pan-Slavist. I think it just reflects the idea that Slavs had made a massive impact in their migrations becoming the principal linguistic population in eastern Europe. One notes that the eastern half of ancient Germania had become Slavic. Byzantine and other independent sources admit to massive Slavic settlement in the Peloponnese itself, but eventually those Slavs became Hellenized. The idea that their original abodes were about the Pripet Marshes have been given much attention and there seems to be a consensus on that point.
|
|
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Aug-2005 at 21:27 |
I already said that the essential concept and the wester border are
accurate but the map (probably with some intentionality) doesn't make
difference between areas fully slavized, partly slavized and somehow
influenced by the Slavic culture. It's too ambiguous east of the red
line. I can take your explanation for Greece but what about Finn and
Baltic areas? For instance, what about the region named "Lithuanians"
that has no red arrow pointing to it and still is fully colored in
ochre?
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
|
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Aug-2005 at 21:41 |
Originally posted by Thracian
the Slavs have simply been in the east/ central
european areas since the beging just like the germanaic peoples in
west/ cent. europe |
No, it's not that simple. Cultures and peoples are more dynamic than that - and at the beginnig we were all somewhere in Africa, btw.
While the Slavic case may cause more doubts, maybe, the German case is
well studied and it is very clear that they are original from
Scandinavia and Lower Germany (where the natives, had recieved
proto-German culture possibly around 2400 BCE) and that they started
their expansion southwards, slowly after 800 BCE and more quickly just
before the start of our conventional age, subduing in the proccess many
Celtic tribes.
On Slavs, I do think that the theory reflected in the map is probably
accurate on source and dates of expansion, at least as far as my
knowledge reaches. Slavs seem to derivate from the Lausitz culture that
was more or less in what is now Poland in the Bronze Age. They may have
been there since maybe as soon as 3000 BCE (but 2400 is a safer date).
Edited by Maju
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
|
Achilles
Pretorian
Joined: 26-Jan-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 198
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Aug-2005 at 18:43 |
The slavs were originally from Ukraine area. An d yes they pretty much
migrated to all the areas shown in the map. although it is a very poor
map. they might not have mixed with the native peoples there but they
did migrate there for however short an amount of time. except albania.
i am not sure aif they to Albania or not. probobly around the edges but
not into the main area.
|
Der Erste hat den Tod,
Der Zweite hat die Not,
Der Dritte erst hat Brot.
Fur immer frei und ungeteilt
-always free and undivided-
|
|
Sharrukin
Chieftain
Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Aug-2005 at 23:54 |
I can take your explanation for Greece but what about Finn and Baltic areas? For instance, what about the region named "Lithuanians" that has no red arrow pointing to it and still is fully colored in ochre? |
For "Lithuanians", and the rest of the eastern Baltic coast, perhaps an oversight? Perhaps an overgeneralization? Linguistically, Baltic and Slavic comprise a family of its own within IE, and perhaps the author wasn't aware how much the rest of the eastern Baltic wasn't even IE. As for "Finnish Peoples", this may represent the initial Slavic penetration of their region by such proto-Russian tribes as the Polochane, Sloviane, and the Krivichi. The westernmost Baltic coast was the abode of the Pomorane.
|
|
strategos
Chieftain
Joined: 09-Mar-2005
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1096
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Aug-2005 at 00:22 |
Originally posted by Harry Potter
Originally posted by Maju
|
interesting map, look good at Greece
|
Interesting map, they actually name Macedonia, now this map is really inaccurate..
|
http://theforgotten.org/intro.html
|
|