| Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
poirot
Arch Duke
Editorial Staff
Joined: 21-May-2005
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1839
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Chinese Armor and Military Uniforms Throughout the Ages Posted: 03-Jul-2005 at 02:10 |
Dear Clive:
I have a serious doubt about the Jin troops wearing helmets that have horns. Here is my reasoning:
1, To make horns for 400,000 helmets is costly and very useless beyond asethetic appeal. Form must follow function.
2, I am pretty sure that the Jin armor was similiar to Southern Song armor. The Jin army is primarily composed of Northerners of the China proper. It would be a stretch for all of them to wear horns.
3, I have yet to find an army that wears horns, besides the Vikings.
My guess is that Jin helmets are midway between Mongolian and Chinese helmets. I would not be suprised if it was very similiar to Liao Khitan helmets as well. After all, with the constant warfare, armor and helmets were bound to be spoils of war and therefore used on both sides.
Sincerely,
poirot 
|
|
AAAAAAAAAA
"The crisis of yesterday is the joke of tomorrow.� ~ HG Wells
|
 |
Conan the destroyer
Samurai
Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 105
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Jul-2005 at 13:23 |
Ming dynasty statue.

|
 |
Conan the destroyer
Samurai
Joined: 21-Jun-2005
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 105
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Jul-2005 at 13:25 |

Song dynasty statue
|
 |
Decebal
Arch Duke
Digital Prometheus
Joined: 20-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1792
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Jul-2005 at 15:14 |
Originally posted by poirot
2, I am pretty sure that the Jin armor was similiar to Southern Song armor. The Jin army is primarily composed of Northerners of the China proper. It would be a stretch for all of them to wear horns.
3, I have yet to find an army that wears horns, besides the Vikings.
Sincerely,
poirot 
|
Even the Vikings didn't wear horns on their helmets: that's a popular myth that arose as a result of German operas in the 19th century. I would say that it's possible that some military officers in China and in the west would wear horns for esthetic and intimidation purposes. But even then, it probably was quite rare, since it would have been expensive and impractical.
|
What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte
Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi
|
 |
jiangweibaoye
Consul
Joined: 25-Mar-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 360
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 16:38 |
Does anybody know why the Qing decided not to use armor? I know they have their version, but to me, it is not armor, but more like symbolic military attire.
I have a hypothesis, but I like to know what others think.
|
 |
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 304
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jul-2005 at 15:32 |
northern and southern dynasties period armor model

|
|
|
 |
Gubook Janggoon
Sultan
Retired Global Moderator
Joined: 08-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2216
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jul-2005 at 16:50 |
Originally posted by sinosword
northern and southern dynasties period armor model

|
How accurate is this really? I've seen this criticized at chf for being innacurate..especially that mask.
|
 |
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 304
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jul-2005 at 19:17 |
|
not sure because of lacks of archeological supports.
|
|
|
 |
Killabee
Earl
Joined: 01-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Feb-2006 at 18:25 |
|
|
 |
Killabee
Earl
Joined: 01-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Feb-2006 at 18:30 |

Continue Ming Dyasty Armor


Edited by Killabee
|
 |
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 304
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Feb-2006 at 21:04 |
qin armor found in tomb.

|
|
|
 |
poirot
Arch Duke
Editorial Staff
Joined: 21-May-2005
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1839
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Feb-2006 at 22:36 |

Taoist Painting

Taoist Painting

Nice painting! Handguns?

From the civilian official garb, it is a Ming Dynasty rendering of Song Dynasty armor

Ming Tomb

Emperor Jiajing and his Imperial Guardsmen Notice how the Jiajing Period armor differs from the early Ming armor depicted in the Ming Tomb carving above. The late Ming armor has unique arm guards characteristic of the 16-17 century, and are foreunners of the Qing brigandine suit armor 
Edited by poirot
|
|
AAAAAAAAAA
"The crisis of yesterday is the joke of tomorrow.� ~ HG Wells
|
 |
poirot
Arch Duke
Editorial Staff
Joined: 21-May-2005
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1839
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Feb-2006 at 22:47 |
Originally posted by jiangweibaoye
Does anybody know why the Qing decided not to use armor? I know they have their version, but to me, it is not armor, but more like symbolic military attire.
I have a hypothesis, but I like to know what others think.
|
Early Qing dynasty armor closely resembled late Ming dynasty armor. If you take a look at Nurachi's armor, you will find out that it is almost the same as armor in painting of the Jiajing and Wanli periods.
Compare Nurachi's suit

with Imperial Guards battle armor during the JiaJing Era

The early Qing armor consisted mostly of brigandine armor, which looks like suits. The brigandine armor was adopted by the Ming Dynasty by the Chongzhen period at the latest. Thus, it is often a misconception to assume that the brigandine armor were originated by Qing bannermen. Brigandine armor was adopted by the late Ming Period because it provides more coverage and allows for more mobility, both essential factors in an age of where firearms had become prevalent.
Notice the Ming officer to the far right, in a brigandine suit

By the Qianlong period (after 1735), the existence of firearms has proved that armor in the traditional sense was obsolete. Like their Western contempories, the Qing army decided to discontinue the use of armor. Hence forth, the only armor seen were ceremonial armor, suits decorated with color, but without metal bolts, and much of the Qing armor we see in paintings are these types of bannermen ceremonial armor.
Edited by poirot
|
|
AAAAAAAAAA
"The crisis of yesterday is the joke of tomorrow.� ~ HG Wells
|
 |
Killabee
Earl
Joined: 01-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 15:44 |

Besides the Ming, the Mongolian and Korean also played a part in shaping the Manchu Armour. The most notable difference between the Ming and Manchu is the Helmet. The Ming Helmet has ear protection on both side of the helmet, whereas the Manchu does not. The other difference is armour in the upper and lower arm area. The Ming has multiple lamellar armours woven in orderly fashion and whereas the Manchu seems to have one piece .
Here is a closer look of Ming China Armour:

Here is the Korean Armour:

Edited by Killabee
|
 |
poirot
Arch Duke
Editorial Staff
Joined: 21-May-2005
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1839
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 00:57 |
Originally posted by Killabee

Besides the Ming, the Mongolian and Korean also played a part in shaping the Manchu Armour. The most notable difference between the Ming and Manchu is the Helmet. The Ming Helmet has ear protection on both side of the helmet, whereas the Manchu does not. The other difference is armour in the upper and lower arm area. The Ming has multiple lamellar armours woven in orderly fashion and whereas the Manchu seems to have one piece .
Here is a closer look of Ming China Armour:

Here is the Korean Armour:

|
Indeed, Manchu armor does derive some of its features from Mongol and Korean armor, especially Mongol.
Good observations about Manchu armor.
However, the upper and lower arm area protection of the Ming is actually quite prevalent in early Manchu armor of Nurachi's period. The photo posted just doesn't show, but considering that many early Manchu bannermen recycled armor captured from the Ming, it is not unexpected.
Ming armor and Choson armor are virtually identical. The armor above was worn by Admiral Yi Soon Shin in the Imjin War
|
|
AAAAAAAAAA
"The crisis of yesterday is the joke of tomorrow.� ~ HG Wells
|
 |
Killabee
Earl
Joined: 01-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 19:11 |
Poirot,
Can you post all of your chinese armour-related pictures? I will do the same thing when I get back home ( I am on the road trip, most of my pictures are stored in my home computer).
Thanks
|
 |
Killabee
Earl
Joined: 01-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 274
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 19:15 |
Originally posted by poirot
3, I have yet to find an army that wears horns, besides the Vikings.
Sincerely,
poirot 
|
The Japanese samurai armour does have horn in the helmet.
|
 |
Gubook Janggoon
Sultan
Retired Global Moderator
Joined: 08-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2216
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 21:01 |
|
The helmets of the cavalry of Goguryeo are also usually depicted as having horns or wings.
|
 |
tadamson
Baron
Joined: 25-Jul-2005
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 452
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Feb-2006 at 20:06 |
Originally posted by Killabee
Originally posted by poirot
3, I have yet to find an army that wears horns, besides the Vikings.
Sincerely,
poirot 
|
The Japanese samurai armour does have horn in the helmet.
|
And, Vikings did not have horned helmets !!
|
|
rgds.
Tom..
|
 |
intem
Knight
Joined: 28-Aug-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 60
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Feb-2006 at 20:22 |
Originally posted by Killabee






Ming Dynasty Armors
|
Very nice i've always wanted those paintings could u tell me where you grabbed them off, like what website did you get it from. thx
|
|
J.T.I.J
|
 |