Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWho are the Croats?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Who are the Croats?
    Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 00:56
Originally posted by Sanimideg

This is a map of real Croat territory colored in black

 





If I don't recall badly from my study of Serbo-Croatan language, the actual dialects are 4 and they don't follow any ethnic lines at all. The dialect depicted here in pink is actually at least two dialects with a NW-SE diagonal divisory. This map is obviously too tendencious to be of any use.


NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
ill_teknique View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 28-Jun-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 636
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 02:00
u dont understand this is nationalisitic b/s aimed at supporting a sick idea of supperiority and claims to lands never owned
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 02:03
Originally posted by ill_teknique

u dont understand this is nationalisitic b/s aimed at supporting a sick idea of supperiority and claims to lands never owned


I do understand perfectly. Precisely for that reason, the truth should be defended and the false propaganda countered.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Sharrukin View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 03:30

Here's another map of Serbo-Croatian dialects:

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/540/langdial/serbcrot.ht ml

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 05:44
Originally posted by Sharrukin

Here's another map of Serbo-Croatian dialects:

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/540/langdial/serbcrot.ht ml



Interesting article/map:



Notice how "Stokavci" is actually 5 dialects (3 of them under the same blue color).

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 07:16

Originally posted by ill_teknique

Originally posted by Iskender Bey ALBO

Proto-Croatians I believe were an Iranian people. However much of todays Croats, Serbs and Bosnians(muslim serbs) are more or less slavinized Illyrians with many slavic traits. Or so some say.

General belief is that both were a people that settled in the Balkans during the slavic invasion.


Bosnians are bosnians slavs not muslim serbs

and point two this guy is a cetnik ultra nationalist whose thread should not be even considered serious enough to post please close this thread.

and iks. please no more misinformation on bosnian identity im bosnian i think i know better than any nonbosnian what i am.

Bosnians are the croats, bosnia is just one of the croatian regions. Bosnian muslims are the croats of islamic religion. Bosnian serbs are in 90 % croats who in the ottoman period from 15 to 19 century rather converted to ortodox than in muslim religion so they automatically became serbians.

and emir please , are you still living in some kind of SFRJ ? Did Tito and communists brainwashed you from 1945 to 1990 ?

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 07:21
 And please I dont have nothing against serbians , but this guy Sanimideg made some insults here and dissrespecting croats ,  those pics he posted on this topic he made me angry so my duty was to respond him
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 07:47
Originally posted by hrwatman

Bosnians are the croats, bosnia is just one of the croatian regions. Bosnian muslims are the croats of islamic religion. Bosnian serbs are in 90 % croats who in the ottoman period from 15 to 19 century rather converted to ortodox than in muslim religion so they automatically became serbians.



That's not true either. Bosnian Muslims are basically descendants of Bosnian Bogomils that converted to Islam after being prosecuted by other Christians. There was a Bosnian kingdom in the Middle ages as well (though I'm not sure how much they are related).

Regarding Serbs of Krajina, now expelled, they were placed there by the Austrians, looking to create a military frontier against the Ottomans and they were probably Serbs or Bosnian Orthodox of origin.

To any outsider the ethnic confrontation between Serbs, Croats and Muslim Bosnians is a nonsense, as they all speak the same language... but it seems that you have taken very seriously those religious differences, despite having 40 or 50 years of secular state.


NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
farohar View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 02-Jul-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 08:04

hey,

I don't know a lot about Croatians and Serbs and what's going on, and why they are "vile enemies" and I don't want to start a huge argument but I just wanna know why they are such theres hate...

I read this article about the Croat-Iranic Theory in IranChamber.com, and there's three now, if anyones interested:

http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/identity_croatia ns_ancient_iran.php

http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/common_origin_cr oats_serbs_jats.php

http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/pdfs/iranian_ori gin_croats.pdf

Arash

Humata, Hukta, Huvarashta
Good Thoughts, Good Words, Good Deeds
Back to Top
ill_teknique View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 28-Jun-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 636
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2005 at 09:49
Originally posted by hrwatman

Originally posted by ill_teknique

Originally posted by Iskender Bey ALBO

Proto-Croatians I believe were an Iranian people. However much of todays Croats, Serbs and Bosnians(muslim serbs) are more or less slavinized Illyrians with many slavic traits. Or so some say.

General belief is that both were a people that settled in the Balkans during the slavic invasion.


Bosnians are bosnians slavs not muslim serbs

and point two this guy is a cetnik ultra nationalist whose thread should not be even considered serious enough to post please close this thread.

and iks. please no more misinformation on bosnian identity im bosnian i think i know better than any nonbosnian what i am.

Bosnians are the croats, bosnia is just one of the croatian regions. Bosnian muslims are the croats of islamic religion. Bosnian serbs are in 90 % croats who in the ottoman period from 15 to 19 century rather converted to ortodox than in muslim religion so they automatically became serbians.

and emir please , are you still living in some kind of SFRJ ? Did Tito and communists brainwashed you from 1945 to 1990 ?



ok this gentleman right here has his brain clouded by 19th century fervor and ultra nationalism


Let me tell you a story hrwatman


On the Bosnians :

There once upon a time in the 500s was such a thing called the Slavic Invasions of the Balkans.  The slavs came in hundreds of different groups and tribal allegiances.  Now by 700 ONE and ONE croat and serbian tribe entered NOW MIND YOU THESWE WERE TWO THEN OUT OF HUNDREDS not the whole population of either region.  they mingled with the other slav tribes and were under the sphere of influence of the avar confederation until their power waned.  By the 700s these slavic people started centralising and forming duchies and counties.  These counties eventually led to the creation of the kingdom of Croatia by 900,  The duchy of Bosnia was formed in 700, and the kingdom of SErbia around the 900s too.  Now the Kingdom of Croatia got annexed by Hungary around 1100, the duchy of Bosnia fell under the sphere of influence of the Hungarian instead of the Byzantines as it had and then fell into the byzantine spehere once again before 1180.  Now by 1180 a duke by the name of ban Kulin, a bosnian ban, became the first king by overthrowing both sides influence on his duchy and formed the kingdom of bosnia.  Now this kingdom lasted untill 1463 the longest of all three because serbia fell to the ottomans at the battleo of kosovo polje in 1389.  they were assisted in the battle by the Bosnian King Tvrtko Kotromanic the great, who himself send a huge part of his army to assist the king of serbia along side the hungarians and i belive some romanian duchies.   Now by 1463 due to  weakend stance after the battle Bosnia fell to the Kotrmonic dynasty ended and the pashdom of Bosnia was created.  Now this pashdom was considered the most important in the region by the sultan so he added croatia and parts of serbia to its administravive circle.

On Bosnian idendity"

The slavs in Bosnia or Bosnian were adherents in majority to the INDEPENDENT BOSNIAN CHURCH. yes such a thing existed in the middle ages in the heyday of the latin church which undoubtetly would have squashed such a church if it could.  The adherents were called Krstjani and the kings were adherents too unofficaialy to a large part.  Now the church was never officially recognized by the kings for political and diplomatic reasons such as keeping up the facade of Bosnian kings being latin christians to keep back channels open with the pope to counter the hungarian threat.  Once the bogomils came they got a huge following.  Now these two groups converted enmasse. the catholics and otrhodox bosnians in smaller numbers.  a

Now this idea of a bosnian serb or bosnian croat did not exist at this time they were bosnians and the croatian were in coratia and the serbians in serbia. but 19th ct nationalism spread and was thought to peasants who felt allegiance to croatia or serbia according to religion.  Now this is why bosnian nationalism  failed when it was  started by the austrian govt.

on the bosnian language

the bosnian language was the purest dialect of  three  even  considered by croatian writers who said they spoke  bosnian  instead of  dalmatian  which was  influenced by italian.  The bosnian  dialect stayed unchaged because of the high tolerance by ottomans  towards local culture.  when coratia was lost to austria and italy they were not in this cricle anymore.  Now by 1878 austria took over bosnia and by the 20th jugoslavija was formed and the bosnian identity was practially underground.  they categorized bosnians as either serbs croats or converted croats or serbs.  this and the fact that the bosnian language was taken out of circulation and schools taught "serbo_croatian"  same happened under comunism and by 1992 bosnia declared independence and still there are two large minorites who claim croatian or serbian nationality and usually have almost no one in their family that is actually from that country there are in bosnia now four religions for bosnian, (bosnian muslim, bosnian catholic, bosnian, serb, and bosnian jew) and two minorites (bosnian serb and bosnian croat) because a lot of nonmuslims and non jews claim bosnian nationality and have for  a while
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Aug-2005 at 13:06
Croatian elements among Serbs
Furthermore, even if the Serbs represent primarily the descendants of round-headed Slavs, there has been much Croat infusion into the Serb genetic stock. Thus, Mandic estimates that one-third of Serbs are ethnically Croat:

"Our investigations have led us to believe that of the Serbs presently in Bosnia and Herzegovina 32 to 35% are descended from Orthodox Croats, 50 to 52% are from non-Slavic Wallachs, 6 to 7% are from Serbianized Bulgarians, Greeks, Armenians and Albanians and 8 to 10% from genuine ethnic Serbs who came there mainly during Austro-Hungarian rule and during the time of the two Yugoslavias. (Mandic 1970, ch.7)

 

T


Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Aug-2005 at 14:12
Originally posted by hrwatman

 And please I dont have nothing against serbians , but this guy Sanimideg made some insults here and dissrespecting croats ,  those pics he posted on this topic he made me angry so my duty was to respond him

Sanimedeg was banned already months ago.
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Aug-2005 at 14:20
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned in this debate that the Croats are in fact a Turkic people, as Osman Karatay's Book "In Search of the Lost Tribe- The History and Making of the Croatian Nation" conclusively proves.




Here is a review by Blent Kenes:

It was surely easier in olden times to solve, or to suggest a solution to
the very problems of ethnic origins. People used to be grandsons of
certain historical or legendary personalities. Today, however, we can be
hardly satisfied with those kinds of stories. On the other hand,
historico-scientific researches continue also not providing very believable
and credible explanations for certain questions. One of them is the
mysterious theme of how, where and when the twin nations of the Balkans,
the Croats and Serbs were formed. International diplomacy has succeeded
in finding some solutions to the most complicated questions posed by the
collapse of the Socialist Yugoslavia in 1991, even though of temporary
nature and aimed at lengthening the many cease-fires; but world-wide
attempts to suggest solutions to the historical matrixes of Eastern Europe
in Early Medieval have resulted in very less consensus. Among them,
the problem of origins of the Croats and Serbs ranks the first.

Croats are a northwestern nation with a Slavic language and Catholic
confession. Today, their confession is the determinant factor on their identity.
However, there was a Croatian nation even before the Catholicism. Language
is by no means determinant, as they speak the same language as their
neighbors Serbs, Montenegrins and Bosniacs. Thus, historians agree on the
fact that a certain ethnie, regardless of its ethnic or linguistic affiliation,
is on the base of this nation. Who were, then, those Proto-Croats?

Their description in medieval sources signs a non-Slavic identity. Thus,
many historians tended to suggest an Iranic and Germanic origin for them.
The second has very few bases, thus has no much supporters. The first
theory relies on the prejudgment that before the Slavic and Turkic invasion
of north of the Black Sea, some Iranic peoples inhabited there. Proto-Croats
split from them and migrated to Poland. In the second phase they came
to the Balkans, were slavicized meanwhile, and formed the Croatian nation.
This theory is even weaker than the Germanic one, as historiography still
searches for traces of those supposed or imaginary Iranic people. Some
scholars suggested Turkic (i.e. Avaric and Bulgaric) origins; however, their
proofs were also very weak and contradictory.

Osman Karatay, the leading balkanolog of Turkey, as well as a prominent
medieval historian has focused on this very extreme question for long years.
He published his conclusions in a Turkish book (Hirvat Ulusunun Olusumu,
Ankara, 2000), in which he proposed a Turkic origin for the Croats. Though
seems very fantastical, this theory was appreciated in scholarly milieu, and
not too much challenged. Its language precluded the book from reaching
more readers. Mr. Karatay preferred writing a new book in English, instead
of translating the Turkish version. Thus, "In Search of the Lost Tribe" was borne.
It is totally different from the Turkish edition both in structure and content.
Fruits of the studies of the last three years were added, and the content was
enriched. This also meant more consolidation of the theory, which the author
himself calls "The Oguric theory".

Mr. Karatay suggests that a tribe of the Oguric union, a Turkic group coming
to Europe just after the collapse of the Hun Empire, second half of the 5th
century, were driven by the Avars from the northwest of the Caspian sea to
Galicia, south of Poland. A few years later the Avars came just to their south,
in today's Hungary and Slovakia. That Ogurs became champions of resistance
to the Avars, and organized local people, i.e. Slavs. The last and conclusive
phase of their anti-Avar activity was invasion of Dalmatia in a coordinated
assault with the Byzantium and Franks. These Turks, very few in number,
were slavicized in the course of time, however gave their national name to
the mass under their state. Medieval Greek, Russian and Latin sources clearly
sign to this adventure.

This very interesting book is also full of new ideas on the formation of Serb
and Bosniac nations. He proposes, for instance, the first Serbian king was a
Turkic prince called Kuber Khan, son of the Great Bulgar khan Kubrat (mid
7th century); and there are many Serbian kings with Turkic names. His
contributions to the Pre-Proto-Bulgar history are surely very outstanding.
The author has new ideas on Hungarian and Khazar histories, too. For example,
he claims the Hungarians had never been in the North Caucasus. Ancestors
of most of the Tataristan Turks, then called Bulgars, lived in cohabitation with the
Chechens in the Caucasus, and were expelled by the rising Khazars to the north,
and not by the Arabo-Islamic armies, as widely accepted



Source




Edited by Komnenos
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
Raider View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 06-Jun-2005
Location: Hungary
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 804
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2005 at 02:42

Originally posted by ill_teknique

Now by 1180 a duke by the name of ban Kulin, a bosnian ban, became the first king by overthrowing both sides influence on his duchy and formed the kingdom of bosnia.  Now this kingdom lasted untill 1463 the longest of all three because serbia fell to the ottomans at the battleo of kosovo polje in 1389.  they were assisted in the battle by the Bosnian King Tvrtko Kotromanic the great, who himself send a huge part of his army to assist the king of serbia along side the hungarians and i belive some romanian duchies.   Now by 1463 due to  weakend stance after the battle Bosnia fell to the Kotrmonic dynasty ended and the pashdom of Bosnia was created.
In 1471 a new Kingdom of Bosnia formed under Hungarian sovereignty on the remaining territory. Mikls jlaki the ban of Slavonia and Macs became the king, but after his death his kingdom ceased to exist.

 

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2005 at 04:57

Originally posted by Komnenos

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned in this debate that the Croats are in fact a Turkic people, as Osman Karatay's Book "In Search of the Lost Tribe- The History and Making of the Croatian Nation" conclusively proves.




Here is a review by Blent Kenes:

It was surely easier in olden times to solve, or to suggest a solution to
the very problems of ethnic origins. People used to be grandsons of
certain historical or legendary personalities. Today, however, we can be
hardly satisfied with those kinds of stories. On the other hand,
historico-scientific researches continue also not providing very believable
and credible explanations for certain questions. One of them is the
mysterious theme of how, where and when the twin nations of the Balkans,
the Croats and Serbs were formed. International diplomacy has succeeded
in finding some solutions to the most complicated questions posed by the
collapse of the Socialist Yugoslavia in 1991, even though of temporary
nature and aimed at lengthening the many cease-fires; but world-wide
attempts to suggest solutions to the historical matrixes of Eastern Europe
in Early Medieval have resulted in very less consensus. Among them,
the problem of origins of the Croats and Serbs ranks the first.

Croats are a northwestern nation with a Slavic language and Catholic
confession. Today, their confession is the determinant factor on their identity.
However, there was a Croatian nation even before the Catholicism. Language
is by no means determinant, as they speak the same language as their
neighbors Serbs, Montenegrins and Bosniacs. Thus, historians agree on the
fact that a certain ethnie, regardless of its ethnic or linguistic affiliation,
is on the base of this nation. Who were, then, those Proto-Croats?

Their description in medieval sources signs a non-Slavic identity. Thus,
many historians tended to suggest an Iranic and Germanic origin for them.
The second has very few bases, thus has no much supporters. The first
theory relies on the prejudgment that before the Slavic and Turkic invasion
of north of the Black Sea, some Iranic peoples inhabited there. Proto-Croats
split from them and migrated to Poland. In the second phase they came
to the Balkans, were slavicized meanwhile, and formed the Croatian nation.
This theory is even weaker than the Germanic one, as historiography still
searches for traces of those supposed or imaginary Iranic people. Some
scholars suggested Turkic (i.e. Avaric and Bulgaric) origins; however, their
proofs were also very weak and contradictory.

Osman Karatay, the leading balkanolog of Turkey, as well as a prominent
medieval historian has focused on this very extreme question for long years.
He published his conclusions in a Turkish book (Hirvat Ulusunun Olusumu,
Ankara, 2000), in which he proposed a Turkic origin for the Croats. Though
seems very fantastical, this theory was appreciated in scholarly milieu, and
not too much challenged. Its language precluded the book from reaching
more readers. Mr. Karatay preferred writing a new book in English, instead
of translating the Turkish version. Thus, "In Search of the Lost Tribe" was borne.
It is totally different from the Turkish edition both in structure and content.
Fruits of the studies of the last three years were added, and the content was
enriched. This also meant more consolidation of the theory, which the author
himself calls "The Oguric theory".

Mr. Karatay suggests that a tribe of the Oguric union, a Turkic group coming
to Europe just after the collapse of the Hun Empire, second half of the 5th
century, were driven by the Avars from the northwest of the Caspian sea to
Galicia, south of Poland. A few years later the Avars came just to their south,
in today's Hungary and Slovakia. That Ogurs became champions of resistance
to the Avars, and organized local people, i.e. Slavs. The last and conclusive
phase of their anti-Avar activity was invasion of Dalmatia in a coordinated
assault with the Byzantium and Franks. These Turks, very few in number,
were slavicized in the course of time, however gave their national name to
the mass under their state. Medieval Greek, Russian and Latin sources clearly
sign to this adventure.

This very interesting book is also full of new ideas on the formation of Serb
and Bosniac nations. He proposes, for instance, the first Serbian king was a
Turkic prince called Kuber Khan, son of the Great Bulgar khan Kubrat (mid
7th century); and there are many Serbian kings with Turkic names. His
contributions to the Pre-Proto-Bulgar history are surely very outstanding.
The author has new ideas on Hungarian and Khazar histories, too. For example,
he claims the Hungarians had never been in the North Caucasus. Ancestors
of most of the Tataristan Turks, then called Bulgars, lived in cohabitation with the
Chechens in the Caucasus, and were expelled by the rising Khazars to the north,
and not by the Arabo-Islamic armies, as widely accepted



Source


bullsh*ts, this is nothing but pan-turkish attempt, attempt to upgrade iranic origin on turkish origin,

iranic theory about origin of croats is offically accepted since the croatia became independent, and today kids in school learn that croats are of iranic origin

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2005 at 13:32

Originally posted by hrvatman

bullsh*ts, this is nothing but pan-turkish attempt, attempt to upgrade iranic origin on turkish origin,

iranic theory about origin of croats is offically accepted since the croatia became independent, and today kids in school learn that croats are of iranic origin


Still Croats, Serbs and Bosnians all are of Slavic origin. Where does that fancy theory of Iranian origin of Croatians come from? It stinks to neo-Nazi stuff and I'm quite surprised/disappointed that it's oficial teaching in Croat schools. It seems to me that you haven't learned enough from the evils of such a stupid and fraticidal war as was the Balcanic conflict.


NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2005 at 13:48
Originally posted by hrwatman

iranic theory about origin of croats is offically accepted since the croatia became independent, and today kids in school learn that croats are of iranic origin



Sorry, it must be true then.
At least as true as the theory about the origins and importance of the German race as taught in German schools in the 30s and 40s.

Of course, the theory about the Turkic origins of the Croats is at its best wishful thinking, but has as much credibility than the legends of the Iranian origin. Give me a month and with a bit of fanciful interpreting of obscure historical documents, I could prove to you that the Croats are the descendants of a lost Zulu tribe.




Edited by Komnenos
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2005 at 13:55
Originally posted by Komnenos

Originally posted by hrwatman

iranic theory about origin of croats is offically accepted since the croatia became independent, and today kids in school learn that croats are of iranic origin



Sorry, it must be true then.
At least as true as the theory about the origins and importance of the German race as taught in German schools in the 30s and 40s.

Of course, the theory about the Turkic origins of the Croats is at its best wishful thinking, but has as much credibility than the legends of the Iranian origin. Give me a month and with a bit of fanciful interpreting of obscure historical documents, I could prove to you that the Croats are the descendant of a lost Zulu tribe.


Or for that matter, another mythical Mormon "tribe" or better yet, the "lost tribe" of Israel.......that would twist around the Croatian Ustache. 



Edited by pikeshot1600
Back to Top
Kenaney View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 28-Apr-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2005 at 14:41
only what i know about croats is they use a lot of Turkic origin words, like "kat"for floor, and so on...
OUT OF LIMIT
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2005 at 15:57
Originally posted by Maju

Originally posted by hrvatman

bullsh*ts, this is nothing but pan-turkish attempt, attempt to upgrade iranic origin on turkish origin,

iranic theory about origin of croats is offically accepted since the croatia became independent, and today kids in school learn that croats are of iranic origin


Still Croats, Serbs and Bosnians all are of Slavic origin. Where does that fancy theory of Iranian origin of Croatians come from? It stinks to neo-Nazi stuff and I'm quite surprised/disappointed that it's oficial teaching in Croat schools. It seems to me that you haven't learned enough from the evils of such a stupid and fraticidal war as was the Balcanic conflict.

well than tell me what makes croats of slavic origin. oh yes you will say their language NOW is slavicophonic.

oh yes by your theory the jamaicans are of english origin because they speak english language and all have english names and surnames, right ?

the iranic theory of origin of croats is only legitimine theory about origin of croats, and i will tell you it started at 1798 about tracing of iranian origin of croats

now please , visit those links down

http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/identity_croatia ns_ancient_iran.php

www.hindunet.org/saraswati/croats2.PDF

www.hindunet.org/saraswati/croats1.PDF

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.